P. 47 of Theorem List - Intuitionistic Logic Explorer

Theorem List for Intuitionistic Logic Explorer - 4601-4700   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	ordn2lp 4601	An ordinal class cannot be an element of one of its members. Variant of first part of Theorem 2.2(vii) of [BellMachover] p. 469. (Contributed by NM, 3-Apr-1994.)
|- ( Ord A -> -. ( A e. B /\ B e. A ) )
Theorem	orddisj 4602	An ordinal class and its singleton are disjoint. (Contributed by NM, 19-May-1998.)
|- ( Ord A -> ( A i^i { A } ) = (/) )
Theorem	orddif 4603	Ordinal derived from its successor. (Contributed by NM, 20-May-1998.)
|- ( Ord A -> A = ( suc A \ { A } ) )
Theorem	elirrv 4604	The membership relation is irreflexive: no set is a member of itself. Theorem 105 of [Suppes] p. 54. (Contributed by NM, 19-Aug-1993.)
|- -. x e. x
Theorem	sucprcreg 4605	A class is equal to its successor iff it is a proper class (assuming the Axiom of Set Induction). (Contributed by NM, 9-Jul-2004.)
|- ( -. A e. _V <-> suc A = A )
Theorem	ruv 4606	The Russell class is equal to the universe _V. Exercise 5 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 22. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Oct-2008.)
|- { x | x e/ x } = _V
Theorem	ruALT 4607	Alternate proof of Russell's Paradox ru 3001, simplified using (indirectly) the Axiom of Set Induction ax-setind 4593. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Oct-2008.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- { x | x e/ x } e/ _V
Theorem	onprc 4608	No set contains all ordinal numbers. Proposition 7.13 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 38. This is also known as the Burali-Forti paradox (remark in [Enderton] p. 194). In 1897, Cesare Burali-Forti noticed that since the "set" of all ordinal numbers is an ordinal class (ordon 4542), it must be both an element of the set of all ordinal numbers yet greater than every such element. ZF set theory resolves this paradox by not allowing the class of all ordinal numbers to be a set (so instead it is a proper class). Here we prove the denial of its existence. (Contributed by NM, 18-May-1994.)
|- -. On e. _V
Theorem	sucon 4609	The class of all ordinal numbers is its own successor. (Contributed by NM, 12-Sep-2003.)
|- suc On = On
Theorem	en2lp 4610	No class has 2-cycle membership loops. Theorem 7X(b) of [Enderton] p. 206. (Contributed by NM, 16-Oct-1996.) (Proof rewritten by Mario Carneiro and Jim Kingdon, 27-Nov-2018.)
|- -. ( A e. B /\ B e. A )
Theorem	preleq 4611	Equality of two unordered pairs when one member of each pair contains the other member. (Contributed by NM, 16-Oct-1996.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   &    |- C e. _V   &    |- D e. _V   =>    |- ( ( ( A e. B /\ C e. D ) /\ { A , B } = { C , D } ) -> ( A = C /\ B = D ) )
Theorem	opthreg 4612	Theorem for alternate representation of ordered pairs, requiring the Axiom of Set Induction ax-setind 4593 (via the preleq 4611 step). See df-op 3647 for a description of other ordered pair representations. Exercise 34 of [Enderton] p. 207. (Contributed by NM, 16-Oct-1996.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   &    |- C e. _V   &    |- D e. _V   =>    |- ( { A , { A , B } } = { C , { C , D } } <-> ( A = C /\ B = D ) )
Theorem	suc11g 4613	The successor operation behaves like a one-to-one function (assuming the Axiom of Set Induction). Similar to Exercise 35 of [Enderton] p. 208 and its converse. (Contributed by NM, 25-Oct-2003.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W ) -> ( suc A = suc B <-> A = B ) )
Theorem	suc11 4614	The successor operation behaves like a one-to-one function. Compare Exercise 16 of [Enderton] p. 194. (Contributed by NM, 3-Sep-2003.)
|- ( ( A e. On /\ B e. On ) -> ( suc A = suc B <-> A = B ) )
Theorem	dtruex 4615*	At least two sets exist (or in terms of first-order logic, the universe of discourse has two or more objects). Although dtruarb 4243 can also be summarized as "at least two sets exist", the difference is that dtruarb 4243 shows the existence of two sets which are not equal to each other, but this theorem says that given a specific y, we can construct a set x which does not equal it. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 29-Dec-2018.)
|- E. x -. x = y
Theorem	dtru 4616*	At least two sets exist (or in terms of first-order logic, the universe of discourse has two or more objects). If we assumed the law of the excluded middle this would be equivalent to dtruex 4615. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 29-Dec-2018.)
|- -. A. x x = y
Theorem	eunex 4617	Existential uniqueness implies there is a value for which the wff argument is false. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 29-Dec-2018.)
|- ( E! x ph -> E. x -. ph )
Theorem	ordsoexmid 4618	Weak linearity of ordinals implies the law of the excluded middle (that is, decidability of an arbitrary proposition). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro and Jim Kingdon, 29-Jan-2019.)
|- _E Or On   =>    |- ( ph \/ -. ph )
Theorem	ordsuc 4619	The successor of an ordinal class is ordinal. (Contributed by NM, 3-Apr-1995.) (Constructive proof by Mario Carneiro and Jim Kingdon, 20-Jul-2019.)
|- ( Ord A <-> Ord suc A )
Theorem	onsucuni2 4620	A successor ordinal is the successor of its union. (Contributed by NM, 10-Dec-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.)
|- ( ( A e. On /\ A = suc B ) -> suc U. A = A )
Theorem	0elsucexmid 4621*	If the successor of any ordinal class contains the empty set, excluded middle follows. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 3-Sep-2021.)
|- A. x e. On (/) e. suc x   =>    |- ( ph \/ -. ph )
Theorem	nlimsucg 4622	A successor is not a limit ordinal. (Contributed by NM, 25-Mar-1995.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.)
|- ( A e. V -> -. Lim suc A )
Theorem	ordpwsucss 4623	The collection of ordinals in the power class of an ordinal is a superset of its successor. We can think of ( ~P A i^i On ) as another possible definition of successor, which would be equivalent to df-suc 4426 given excluded middle. It is an ordinal, and has some successor-like properties. For example, if A e. On then both U. suc A = A (onunisuci 4487) and U. { x e. On | x C_ A } = A (onuniss2 4568). Constructively ( ~P A i^i On ) and suc A cannot be shown to be equivalent (as proved at ordpwsucexmid 4626). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Jul-2019.)
|- ( Ord A -> suc A C_ ( ~P A i^i On ) )
Theorem	onnmin 4624	No member of a set of ordinal numbers belongs to its minimum. (Contributed by NM, 2-Feb-1997.) (Constructive proof by Mario Carneiro and Jim Kingdon, 21-Jul-2019.)
|- ( ( A C_ On /\ B e. A ) -> -. B e. |^| A )
Theorem	ssnel 4625	Relationship between subset and elementhood. In the context of ordinals this can be seen as an ordering law. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 22-Jul-2019.)
|- ( A C_ B -> -. B e. A )
Theorem	ordpwsucexmid 4626*	The subset in ordpwsucss 4623 cannot be equality. That is, strengthening it to equality implies excluded middle. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-Jul-2019.)
|- A. x e. On suc x = ( ~P x i^i On )   =>    |- ( ph \/ -. ph )
Theorem	ordtri2or2exmid 4627*	Ordinal trichotomy implies excluded middle. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 29-Aug-2021.)
|- A. x e. On A. y e. On ( x C_ y \/ y C_ x )   =>    |- ( ph \/ -. ph )
Theorem	ontri2orexmidim 4628*	Ordinal trichotomy implies excluded middle. Closed form of ordtri2or2exmid 4627. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 26-Aug-2024.)
|- ( A. x e. On A. y e. On ( x C_ y \/ y C_ x ) -> DECID ph )
Theorem	onintexmid 4629*	If the intersection (infimum) of an inhabited class of ordinal numbers belongs to the class, excluded middle follows. The hypothesis would be provable given excluded middle. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro and Jim Kingdon, 29-Aug-2021.)
|- ( ( y C_ On /\ E. x x e. y ) -> |^| y e. y )   =>    |- ( ph \/ -. ph )
Theorem	zfregfr 4630	The epsilon relation is well-founded on any class. (Contributed by NM, 26-Nov-1995.)
|- _E Fr A
Theorem	ordfr 4631	Epsilon is well-founded on an ordinal class. (Contributed by NM, 22-Apr-1994.)
|- ( Ord A -> _E Fr A )
Theorem	ordwe 4632	Epsilon well-orders every ordinal. Proposition 7.4 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 36. (Contributed by NM, 3-Apr-1994.)
|- ( Ord A -> _E We A )
Theorem	wetriext 4633*	A trichotomous well-order is extensional. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 26-Sep-2021.)
|- ( ph -> R We A )   &    |- ( ph -> A e. V )   &    |- ( ph -> A. a e. A A. b e. A ( a R b \/ a = b \/ b R a ) )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. A )   &    |- ( ph -> C e. A )   &    |- ( ph -> A. z e. A ( z R B <-> z R C ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> B = C )
Theorem	wessep 4634	A subset of a set well-ordered by set membership is well-ordered by set membership. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-Sep-2021.)
|- ( ( _E We A /\ B C_ A ) -> _E We B )
Theorem	reg3exmidlemwe 4635*	Lemma for reg3exmid 4636. Our counterexample A satisfies We. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 3-Oct-2021.)
|- A = { x e. { (/) , { (/) } } | ( x = { (/) } \/ ( x = (/) /\ ph ) ) }   =>    |- _E We A
Theorem	reg3exmid 4636*	If any inhabited set satisfying df-wetr 4389 for _E has a minimal element, excluded middle follows. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 3-Oct-2021.)
|- ( ( _E We z /\ E. w w e. z ) -> E. x e. z A. y e. z x C_ y )   =>    |- ( ph \/ -. ph )
Theorem	dcextest 4637*	If it is decidable whether { x | ph } is a set, then -. ph is decidable (where x does not occur in ph). From this fact, we can deduce (outside the formal system, since we cannot quantify over classes) that if it is decidable whether any class is a set, then "weak excluded middle" (that is, any negated proposition -. ph is decidable) holds. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 3-Jul-2022.)
|- DECID { x | ph } e. _V   =>    |- DECID -. ph
2.5.3  Transfinite induction
Theorem	tfi 4638*	The Principle of Transfinite Induction. Theorem 7.17 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 39. This principle states that if A is a class of ordinal numbers with the property that every ordinal number included in A also belongs to A, then every ordinal number is in A. (Contributed by NM, 18-Feb-2004.)
|- ( ( A C_ On /\ A. x e. On ( x C_ A -> x e. A ) ) -> A = On )
Theorem	tfis 4639*	Transfinite Induction Schema. If all ordinal numbers less than a given number x have a property (induction hypothesis), then all ordinal numbers have the property (conclusion). Exercise 25 of [Enderton] p. 200. (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-1994.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 20-Nov-2016.)
|- ( x e. On -> ( A. y e. x [ y / x ] ph -> ph ) )   =>    |- ( x e. On -> ph )
Theorem	tfis2f 4640*	Transfinite Induction Schema, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-1994.)
|- F/ x ps   &    |- ( x = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( x e. On -> ( A. y e. x ps -> ph ) )   =>    |- ( x e. On -> ph )
Theorem	tfis2 4641*	Transfinite Induction Schema, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-1994.)
|- ( x = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( x e. On -> ( A. y e. x ps -> ph ) )   =>    |- ( x e. On -> ph )
Theorem	tfis3 4642*	Transfinite Induction Schema, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 4-Nov-2003.)
|- ( x = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ch ) )   &    |- ( x e. On -> ( A. y e. x ps -> ph ) )   =>    |- ( A e. On -> ch )
Theorem	tfisi 4643*	A transfinite induction scheme in "implicit" form where the induction is done on an object derived from the object of interest. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 24-Aug-2015.)
|- ( ph -> A e. V )   &    |- ( ph -> T e. On )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ ( R e. On /\ R C_ T ) /\ A. y ( S e. R -> ch ) ) -> ps )   &    |- ( x = y -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   &    |- ( x = A -> ( ps <-> th ) )   &    |- ( x = y -> R = S )   &    |- ( x = A -> R = T )   =>    |- ( ph -> th )
2.6  IZF Set Theory - add the Axiom of Infinity
2.6.1  Introduce the Axiom of Infinity
Axiom	ax-iinf 4644*	Axiom of Infinity. Axiom 5 of [Crosilla] p. "Axioms of CZF and IZF". (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 16-Nov-2018.)
|- E. x ( (/) e. x /\ A. y ( y e. x -> suc y e. x ) )
Theorem	zfinf2 4645*	A standard version of the Axiom of Infinity, using definitions to abbreviate. Axiom Inf of [BellMachover] p. 472. (Contributed by NM, 30-Aug-1993.)
|- E. x ( (/) e. x /\ A. y e. x suc y e. x )
2.6.2  The natural numbers
Syntax	com 4646	Extend class notation to include the class of natural numbers.
class om
Definition	df-iom 4647*	Define the class of natural numbers as the smallest inductive set, which is valid provided we assume the Axiom of Infinity. Definition 6.3 of [Eisenberg] p. 82. Note: the natural numbers om are a subset of the ordinal numbers df-on 4423. Later, when we define complex numbers, we will be able to also define a subset of the complex numbers (df-inn 9057) with analogous properties and operations, but they will be different sets. We are unable to use the terms finite ordinal and natural number interchangeably, as shown at exmidonfin 7318. (Contributed by NM, 6-Aug-1994.) Use its alias dfom3 4648 instead for naming consistency with set.mm. (New usage is discouraged.)
|- om = |^| { x | ( (/) e. x /\ A. y e. x suc y e. x ) }
Theorem	dfom3 4648*	Alias for df-iom 4647. Use it instead of df-iom 4647 for naming consistency with set.mm. (Contributed by NM, 6-Aug-1994.)
|- om = |^| { x | ( (/) e. x /\ A. y e. x suc y e. x ) }
Theorem	omex 4649	The existence of omega (the class of natural numbers). Axiom 7 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 43. (Contributed by NM, 6-Aug-1994.)
|- om e. _V
2.6.3  Peano's postulates
Theorem	peano1 4650	Zero is a natural number. One of Peano's five postulates for arithmetic. Proposition 7.30(1) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 42. (Contributed by NM, 15-May-1994.)
|- (/) e. om
Theorem	peano2 4651	The successor of any natural number is a natural number. One of Peano's five postulates for arithmetic. Proposition 7.30(2) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 42. (Contributed by NM, 3-Sep-2003.)
|- ( A e. om -> suc A e. om )
Theorem	peano3 4652	The successor of any natural number is not zero. One of Peano's five postulates for arithmetic. Proposition 7.30(3) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 42. (Contributed by NM, 3-Sep-2003.)
|- ( A e. om -> suc A =/= (/) )
Theorem	peano4 4653	Two natural numbers are equal iff their successors are equal, i.e. the successor function is one-to-one. One of Peano's five postulates for arithmetic. Proposition 7.30(4) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 43. (Contributed by NM, 3-Sep-2003.)
|- ( ( A e. om /\ B e. om ) -> ( suc A = suc B <-> A = B ) )
Theorem	peano5 4654*	The induction postulate: any class containing zero and closed under the successor operation contains all natural numbers. One of Peano's five postulates for arithmetic. Proposition 7.30(5) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 43. The more traditional statement of mathematical induction as a theorem schema, with a basis and an induction step, is derived from this theorem as Theorem findes 4659. (Contributed by NM, 18-Feb-2004.)
|- ( ( (/) e. A /\ A. x e. om ( x e. A -> suc x e. A ) ) -> om C_ A )
2.6.4  Finite induction (for finite ordinals)
Theorem	find 4655*	The Principle of Finite Induction (mathematical induction). Corollary 7.31 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 43. The simpler hypothesis shown here was suggested in an email from "Colin" on 1-Oct-2001. The hypothesis states that A is a set of natural numbers, zero belongs to A, and given any member of A the member's successor also belongs to A. The conclusion is that every natural number is in A. (Contributed by NM, 22-Feb-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.)
|- ( A C_ om /\ (/) e. A /\ A. x e. A suc x e. A )   =>    |- A = om
Theorem	finds 4656*	Principle of Finite Induction (inference schema), using implicit substitutions. The first four hypotheses establish the substitutions we need. The last two are the basis and the induction step. Theorem Schema 22 of [Suppes] p. 136. This is Metamath 100 proof #74. (Contributed by NM, 14-Apr-1995.)
|- ( x = (/) -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( x = y -> ( ph <-> ch ) )   &    |- ( x = suc y -> ( ph <-> th ) )   &    |- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ta ) )   &    |- ps   &    |- ( y e. om -> ( ch -> th ) )   =>    |- ( A e. om -> ta )
Theorem	finds2 4657*	Principle of Finite Induction (inference schema), using implicit substitutions. The first three hypotheses establish the substitutions we need. The last two are the basis and the induction step. Theorem Schema 22 of [Suppes] p. 136. (Contributed by NM, 29-Nov-2002.)
|- ( x = (/) -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( x = y -> ( ph <-> ch ) )   &    |- ( x = suc y -> ( ph <-> th ) )   &    |- ( ta -> ps )   &    |- ( y e. om -> ( ta -> ( ch -> th ) ) )   =>    |- ( x e. om -> ( ta -> ph ) )
Theorem	finds1 4658*	Principle of Finite Induction (inference schema), using implicit substitutions. The first three hypotheses establish the substitutions we need. The last two are the basis and the induction step. Theorem Schema 22 of [Suppes] p. 136. (Contributed by NM, 22-Mar-2006.)
|- ( x = (/) -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( x = y -> ( ph <-> ch ) )   &    |- ( x = suc y -> ( ph <-> th ) )   &    |- ps   &    |- ( y e. om -> ( ch -> th ) )   =>    |- ( x e. om -> ph )
Theorem	findes 4659	Finite induction with explicit substitution. The first hypothesis is the basis and the second is the induction step. Theorem Schema 22 of [Suppes] p. 136. This is an alternative for Metamath 100 proof #74. (Contributed by Raph Levien, 9-Jul-2003.)
|- [. (/) / x ]. ph   &    |- ( x e. om -> ( ph -> [. suc x / x ]. ph ) )   =>    |- ( x e. om -> ph )
2.6.5  The Natural Numbers (continued)
Theorem	nn0suc 4660*	A natural number is either 0 or a successor. Similar theorems for arbitrary sets or real numbers will not be provable (without the law of the excluded middle), but equality of natural numbers is decidable. (Contributed by NM, 27-May-1998.)
|- ( A e. om -> ( A = (/) \/ E. x e. om A = suc x ) )
Theorem	elomssom 4661	A natural number ordinal is, as a set, included in the set of natural number ordinals. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-1998.) Extract this result from the previous proof of elnn 4662. (Revised by BJ, 7-Aug-2024.)
|- ( A e. om -> A C_ om )
Theorem	elnn 4662	A member of a natural number is a natural number. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-1998.)
|- ( ( A e. B /\ B e. om ) -> A e. om )
Theorem	ordom 4663	Omega is ordinal. Theorem 7.32 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 43. (Contributed by NM, 18-Oct-1995.)
|- Ord om
Theorem	omelon2 4664	Omega is an ordinal number. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Jan-2013.)
|- ( om e. _V -> om e. On )
Theorem	omelon 4665	Omega is an ordinal number. (Contributed by NM, 10-May-1998.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-Jan-2013.)
|- om e. On
Theorem	nnon 4666	A natural number is an ordinal number. (Contributed by NM, 27-Jun-1994.)
|- ( A e. om -> A e. On )
Theorem	nnoni 4667	A natural number is an ordinal number. (Contributed by NM, 27-Jun-1994.)
|- A e. om   =>    |- A e. On
Theorem	nnord 4668	A natural number is ordinal. (Contributed by NM, 17-Oct-1995.)
|- ( A e. om -> Ord A )
Theorem	omsson 4669	Omega is a subset of On. (Contributed by NM, 13-Jun-1994.)
|- om C_ On
Theorem	limom 4670	Omega is a limit ordinal. Theorem 2.8 of [BellMachover] p. 473. (Contributed by NM, 26-Mar-1995.) (Proof rewritten by Jim Kingdon, 5-Jan-2019.)
|- Lim om
Theorem	peano2b 4671	A class belongs to omega iff its successor does. (Contributed by NM, 3-Dec-1995.)
|- ( A e. om <-> suc A e. om )
Theorem	nnsuc 4672*	A nonzero natural number is a successor. (Contributed by NM, 18-Feb-2004.)
|- ( ( A e. om /\ A =/= (/) ) -> E. x e. om A = suc x )
Theorem	nnsucpred 4673	The successor of the precedessor of a nonzero natural number. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 31-Jul-2022.)
|- ( ( A e. om /\ A =/= (/) ) -> suc U. A = A )
Theorem	nndceq0 4674	A natural number is either zero or nonzero. Decidable equality for natural numbers is a special case of the law of the excluded middle which holds in most constructive set theories including ours. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 5-Jan-2019.)
|- ( A e. om -> DECID A = (/) )
Theorem	0elnn 4675	A natural number is either the empty set or has the empty set as an element. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 23-Aug-2019.)
|- ( A e. om -> ( A = (/) \/ (/) e. A ) )
Theorem	nn0eln0 4676	A natural number is nonempty iff it contains the empty set. Although in constructive mathematics it is generally more natural to work with inhabited sets and ignore the whole concept of nonempty sets, in the specific case of natural numbers this theorem may be helpful in converting proofs which were written assuming excluded middle. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 28-Aug-2019.)
|- ( A e. om -> ( (/) e. A <-> A =/= (/) ) )
Theorem	nnregexmid 4677*	If inhabited sets of natural numbers always have minimal elements, excluded middle follows. The argument is essentially the same as regexmid 4591 and the larger lesson is that although natural numbers may behave "non-constructively" even in a constructive set theory (for example see nndceq 6598 or nntri3or 6592), sets of natural numbers are a different animal. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 6-Sep-2019.)
|- ( ( x C_ om /\ E. y y e. x ) -> E. y ( y e. x /\ A. z ( z e. y -> -. z e. x ) ) )   =>    |- ( ph \/ -. ph )
Theorem	omsinds 4678*	Strong (or "total") induction principle over om. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 17-Jul-2015.)
|- ( x = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ch ) )   &    |- ( x e. om -> ( A. y e. x ps -> ph ) )   =>    |- ( A e. om -> ch )
Theorem	nnpredcl 4679	The predecessor of a natural number is a natural number. This theorem is most interesting when the natural number is a successor (as seen in theorems like onsucuni2 4620) but also holds when it is (/) by uni0 3883. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 31-Jul-2022.)
|- ( A e. om -> U. A e. om )
Theorem	nnpredlt 4680	The predecessor (see nnpredcl 4679) of a nonzero natural number is less than (see df-iord 4421) that number. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 14-Sep-2024.)
|- ( ( A e. om /\ A =/= (/) ) -> U. A e. A )
2.6.6  Relations
Syntax	cxp 4681	Extend the definition of a class to include the cross product.
class ( A X. B )
Syntax	ccnv 4682	Extend the definition of a class to include the converse of a class.
class `' A
Syntax	cdm 4683	Extend the definition of a class to include the domain of a class.
class dom A
Syntax	crn 4684	Extend the definition of a class to include the range of a class.
class ran A
Syntax	cres 4685	Extend the definition of a class to include the restriction of a class. (Read: The restriction of A to B.)
class ( A |` B )
Syntax	cima 4686	Extend the definition of a class to include the image of a class. (Read: The image of B under A.)
class ( A " B )
Syntax	ccom 4687	Extend the definition of a class to include the composition of two classes. (Read: The composition of A and B.)
class ( A o. B )
Syntax	wrel 4688	Extend the definition of a wff to include the relation predicate. (Read: A is a relation.)
wff Rel A
Definition	df-xp 4689*	Define the Cartesian product of two classes. This is also sometimes called the "cross product" but that term also has other meanings; we intentionally choose a less ambiguous term. Definition 9.11 of [Quine] p. 64. For example, ( { 1 , 5 } X. { 2 , 7 } ) = ( { <. 1 , 2 >. , <. 1 , 7 >. } u. { <. 5 , 2 >. , <. 5 , 7 >. } ). Another example is that the set of rational numbers is defined using the Cartesian product as ( ZZ X. NN ); the left- and right-hand sides of the Cartesian product represent the top (integer) and bottom (natural) numbers of a fraction. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jul-1994.)
|- ( A X. B ) = { <. x , y >. | ( x e. A /\ y e. B ) }
Definition	df-rel 4690	Define the relation predicate. Definition 6.4(1) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 23. For alternate definitions, see dfrel2 5142 and dfrel3 5149. (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-1994.)
|- ( Rel A <-> A C_ ( _V X. _V ) )
Definition	df-cnv 4691*	Define the converse of a class. Definition 9.12 of [Quine] p. 64. The converse of a binary relation swaps its arguments, i.e., if A e. _V and B e. _V then ( A `' R B <-> B R A ), as proven in brcnv 4869 (see df-br 4052 and df-rel 4690 for more on relations). For example, `' { <. 2 , 6 >. , <. 3 , 9 >. } = { <. 6 , 2 >. , <. 9 , 3 >. }. We use Quine's breve accent (smile) notation. Like Quine, we use it as a prefix, which eliminates the need for parentheses. "Converse" is Quine's terminology. Some authors use a "minus one" exponent and call it "inverse", especially when the argument is a function, although this is not in general a genuine inverse. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jul-1994.)
|- `' A = { <. x , y >. | y A x }
Definition	df-co 4692*	Define the composition of two classes. Definition 6.6(3) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 24. Note that Definition 7 of [Suppes] p. 63 reverses A and B, uses a slash instead of o., and calls the operation "relative product". (Contributed by NM, 4-Jul-1994.)
|- ( A o. B ) = { <. x , y >. | E. z ( x B z /\ z A y ) }
Definition	df-dm 4693*	Define the domain of a class. Definition 3 of [Suppes] p. 59. For example, F = { <. 2 , 6 >., <. 3 , 9 >. } -> dom F = { 2 , 3 } . Contrast with range (defined in df-rn 4694). For alternate definitions see dfdm2 5226, dfdm3 4873, and dfdm4 4879. The notation " dom " is used by Enderton; other authors sometimes use script D. (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-1994.)
|- dom A = { x | E. y x A y }
Definition	df-rn 4694	Define the range of a class. For example, F = { <. 2 , 6 >., <. 3 , 9 >. } -> ran F = { 6 , 9 } . Contrast with domain (defined in df-dm 4693). For alternate definitions, see dfrn2 4874, dfrn3 4875, and dfrn4 5152. The notation " ran " is used by Enderton; other authors sometimes use script R or script W. (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-1994.)
|- ran A = dom `' A
Definition	df-res 4695	Define the restriction of a class. Definition 6.6(1) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 24. For example, ( F = { <. 2 , 6 >. , <. 3 , 9 >. } /\ B = { 1 , 2 } ) -> ( F |` B ) = { <. 2 , 6 >. }. We do not introduce a special syntax for the corestriction of a class: it will be expressed either as the intersection ( A i^i ( _V X. B ) ) or as the converse of the restricted converse. (Contributed by NM, 2-Aug-1994.)
|- ( A |` B ) = ( A i^i ( B X. _V ) )
Definition	df-ima 4696	Define the image of a class (as restricted by another class). Definition 6.6(2) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 24. For example, ( F = { <. 2 , 6 >., <. 3 , 9 >. } /\ B = { 1 , 2 } ) -> ( F " B ) = { 6 } . Contrast with restriction (df-res 4695) and range (df-rn 4694). For an alternate definition, see dfima2 5033. (Contributed by NM, 2-Aug-1994.)
|- ( A " B ) = ran ( A |` B )
Theorem	xpeq1 4697	Equality theorem for cross product. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jul-1994.)
|- ( A = B -> ( A X. C ) = ( B X. C ) )
Theorem	xpeq2 4698	Equality theorem for cross product. (Contributed by NM, 5-Jul-1994.)
|- ( A = B -> ( C X. A ) = ( C X. B ) )
Theorem	elxpi 4699*	Membership in a cross product. Uses fewer axioms than elxp 4700. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jul-1994.)
|- ( A e. ( B X. C ) -> E. x E. y ( A = <. x , y >. /\ ( x e. B /\ y e. C ) ) )
Theorem	elxp 4700*	Membership in a cross product. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jul-1994.)
|- ( A e. ( B X. C ) <-> E. x E. y ( A = <. x , y >. /\ ( x e. B /\ y e. C ) ) )