| Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > eloprabg | GIF version | ||
| Description: The law of concretion for operation class abstraction. Compare elopab 4292. (Contributed by NM, 14-Sep-1999.) (Revised by David Abernethy, 19-Jun-2012.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| eloprabg.1 | ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) |
| eloprabg.2 | ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) |
| eloprabg.3 | ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐶 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| eloprabg | ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) → (〈〈𝐴, 𝐵〉, 𝐶〉 ∈ {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝜃)) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | eloprabg.1 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) | |
| 2 | eloprabg.2 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) | |
| 3 | eloprabg.3 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐶 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)) | |
| 4 | 1, 2, 3 | syl3an9b 1321 | . 2 ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 = 𝐶) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃)) |
| 5 | 4 | eloprabga 6009 | 1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) → (〈〈𝐴, 𝐵〉, 𝐶〉 ∈ {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝜃)) |
| Colors of variables: wff set class |
| Syntax hints: → wi 4 ↔ wb 105 ∧ w3a 980 = wceq 1364 ∈ wcel 2167 〈cop 3625 {coprab 5923 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-ia1 106 ax-ia2 107 ax-ia3 108 ax-io 710 ax-5 1461 ax-7 1462 ax-gen 1463 ax-ie1 1507 ax-ie2 1508 ax-8 1518 ax-10 1519 ax-11 1520 ax-i12 1521 ax-bndl 1523 ax-4 1524 ax-17 1540 ax-i9 1544 ax-ial 1548 ax-i5r 1549 ax-14 2170 ax-ext 2178 ax-sep 4151 ax-pow 4207 ax-pr 4242 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 117 df-3an 982 df-tru 1367 df-nf 1475 df-sb 1777 df-clab 2183 df-cleq 2189 df-clel 2192 df-nfc 2328 df-v 2765 df-un 3161 df-in 3163 df-ss 3170 df-pw 3607 df-sn 3628 df-pr 3629 df-op 3631 df-oprab 5926 |
| This theorem is referenced by: ov 6042 ovg 6062 |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |