![]() |
Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
|
Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > eloprabg | GIF version |
Description: The law of concretion for operation class abstraction. Compare elopab 4288. (Contributed by NM, 14-Sep-1999.) (Revised by David Abernethy, 19-Jun-2012.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
eloprabg.1 | ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) |
eloprabg.2 | ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) |
eloprabg.3 | ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐶 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
eloprabg | ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) → (〈〈𝐴, 𝐵〉, 𝐶〉 ∈ {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝜃)) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | eloprabg.1 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) | |
2 | eloprabg.2 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) | |
3 | eloprabg.3 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐶 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)) | |
4 | 1, 2, 3 | syl3an9b 1321 | . 2 ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 = 𝐶) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃)) |
5 | 4 | eloprabga 6005 | 1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) → (〈〈𝐴, 𝐵〉, 𝐶〉 ∈ {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝜃)) |
Colors of variables: wff set class |
Syntax hints: → wi 4 ↔ wb 105 ∧ w3a 980 = wceq 1364 ∈ wcel 2164 〈cop 3621 {coprab 5919 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-ia1 106 ax-ia2 107 ax-ia3 108 ax-io 710 ax-5 1458 ax-7 1459 ax-gen 1460 ax-ie1 1504 ax-ie2 1505 ax-8 1515 ax-10 1516 ax-11 1517 ax-i12 1518 ax-bndl 1520 ax-4 1521 ax-17 1537 ax-i9 1541 ax-ial 1545 ax-i5r 1546 ax-14 2167 ax-ext 2175 ax-sep 4147 ax-pow 4203 ax-pr 4238 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 117 df-3an 982 df-tru 1367 df-nf 1472 df-sb 1774 df-clab 2180 df-cleq 2186 df-clel 2189 df-nfc 2325 df-v 2762 df-un 3157 df-in 3159 df-ss 3166 df-pw 3603 df-sn 3624 df-pr 3625 df-op 3627 df-oprab 5922 |
This theorem is referenced by: ov 6038 ovg 6057 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |