Theorem bj-zfpair2 16015

Description: Proof of zfpair2 4265 using only bounded separation. (Contributed by BJ, 5-Oct-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bj-zfpair2	⊢ {𝑥, 𝑦} ∈ V

Proof of Theorem bj-zfpair2

Dummy variables 𝑧 𝑤 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ax-bdeq 15925	. . . . 5 ⊢ BOUNDED 𝑤 = 𝑥
2		ax-bdeq 15925	. . . . 5 ⊢ BOUNDED 𝑤 = 𝑦
3	1, 2	ax-bdor 15921	. . . 4 ⊢ BOUNDED (𝑤 = 𝑥 ∨ 𝑤 = 𝑦)
4		ax-pr 4264	. . . 4 ⊢ ∃𝑧∀𝑤((𝑤 = 𝑥 ∨ 𝑤 = 𝑦) → 𝑤 ∈ 𝑧)
5	3, 4	bdbm1.3ii 15996	. . 3 ⊢ ∃𝑧∀𝑤(𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 ↔ (𝑤 = 𝑥 ∨ 𝑤 = 𝑦))
6		dfcleq 2200	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑧 = {𝑥, 𝑦} ↔ ∀𝑤(𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 ↔ 𝑤 ∈ {𝑥, 𝑦}))
7		vex 2776	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ 𝑤 ∈ V
8	7	elpr 3659	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑤 ∈ {𝑥, 𝑦} ↔ (𝑤 = 𝑥 ∨ 𝑤 = 𝑦))
9	8	bibi2i 227	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 ↔ 𝑤 ∈ {𝑥, 𝑦}) ↔ (𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 ↔ (𝑤 = 𝑥 ∨ 𝑤 = 𝑦)))
10	9	albii 1494	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∀𝑤(𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 ↔ 𝑤 ∈ {𝑥, 𝑦}) ↔ ∀𝑤(𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 ↔ (𝑤 = 𝑥 ∨ 𝑤 = 𝑦)))
11	6, 10	bitri 184	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑧 = {𝑥, 𝑦} ↔ ∀𝑤(𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 ↔ (𝑤 = 𝑥 ∨ 𝑤 = 𝑦)))
12	11	exbii 1629	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑧 𝑧 = {𝑥, 𝑦} ↔ ∃𝑧∀𝑤(𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 ↔ (𝑤 = 𝑥 ∨ 𝑤 = 𝑦)))
13	5, 12	mpbir 146	. 2 ⊢ ∃𝑧 𝑧 = {𝑥, 𝑦}
14	13	issetri 2783	1 ⊢ {𝑥, 𝑦} ∈ V

Syntax hints:   ↔ wb 105   ∨ wo 710  ∀wal 1371   = wceq 1373  ∃wex 1516   ∈ wcel 2177  Vcvv 2773  {cpr 3639

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 711  ax-5 1471  ax-7 1472  ax-gen 1473  ax-ie1 1517  ax-ie2 1518  ax-8 1528  ax-10 1529  ax-11 1530  ax-i12 1531  ax-bndl 1533  ax-4 1534  ax-17 1550  ax-i9 1554  ax-ial 1558  ax-i5r 1559  ax-14 2180  ax-ext 2188  ax-pr 4264  ax-bdor 15921  ax-bdeq 15925  ax-bdsep 15989

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-tru 1376  df-nf 1485  df-sb 1787  df-clab 2193  df-cleq 2199  df-clel 2202  df-nfc 2338  df-v 2775  df-un 3174  df-sn 3644  df-pr 3645

This theorem is referenced by:  bj-prexg  16016