Theorem List for Intuitionistic Logic Explorer - 4801-4900 *Has distinct variable
group(s)
| Type | Label | Description |
| Statement |
| |
| Theorem | reliin 4801 |
An indexed intersection is a relation if at least one of the member of the
indexed family is a relation. (Contributed by NM, 8-Mar-2014.)
|
| ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 Rel 𝐵 → Rel ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | reluni 4802* |
The union of a class is a relation iff any member is a relation.
Exercise 6 of [TakeutiZaring] p.
25 and its converse. (Contributed by
NM, 13-Aug-2004.)
|
| ⊢ (Rel ∪ 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 Rel 𝑥) |
| |
| Theorem | relint 4803* |
The intersection of a class is a relation if at least one member is a
relation. (Contributed by NM, 8-Mar-2014.)
|
| ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 Rel 𝑥 → Rel ∩
𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | rel0 4804 |
The empty set is a relation. (Contributed by NM, 26-Apr-1998.)
|
| ⊢ Rel ∅ |
| |
| Theorem | relopabiv 4805* |
A class of ordered pairs is a relation. For a version without a
disjoint variable condition, see relopabi 4807. (Contributed by BJ,
22-Jul-2023.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜑} ⇒ ⊢ Rel 𝐴 |
| |
| Theorem | relopabv 4806* |
A class of ordered pairs is a relation. For a version without a
disjoint variable condition, see relopab 4808. (Contributed by SN,
8-Sep-2024.)
|
| ⊢ Rel {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜑} |
| |
| Theorem | relopabi 4807 |
A class of ordered pairs is a relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro,
21-Dec-2013.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜑} ⇒ ⊢ Rel 𝐴 |
| |
| Theorem | relopab 4808 |
A class of ordered pairs is a relation. (Contributed by NM, 8-Mar-1995.)
(Unnecessary distinct variable restrictions were removed by Alan Sare,
9-Jul-2013.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 21-Dec-2013.)
|
| ⊢ Rel {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜑} |
| |
| Theorem | brabv 4809 |
If two classes are in a relationship given by an ordered-pair class
abstraction, the classes are sets. (Contributed by Alexander van der
Vekens, 5-Nov-2017.)
|
| ⊢ (𝑋{〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜑}𝑌 → (𝑋 ∈ V ∧ 𝑌 ∈ V)) |
| |
| Theorem | mptrel 4810 |
The maps-to notation always describes a relationship. (Contributed by
Scott Fenton, 16-Apr-2012.)
|
| ⊢ Rel (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | reli 4811 |
The identity relation is a relation. Part of Exercise 4.12(p) of
[Mendelson] p. 235. (Contributed by
NM, 26-Apr-1998.) (Revised by
Mario Carneiro, 21-Dec-2013.)
|
| ⊢ Rel I |
| |
| Theorem | rele 4812 |
The membership relation is a relation. (Contributed by NM,
26-Apr-1998.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 21-Dec-2013.)
|
| ⊢ Rel E |
| |
| Theorem | opabid2 4813* |
A relation expressed as an ordered pair abstraction. (Contributed by
NM, 11-Dec-2006.)
|
| ⊢ (Rel 𝐴 → {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∈ 𝐴} = 𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | inopab 4814* |
Intersection of two ordered pair class abstractions. (Contributed by
NM, 30-Sep-2002.)
|
| ⊢ ({〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜑} ∩ {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜓}) = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)} |
| |
| Theorem | difopab 4815* |
The difference of two ordered-pair abstractions. (Contributed by Stefan
O'Rear, 17-Jan-2015.)
|
| ⊢ ({〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜑} ∖ {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜓}) = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ (𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓)} |
| |
| Theorem | inxp 4816 |
The intersection of two cross products. Exercise 9 of [TakeutiZaring]
p. 25. (Contributed by NM, 3-Aug-1994.) (Proof shortened by Andrew
Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) ∩ (𝐶 × 𝐷)) = ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐶) × (𝐵 ∩ 𝐷)) |
| |
| Theorem | xpindi 4817 |
Distributive law for cross product over intersection. Theorem 102 of
[Suppes] p. 52. (Contributed by NM,
26-Sep-2004.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 × (𝐵 ∩ 𝐶)) = ((𝐴 × 𝐵) ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐶)) |
| |
| Theorem | xpindir 4818 |
Distributive law for cross product over intersection. Similar to
Theorem 102 of [Suppes] p. 52.
(Contributed by NM, 26-Sep-2004.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) × 𝐶) = ((𝐴 × 𝐶) ∩ (𝐵 × 𝐶)) |
| |
| Theorem | xpiindim 4819* |
Distributive law for cross product over indexed intersection.
(Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 7-Dec-2018.)
|
| ⊢ (∃𝑦 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝐶 × ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵) = ∩
𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐶 × 𝐵)) |
| |
| Theorem | xpriindim 4820* |
Distributive law for cross product over relativized indexed
intersection. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 7-Dec-2018.)
|
| ⊢ (∃𝑦 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝐶 × (𝐷 ∩ ∩
𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵)) = ((𝐶 × 𝐷) ∩ ∩
𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐶 × 𝐵))) |
| |
| Theorem | eliunxp 4821* |
Membership in a union of cross products. Analogue of elxp 4696
for
nonconstant 𝐵(𝑥). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro,
29-Dec-2014.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ ∪
𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ({𝑥} × 𝐵) ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝐶 = 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵))) |
| |
| Theorem | opeliunxp2 4822* |
Membership in a union of cross products. (Contributed by Mario
Carneiro, 14-Feb-2015.)
|
| ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐶 → 𝐵 = 𝐸) ⇒ ⊢ (〈𝐶, 𝐷〉 ∈ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ({𝑥} × 𝐵) ↔ (𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐸)) |
| |
| Theorem | raliunxp 4823* |
Write a double restricted quantification as one universal quantifier.
In this version of ralxp 4825, 𝐵(𝑦) is not assumed to be constant.
(Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Dec-2014.)
|
| ⊢ (𝑥 = 〈𝑦, 𝑧〉 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ ∪
𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ({𝑦} × 𝐵)𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓) |
| |
| Theorem | rexiunxp 4824* |
Write a double restricted quantification as one universal quantifier.
In this version of rexxp 4826, 𝐵(𝑦) is not assumed to be constant.
(Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Feb-2015.)
|
| ⊢ (𝑥 = 〈𝑦, 𝑧〉 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ ∪
𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ({𝑦} × 𝐵)𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓) |
| |
| Theorem | ralxp 4825* |
Universal quantification restricted to a cross product is equivalent to
a double restricted quantification. The hypothesis specifies an
implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 7-Feb-2004.) (Revised by
Mario Carneiro, 29-Dec-2014.)
|
| ⊢ (𝑥 = 〈𝑦, 𝑧〉 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵)𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓) |
| |
| Theorem | rexxp 4826* |
Existential quantification restricted to a cross product is equivalent
to a double restricted quantification. (Contributed by NM,
11-Nov-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 14-Feb-2015.)
|
| ⊢ (𝑥 = 〈𝑦, 𝑧〉 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵)𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓) |
| |
| Theorem | djussxp 4827* |
Disjoint union is a subset of a cross product. (Contributed by Stefan
O'Rear, 21-Nov-2014.)
|
| ⊢ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ({𝑥} × 𝐵) ⊆ (𝐴 × V) |
| |
| Theorem | ralxpf 4828* |
Version of ralxp 4825 with bound-variable hypotheses. (Contributed
by NM,
18-Aug-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2016.)
|
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑
& ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧𝜑
& ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓
& ⊢ (𝑥 = 〈𝑦, 𝑧〉 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵)𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓) |
| |
| Theorem | rexxpf 4829* |
Version of rexxp 4826 with bound-variable hypotheses. (Contributed
by NM,
19-Dec-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2016.)
|
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑
& ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧𝜑
& ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓
& ⊢ (𝑥 = 〈𝑦, 𝑧〉 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵)𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓) |
| |
| Theorem | iunxpf 4830* |
Indexed union on a cross product is equals a double indexed union. The
hypothesis specifies an implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM,
19-Dec-2008.)
|
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐶
& ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧𝐶
& ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐷
& ⊢ (𝑥 = 〈𝑦, 𝑧〉 → 𝐶 = 𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵)𝐶 = ∪
𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∪ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝐷 |
| |
| Theorem | opabbi2dv 4831* |
Deduce equality of a relation and an ordered-pair class builder.
Compare abbi2dv 2325. (Contributed by NM, 24-Feb-2014.)
|
| ⊢ Rel 𝐴
& ⊢ (𝜑 → (〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜓}) |
| |
| Theorem | relop 4832* |
A necessary and sufficient condition for a Kuratowski ordered pair to be
a relation. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jun-2008.) (Avoid depending on this
detail.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈
V ⇒ ⊢ (Rel 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉 ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝐴 = {𝑥} ∧ 𝐵 = {𝑥, 𝑦})) |
| |
| Theorem | ideqg 4833 |
For sets, the identity relation is the same as equality. (Contributed
by NM, 30-Apr-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon,
27-Aug-2011.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 I 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵)) |
| |
| Theorem | ideq 4834 |
For sets, the identity relation is the same as equality. (Contributed
by NM, 13-Aug-1995.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 I 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | ididg 4835 |
A set is identical to itself. (Contributed by NM, 28-May-2008.) (Proof
shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐴 I 𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | issetid 4836 |
Two ways of expressing set existence. (Contributed by NM, 16-Feb-2008.)
(Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) (Revised by Mario
Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ V ↔ 𝐴 I 𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | coss1 4837 |
Subclass theorem for composition. (Contributed by FL, 30-Dec-2010.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∘ 𝐶) ⊆ (𝐵 ∘ 𝐶)) |
| |
| Theorem | coss2 4838 |
Subclass theorem for composition. (Contributed by NM, 5-Apr-2013.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (𝐶 ∘ 𝐴) ⊆ (𝐶 ∘ 𝐵)) |
| |
| Theorem | coeq1 4839 |
Equality theorem for composition of two classes. (Contributed by NM,
3-Jan-1997.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∘ 𝐶) = (𝐵 ∘ 𝐶)) |
| |
| Theorem | coeq2 4840 |
Equality theorem for composition of two classes. (Contributed by NM,
3-Jan-1997.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝐶 ∘ 𝐴) = (𝐶 ∘ 𝐵)) |
| |
| Theorem | coeq1i 4841 |
Equality inference for composition of two classes. (Contributed by NM,
16-Nov-2000.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∘ 𝐶) = (𝐵 ∘ 𝐶) |
| |
| Theorem | coeq2i 4842 |
Equality inference for composition of two classes. (Contributed by NM,
16-Nov-2000.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ (𝐶 ∘ 𝐴) = (𝐶 ∘ 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | coeq1d 4843 |
Equality deduction for composition of two classes. (Contributed by NM,
16-Nov-2000.)
|
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∘ 𝐶) = (𝐵 ∘ 𝐶)) |
| |
| Theorem | coeq2d 4844 |
Equality deduction for composition of two classes. (Contributed by NM,
16-Nov-2000.)
|
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 ∘ 𝐴) = (𝐶 ∘ 𝐵)) |
| |
| Theorem | coeq12i 4845 |
Equality inference for composition of two classes. (Contributed by FL,
7-Jun-2012.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵
& ⊢ 𝐶 = 𝐷 ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∘ 𝐶) = (𝐵 ∘ 𝐷) |
| |
| Theorem | coeq12d 4846 |
Equality deduction for composition of two classes. (Contributed by FL,
7-Jun-2012.)
|
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
& ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = 𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∘ 𝐶) = (𝐵 ∘ 𝐷)) |
| |
| Theorem | nfco 4847 |
Bound-variable hypothesis builder for function value. (Contributed by
NM, 1-Sep-1999.)
|
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
& ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | elco 4848* |
Elements of a composed relation. (Contributed by BJ, 10-Jul-2022.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝑅 ∘ 𝑆) ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝐴 = 〈𝑥, 𝑧〉 ∧ (𝑥𝑆𝑦 ∧ 𝑦𝑅𝑧))) |
| |
| Theorem | brcog 4849* |
Ordered pair membership in a composition. (Contributed by NM,
24-Feb-2015.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴(𝐶 ∘ 𝐷)𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝐴𝐷𝑥 ∧ 𝑥𝐶𝐵))) |
| |
| Theorem | opelco2g 4850* |
Ordered pair membership in a composition. (Contributed by NM,
27-Jan-1997.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Feb-2015.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (〈𝐴, 𝐵〉 ∈ (𝐶 ∘ 𝐷) ↔ ∃𝑥(〈𝐴, 𝑥〉 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 〈𝑥, 𝐵〉 ∈ 𝐶))) |
| |
| Theorem | brcogw 4851 |
Ordered pair membership in a composition. (Contributed by Thierry
Arnoux, 14-Jan-2018.)
|
| ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑍) ∧ (𝐴𝐷𝑋 ∧ 𝑋𝐶𝐵)) → 𝐴(𝐶 ∘ 𝐷)𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | eqbrrdva 4852* |
Deduction from extensionality principle for relations, given an
equivalence only on the relation's domain and range. (Contributed by
Thierry Arnoux, 28-Nov-2017.)
|
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ (𝐶 × 𝐷)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ (𝐶 × 𝐷)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷) → (𝑥𝐴𝑦 ↔ 𝑥𝐵𝑦)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | brco 4853* |
Binary relation on a composition. (Contributed by NM, 21-Sep-2004.)
(Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Feb-2015.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈
V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴(𝐶 ∘ 𝐷)𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝐴𝐷𝑥 ∧ 𝑥𝐶𝐵)) |
| |
| Theorem | opelco 4854* |
Ordered pair membership in a composition. (Contributed by NM,
27-Dec-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Feb-2015.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈
V ⇒ ⊢ (〈𝐴, 𝐵〉 ∈ (𝐶 ∘ 𝐷) ↔ ∃𝑥(𝐴𝐷𝑥 ∧ 𝑥𝐶𝐵)) |
| |
| Theorem | cnvss 4855 |
Subset theorem for converse. (Contributed by NM, 22-Mar-1998.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → ◡𝐴 ⊆ ◡𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | cnveq 4856 |
Equality theorem for converse. (Contributed by NM, 13-Aug-1995.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → ◡𝐴 = ◡𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | cnveqi 4857 |
Equality inference for converse. (Contributed by NM, 23-Dec-2008.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ ◡𝐴 = ◡𝐵 |
| |
| Theorem | cnveqd 4858 |
Equality deduction for converse. (Contributed by NM, 6-Dec-2013.)
|
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ◡𝐴 = ◡𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | elcnv 4859* |
Membership in a converse. Equation 5 of [Suppes] p. 62. (Contributed
by NM, 24-Mar-1998.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ◡𝑅 ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝐴 = 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∧ 𝑦𝑅𝑥)) |
| |
| Theorem | elcnv2 4860* |
Membership in a converse. Equation 5 of [Suppes] p. 62. (Contributed
by NM, 11-Aug-2004.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ◡𝑅 ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝐴 = 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∧ 〈𝑦, 𝑥〉 ∈ 𝑅)) |
| |
| Theorem | nfcnv 4861 |
Bound-variable hypothesis builder for converse. (Contributed by NM,
31-Jan-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2016.)
|
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 ⇒ ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥◡𝐴 |
| |
| Theorem | opelcnvg 4862 |
Ordered-pair membership in converse. (Contributed by NM, 13-May-1999.)
(Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷) → (〈𝐴, 𝐵〉 ∈ ◡𝑅 ↔ 〈𝐵, 𝐴〉 ∈ 𝑅)) |
| |
| Theorem | brcnvg 4863 |
The converse of a binary relation swaps arguments. Theorem 11 of [Suppes]
p. 61. (Contributed by NM, 10-Oct-2005.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷) → (𝐴◡𝑅𝐵 ↔ 𝐵𝑅𝐴)) |
| |
| Theorem | opelcnv 4864 |
Ordered-pair membership in converse. (Contributed by NM,
13-Aug-1995.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈
V ⇒ ⊢ (〈𝐴, 𝐵〉 ∈ ◡𝑅 ↔ 〈𝐵, 𝐴〉 ∈ 𝑅) |
| |
| Theorem | brcnv 4865 |
The converse of a binary relation swaps arguments. Theorem 11 of
[Suppes] p. 61. (Contributed by NM,
13-Aug-1995.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈
V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴◡𝑅𝐵 ↔ 𝐵𝑅𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | csbcnvg 4866 |
Move class substitution in and out of the converse of a function.
(Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 8-Feb-2017.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ◡⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹 = ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌◡𝐹) |
| |
| Theorem | cnvco 4867 |
Distributive law of converse over class composition. Theorem 26 of
[Suppes] p. 64. (Contributed by NM,
19-Mar-1998.) (Proof shortened by
Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.)
|
| ⊢ ◡(𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) = (◡𝐵 ∘ ◡𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | cnvuni 4868* |
The converse of a class union is the (indexed) union of the converses of
its members. (Contributed by NM, 11-Aug-2004.)
|
| ⊢ ◡∪ 𝐴 = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ◡𝑥 |
| |
| Theorem | dfdm3 4869* |
Alternate definition of domain. Definition 6.5(1) of [TakeutiZaring]
p. 24. (Contributed by NM, 28-Dec-1996.)
|
| ⊢ dom 𝐴 = {𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑦〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∈ 𝐴} |
| |
| Theorem | dfrn2 4870* |
Alternate definition of range. Definition 4 of [Suppes] p. 60.
(Contributed by NM, 27-Dec-1996.)
|
| ⊢ ran 𝐴 = {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 𝑥𝐴𝑦} |
| |
| Theorem | dfrn3 4871* |
Alternate definition of range. Definition 6.5(2) of [TakeutiZaring]
p. 24. (Contributed by NM, 28-Dec-1996.)
|
| ⊢ ran 𝐴 = {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∈ 𝐴} |
| |
| Theorem | elrn2g 4872* |
Membership in a range. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 2-Feb-2011.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 ∈ ran 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑥〈𝑥, 𝐴〉 ∈ 𝐵)) |
| |
| Theorem | elrng 4873* |
Membership in a range. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 2-Feb-2011.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 ∈ ran 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑥 𝑥𝐵𝐴)) |
| |
| Theorem | ssrelrn 4874* |
If a relation is a subset of a cartesian product, then for each element
of the range of the relation there is an element of the first set of the
cartesian product which is related to the element of the range by the
relation. (Contributed by AV, 24-Oct-2020.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝑅 ⊆ (𝐴 × 𝐵) ∧ 𝑌 ∈ ran 𝑅) → ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 𝑎𝑅𝑌) |
| |
| Theorem | dfdm4 4875 |
Alternate definition of domain. (Contributed by NM, 28-Dec-1996.)
|
| ⊢ dom 𝐴 = ran ◡𝐴 |
| |
| Theorem | dfdmf 4876* |
Definition of domain, using bound-variable hypotheses instead of
distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by NM, 8-Mar-1995.)
(Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2016.)
|
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
& ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴 ⇒ ⊢ dom 𝐴 = {𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑦 𝑥𝐴𝑦} |
| |
| Theorem | csbdmg 4877 |
Distribute proper substitution through the domain of a class.
(Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 8-Dec-2018.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌dom 𝐵 = dom ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | eldmg 4878* |
Domain membership. Theorem 4 of [Suppes] p. 59.
(Contributed by Mario
Carneiro, 9-Jul-2014.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑦 𝐴𝐵𝑦)) |
| |
| Theorem | eldm2g 4879* |
Domain membership. Theorem 4 of [Suppes] p. 59.
(Contributed by NM,
27-Jan-1997.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2014.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑦〈𝐴, 𝑦〉 ∈ 𝐵)) |
| |
| Theorem | eldm 4880* |
Membership in a domain. Theorem 4 of [Suppes]
p. 59. (Contributed by
NM, 2-Apr-2004.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑦 𝐴𝐵𝑦) |
| |
| Theorem | eldm2 4881* |
Membership in a domain. Theorem 4 of [Suppes]
p. 59. (Contributed by
NM, 1-Aug-1994.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑦〈𝐴, 𝑦〉 ∈ 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | dmss 4882 |
Subset theorem for domain. (Contributed by NM, 11-Aug-1994.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → dom 𝐴 ⊆ dom 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | dmeq 4883 |
Equality theorem for domain. (Contributed by NM, 11-Aug-1994.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → dom 𝐴 = dom 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | dmeqi 4884 |
Equality inference for domain. (Contributed by NM, 4-Mar-2004.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ dom 𝐴 = dom 𝐵 |
| |
| Theorem | dmeqd 4885 |
Equality deduction for domain. (Contributed by NM, 4-Mar-2004.)
|
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → dom 𝐴 = dom 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | opeldm 4886 |
Membership of first of an ordered pair in a domain. (Contributed by NM,
30-Jul-1995.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈
V ⇒ ⊢ (〈𝐴, 𝐵〉 ∈ 𝐶 → 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐶) |
| |
| Theorem | breldm 4887 |
Membership of first of a binary relation in a domain. (Contributed by
NM, 30-Jul-1995.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈
V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴𝑅𝐵 → 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝑅) |
| |
| Theorem | opeldmg 4888 |
Membership of first of an ordered pair in a domain. (Contributed by Jim
Kingdon, 9-Jul-2019.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (〈𝐴, 𝐵〉 ∈ 𝐶 → 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐶)) |
| |
| Theorem | breldmg 4889 |
Membership of first of a binary relation in a domain. (Contributed by
NM, 21-Mar-2007.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝐴𝑅𝐵) → 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝑅) |
| |
| Theorem | dmun 4890 |
The domain of a union is the union of domains. Exercise 56(a) of
[Enderton] p. 65. (Contributed by NM,
12-Aug-1994.) (Proof shortened
by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.)
|
| ⊢ dom (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) = (dom 𝐴 ∪ dom 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | dmin 4891 |
The domain of an intersection belong to the intersection of domains.
Theorem 6 of [Suppes] p. 60.
(Contributed by NM, 15-Sep-2004.)
|
| ⊢ dom (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ⊆ (dom 𝐴 ∩ dom 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | dmiun 4892 |
The domain of an indexed union. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro,
26-Apr-2016.)
|
| ⊢ dom ∪
𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = ∪
𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 dom 𝐵 |
| |
| Theorem | dmuni 4893* |
The domain of a union. Part of Exercise 8 of [Enderton] p. 41.
(Contributed by NM, 3-Feb-2004.)
|
| ⊢ dom ∪ 𝐴 = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 dom 𝑥 |
| |
| Theorem | dmopab 4894* |
The domain of a class of ordered pairs. (Contributed by NM,
16-May-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 4-Dec-2016.)
|
| ⊢ dom {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑦𝜑} |
| |
| Theorem | dmopabss 4895* |
Upper bound for the domain of a restricted class of ordered pairs.
(Contributed by NM, 31-Jan-2004.)
|
| ⊢ dom {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} ⊆ 𝐴 |
| |
| Theorem | dmopab3 4896* |
The domain of a restricted class of ordered pairs. (Contributed by NM,
31-Jan-2004.)
|
| ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦𝜑 ↔ dom {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} = 𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | dm0 4897 |
The domain of the empty set is empty. Part of Theorem 3.8(v) of [Monk1]
p. 36. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jul-1994.) (Proof shortened by Andrew
Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.)
|
| ⊢ dom ∅ = ∅ |
| |
| Theorem | dmi 4898 |
The domain of the identity relation is the universe. (Contributed by
NM, 30-Apr-1998.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.)
|
| ⊢ dom I = V |
| |
| Theorem | dmv 4899 |
The domain of the universe is the universe. (Contributed by NM,
8-Aug-2003.)
|
| ⊢ dom V = V |
| |
| Theorem | dm0rn0 4900 |
An empty domain implies an empty range. For a similar theorem for
whether the domain and range are inhabited, see dmmrnm 4902. (Contributed
by NM, 21-May-1998.)
|
| ⊢ (dom 𝐴 = ∅ ↔ ran 𝐴 = ∅) |