Theorem tfrlem8 6371

Description: Lemma for transfinite recursion. The domain of recs is ordinal. (Contributed by NM, 14-Aug-1994.) (Proof shortened by Alan Sare, 11-Mar-2008.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
tfrlem.1	|- A = { f | E. x e. On ( f Fn x /\ A. y e. x ( f ` y ) = ( F ` ( f |` y ) ) ) }

Assertion

Ref	Expression
tfrlem8	|- Ord dom recs ( F )

Distinct variable group:   x, f, y, F

Allowed substitution hints:   A( x, y, f)

Proof of Theorem tfrlem8

Dummy variables g z w are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		tfrlem.1	. . . . . . . . 9 |- A = { f | E. x e. On ( f Fn x /\ A. y e. x ( f ` y ) = ( F ` ( f |` y ) ) ) }
2	1	tfrlem3 6364	. . . . . . . 8 |- A = { g | E. z e. On ( g Fn z /\ A. w e. z ( g ` w ) = ( F ` ( g |` w ) ) ) }
3	2	abeq2i 2304	. . . . . . 7 |- ( g e. A <-> E. z e. On ( g Fn z /\ A. w e. z ( g ` w ) = ( F ` ( g |` w ) ) ) )
4		fndm 5353	. . . . . . . . . . 11 |- ( g Fn z -> dom g = z )
5	4	adantr 276	. . . . . . . . . 10 |- ( ( g Fn z /\ A. w e. z ( g ` w ) = ( F ` ( g |` w ) ) ) -> dom g = z )
6	5	eleq1d 2262	. . . . . . . . 9 |- ( ( g Fn z /\ A. w e. z ( g ` w ) = ( F ` ( g |` w ) ) ) -> ( dom g e. On <-> z e. On ) )
7	6	biimprcd 160	. . . . . . . 8 |- ( z e. On -> ( ( g Fn z /\ A. w e. z ( g ` w ) = ( F ` ( g |` w ) ) ) -> dom g e. On ) )
8	7	rexlimiv 2605	. . . . . . 7 |- ( E. z e. On ( g Fn z /\ A. w e. z ( g ` w ) = ( F ` ( g |` w ) ) ) -> dom g e. On )
9	3, 8	sylbi 121	. . . . . 6 |- ( g e. A -> dom g e. On )
10		eleq1a 2265	. . . . . 6 |- ( dom g e. On -> ( z = dom g -> z e. On ) )
11	9, 10	syl 14	. . . . 5 |- ( g e. A -> ( z = dom g -> z e. On ) )
12	11	rexlimiv 2605	. . . 4 |- ( E. g e. A z = dom g -> z e. On )
13	12	abssi 3254	. . 3 |- { z | E. g e. A z = dom g } C_ On
14		ssorduni 4519	. . 3 |- ( { z | E. g e. A z = dom g } C_ On -> Ord U. { z | E. g e. A z = dom g } )
15	13, 14	ax-mp 5	. 2 |- Ord U. { z | E. g e. A z = dom g }
16	1	recsfval 6368	. . . . 5 |- recs ( F ) = U. A
17	16	dmeqi 4863	. . . 4 |- dom recs ( F ) = dom U. A
18		dmuni 4872	. . . 4 |- dom U. A = U_ g e. A dom g
19		vex 2763	. . . . . 6 |- g e. _V
20	19	dmex 4928	. . . . 5 |- dom g e. _V
21	20	dfiun2 3946	. . . 4 |- U_ g e. A dom g = U. { z | E. g e. A z = dom g }
22	17, 18, 21	3eqtri 2218	. . 3 |- dom recs ( F ) = U. { z | E. g e. A z = dom g }
23		ordeq 4403	. . 3 |- ( dom recs ( F ) = U. { z | E. g e. A z = dom g } -> ( Ord dom recs ( F ) <-> Ord U. { z | E. g e. A z = dom g } ) )
24	22, 23	ax-mp 5	. 2 |- ( Ord dom recs ( F ) <-> Ord U. { z | E. g e. A z = dom g } )
25	15, 24	mpbir 146	1 |- Ord dom recs ( F )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   /\ wa 104   <-> wb 105   = wceq 1364   e. wcel 2164   {cab 2179   A.wral 2472   E.wrex 2473   C_ wss 3153   U.cuni 3835   U_ciun 3912   Ord word 4393   Oncon0 4394   dom cdm 4659   |` cres 4661   Fn wfn 5249   ` cfv 5254  recscrecs 6357

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 710  ax-5 1458  ax-7 1459  ax-gen 1460  ax-ie1 1504  ax-ie2 1505  ax-8 1515  ax-10 1516  ax-11 1517  ax-i12 1518  ax-bndl 1520  ax-4 1521  ax-17 1537  ax-i9 1541  ax-ial 1545  ax-i5r 1546  ax-13 2166  ax-14 2167  ax-ext 2175  ax-sep 4147  ax-pow 4203  ax-pr 4238  ax-un 4464

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3an 982  df-tru 1367  df-nf 1472  df-sb 1774  df-eu 2045  df-mo 2046  df-clab 2180  df-cleq 2186  df-clel 2189  df-nfc 2325  df-ral 2477  df-rex 2478  df-v 2762  df-un 3157  df-in 3159  df-ss 3166  df-pw 3603  df-sn 3624  df-pr 3625  df-op 3627  df-uni 3836  df-iun 3914  df-br 4030  df-opab 4091  df-tr 4128  df-iord 4397  df-on 4399  df-xp 4665  df-rel 4666  df-cnv 4667  df-co 4668  df-dm 4669  df-rn 4670  df-res 4671  df-iota 5215  df-fun 5256  df-fn 5257  df-fv 5262  df-recs 6358

This theorem is referenced by:  tfrlemi14d  6386  tfri1dALT  6404