| Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > imbrov2fvoveq | GIF version | ||
| Description: Equality theorem for nested function and operation value in an implication for a binary relation. Technical theorem to be used to reduce the size of a significant number of proofs. (Contributed by AV, 17-Aug-2022.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| imbrov2fvoveq.1 | ⊢ (𝑋 = 𝑌 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| imbrov2fvoveq | ⊢ (𝑋 = 𝑌 → ((𝜑 → (𝐹‘((𝐺‘𝑋) · 𝑂))𝑅𝐴) ↔ (𝜓 → (𝐹‘((𝐺‘𝑌) · 𝑂))𝑅𝐴))) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | imbrov2fvoveq.1 | . 2 ⊢ (𝑋 = 𝑌 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) | |
| 2 | fveq2 5558 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝑋 = 𝑌 → (𝐺‘𝑋) = (𝐺‘𝑌)) | |
| 3 | 2 | fvoveq1d 5944 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝑋 = 𝑌 → (𝐹‘((𝐺‘𝑋) · 𝑂)) = (𝐹‘((𝐺‘𝑌) · 𝑂))) |
| 4 | 3 | breq1d 4043 | . 2 ⊢ (𝑋 = 𝑌 → ((𝐹‘((𝐺‘𝑋) · 𝑂))𝑅𝐴 ↔ (𝐹‘((𝐺‘𝑌) · 𝑂))𝑅𝐴)) |
| 5 | 1, 4 | imbi12d 234 | 1 ⊢ (𝑋 = 𝑌 → ((𝜑 → (𝐹‘((𝐺‘𝑋) · 𝑂))𝑅𝐴) ↔ (𝜓 → (𝐹‘((𝐺‘𝑌) · 𝑂))𝑅𝐴))) |
| Colors of variables: wff set class |
| Syntax hints: → wi 4 ↔ wb 105 = wceq 1364 class class class wbr 4033 ‘cfv 5258 (class class class)co 5922 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-ia1 106 ax-ia2 107 ax-ia3 108 ax-io 710 ax-5 1461 ax-7 1462 ax-gen 1463 ax-ie1 1507 ax-ie2 1508 ax-8 1518 ax-10 1519 ax-11 1520 ax-i12 1521 ax-bndl 1523 ax-4 1524 ax-17 1540 ax-i9 1544 ax-ial 1548 ax-i5r 1549 ax-ext 2178 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 117 df-3an 982 df-tru 1367 df-nf 1475 df-sb 1777 df-clab 2183 df-cleq 2189 df-clel 2192 df-nfc 2328 df-rex 2481 df-v 2765 df-un 3161 df-sn 3628 df-pr 3629 df-op 3631 df-uni 3840 df-br 4034 df-iota 5219 df-fv 5266 df-ov 5925 |
| This theorem is referenced by: cncfco 14827 mulcncflem 14843 ivthinclemlopn 14872 ivthinclemuopn 14874 limcimolemlt 14900 eflt 15011 |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |