Theorem dfdmf 4690

Description: Definition of domain, using bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by NM, 8-Mar-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2016.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
dfdmf.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
dfdmf.2	⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴

Assertion

Ref	Expression
dfdmf	⊢ dom 𝐴 = {𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑦 𝑥𝐴𝑦}

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝐴(𝑥,𝑦)

Proof of Theorem dfdmf

Dummy variables 𝑤 𝑣 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-dm 4507	. 2 ⊢ dom 𝐴 = {𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑣 𝑤𝐴𝑣}
2		nfcv 2253	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝑤
3		dfdmf.2	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴
4		nfcv 2253	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝑣
5	2, 3, 4	nfbr 3937	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦 𝑤𝐴𝑣
6		nfv 1489	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑣 𝑤𝐴𝑦
7		breq2 3897	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑣 = 𝑦 → (𝑤𝐴𝑣 ↔ 𝑤𝐴𝑦))
8	5, 6, 7	cbvex 1710	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑣 𝑤𝐴𝑣 ↔ ∃𝑦 𝑤𝐴𝑦)
9	8	abbii 2228	. 2 ⊢ {𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑣 𝑤𝐴𝑣} = {𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑦 𝑤𝐴𝑦}
10		nfcv 2253	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝑤
11		dfdmf.1	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
12		nfcv 2253	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝑦
13	10, 11, 12	nfbr 3937	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝑤𝐴𝑦
14	13	nfex 1597	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥∃𝑦 𝑤𝐴𝑦
15		nfv 1489	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑤∃𝑦 𝑥𝐴𝑦
16		breq1 3896	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑥 → (𝑤𝐴𝑦 ↔ 𝑥𝐴𝑦))
17	16	exbidv 1777	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑥 → (∃𝑦 𝑤𝐴𝑦 ↔ ∃𝑦 𝑥𝐴𝑦))
18	14, 15, 17	cbvab 2235	. 2 ⊢ {𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑦 𝑤𝐴𝑦} = {𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑦 𝑥𝐴𝑦}
19	1, 9, 18	3eqtri 2137	1 ⊢ dom 𝐴 = {𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑦 𝑥𝐴𝑦}

Syntax hints:   = wceq 1312  ∃wex 1449  {cab 2099  Ⅎwnfc 2240   class class class wbr 3893  dom cdm 4497

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-io 681  ax-5 1404  ax-7 1405  ax-gen 1406  ax-ie1 1450  ax-ie2 1451  ax-8 1463  ax-10 1464  ax-11 1465  ax-i12 1466  ax-bndl 1467  ax-4 1468  ax-17 1487  ax-i9 1491  ax-ial 1495  ax-i5r 1496  ax-ext 2095

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-3an 945  df-tru 1315  df-nf 1418  df-sb 1717  df-clab 2100  df-cleq 2106  df-clel 2109  df-nfc 2242  df-v 2657  df-un 3039  df-sn 3497  df-pr 3498  df-op 3500  df-br 3894  df-dm 4507

This theorem is referenced by:  dmopab  4708