| Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > imbrov2fvoveq | GIF version | ||
| Description: Equality theorem for nested function and operation value in an implication for a binary relation. Technical theorem to be used to reduce the size of a significant number of proofs. (Contributed by AV, 17-Aug-2022.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| imbrov2fvoveq.1 | ⊢ (𝑋 = 𝑌 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| imbrov2fvoveq | ⊢ (𝑋 = 𝑌 → ((𝜑 → (𝐹‘((𝐺‘𝑋) · 𝑂))𝑅𝐴) ↔ (𝜓 → (𝐹‘((𝐺‘𝑌) · 𝑂))𝑅𝐴))) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | imbrov2fvoveq.1 | . 2 ⊢ (𝑋 = 𝑌 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) | |
| 2 | fveq2 5626 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝑋 = 𝑌 → (𝐺‘𝑋) = (𝐺‘𝑌)) | |
| 3 | 2 | fvoveq1d 6022 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝑋 = 𝑌 → (𝐹‘((𝐺‘𝑋) · 𝑂)) = (𝐹‘((𝐺‘𝑌) · 𝑂))) |
| 4 | 3 | breq1d 4092 | . 2 ⊢ (𝑋 = 𝑌 → ((𝐹‘((𝐺‘𝑋) · 𝑂))𝑅𝐴 ↔ (𝐹‘((𝐺‘𝑌) · 𝑂))𝑅𝐴)) |
| 5 | 1, 4 | imbi12d 234 | 1 ⊢ (𝑋 = 𝑌 → ((𝜑 → (𝐹‘((𝐺‘𝑋) · 𝑂))𝑅𝐴) ↔ (𝜓 → (𝐹‘((𝐺‘𝑌) · 𝑂))𝑅𝐴))) |
| Colors of variables: wff set class |
| Syntax hints: → wi 4 ↔ wb 105 = wceq 1395 class class class wbr 4082 ‘cfv 5317 (class class class)co 6000 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-ia1 106 ax-ia2 107 ax-ia3 108 ax-io 714 ax-5 1493 ax-7 1494 ax-gen 1495 ax-ie1 1539 ax-ie2 1540 ax-8 1550 ax-10 1551 ax-11 1552 ax-i12 1553 ax-bndl 1555 ax-4 1556 ax-17 1572 ax-i9 1576 ax-ial 1580 ax-i5r 1581 ax-ext 2211 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 117 df-3an 1004 df-tru 1398 df-nf 1507 df-sb 1809 df-clab 2216 df-cleq 2222 df-clel 2225 df-nfc 2361 df-rex 2514 df-v 2801 df-un 3201 df-sn 3672 df-pr 3673 df-op 3675 df-uni 3888 df-br 4083 df-iota 5277 df-fv 5325 df-ov 6003 |
| This theorem is referenced by: cncfco 15259 mulcncflem 15275 ivthinclemlopn 15304 ivthinclemuopn 15306 limcimolemlt 15332 eflt 15443 |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |