ILE Home Intuitionistic Logic Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  ILE Home  >  Th. List  >  ov GIF version

Theorem ov 5883
Description: The value of an operation class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 16-May-1995.) (Revised by David Abernethy, 19-Jun-2012.)
Hypotheses
Ref Expression
ov.1 𝐶 ∈ V
ov.2 (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑𝜓))
ov.3 (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (𝜓𝜒))
ov.4 (𝑧 = 𝐶 → (𝜒𝜃))
ov.5 ((𝑥𝑅𝑦𝑆) → ∃!𝑧𝜑)
ov.6 𝐹 = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝑥𝑅𝑦𝑆) ∧ 𝜑)}
Assertion
Ref Expression
ov ((𝐴𝑅𝐵𝑆) → ((𝐴𝐹𝐵) = 𝐶𝜃))
Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦,𝑧,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵,𝑦,𝑧   𝑥,𝐶,𝑦,𝑧   𝑥,𝑅,𝑦,𝑧   𝑥,𝑆,𝑦,𝑧   𝜃,𝑥,𝑦,𝑧
Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧)   𝜓(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧)   𝜒(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧)   𝐹(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧)

Proof of Theorem ov
StepHypRef Expression
1 df-ov 5770 . . . . 5 (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = (𝐹‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩)
2 ov.6 . . . . . 6 𝐹 = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝑥𝑅𝑦𝑆) ∧ 𝜑)}
32fveq1i 5415 . . . . 5 (𝐹‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩) = ({⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝑥𝑅𝑦𝑆) ∧ 𝜑)}‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩)
41, 3eqtri 2158 . . . 4 (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = ({⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝑥𝑅𝑦𝑆) ∧ 𝜑)}‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩)
54eqeq1i 2145 . . 3 ((𝐴𝐹𝐵) = 𝐶 ↔ ({⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝑥𝑅𝑦𝑆) ∧ 𝜑)}‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩) = 𝐶)
6 ov.5 . . . . . 6 ((𝑥𝑅𝑦𝑆) → ∃!𝑧𝜑)
76fnoprab 5867 . . . . 5 {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝑥𝑅𝑦𝑆) ∧ 𝜑)} Fn {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥𝑅𝑦𝑆)}
8 eleq1 2200 . . . . . . . 8 (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝑥𝑅𝐴𝑅))
98anbi1d 460 . . . . . . 7 (𝑥 = 𝐴 → ((𝑥𝑅𝑦𝑆) ↔ (𝐴𝑅𝑦𝑆)))
10 eleq1 2200 . . . . . . . 8 (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (𝑦𝑆𝐵𝑆))
1110anbi2d 459 . . . . . . 7 (𝑦 = 𝐵 → ((𝐴𝑅𝑦𝑆) ↔ (𝐴𝑅𝐵𝑆)))
129, 11opelopabg 4185 . . . . . 6 ((𝐴𝑅𝐵𝑆) → (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥𝑅𝑦𝑆)} ↔ (𝐴𝑅𝐵𝑆)))
1312ibir 176 . . . . 5 ((𝐴𝑅𝐵𝑆) → ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥𝑅𝑦𝑆)})
14 fnopfvb 5456 . . . . 5 (({⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝑥𝑅𝑦𝑆) ∧ 𝜑)} Fn {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥𝑅𝑦𝑆)} ∧ ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥𝑅𝑦𝑆)}) → (({⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝑥𝑅𝑦𝑆) ∧ 𝜑)}‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩) = 𝐶 ↔ ⟨⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩, 𝐶⟩ ∈ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝑥𝑅𝑦𝑆) ∧ 𝜑)}))
157, 13, 14sylancr 410 . . . 4 ((𝐴𝑅𝐵𝑆) → (({⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝑥𝑅𝑦𝑆) ∧ 𝜑)}‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩) = 𝐶 ↔ ⟨⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩, 𝐶⟩ ∈ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝑥𝑅𝑦𝑆) ∧ 𝜑)}))
16 ov.1 . . . . 5 𝐶 ∈ V
17 ov.2 . . . . . . 7 (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑𝜓))
189, 17anbi12d 464 . . . . . 6 (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (((𝑥𝑅𝑦𝑆) ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ((𝐴𝑅𝑦𝑆) ∧ 𝜓)))
19 ov.3 . . . . . . 7 (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (𝜓𝜒))
2011, 19anbi12d 464 . . . . . 6 (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (((𝐴𝑅𝑦𝑆) ∧ 𝜓) ↔ ((𝐴𝑅𝐵𝑆) ∧ 𝜒)))
21 ov.4 . . . . . . 7 (𝑧 = 𝐶 → (𝜒𝜃))
2221anbi2d 459 . . . . . 6 (𝑧 = 𝐶 → (((𝐴𝑅𝐵𝑆) ∧ 𝜒) ↔ ((𝐴𝑅𝐵𝑆) ∧ 𝜃)))
2318, 20, 22eloprabg 5852 . . . . 5 ((𝐴𝑅𝐵𝑆𝐶 ∈ V) → (⟨⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩, 𝐶⟩ ∈ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝑥𝑅𝑦𝑆) ∧ 𝜑)} ↔ ((𝐴𝑅𝐵𝑆) ∧ 𝜃)))
2416, 23mp3an3 1304 . . . 4 ((𝐴𝑅𝐵𝑆) → (⟨⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩, 𝐶⟩ ∈ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝑥𝑅𝑦𝑆) ∧ 𝜑)} ↔ ((𝐴𝑅𝐵𝑆) ∧ 𝜃)))
2515, 24bitrd 187 . . 3 ((𝐴𝑅𝐵𝑆) → (({⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝑥𝑅𝑦𝑆) ∧ 𝜑)}‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩) = 𝐶 ↔ ((𝐴𝑅𝐵𝑆) ∧ 𝜃)))
265, 25syl5bb 191 . 2 ((𝐴𝑅𝐵𝑆) → ((𝐴𝐹𝐵) = 𝐶 ↔ ((𝐴𝑅𝐵𝑆) ∧ 𝜃)))
2726bianabs 600 1 ((𝐴𝑅𝐵𝑆) → ((𝐴𝐹𝐵) = 𝐶𝜃))
Colors of variables: wff set class
Syntax hints:  wi 4  wa 103  wb 104   = wceq 1331  wcel 1480  ∃!weu 1997  Vcvv 2681  cop 3525  {copab 3983   Fn wfn 5113  cfv 5118  (class class class)co 5767  {coprab 5768
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-io 698  ax-5 1423  ax-7 1424  ax-gen 1425  ax-ie1 1469  ax-ie2 1470  ax-8 1482  ax-10 1483  ax-11 1484  ax-i12 1485  ax-bndl 1486  ax-4 1487  ax-14 1492  ax-17 1506  ax-i9 1510  ax-ial 1514  ax-i5r 1515  ax-ext 2119  ax-sep 4041  ax-pow 4093  ax-pr 4126
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-3an 964  df-tru 1334  df-nf 1437  df-sb 1736  df-eu 2000  df-mo 2001  df-clab 2124  df-cleq 2130  df-clel 2133  df-nfc 2268  df-ral 2419  df-rex 2420  df-v 2683  df-sbc 2905  df-un 3070  df-in 3072  df-ss 3079  df-pw 3507  df-sn 3528  df-pr 3529  df-op 3531  df-uni 3732  df-br 3925  df-opab 3985  df-id 4210  df-xp 4540  df-rel 4541  df-cnv 4542  df-co 4543  df-dm 4544  df-iota 5083  df-fun 5120  df-fn 5121  df-fv 5126  df-ov 5770  df-oprab 5771
This theorem is referenced by: (None)
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator