ILE Home Intuitionistic Logic Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  ILE Home  >  Th. List  >  elxpi GIF version

Theorem elxpi 4429
Description: Membership in a cross product. Uses fewer axioms than elxp 4430. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jul-1994.)
Assertion
Ref Expression
elxpi (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 × 𝐶) → ∃𝑥𝑦(𝐴 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑥𝐵𝑦𝐶)))
Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵,𝑦   𝑥,𝐶,𝑦

Proof of Theorem elxpi
Dummy variable 𝑧 is distinct from all other variables.
StepHypRef Expression
1 eqeq1 2091 . . . . . 6 (𝑧 = 𝐴 → (𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ↔ 𝐴 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩))
21anbi1d 453 . . . . 5 (𝑧 = 𝐴 → ((𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑥𝐵𝑦𝐶)) ↔ (𝐴 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑥𝐵𝑦𝐶))))
322exbidv 1793 . . . 4 (𝑧 = 𝐴 → (∃𝑥𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑥𝐵𝑦𝐶)) ↔ ∃𝑥𝑦(𝐴 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑥𝐵𝑦𝐶))))
43elabg 2752 . . 3 (𝐴 ∈ {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑥𝐵𝑦𝐶))} → (𝐴 ∈ {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑥𝐵𝑦𝐶))} ↔ ∃𝑥𝑦(𝐴 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑥𝐵𝑦𝐶))))
54ibi 174 . 2 (𝐴 ∈ {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑥𝐵𝑦𝐶))} → ∃𝑥𝑦(𝐴 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑥𝐵𝑦𝐶)))
6 df-xp 4419 . . 3 (𝐵 × 𝐶) = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥𝐵𝑦𝐶)}
7 df-opab 3877 . . 3 {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥𝐵𝑦𝐶)} = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑥𝐵𝑦𝐶))}
86, 7eqtri 2105 . 2 (𝐵 × 𝐶) = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑥𝐵𝑦𝐶))}
95, 8eleq2s 2179 1 (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 × 𝐶) → ∃𝑥𝑦(𝐴 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑥𝐵𝑦𝐶)))
Colors of variables: wff set class
Syntax hints:  wi 4  wa 102   = wceq 1287  wex 1424  wcel 1436  {cab 2071  cop 3434  {copab 3875   × cxp 4411
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 104  ax-ia2 105  ax-ia3 106  ax-io 663  ax-5 1379  ax-7 1380  ax-gen 1381  ax-ie1 1425  ax-ie2 1426  ax-8 1438  ax-10 1439  ax-11 1440  ax-i12 1441  ax-bndl 1442  ax-4 1443  ax-17 1462  ax-i9 1466  ax-ial 1470  ax-i5r 1471  ax-ext 2067
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 115  df-tru 1290  df-nf 1393  df-sb 1690  df-clab 2072  df-cleq 2078  df-clel 2081  df-nfc 2214  df-v 2617  df-opab 3877  df-xp 4419
This theorem is referenced by:  xpsspw  4520  dmaddpqlem  6883  nqpi  6884  enq0ref  6939  nqnq0  6947  nq0nn  6948  axaddcl  7348  axmulcl  7350
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator