Theorem copsex2g 4049

Description: Implicit substitution inference for ordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 28-May-1995.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
copsex2g.1	|- ( ( x = A /\ y = B ) -> ( ph <-> ps ) )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
copsex2g	|- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W ) -> ( E. x E. y ( <. A , B >. = <. x , y >. /\ ph ) <-> ps ) )

Distinct variable groups:   x, y, ps   x, A, y   x, B, y

Allowed substitution hints:   ph( x, y)   V( x, y)   W( x, y)

Proof of Theorem copsex2g

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		elisset 2627	. 2 |- ( A e. V -> E. x x = A )
2		elisset 2627	. 2 |- ( B e. W -> E. y y = B )
3		eeanv 1852	. . 3 |- ( E. x E. y ( x = A /\ y = B ) <-> ( E. x x = A /\ E. y y = B ) )
4		nfe1 1428	. . . . 5 |- F/ x E. x E. y ( <. A , B >. = <. x , y >. /\ ph )
5		nfv 1464	. . . . 5 |- F/ x ps
6	4, 5	nfbi 1524	. . . 4 |- F/ x ( E. x E. y ( <. A , B >. = <. x , y >. /\ ph ) <-> ps )
7		nfe1 1428	. . . . . . 7 |- F/ y E. y ( <. A , B >. = <. x , y >. /\ ph )
8	7	nfex 1571	. . . . . 6 |- F/ y E. x E. y ( <. A , B >. = <. x , y >. /\ ph )
9		nfv 1464	. . . . . 6 |- F/ y ps
10	8, 9	nfbi 1524	. . . . 5 |- F/ y ( E. x E. y ( <. A , B >. = <. x , y >. /\ ph ) <-> ps )
11		opeq12 3609	. . . . . . 7 |- ( ( x = A /\ y = B ) -> <. x , y >. = <. A , B >. )
12		copsexg 4047	. . . . . . . 8 |- ( <. A , B >. = <. x , y >. -> ( ph <-> E. x E. y ( <. A , B >. = <. x , y >. /\ ph ) ) )
13	12	eqcoms 2088	. . . . . . 7 |- ( <. x , y >. = <. A , B >. -> ( ph <-> E. x E. y ( <. A , B >. = <. x , y >. /\ ph ) ) )
14	11, 13	syl 14	. . . . . 6 |- ( ( x = A /\ y = B ) -> ( ph <-> E. x E. y ( <. A , B >. = <. x , y >. /\ ph ) ) )
15		copsex2g.1	. . . . . 6 |- ( ( x = A /\ y = B ) -> ( ph <-> ps ) )
16	14, 15	bitr3d 188	. . . . 5 |- ( ( x = A /\ y = B ) -> ( E. x E. y ( <. A , B >. = <. x , y >. /\ ph ) <-> ps ) )
17	10, 16	exlimi 1528	. . . 4 |- ( E. y ( x = A /\ y = B ) -> ( E. x E. y ( <. A , B >. = <. x , y >. /\ ph ) <-> ps ) )
18	6, 17	exlimi 1528	. . 3 |- ( E. x E. y ( x = A /\ y = B ) -> ( E. x E. y ( <. A , B >. = <. x , y >. /\ ph ) <-> ps ) )
19	3, 18	sylbir 133	. 2 |- ( ( E. x x = A /\ E. y y = B ) -> ( E. x E. y ( <. A , B >. = <. x , y >. /\ ph ) <-> ps ) )
20	1, 2, 19	syl2an 283	1 |- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W ) -> ( E. x E. y ( <. A , B >. = <. x , y >. /\ ph ) <-> ps ) )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   /\ wa 102   <-> wb 103   = wceq 1287   E.wex 1424   e. wcel 1436   <.cop 3434

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 104  ax-ia2 105  ax-ia3 106  ax-io 663  ax-5 1379  ax-7 1380  ax-gen 1381  ax-ie1 1425  ax-ie2 1426  ax-8 1438  ax-10 1439  ax-11 1440  ax-i12 1441  ax-bndl 1442  ax-4 1443  ax-14 1448  ax-17 1462  ax-i9 1466  ax-ial 1470  ax-i5r 1471  ax-ext 2067  ax-sep 3934  ax-pow 3986  ax-pr 4012

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 115  df-3an 924  df-tru 1290  df-nf 1393  df-sb 1690  df-eu 1948  df-mo 1949  df-clab 2072  df-cleq 2078  df-clel 2081  df-nfc 2214  df-v 2617  df-un 2992  df-in 2994  df-ss 3001  df-pw 3417  df-sn 3437  df-pr 3438  df-op 3440

This theorem is referenced by:  opelopabga  4066  ov6g  5741  ltresr  7323