Theorem unssd 3176

Description: A deduction showing the union of two subclasses is a subclass. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
unssd.1	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶)
unssd.2	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
unssd	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ⊆ 𝐶)

Proof of Theorem unssd

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		unssd.1	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶)
2		unssd.2	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶)
3		unss 3174	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶) ↔ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ⊆ 𝐶)
4	3	biimpi 118	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶) → (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ⊆ 𝐶)
5	1, 2, 4	syl2anc 403	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ⊆ 𝐶)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 102   ∪ cun 2997   ⊆ wss 2999

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 104  ax-ia2 105  ax-ia3 106  ax-io 665  ax-5 1381  ax-7 1382  ax-gen 1383  ax-ie1 1427  ax-ie2 1428  ax-8 1440  ax-10 1441  ax-11 1442  ax-i12 1443  ax-bndl 1444  ax-4 1445  ax-17 1464  ax-i9 1468  ax-ial 1472  ax-i5r 1473  ax-ext 2070

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 115  df-tru 1292  df-nf 1395  df-sb 1693  df-clab 2075  df-cleq 2081  df-clel 2084  df-nfc 2217  df-v 2621  df-un 3003  df-in 3005  df-ss 3012

This theorem is referenced by:  tpssi  3603  casef  6779  un0addcl  8706  un0mulcl  8707  fzosplit  9588  fzouzsplit  9590  strleund  11581  bj-omtrans  11851