P. 43 of Theorem List - Intuitionistic Logic Explorer

Theorem List for Intuitionistic Logic Explorer - 4201-4300   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	elpwi2 4201	Membership in a power class. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 3-Mar-2021.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 26-May-2024.)
|- B e. V   &    |- A C_ B   =>    |- A e. ~P B
Theorem	pwnss 4202	The power set of a set is never a subset. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 22-Feb-2015.)
|- ( A e. V -> -. ~P A C_ A )
Theorem	pwne 4203	No set equals its power set. The sethood antecedent is necessary; compare pwv 3848. (Contributed by NM, 17-Nov-2008.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2016.)
|- ( A e. V -> ~P A =/= A )
Theorem	repizf2lem 4204	Lemma for repizf2 4205. If we have a function-like proposition which provides at most one value of y for each x in a set w, we can change "at most one" to "exactly one" by restricting the values of x to those values for which the proposition provides a value of y. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 7-Sep-2018.)
|- ( A. x e. w E* y ph <-> A. x e. { x e. w | E. y ph } E! y ph )
Theorem	repizf2 4205*	Replacement. This version of replacement is stronger than repizf 4159 in the sense that ph does not need to map all values of x in w to a value of y. The resulting set contains those elements for which there is a value of y and in that sense, this theorem combines repizf 4159 with ax-sep 4161. Another variation would be A. x e. w E* y ph -> { y | E. x ( x e. w /\ ph ) } e. _V but we don't have a proof of that yet. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 7-Sep-2018.)
|- F/ z ph   =>    |- ( A. x e. w E* y ph -> E. z A. x e. { x e. w | E. y ph } E. y e. z ph )
2.2.5  Theorems requiring empty set existence
Theorem	class2seteq 4206*	Equality theorem for classes and sets . (Contributed by NM, 13-Dec-2005.) (Proof shortened by Raph Levien, 30-Jun-2006.)
|- ( A e. V -> { x e. A | A e. _V } = A )
Theorem	0elpw 4207	Every power class contains the empty set. (Contributed by NM, 25-Oct-2007.)
|- (/) e. ~P A
Theorem	0nep0 4208	The empty set and its power set are not equal. (Contributed by NM, 23-Dec-1993.)
|- (/) =/= { (/) }
Theorem	0inp0 4209	Something cannot be equal to both the null set and the power set of the null set. (Contributed by NM, 30-Sep-2003.)
|- ( A = (/) -> -. A = { (/) } )
Theorem	unidif0 4210	The removal of the empty set from a class does not affect its union. (Contributed by NM, 22-Mar-2004.)
|- U. ( A \ { (/) } ) = U. A
Theorem	iin0imm 4211*	An indexed intersection of the empty set, with an inhabited index set, is empty. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 29-Aug-2018.)
|- ( E. y y e. A -> |^|_ x e. A (/) = (/) )
Theorem	iin0r 4212*	If an indexed intersection of the empty set is empty, the index set is nonempty. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 29-Aug-2018.)
|- ( |^|_ x e. A (/) = (/) -> A =/= (/) )
Theorem	intv 4213	The intersection of the universal class is empty. (Contributed by NM, 11-Sep-2008.)
|- |^| _V = (/)
Theorem	axpweq 4214*	Two equivalent ways to express the Power Set Axiom. Note that ax-pow 4217 is not used by the proof. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jun-2009.)
|- A e. _V   =>    |- ( ~P A e. _V <-> E. x A. y ( A. z ( z e. y -> z e. A ) -> y e. x ) )
2.2.6  Collection principle
Theorem	bnd 4215*	A very strong generalization of the Axiom of Replacement (compare zfrep6 4160). Its strength lies in the rather profound fact that ph ( x , y ) does not have to be a "function-like" wff, as it does in the standard Axiom of Replacement. This theorem is sometimes called the Boundedness Axiom. In the context of IZF, it is just a slight variation of ax-coll 4158. (Contributed by NM, 17-Oct-2004.)
|- ( A. x e. z E. y ph -> E. w A. x e. z E. y e. w ph )
Theorem	bnd2 4216*	A variant of the Boundedness Axiom bnd 4215 that picks a subset z out of a possibly proper class B in which a property is true. (Contributed by NM, 4-Feb-2004.)
|- A e. _V   =>    |- ( A. x e. A E. y e. B ph -> E. z ( z C_ B /\ A. x e. A E. y e. z ph ) )
2.3  IZF Set Theory - add the Axioms of Power Sets and Pairing
2.3.1  Introduce the Axiom of Power Sets
Axiom	ax-pow 4217*	Axiom of Power Sets. An axiom of Intuitionistic Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory. It states that a set y exists that includes the power set of a given set x i.e. contains every subset of x. This is Axiom 8 of [Crosilla] p. "Axioms of CZF and IZF" except (a) unnecessary quantifiers are removed, and (b) Crosilla has a biconditional rather than an implication (but the two are equivalent by bm1.3ii 4164). The variant axpow2 4219 uses explicit subset notation. A version using class notation is pwex 4226. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
|- E. y A. z ( A. w ( w e. z -> w e. x ) -> z e. y )
Theorem	zfpow 4218*	Axiom of Power Sets expressed with the fewest number of different variables. (Contributed by NM, 14-Aug-2003.)
|- E. x A. y ( A. x ( x e. y -> x e. z ) -> y e. x )
Theorem	axpow2 4219*	A variant of the Axiom of Power Sets ax-pow 4217 using subset notation. Problem in {BellMachover] p. 466. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jun-2006.)
|- E. y A. z ( z C_ x -> z e. y )
Theorem	axpow3 4220*	A variant of the Axiom of Power Sets ax-pow 4217. For any set x, there exists a set y whose members are exactly the subsets of x i.e. the power set of x. Axiom Pow of [BellMachover] p. 466. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jun-2006.)
|- E. y A. z ( z C_ x <-> z e. y )
Theorem	el 4221*	Every set is an element of some other set. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jan-2002.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-Jul-2011.)
|- E. y x e. y
Theorem	vpwex 4222	Power set axiom: the powerclass of a set is a set. Axiom 4 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 17. (Contributed by NM, 30-Oct-2003.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-Jul-2011.) Revised to prove pwexg 4223 from vpwex 4222. (Revised by BJ, 10-Aug-2022.)
|- ~P x e. _V
Theorem	pwexg 4223	Power set axiom expressed in class notation, with the sethood requirement as an antecedent. (Contributed by NM, 30-Oct-2003.)
|- ( A e. V -> ~P A e. _V )
Theorem	pwexd 4224	Deduction version of the power set axiom. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 26-Jun-2021.)
|- ( ph -> A e. V )   =>    |- ( ph -> ~P A e. _V )
Theorem	abssexg 4225*	Existence of a class of subsets. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jul-2006.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-Jul-2011.)
|- ( A e. V -> { x | ( x C_ A /\ ph ) } e. _V )
Theorem	pwex 4226	Power set axiom expressed in class notation. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-1993.)
|- A e. _V   =>    |- ~P A e. _V
Theorem	snexg 4227	A singleton whose element exists is a set. The A e. _V case of Theorem 7.12 of [Quine] p. 51, proved using only Extensionality, Power Set, and Separation. Replacement is not needed. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 1-Sep-2018.)
|- ( A e. V -> { A } e. _V )
Theorem	snex 4228	A singleton whose element exists is a set. (Contributed by NM, 7-Aug-1994.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-May-2019.)
|- A e. _V   =>    |- { A } e. _V
Theorem	snexprc 4229	A singleton whose element is a proper class is a set. The -. A e. _V case of Theorem 7.12 of [Quine] p. 51, proved using only Extensionality, Power Set, and Separation. Replacement is not needed. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 1-Sep-2018.)
|- ( -. A e. _V -> { A } e. _V )
Theorem	notnotsnex 4230	A singleton is never a proper class. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro and Jim Kingdon, 3-Jul-2022.)
|- -. -. { A } e. _V
Theorem	p0ex 4231	The power set of the empty set (the ordinal 1) is a set. (Contributed by NM, 23-Dec-1993.)
|- { (/) } e. _V
Theorem	pp0ex 4232	{ (/) , { (/) } } (the ordinal 2) is a set. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
|- { (/) , { (/) } } e. _V
Theorem	ord3ex 4233	The ordinal number 3 is a set, proved without the Axiom of Union. (Contributed by NM, 2-May-2009.)
|- { (/) , { (/) } , { (/) , { (/) } } } e. _V
Theorem	dtruarb 4234*	At least two sets exist (or in terms of first-order logic, the universe of discourse has two or more objects). This theorem asserts the existence of two sets which do not equal each other; compare with dtruex 4606 in which we are given a set y and go from there to a set x which is not equal to it. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 2-Sep-2018.)
|- E. x E. y -. x = y
Theorem	pwuni 4235	A class is a subclass of the power class of its union. Exercise 6(b) of [Enderton] p. 38. (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-1996.)
|- A C_ ~P U. A
Theorem	undifexmid 4236*	Union of complementary parts producing the whole and excluded middle. Although special cases such as undifss 3540 and undifdcss 7019 are provable, the full statement implies excluded middle as shown here. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 16-Jun-2022.)
|- ( x C_ y <-> ( x u. ( y \ x ) ) = y )   =>    |- ( ph \/ -. ph )
2.3.2  A notation for excluded middle
Syntax	wem 4237	Formula for an abbreviation of excluded middle.
wff EXMID
Definition	df-exmid 4238	The expression EXMID will be used as a readable shorthand for any form of the law of the excluded middle; this is a useful shorthand largely because it hides statements of the form "for any proposition" in a system which can only quantify over sets, not propositions. To see how this compares with other ways of expressing excluded middle, compare undifexmid 4236 with exmidundif 4249. The former may be more recognizable as excluded middle because it is in terms of propositions, and the proof may be easier to follow for much the same reason (it just has to show ph and -. ph in the the relevant parts of the proof). The latter, however, has the key advantage of being able to prove both directions of the biconditional. To state that excluded middle implies a proposition is hard to do gracefully without EXMID, because there is no way to write a hypothesis ph \/ -. ph for an arbitrary proposition; instead the hypothesis would need to be the particular instance of excluded middle which that proof needs. Or to say it another way, EXMID implies DECID ph by exmidexmid 4239 but there is no good way to express the converse. This definition and how we use it is easiest to understand (and most appropriate to assign the name "excluded middle" to) if we assume ax-sep 4161, in which case EXMID means that all propositions are decidable (see exmidexmid 4239 and notice that it relies on ax-sep 4161). If we instead work with ax-bdsep 15753, EXMID as defined here means that all bounded propositions are decidable. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro and Jim Kingdon, 18-Jun-2022.)
|- (EXMID <-> A. x ( x C_ { (/) } -> DECID (/) e. x ) )
Theorem	exmidexmid 4239	EXMID implies that an arbitrary proposition is decidable. That is, EXMID captures the usual meaning of excluded middle when stated in terms of propositions. To get other propositional statements which are equivalent to excluded middle, combine this with notnotrdc 844, peircedc 915, or condc 854. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 18-Jun-2022.)
|- (EXMID -> DECID ph )
Theorem	ss1o0el1 4240	A subclass of { (/) } contains the empty set if and only if it equals { (/) }. (Contributed by BJ and Jim Kingdon, 9-Aug-2024.)
|- ( A C_ { (/) } -> ( (/) e. A <-> A = { (/) } ) )
Theorem	exmid01 4241	Excluded middle is equivalent to saying any subset of { (/) } is either (/) or { (/) }. (Contributed by BJ and Jim Kingdon, 18-Jun-2022.)
|- (EXMID <-> A. x ( x C_ { (/) } -> ( x = (/) \/ x = { (/) } ) ) )
Theorem	pwntru 4242	A slight strengthening of pwtrufal 15867. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro and Jim Kingdon, 12-Sep-2023.)
|- ( ( A C_ { (/) } /\ A =/= { (/) } ) -> A = (/) )
Theorem	exmid1dc 4243*	A convenience theorem for proving that something implies EXMID. Think of this as an alternative to using a proposition, as in proofs like undifexmid 4236 or ordtriexmid 4568. In this context x = { (/) } can be thought of as "x is true". (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Nov-2023.)
|- ( ( ph /\ x C_ { (/) } ) -> DECID x = { (/) } )   =>    |- ( ph -> EXMID )
Theorem	exmidn0m 4244*	Excluded middle is equivalent to any set being empty or inhabited. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 5-Mar-2023.)
|- (EXMID <-> A. x ( x = (/) \/ E. y y e. x ) )
Theorem	exmidsssn 4245*	Excluded middle is equivalent to the biconditionalized version of sssnr 3793 for sets. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 5-Mar-2023.)
|- (EXMID <-> A. x A. y ( x C_ { y } <-> ( x = (/) \/ x = { y } ) ) )
Theorem	exmidsssnc 4246*	Excluded middle in terms of subsets of a singleton. This is similar to exmid01 4241 but lets you choose any set as the element of the singleton rather than just (/). It is similar to exmidsssn 4245 but for a particular set B rather than all sets. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 29-Jul-2023.)
|- ( B e. V -> (EXMID <-> A. x ( x C_ { B } -> ( x = (/) \/ x = { B } ) ) ) )
Theorem	exmid0el 4247	Excluded middle is equivalent to decidability of (/) being an element of an arbitrary set. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 18-Jun-2022.)
|- (EXMID <-> A. xDECID (/) e. x )
Theorem	exmidel 4248*	Excluded middle is equivalent to decidability of membership for two arbitrary sets. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 18-Jun-2022.)
|- (EXMID <-> A. x A. yDECID x e. y )
Theorem	exmidundif 4249*	Excluded middle is equivalent to every subset having a complement. That is, the union of a subset and its relative complement being the whole set. Although special cases such as undifss 3540 and undifdcss 7019 are provable, the full statement is equivalent to excluded middle as shown here. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 18-Jun-2022.)
|- (EXMID <-> A. x A. y ( x C_ y <-> ( x u. ( y \ x ) ) = y ) )
Theorem	exmidundifim 4250*	Excluded middle is equivalent to every subset having a complement. Variation of exmidundif 4249 with an implication rather than a biconditional. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 16-Feb-2023.)
|- (EXMID <-> A. x A. y ( x C_ y -> ( x u. ( y \ x ) ) = y ) )
Theorem	exmid1stab 4251*	If every proposition is stable, excluded middle follows. We are thinking of x as a proposition and x = { (/) } as " x is true". (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 28-Nov-2023.)
|- ( ( ph /\ x C_ { (/) } ) -> STAB x = { (/) } )   =>    |- ( ph -> EXMID )
2.3.3  Axiom of Pairing
Axiom	ax-pr 4252*	The Axiom of Pairing of IZF set theory. Axiom 2 of [Crosilla] p. "Axioms of CZF and IZF", except (a) unnecessary quantifiers are removed, and (b) Crosilla has a biconditional rather than an implication (but the two are equivalent by bm1.3ii 4164). (Contributed by NM, 14-Nov-2006.)
|- E. z A. w ( ( w = x \/ w = y ) -> w e. z )
Theorem	zfpair2 4253	Derive the abbreviated version of the Axiom of Pairing from ax-pr 4252. (Contributed by NM, 14-Nov-2006.)
|- { x , y } e. _V
Theorem	prexg 4254	The Axiom of Pairing using class variables. Theorem 7.13 of [Quine] p. 51, but restricted to classes which exist. For proper classes, see prprc 3742, prprc1 3740, and prprc2 3741. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 16-Sep-2018.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W ) -> { A , B } e. _V )
Theorem	snelpwi 4255	A singleton of a set belongs to the power class of a class containing the set. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 25-Aug-2011.)
|- ( A e. B -> { A } e. ~P B )
Theorem	snelpw 4256	A singleton of a set belongs to the power class of a class containing the set. (Contributed by NM, 1-Apr-1998.)
|- A e. _V   =>    |- ( A e. B <-> { A } e. ~P B )
Theorem	prelpwi 4257	A pair of two sets belongs to the power class of a class containing those two sets. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 10-Mar-2017.)
|- ( ( A e. C /\ B e. C ) -> { A , B } e. ~P C )
Theorem	rext 4258*	A theorem similar to extensionality, requiring the existence of a singleton. Exercise 8 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 16. (Contributed by NM, 10-Aug-1993.)
|- ( A. z ( x e. z -> y e. z ) -> x = y )
Theorem	sspwb 4259	Classes are subclasses if and only if their power classes are subclasses. Exercise 18 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 18. (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-1996.)
|- ( A C_ B <-> ~P A C_ ~P B )
Theorem	unipw 4260	A class equals the union of its power class. Exercise 6(a) of [Enderton] p. 38. (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-1996.) (Proof shortened by Alan Sare, 28-Dec-2008.)
|- U. ~P A = A
Theorem	pwel 4261	Membership of a power class. Exercise 10 of [Enderton] p. 26. (Contributed by NM, 13-Jan-2007.)
|- ( A e. B -> ~P A e. ~P ~P U. B )
Theorem	pwtr 4262	A class is transitive iff its power class is transitive. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 25-Aug-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Jun-2014.)
|- ( Tr A <-> Tr ~P A )
Theorem	ssextss 4263*	An extensionality-like principle defining subclass in terms of subsets. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jun-2004.)
|- ( A C_ B <-> A. x ( x C_ A -> x C_ B ) )
Theorem	ssext 4264*	An extensionality-like principle that uses the subset instead of the membership relation: two classes are equal iff they have the same subsets. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jun-2004.)
|- ( A = B <-> A. x ( x C_ A <-> x C_ B ) )
Theorem	nssssr 4265*	Negation of subclass relationship. Compare nssr 3252. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 17-Sep-2018.)
|- ( E. x ( x C_ A /\ -. x C_ B ) -> -. A C_ B )
Theorem	pweqb 4266	Classes are equal if and only if their power classes are equal. Exercise 19 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 18. (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-1996.)
|- ( A = B <-> ~P A = ~P B )
Theorem	intid 4267*	The intersection of all sets to which a set belongs is the singleton of that set. (Contributed by NM, 5-Jun-2009.)
|- A e. _V   =>    |- |^| { x | A e. x } = { A }
Theorem	euabex 4268	The abstraction of a wff with existential uniqueness exists. (Contributed by NM, 25-Nov-1994.)
|- ( E! x ph -> { x | ph } e. _V )
Theorem	mss 4269*	An inhabited class (even if proper) has an inhabited subset. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 17-Sep-2018.)
|- ( E. y y e. A -> E. x ( x C_ A /\ E. z z e. x ) )
Theorem	exss 4270*	Restricted existence in a class (even if proper) implies restricted existence in a subset. (Contributed by NM, 23-Aug-2003.)
|- ( E. x e. A ph -> E. y ( y C_ A /\ E. x e. y ph ) )
Theorem	opexg 4271	An ordered pair of sets is a set. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 11-Jan-2019.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W ) -> <. A , B >. e. _V )
Theorem	opex 4272	An ordered pair of sets is a set. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 24-Sep-2018.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-May-2019.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   =>    |- <. A , B >. e. _V
Theorem	otexg 4273	An ordered triple of sets is a set. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 19-Sep-2018.)
|- ( ( A e. U /\ B e. V /\ C e. W ) -> <. A , B , C >. e. _V )
Theorem	elop 4274	An ordered pair has two elements. Exercise 3 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 15. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   &    |- C e. _V   =>    |- ( A e. <. B , C >. <-> ( A = { B } \/ A = { B , C } ) )
Theorem	opi1 4275	One of the two elements in an ordered pair. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   =>    |- { A } e. <. A , B >.
Theorem	opi2 4276	One of the two elements of an ordered pair. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   =>    |- { A , B } e. <. A , B >.
2.3.4  Ordered pair theorem
Theorem	opm 4277*	An ordered pair is inhabited iff the arguments are sets. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Sep-2018.)
|- ( E. x x e. <. A , B >. <-> ( A e. _V /\ B e. _V ) )
Theorem	opnzi 4278	An ordered pair is nonempty if the arguments are sets (it is also inhabited; see opm 4277). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   =>    |- <. A , B >. =/= (/)
Theorem	opth1 4279	Equality of the first members of equal ordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 28-May-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   =>    |- ( <. A , B >. = <. C , D >. -> A = C )
Theorem	opth 4280	The ordered pair theorem. If two ordered pairs are equal, their first elements are equal and their second elements are equal. Exercise 6 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 16. Note that C and D are not required to be sets due our specific ordered pair definition. (Contributed by NM, 28-May-1995.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   =>    |- ( <. A , B >. = <. C , D >. <-> ( A = C /\ B = D ) )
Theorem	opthg 4281	Ordered pair theorem. C and D are not required to be sets under our specific ordered pair definition. (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W ) -> ( <. A , B >. = <. C , D >. <-> ( A = C /\ B = D ) ) )
Theorem	opthg2 4282	Ordered pair theorem. (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
|- ( ( C e. V /\ D e. W ) -> ( <. A , B >. = <. C , D >. <-> ( A = C /\ B = D ) ) )
Theorem	opth2 4283	Ordered pair theorem. (Contributed by NM, 21-Sep-2014.)
|- C e. _V   &    |- D e. _V   =>    |- ( <. A , B >. = <. C , D >. <-> ( A = C /\ B = D ) )
Theorem	otth2 4284	Ordered triple theorem, with triple express with ordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 1-May-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   &    |- R e. _V   =>    |- ( <. <. A , B >. , R >. = <. <. C , D >. , S >. <-> ( A = C /\ B = D /\ R = S ) )
Theorem	otth 4285	Ordered triple theorem. (Contributed by NM, 25-Sep-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   &    |- R e. _V   =>    |- ( <. A , B , R >. = <. C , D , S >. <-> ( A = C /\ B = D /\ R = S ) )
Theorem	eqvinop 4286*	A variable introduction law for ordered pairs. Analog of Lemma 15 of [Monk2] p. 109. (Contributed by NM, 28-May-1995.)
|- B e. _V   &    |- C e. _V   =>    |- ( A = <. B , C >. <-> E. x E. y ( A = <. x , y >. /\ <. x , y >. = <. B , C >. ) )
Theorem	copsexg 4287*	Substitution of class A for ordered pair <. x , y >.. (Contributed by NM, 27-Dec-1996.) (Revised by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.)
|- ( A = <. x , y >. -> ( ph <-> E. x E. y ( A = <. x , y >. /\ ph ) ) )
Theorem	copsex2t 4288*	Closed theorem form of copsex2g 4289. (Contributed by NM, 17-Feb-2013.)
|- ( ( A. x A. y ( ( x = A /\ y = B ) -> ( ph <-> ps ) ) /\ ( A e. V /\ B e. W ) ) -> ( E. x E. y ( <. A , B >. = <. x , y >. /\ ph ) <-> ps ) )
Theorem	copsex2g 4289*	Implicit substitution inference for ordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 28-May-1995.)
|- ( ( x = A /\ y = B ) -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W ) -> ( E. x E. y ( <. A , B >. = <. x , y >. /\ ph ) <-> ps ) )
Theorem	copsex4g 4290*	An implicit substitution inference for 2 ordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1995.)
|- ( ( ( x = A /\ y = B ) /\ ( z = C /\ w = D ) ) -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( ( ( A e. R /\ B e. S ) /\ ( C e. R /\ D e. S ) ) -> ( E. x E. y E. z E. w ( ( <. A , B >. = <. x , y >. /\ <. C , D >. = <. z , w >. ) /\ ph ) <-> ps ) )
Theorem	0nelop 4291	A property of ordered pairs. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
|- -. (/) e. <. A , B >.
Theorem	opwo0id 4292	An ordered pair is equal to the ordered pair without the empty set. This is because no ordered pair contains the empty set. (Contributed by AV, 15-Nov-2021.)
|- <. X , Y >. = ( <. X , Y >. \ { (/) } )
Theorem	opeqex 4293	Equivalence of existence implied by equality of ordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 28-May-2008.)
|- ( <. A , B >. = <. C , D >. -> ( ( A e. _V /\ B e. _V ) <-> ( C e. _V /\ D e. _V ) ) )
Theorem	opcom 4294	An ordered pair commutes iff its members are equal. (Contributed by NM, 28-May-2009.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   =>    |- ( <. A , B >. = <. B , A >. <-> A = B )
Theorem	moop2 4295*	"At most one" property of an ordered pair. (Contributed by NM, 11-Apr-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
|- B e. _V   =>    |- E* x A = <. B , x >.
Theorem	opeqsn 4296	Equivalence for an ordered pair equal to a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jun-2008.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   &    |- C e. _V   =>    |- ( <. A , B >. = { C } <-> ( A = B /\ C = { A } ) )
Theorem	opeqpr 4297	Equivalence for an ordered pair equal to an unordered pair. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jun-2008.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   &    |- C e. _V   &    |- D e. _V   =>    |- ( <. A , B >. = { C , D } <-> ( ( C = { A } /\ D = { A , B } ) \/ ( C = { A , B } /\ D = { A } ) ) )
Theorem	euotd 4298*	Prove existential uniqueness for an ordered triple. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-May-2015.)
|- ( ph -> A e. _V )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. _V )   &    |- ( ph -> C e. _V )   &    |- ( ph -> ( ps <-> ( a = A /\ b = B /\ c = C ) ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> E! x E. a E. b E. c ( x = <. a , b , c >. /\ ps ) )
Theorem	uniop 4299	The union of an ordered pair. Theorem 65 of [Suppes] p. 39. (Contributed by NM, 17-Aug-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   =>    |- U. <. A , B >. = { A , B }
Theorem	uniopel 4300	Ordered pair membership is inherited by class union. (Contributed by NM, 13-May-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   =>    |- ( <. A , B >. e. C -> U. <. A , B >. e. U. C )