Theorem eloprabg 5930

Description: The law of concretion for operation class abstraction. Compare elopab 4236. (Contributed by NM, 14-Sep-1999.) (Revised by David Abernethy, 19-Jun-2012.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
eloprabg.1	⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
eloprabg.2	⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))
eloprabg.3	⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐶 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
eloprabg	⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) → (⟨⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩, 𝐶⟩ ∈ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝜃))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦,𝑧,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵,𝑦,𝑧   𝑥,𝐶,𝑦,𝑧   𝜃,𝑥,𝑦,𝑧

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧)   𝜓(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧)   𝜒(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧)   𝑉(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧)   𝑊(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧)   𝑋(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧)

Proof of Theorem eloprabg

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		eloprabg.1	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
2		eloprabg.2	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))
3		eloprabg.3	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐶 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃))
4	1, 2, 3	syl3an9b 1300	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 = 𝐶) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃))
5	4	eloprabga 5929	1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) → (⟨⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩, 𝐶⟩ ∈ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝜃))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 104   ∧ w3a 968   = wceq 1343   ∈ wcel 2136  ⟨cop 3579  {coprab 5843

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-io 699  ax-5 1435  ax-7 1436  ax-gen 1437  ax-ie1 1481  ax-ie2 1482  ax-8 1492  ax-10 1493  ax-11 1494  ax-i12 1495  ax-bndl 1497  ax-4 1498  ax-17 1514  ax-i9 1518  ax-ial 1522  ax-i5r 1523  ax-14 2139  ax-ext 2147  ax-sep 4100  ax-pow 4153  ax-pr 4187

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-3an 970  df-tru 1346  df-nf 1449  df-sb 1751  df-clab 2152  df-cleq 2158  df-clel 2161  df-nfc 2297  df-v 2728  df-un 3120  df-in 3122  df-ss 3129  df-pw 3561  df-sn 3582  df-pr 3583  df-op 3585  df-oprab 5846

This theorem is referenced by:  ov  5961  ovg  5980