Theorem rabxp 4536

Description: Membership in a class builder restricted to a cross product. (Contributed by NM, 20-Feb-2014.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
rabxp.1	|- ( x = <. y , z >. -> ( ph <-> ps ) )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
rabxp	|- { x e. ( A X. B ) | ph } = { <. y , z >. | ( y e. A /\ z e. B /\ ps ) }

Distinct variable groups:   x, y, z, A   x, B, y, z   ph, y, z   ps, x

Allowed substitution hints:   ph( x)   ps( y, z)

Proof of Theorem rabxp

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		elxp 4516	. . . . 5 |- ( x e. ( A X. B ) <-> E. y E. z ( x = <. y , z >. /\ ( y e. A /\ z e. B ) ) )
2	1	anbi1i 451	. . . 4 |- ( ( x e. ( A X. B ) /\ ph ) <-> ( E. y E. z ( x = <. y , z >. /\ ( y e. A /\ z e. B ) ) /\ ph ) )
3		19.41vv 1857	. . . 4 |- ( E. y E. z ( ( x = <. y , z >. /\ ( y e. A /\ z e. B ) ) /\ ph ) <-> ( E. y E. z ( x = <. y , z >. /\ ( y e. A /\ z e. B ) ) /\ ph ) )
4		anass 396	. . . . . 6 |- ( ( ( x = <. y , z >. /\ ( y e. A /\ z e. B ) ) /\ ph ) <-> ( x = <. y , z >. /\ ( ( y e. A /\ z e. B ) /\ ph ) ) )
5		rabxp.1	. . . . . . . . 9 |- ( x = <. y , z >. -> ( ph <-> ps ) )
6	5	anbi2d 457	. . . . . . . 8 |- ( x = <. y , z >. -> ( ( ( y e. A /\ z e. B ) /\ ph ) <-> ( ( y e. A /\ z e. B ) /\ ps ) ) )
7		df-3an 947	. . . . . . . 8 |- ( ( y e. A /\ z e. B /\ ps ) <-> ( ( y e. A /\ z e. B ) /\ ps ) )
8	6, 7	syl6bbr 197	. . . . . . 7 |- ( x = <. y , z >. -> ( ( ( y e. A /\ z e. B ) /\ ph ) <-> ( y e. A /\ z e. B /\ ps ) ) )
9	8	pm5.32i 447	. . . . . 6 |- ( ( x = <. y , z >. /\ ( ( y e. A /\ z e. B ) /\ ph ) ) <-> ( x = <. y , z >. /\ ( y e. A /\ z e. B /\ ps ) ) )
10	4, 9	bitri 183	. . . . 5 |- ( ( ( x = <. y , z >. /\ ( y e. A /\ z e. B ) ) /\ ph ) <-> ( x = <. y , z >. /\ ( y e. A /\ z e. B /\ ps ) ) )
11	10	2exbii 1568	. . . 4 |- ( E. y E. z ( ( x = <. y , z >. /\ ( y e. A /\ z e. B ) ) /\ ph ) <-> E. y E. z ( x = <. y , z >. /\ ( y e. A /\ z e. B /\ ps ) ) )
12	2, 3, 11	3bitr2i 207	. . 3 |- ( ( x e. ( A X. B ) /\ ph ) <-> E. y E. z ( x = <. y , z >. /\ ( y e. A /\ z e. B /\ ps ) ) )
13	12	abbii 2230	. 2 |- { x | ( x e. ( A X. B ) /\ ph ) } = { x | E. y E. z ( x = <. y , z >. /\ ( y e. A /\ z e. B /\ ps ) ) }
14		df-rab 2399	. 2 |- { x e. ( A X. B ) | ph } = { x | ( x e. ( A X. B ) /\ ph ) }
15		df-opab 3950	. 2 |- { <. y , z >. | ( y e. A /\ z e. B /\ ps ) } = { x | E. y E. z ( x = <. y , z >. /\ ( y e. A /\ z e. B /\ ps ) ) }
16	13, 14, 15	3eqtr4i 2145	1 |- { x e. ( A X. B ) | ph } = { <. y , z >. | ( y e. A /\ z e. B /\ ps ) }

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   /\ wa 103   <-> wb 104   /\ w3a 945   = wceq 1314   E.wex 1451   e. wcel 1463   {cab 2101   {crab 2394   <.cop 3496   {copab 3948   X. cxp 4497

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-io 681  ax-5 1406  ax-7 1407  ax-gen 1408  ax-ie1 1452  ax-ie2 1453  ax-8 1465  ax-10 1466  ax-11 1467  ax-i12 1468  ax-bndl 1469  ax-4 1470  ax-14 1475  ax-17 1489  ax-i9 1493  ax-ial 1497  ax-i5r 1498  ax-ext 2097  ax-sep 4006  ax-pow 4058  ax-pr 4091

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-3an 947  df-tru 1317  df-nf 1420  df-sb 1719  df-clab 2102  df-cleq 2108  df-clel 2111  df-nfc 2244  df-rab 2399  df-v 2659  df-un 3041  df-in 3043  df-ss 3050  df-pw 3478  df-sn 3499  df-pr 3500  df-op 3502  df-opab 3950  df-xp 4505

This theorem is referenced by: (None)