![]() |
Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
|
Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > imbrov2fvoveq | GIF version |
Description: Equality theorem for nested function and operation value in an implication for a binary relation. Technical theorem to be used to reduce the size of a significant number of proofs. (Contributed by AV, 17-Aug-2022.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
imbrov2fvoveq.1 | ⊢ (𝑋 = 𝑌 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
imbrov2fvoveq | ⊢ (𝑋 = 𝑌 → ((𝜑 → (𝐹‘((𝐺‘𝑋) · 𝑂))𝑅𝐴) ↔ (𝜓 → (𝐹‘((𝐺‘𝑌) · 𝑂))𝑅𝐴))) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | imbrov2fvoveq.1 | . 2 ⊢ (𝑋 = 𝑌 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) | |
2 | fveq2 5534 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝑋 = 𝑌 → (𝐺‘𝑋) = (𝐺‘𝑌)) | |
3 | 2 | fvoveq1d 5919 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝑋 = 𝑌 → (𝐹‘((𝐺‘𝑋) · 𝑂)) = (𝐹‘((𝐺‘𝑌) · 𝑂))) |
4 | 3 | breq1d 4028 | . 2 ⊢ (𝑋 = 𝑌 → ((𝐹‘((𝐺‘𝑋) · 𝑂))𝑅𝐴 ↔ (𝐹‘((𝐺‘𝑌) · 𝑂))𝑅𝐴)) |
5 | 1, 4 | imbi12d 234 | 1 ⊢ (𝑋 = 𝑌 → ((𝜑 → (𝐹‘((𝐺‘𝑋) · 𝑂))𝑅𝐴) ↔ (𝜓 → (𝐹‘((𝐺‘𝑌) · 𝑂))𝑅𝐴))) |
Colors of variables: wff set class |
Syntax hints: → wi 4 ↔ wb 105 = wceq 1364 class class class wbr 4018 ‘cfv 5235 (class class class)co 5897 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-ia1 106 ax-ia2 107 ax-ia3 108 ax-io 710 ax-5 1458 ax-7 1459 ax-gen 1460 ax-ie1 1504 ax-ie2 1505 ax-8 1515 ax-10 1516 ax-11 1517 ax-i12 1518 ax-bndl 1520 ax-4 1521 ax-17 1537 ax-i9 1541 ax-ial 1545 ax-i5r 1546 ax-ext 2171 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 117 df-3an 982 df-tru 1367 df-nf 1472 df-sb 1774 df-clab 2176 df-cleq 2182 df-clel 2185 df-nfc 2321 df-rex 2474 df-v 2754 df-un 3148 df-sn 3613 df-pr 3614 df-op 3616 df-uni 3825 df-br 4019 df-iota 5196 df-fv 5243 df-ov 5900 |
This theorem is referenced by: cncfco 14555 mulcncflem 14567 ivthinclemlopn 14591 ivthinclemuopn 14593 limcimolemlt 14610 eflt 14673 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |