| Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > imbrov2fvoveq | GIF version | ||
| Description: Equality theorem for nested function and operation value in an implication for a binary relation. Technical theorem to be used to reduce the size of a significant number of proofs. (Contributed by AV, 17-Aug-2022.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| imbrov2fvoveq.1 | ⊢ (𝑋 = 𝑌 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| imbrov2fvoveq | ⊢ (𝑋 = 𝑌 → ((𝜑 → (𝐹‘((𝐺‘𝑋) · 𝑂))𝑅𝐴) ↔ (𝜓 → (𝐹‘((𝐺‘𝑌) · 𝑂))𝑅𝐴))) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | imbrov2fvoveq.1 | . 2 ⊢ (𝑋 = 𝑌 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) | |
| 2 | fveq2 5639 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝑋 = 𝑌 → (𝐺‘𝑋) = (𝐺‘𝑌)) | |
| 3 | 2 | fvoveq1d 6039 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝑋 = 𝑌 → (𝐹‘((𝐺‘𝑋) · 𝑂)) = (𝐹‘((𝐺‘𝑌) · 𝑂))) |
| 4 | 3 | breq1d 4098 | . 2 ⊢ (𝑋 = 𝑌 → ((𝐹‘((𝐺‘𝑋) · 𝑂))𝑅𝐴 ↔ (𝐹‘((𝐺‘𝑌) · 𝑂))𝑅𝐴)) |
| 5 | 1, 4 | imbi12d 234 | 1 ⊢ (𝑋 = 𝑌 → ((𝜑 → (𝐹‘((𝐺‘𝑋) · 𝑂))𝑅𝐴) ↔ (𝜓 → (𝐹‘((𝐺‘𝑌) · 𝑂))𝑅𝐴))) |
| Colors of variables: wff set class |
| Syntax hints: → wi 4 ↔ wb 105 = wceq 1397 class class class wbr 4088 ‘cfv 5326 (class class class)co 6017 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-ia1 106 ax-ia2 107 ax-ia3 108 ax-io 716 ax-5 1495 ax-7 1496 ax-gen 1497 ax-ie1 1541 ax-ie2 1542 ax-8 1552 ax-10 1553 ax-11 1554 ax-i12 1555 ax-bndl 1557 ax-4 1558 ax-17 1574 ax-i9 1578 ax-ial 1582 ax-i5r 1583 ax-ext 2213 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 117 df-3an 1006 df-tru 1400 df-nf 1509 df-sb 1811 df-clab 2218 df-cleq 2224 df-clel 2227 df-nfc 2363 df-rex 2516 df-v 2804 df-un 3204 df-sn 3675 df-pr 3676 df-op 3678 df-uni 3894 df-br 4089 df-iota 5286 df-fv 5334 df-ov 6020 |
| This theorem is referenced by: cncfco 15314 mulcncflem 15330 ivthinclemlopn 15359 ivthinclemuopn 15361 limcimolemlt 15387 eflt 15498 |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |