Theorem bj-d0clsepcl 16865

Description: Δ₀-classical logic and separation implies classical logic. (Contributed by BJ, 2-Jan-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) New usage is discouraged since this statement is not intuitionnistic. (New usage is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bj-d0clsepcl	⊢ DECID 𝜑

Proof of Theorem bj-d0clsepcl

Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑎 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		0ex 4255	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ∅ ∈ V
2	1	bj-snex 16853	. . . . . 6 ⊢ {∅} ∈ V
3	2	sepgi 4247	. . . . 5 ⊢ ∃𝑎∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ {∅} ∧ 𝜑))
4		eleq1 2301	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ↔ ∅ ∈ 𝑎))
5		eleq1 2301	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → (𝑥 ∈ {∅} ↔ ∅ ∈ {∅}))
6	5	anbi1d 469	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → ((𝑥 ∈ {∅} ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (∅ ∈ {∅} ∧ 𝜑)))
7	4, 6	bibi12d 235	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ {∅} ∧ 𝜑)) ↔ (∅ ∈ 𝑎 ↔ (∅ ∈ {∅} ∧ 𝜑))))
8	1, 7	spcv 2919	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ {∅} ∧ 𝜑)) → (∅ ∈ 𝑎 ↔ (∅ ∈ {∅} ∧ 𝜑)))
9	3, 8	eximii 1655	. . . 4 ⊢ ∃𝑎(∅ ∈ 𝑎 ↔ (∅ ∈ {∅} ∧ 𝜑))
10	1	snid 3736	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ∅ ∈ {∅}
11	10	biantrur 303	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (∅ ∈ {∅} ∧ 𝜑))
12	11	bicomi 132	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((∅ ∈ {∅} ∧ 𝜑) ↔ 𝜑)
13	12	bibi2i 227	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((∅ ∈ 𝑎 ↔ (∅ ∈ {∅} ∧ 𝜑)) ↔ (∅ ∈ 𝑎 ↔ 𝜑))
14	13	exbii 1658	. . . 4 ⊢ (∃𝑎(∅ ∈ 𝑎 ↔ (∅ ∈ {∅} ∧ 𝜑)) ↔ ∃𝑎(∅ ∈ 𝑎 ↔ 𝜑))
15	9, 14	mpbi 145	. . 3 ⊢ ∃𝑎(∅ ∈ 𝑎 ↔ 𝜑)
16		bj-bd0el 16808	. . . . 5 ⊢ BOUNDED ∅ ∈ 𝑎
17	16	ax-bj-d0cl 16864	. . . 4 ⊢ DECID ∅ ∈ 𝑎
18		dcbiit 851	. . . 4 ⊢ ((∅ ∈ 𝑎 ↔ 𝜑) → (DECID ∅ ∈ 𝑎 ↔ DECID 𝜑))
19	17, 18	mpbii 148	. . 3 ⊢ ((∅ ∈ 𝑎 ↔ 𝜑) → DECID 𝜑)
20	15, 19	eximii 1655	. 2 ⊢ ∃𝑎DECID 𝜑
21		bj-ex 16704	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑎DECID 𝜑 → DECID 𝜑)
22	20, 21	ax-mp 5	1 ⊢ DECID 𝜑

Syntax hints:   ∧ wa 104   ↔ wb 105  DECID wdc 846  ∀wal 1400   = wceq 1402  ∃wex 1545   ∈ wcel 2209  ∅c0 3520  {csn 3705

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 623  ax-in2 624  ax-io 721  ax-5 1500  ax-7 1501  ax-gen 1502  ax-ie1 1546  ax-ie2 1547  ax-8 1557  ax-10 1558  ax-11 1559  ax-i12 1560  ax-bndl 1562  ax-4 1563  ax-17 1579  ax-i9 1583  ax-ial 1587  ax-i5r 1588  ax-14 2212  ax-ext 2220  ax-sep 4244  ax-nul 4254  ax-pr 4341  ax-bd0 16753  ax-bdim 16754  ax-bdor 16756  ax-bdn 16757  ax-bdal 16758  ax-bdex 16759  ax-bdeq 16760  ax-bdsep 16824  ax-bj-d0cl 16864

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-dc 847  df-tru 1405  df-fal 1408  df-nf 1514  df-sb 1816  df-clab 2225  df-cleq 2231  df-clel 2234  df-nfc 2381  df-ral 2533  df-rex 2534  df-v 2823  df-dif 3222  df-un 3224  df-in 3226  df-ss 3233  df-nul 3521  df-sn 3711  df-pr 3712  df-bdc 16781

This theorem is referenced by: (None)