Theorem eloprabg 6108

Description: The law of concretion for operation class abstraction. Compare elopab 4352. (Contributed by NM, 14-Sep-1999.) (Revised by David Abernethy, 19-Jun-2012.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
eloprabg.1	⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
eloprabg.2	⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))
eloprabg.3	⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐶 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
eloprabg	⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) → (⟨⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩, 𝐶⟩ ∈ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝜃))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦,𝑧,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵,𝑦,𝑧   𝑥,𝐶,𝑦,𝑧   𝜃,𝑥,𝑦,𝑧

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧)   𝜓(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧)   𝜒(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧)   𝑉(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧)   𝑊(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧)   𝑋(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧)

Proof of Theorem eloprabg

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		eloprabg.1	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
2		eloprabg.2	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))
3		eloprabg.3	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐶 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃))
4	1, 2, 3	syl3an9b 1346	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 = 𝐶) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃))
5	4	eloprabga 6107	1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) → (⟨⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩, 𝐶⟩ ∈ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝜃))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 105   ∧ w3a 1004   = wceq 1397   ∈ wcel 2202  ⟨cop 3672  {coprab 6018

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 716  ax-5 1495  ax-7 1496  ax-gen 1497  ax-ie1 1541  ax-ie2 1542  ax-8 1552  ax-10 1553  ax-11 1554  ax-i12 1555  ax-bndl 1557  ax-4 1558  ax-17 1574  ax-i9 1578  ax-ial 1582  ax-i5r 1583  ax-14 2205  ax-ext 2213  ax-sep 4207  ax-pow 4264  ax-pr 4299

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3an 1006  df-tru 1400  df-nf 1509  df-sb 1811  df-clab 2218  df-cleq 2224  df-clel 2227  df-nfc 2363  df-v 2804  df-un 3204  df-in 3206  df-ss 3213  df-pw 3654  df-sn 3675  df-pr 3676  df-op 3678  df-oprab 6021

This theorem is referenced by:  ov  6140  ovg  6160