Theorem copsex2g 4264

Description: Implicit substitution inference for ordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 28-May-1995.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
copsex2g.1	|- ( ( x = A /\ y = B ) -> ( ph <-> ps ) )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
copsex2g	|- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W ) -> ( E. x E. y ( <. A , B >. = <. x , y >. /\ ph ) <-> ps ) )

Distinct variable groups:   x, y, ps   x, A, y   x, B, y

Allowed substitution hints:   ph( x, y)   V( x, y)   W( x, y)

Proof of Theorem copsex2g

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		elisset 2766	. 2 |- ( A e. V -> E. x x = A )
2		elisset 2766	. 2 |- ( B e. W -> E. y y = B )
3		eeanv 1944	. . 3 |- ( E. x E. y ( x = A /\ y = B ) <-> ( E. x x = A /\ E. y y = B ) )
4		nfe1 1507	. . . . 5 |- F/ x E. x E. y ( <. A , B >. = <. x , y >. /\ ph )
5		nfv 1539	. . . . 5 |- F/ x ps
6	4, 5	nfbi 1600	. . . 4 |- F/ x ( E. x E. y ( <. A , B >. = <. x , y >. /\ ph ) <-> ps )
7		nfe1 1507	. . . . . . 7 |- F/ y E. y ( <. A , B >. = <. x , y >. /\ ph )
8	7	nfex 1648	. . . . . 6 |- F/ y E. x E. y ( <. A , B >. = <. x , y >. /\ ph )
9		nfv 1539	. . . . . 6 |- F/ y ps
10	8, 9	nfbi 1600	. . . . 5 |- F/ y ( E. x E. y ( <. A , B >. = <. x , y >. /\ ph ) <-> ps )
11		opeq12 3795	. . . . . . 7 |- ( ( x = A /\ y = B ) -> <. x , y >. = <. A , B >. )
12		copsexg 4262	. . . . . . . 8 |- ( <. A , B >. = <. x , y >. -> ( ph <-> E. x E. y ( <. A , B >. = <. x , y >. /\ ph ) ) )
13	12	eqcoms 2192	. . . . . . 7 |- ( <. x , y >. = <. A , B >. -> ( ph <-> E. x E. y ( <. A , B >. = <. x , y >. /\ ph ) ) )
14	11, 13	syl 14	. . . . . 6 |- ( ( x = A /\ y = B ) -> ( ph <-> E. x E. y ( <. A , B >. = <. x , y >. /\ ph ) ) )
15		copsex2g.1	. . . . . 6 |- ( ( x = A /\ y = B ) -> ( ph <-> ps ) )
16	14, 15	bitr3d 190	. . . . 5 |- ( ( x = A /\ y = B ) -> ( E. x E. y ( <. A , B >. = <. x , y >. /\ ph ) <-> ps ) )
17	10, 16	exlimi 1605	. . . 4 |- ( E. y ( x = A /\ y = B ) -> ( E. x E. y ( <. A , B >. = <. x , y >. /\ ph ) <-> ps ) )
18	6, 17	exlimi 1605	. . 3 |- ( E. x E. y ( x = A /\ y = B ) -> ( E. x E. y ( <. A , B >. = <. x , y >. /\ ph ) <-> ps ) )
19	3, 18	sylbir 135	. 2 |- ( ( E. x x = A /\ E. y y = B ) -> ( E. x E. y ( <. A , B >. = <. x , y >. /\ ph ) <-> ps ) )
20	1, 2, 19	syl2an 289	1 |- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W ) -> ( E. x E. y ( <. A , B >. = <. x , y >. /\ ph ) <-> ps ) )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   /\ wa 104   <-> wb 105   = wceq 1364   E.wex 1503   e. wcel 2160   <.cop 3610

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 710  ax-5 1458  ax-7 1459  ax-gen 1460  ax-ie1 1504  ax-ie2 1505  ax-8 1515  ax-10 1516  ax-11 1517  ax-i12 1518  ax-bndl 1520  ax-4 1521  ax-17 1537  ax-i9 1541  ax-ial 1545  ax-i5r 1546  ax-14 2163  ax-ext 2171  ax-sep 4136  ax-pow 4192  ax-pr 4227

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3an 982  df-tru 1367  df-nf 1472  df-sb 1774  df-eu 2041  df-mo 2042  df-clab 2176  df-cleq 2182  df-clel 2185  df-nfc 2321  df-v 2754  df-un 3148  df-in 3150  df-ss 3157  df-pw 3592  df-sn 3613  df-pr 3614  df-op 3616

This theorem is referenced by:  opelopabga  4281  ov6g  6033  ltresr  7867