Theorem rabxp 4657

Description: Membership in a class builder restricted to a cross product. (Contributed by NM, 20-Feb-2014.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
rabxp.1	|- ( x = <. y , z >. -> ( ph <-> ps ) )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
rabxp	|- { x e. ( A X. B ) | ph } = { <. y , z >. | ( y e. A /\ z e. B /\ ps ) }

Distinct variable groups:   x, y, z, A   x, B, y, z   ph, y, z   ps, x

Allowed substitution hints:   ph( x)   ps( y, z)

Proof of Theorem rabxp

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		elxp 4637	. . . . 5 |- ( x e. ( A X. B ) <-> E. y E. z ( x = <. y , z >. /\ ( y e. A /\ z e. B ) ) )
2	1	anbi1i 458	. . . 4 |- ( ( x e. ( A X. B ) /\ ph ) <-> ( E. y E. z ( x = <. y , z >. /\ ( y e. A /\ z e. B ) ) /\ ph ) )
3		19.41vv 1901	. . . 4 |- ( E. y E. z ( ( x = <. y , z >. /\ ( y e. A /\ z e. B ) ) /\ ph ) <-> ( E. y E. z ( x = <. y , z >. /\ ( y e. A /\ z e. B ) ) /\ ph ) )
4		anass 401	. . . . . 6 |- ( ( ( x = <. y , z >. /\ ( y e. A /\ z e. B ) ) /\ ph ) <-> ( x = <. y , z >. /\ ( ( y e. A /\ z e. B ) /\ ph ) ) )
5		rabxp.1	. . . . . . . . 9 |- ( x = <. y , z >. -> ( ph <-> ps ) )
6	5	anbi2d 464	. . . . . . . 8 |- ( x = <. y , z >. -> ( ( ( y e. A /\ z e. B ) /\ ph ) <-> ( ( y e. A /\ z e. B ) /\ ps ) ) )
7		df-3an 980	. . . . . . . 8 |- ( ( y e. A /\ z e. B /\ ps ) <-> ( ( y e. A /\ z e. B ) /\ ps ) )
8	6, 7	bitr4di 198	. . . . . . 7 |- ( x = <. y , z >. -> ( ( ( y e. A /\ z e. B ) /\ ph ) <-> ( y e. A /\ z e. B /\ ps ) ) )
9	8	pm5.32i 454	. . . . . 6 |- ( ( x = <. y , z >. /\ ( ( y e. A /\ z e. B ) /\ ph ) ) <-> ( x = <. y , z >. /\ ( y e. A /\ z e. B /\ ps ) ) )
10	4, 9	bitri 184	. . . . 5 |- ( ( ( x = <. y , z >. /\ ( y e. A /\ z e. B ) ) /\ ph ) <-> ( x = <. y , z >. /\ ( y e. A /\ z e. B /\ ps ) ) )
11	10	2exbii 1604	. . . 4 |- ( E. y E. z ( ( x = <. y , z >. /\ ( y e. A /\ z e. B ) ) /\ ph ) <-> E. y E. z ( x = <. y , z >. /\ ( y e. A /\ z e. B /\ ps ) ) )
12	2, 3, 11	3bitr2i 208	. . 3 |- ( ( x e. ( A X. B ) /\ ph ) <-> E. y E. z ( x = <. y , z >. /\ ( y e. A /\ z e. B /\ ps ) ) )
13	12	abbii 2291	. 2 |- { x | ( x e. ( A X. B ) /\ ph ) } = { x | E. y E. z ( x = <. y , z >. /\ ( y e. A /\ z e. B /\ ps ) ) }
14		df-rab 2462	. 2 |- { x e. ( A X. B ) | ph } = { x | ( x e. ( A X. B ) /\ ph ) }
15		df-opab 4060	. 2 |- { <. y , z >. | ( y e. A /\ z e. B /\ ps ) } = { x | E. y E. z ( x = <. y , z >. /\ ( y e. A /\ z e. B /\ ps ) ) }
16	13, 14, 15	3eqtr4i 2206	1 |- { x e. ( A X. B ) | ph } = { <. y , z >. | ( y e. A /\ z e. B /\ ps ) }

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   /\ wa 104   <-> wb 105   /\ w3a 978   = wceq 1353   E.wex 1490   e. wcel 2146   {cab 2161   {crab 2457   <.cop 3592   {copab 4058   X. cxp 4618

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 709  ax-5 1445  ax-7 1446  ax-gen 1447  ax-ie1 1491  ax-ie2 1492  ax-8 1502  ax-10 1503  ax-11 1504  ax-i12 1505  ax-bndl 1507  ax-4 1508  ax-17 1524  ax-i9 1528  ax-ial 1532  ax-i5r 1533  ax-14 2149  ax-ext 2157  ax-sep 4116  ax-pow 4169  ax-pr 4203

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3an 980  df-tru 1356  df-nf 1459  df-sb 1761  df-clab 2162  df-cleq 2168  df-clel 2171  df-nfc 2306  df-rab 2462  df-v 2737  df-un 3131  df-in 3133  df-ss 3140  df-pw 3574  df-sn 3595  df-pr 3596  df-op 3598  df-opab 4060  df-xp 4626

This theorem is referenced by: (None)