Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > eloprabg | GIF version |
Description: The law of concretion for operation class abstraction. Compare elopab 4218. (Contributed by NM, 14-Sep-1999.) (Revised by David Abernethy, 19-Jun-2012.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
eloprabg.1 | ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) |
eloprabg.2 | ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) |
eloprabg.3 | ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐶 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
eloprabg | ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) → (〈〈𝐴, 𝐵〉, 𝐶〉 ∈ {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝜃)) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | eloprabg.1 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) | |
2 | eloprabg.2 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) | |
3 | eloprabg.3 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐶 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)) | |
4 | 1, 2, 3 | syl3an9b 1292 | . 2 ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 = 𝐶) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃)) |
5 | 4 | eloprabga 5905 | 1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) → (〈〈𝐴, 𝐵〉, 𝐶〉 ∈ {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝜃)) |
Colors of variables: wff set class |
Syntax hints: → wi 4 ↔ wb 104 ∧ w3a 963 = wceq 1335 ∈ wcel 2128 〈cop 3563 {coprab 5822 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-ia1 105 ax-ia2 106 ax-ia3 107 ax-io 699 ax-5 1427 ax-7 1428 ax-gen 1429 ax-ie1 1473 ax-ie2 1474 ax-8 1484 ax-10 1485 ax-11 1486 ax-i12 1487 ax-bndl 1489 ax-4 1490 ax-17 1506 ax-i9 1510 ax-ial 1514 ax-i5r 1515 ax-14 2131 ax-ext 2139 ax-sep 4082 ax-pow 4135 ax-pr 4169 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 116 df-3an 965 df-tru 1338 df-nf 1441 df-sb 1743 df-clab 2144 df-cleq 2150 df-clel 2153 df-nfc 2288 df-v 2714 df-un 3106 df-in 3108 df-ss 3115 df-pw 3545 df-sn 3566 df-pr 3567 df-op 3569 df-oprab 5825 |
This theorem is referenced by: ov 5937 ovg 5956 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |