ILE Home Intuitionistic Logic Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  ILE Home  >  Th. List  >  ov GIF version

Theorem ov 6072
Description: The value of an operation class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 16-May-1995.) (Revised by David Abernethy, 19-Jun-2012.)
Hypotheses
Ref Expression
ov.1 𝐶 ∈ V
ov.2 (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑𝜓))
ov.3 (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (𝜓𝜒))
ov.4 (𝑧 = 𝐶 → (𝜒𝜃))
ov.5 ((𝑥𝑅𝑦𝑆) → ∃!𝑧𝜑)
ov.6 𝐹 = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝑥𝑅𝑦𝑆) ∧ 𝜑)}
Assertion
Ref Expression
ov ((𝐴𝑅𝐵𝑆) → ((𝐴𝐹𝐵) = 𝐶𝜃))
Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦,𝑧,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵,𝑦,𝑧   𝑥,𝐶,𝑦,𝑧   𝑥,𝑅,𝑦,𝑧   𝑥,𝑆,𝑦,𝑧   𝜃,𝑥,𝑦,𝑧
Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧)   𝜓(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧)   𝜒(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧)   𝐹(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧)

Proof of Theorem ov
StepHypRef Expression
1 df-ov 5954 . . . . 5 (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = (𝐹‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩)
2 ov.6 . . . . . 6 𝐹 = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝑥𝑅𝑦𝑆) ∧ 𝜑)}
32fveq1i 5584 . . . . 5 (𝐹‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩) = ({⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝑥𝑅𝑦𝑆) ∧ 𝜑)}‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩)
41, 3eqtri 2227 . . . 4 (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = ({⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝑥𝑅𝑦𝑆) ∧ 𝜑)}‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩)
54eqeq1i 2214 . . 3 ((𝐴𝐹𝐵) = 𝐶 ↔ ({⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝑥𝑅𝑦𝑆) ∧ 𝜑)}‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩) = 𝐶)
6 ov.5 . . . . . 6 ((𝑥𝑅𝑦𝑆) → ∃!𝑧𝜑)
76fnoprab 6055 . . . . 5 {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝑥𝑅𝑦𝑆) ∧ 𝜑)} Fn {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥𝑅𝑦𝑆)}
8 eleq1 2269 . . . . . . . 8 (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝑥𝑅𝐴𝑅))
98anbi1d 465 . . . . . . 7 (𝑥 = 𝐴 → ((𝑥𝑅𝑦𝑆) ↔ (𝐴𝑅𝑦𝑆)))
10 eleq1 2269 . . . . . . . 8 (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (𝑦𝑆𝐵𝑆))
1110anbi2d 464 . . . . . . 7 (𝑦 = 𝐵 → ((𝐴𝑅𝑦𝑆) ↔ (𝐴𝑅𝐵𝑆)))
129, 11opelopabg 4318 . . . . . 6 ((𝐴𝑅𝐵𝑆) → (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥𝑅𝑦𝑆)} ↔ (𝐴𝑅𝐵𝑆)))
1312ibir 177 . . . . 5 ((𝐴𝑅𝐵𝑆) → ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥𝑅𝑦𝑆)})
14 fnopfvb 5627 . . . . 5 (({⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝑥𝑅𝑦𝑆) ∧ 𝜑)} Fn {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥𝑅𝑦𝑆)} ∧ ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥𝑅𝑦𝑆)}) → (({⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝑥𝑅𝑦𝑆) ∧ 𝜑)}‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩) = 𝐶 ↔ ⟨⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩, 𝐶⟩ ∈ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝑥𝑅𝑦𝑆) ∧ 𝜑)}))
157, 13, 14sylancr 414 . . . 4 ((𝐴𝑅𝐵𝑆) → (({⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝑥𝑅𝑦𝑆) ∧ 𝜑)}‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩) = 𝐶 ↔ ⟨⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩, 𝐶⟩ ∈ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝑥𝑅𝑦𝑆) ∧ 𝜑)}))
16 ov.1 . . . . 5 𝐶 ∈ V
17 ov.2 . . . . . . 7 (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑𝜓))
189, 17anbi12d 473 . . . . . 6 (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (((𝑥𝑅𝑦𝑆) ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ((𝐴𝑅𝑦𝑆) ∧ 𝜓)))
19 ov.3 . . . . . . 7 (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (𝜓𝜒))
2011, 19anbi12d 473 . . . . . 6 (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (((𝐴𝑅𝑦𝑆) ∧ 𝜓) ↔ ((𝐴𝑅𝐵𝑆) ∧ 𝜒)))
21 ov.4 . . . . . . 7 (𝑧 = 𝐶 → (𝜒𝜃))
2221anbi2d 464 . . . . . 6 (𝑧 = 𝐶 → (((𝐴𝑅𝐵𝑆) ∧ 𝜒) ↔ ((𝐴𝑅𝐵𝑆) ∧ 𝜃)))
2318, 20, 22eloprabg 6040 . . . . 5 ((𝐴𝑅𝐵𝑆𝐶 ∈ V) → (⟨⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩, 𝐶⟩ ∈ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝑥𝑅𝑦𝑆) ∧ 𝜑)} ↔ ((𝐴𝑅𝐵𝑆) ∧ 𝜃)))
2416, 23mp3an3 1339 . . . 4 ((𝐴𝑅𝐵𝑆) → (⟨⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩, 𝐶⟩ ∈ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝑥𝑅𝑦𝑆) ∧ 𝜑)} ↔ ((𝐴𝑅𝐵𝑆) ∧ 𝜃)))
2515, 24bitrd 188 . . 3 ((𝐴𝑅𝐵𝑆) → (({⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝑥𝑅𝑦𝑆) ∧ 𝜑)}‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩) = 𝐶 ↔ ((𝐴𝑅𝐵𝑆) ∧ 𝜃)))
265, 25bitrid 192 . 2 ((𝐴𝑅𝐵𝑆) → ((𝐴𝐹𝐵) = 𝐶 ↔ ((𝐴𝑅𝐵𝑆) ∧ 𝜃)))
2726bianabs 611 1 ((𝐴𝑅𝐵𝑆) → ((𝐴𝐹𝐵) = 𝐶𝜃))
Colors of variables: wff set class
Syntax hints:  wi 4  wa 104  wb 105   = wceq 1373  ∃!weu 2055  wcel 2177  Vcvv 2773  cop 3637  {copab 4108   Fn wfn 5271  cfv 5276  (class class class)co 5951  {coprab 5952
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 711  ax-5 1471  ax-7 1472  ax-gen 1473  ax-ie1 1517  ax-ie2 1518  ax-8 1528  ax-10 1529  ax-11 1530  ax-i12 1531  ax-bndl 1533  ax-4 1534  ax-17 1550  ax-i9 1554  ax-ial 1558  ax-i5r 1559  ax-14 2180  ax-ext 2188  ax-sep 4166  ax-pow 4222  ax-pr 4257
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3an 983  df-tru 1376  df-nf 1485  df-sb 1787  df-eu 2058  df-mo 2059  df-clab 2193  df-cleq 2199  df-clel 2202  df-nfc 2338  df-ral 2490  df-rex 2491  df-v 2775  df-sbc 3000  df-un 3171  df-in 3173  df-ss 3180  df-pw 3619  df-sn 3640  df-pr 3641  df-op 3643  df-uni 3853  df-br 4048  df-opab 4110  df-id 4344  df-xp 4685  df-rel 4686  df-cnv 4687  df-co 4688  df-dm 4689  df-iota 5237  df-fun 5278  df-fn 5279  df-fv 5284  df-ov 5954  df-oprab 5955
This theorem is referenced by: (None)
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator