Theorem casef 7172

Description: The "case" construction of two functions is a function on the disjoint union of their domains. (Contributed by BJ, 10-Jul-2022.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
casef.f	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝑋)
casef.g	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐵⟶𝑋)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
casef	⊢ (𝜑 → case(𝐹, 𝐺):(𝐴 ⊔ 𝐵)⟶𝑋)

Proof of Theorem casef

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		casef.f	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝑋)
2		ffun 5422	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴⟶𝑋 → Fun 𝐹)
3	1, 2	syl 14	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun 𝐹)
4		casef.g	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐵⟶𝑋)
5		ffun 5422	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐺:𝐵⟶𝑋 → Fun 𝐺)
6	4, 5	syl 14	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun 𝐺)
7	3, 6	casefun 7169	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun case(𝐹, 𝐺))
8		caserel 7171	. . . 4 ⊢ case(𝐹, 𝐺) ⊆ ((dom 𝐹 ⊔ dom 𝐺) × (ran 𝐹 ∪ ran 𝐺))
9		ssid 3212	. . . . 5 ⊢ (dom 𝐹 ⊔ dom 𝐺) ⊆ (dom 𝐹 ⊔ dom 𝐺)
10		frn 5428	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴⟶𝑋 → ran 𝐹 ⊆ 𝑋)
11	1, 10	syl 14	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → ran 𝐹 ⊆ 𝑋)
12		frn 5428	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐺:𝐵⟶𝑋 → ran 𝐺 ⊆ 𝑋)
13	4, 12	syl 14	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → ran 𝐺 ⊆ 𝑋)
14	11, 13	unssd 3348	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → (ran 𝐹 ∪ ran 𝐺) ⊆ 𝑋)
15		xpss12 4780	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((dom 𝐹 ⊔ dom 𝐺) ⊆ (dom 𝐹 ⊔ dom 𝐺) ∧ (ran 𝐹 ∪ ran 𝐺) ⊆ 𝑋) → ((dom 𝐹 ⊔ dom 𝐺) × (ran 𝐹 ∪ ran 𝐺)) ⊆ ((dom 𝐹 ⊔ dom 𝐺) × 𝑋))
16	9, 14, 15	sylancr 414	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((dom 𝐹 ⊔ dom 𝐺) × (ran 𝐹 ∪ ran 𝐺)) ⊆ ((dom 𝐹 ⊔ dom 𝐺) × 𝑋))
17	8, 16	sstrid 3203	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → case(𝐹, 𝐺) ⊆ ((dom 𝐹 ⊔ dom 𝐺) × 𝑋))
18		funssxp 5439	. . . 4 ⊢ ((Fun case(𝐹, 𝐺) ∧ case(𝐹, 𝐺) ⊆ ((dom 𝐹 ⊔ dom 𝐺) × 𝑋)) ↔ (case(𝐹, 𝐺):dom case(𝐹, 𝐺)⟶𝑋 ∧ dom case(𝐹, 𝐺) ⊆ (dom 𝐹 ⊔ dom 𝐺)))
19	18	simplbi 274	. . 3 ⊢ ((Fun case(𝐹, 𝐺) ∧ case(𝐹, 𝐺) ⊆ ((dom 𝐹 ⊔ dom 𝐺) × 𝑋)) → case(𝐹, 𝐺):dom case(𝐹, 𝐺)⟶𝑋)
20	7, 17, 19	syl2anc 411	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → case(𝐹, 𝐺):dom case(𝐹, 𝐺)⟶𝑋)
21		casedm 7170	. . . 4 ⊢ dom case(𝐹, 𝐺) = (dom 𝐹 ⊔ dom 𝐺)
22		fdm 5425	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴⟶𝑋 → dom 𝐹 = 𝐴)
23	1, 22	syl 14	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → dom 𝐹 = 𝐴)
24		fdm 5425	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐺:𝐵⟶𝑋 → dom 𝐺 = 𝐵)
25	4, 24	syl 14	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → dom 𝐺 = 𝐵)
26		djueq12 7123	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((dom 𝐹 = 𝐴 ∧ dom 𝐺 = 𝐵) → (dom 𝐹 ⊔ dom 𝐺) = (𝐴 ⊔ 𝐵))
27	23, 25, 26	syl2anc 411	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (dom 𝐹 ⊔ dom 𝐺) = (𝐴 ⊔ 𝐵))
28	21, 27	eqtrid 2249	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → dom case(𝐹, 𝐺) = (𝐴 ⊔ 𝐵))
29	28	feq2d 5407	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (case(𝐹, 𝐺):dom case(𝐹, 𝐺)⟶𝑋 ↔ case(𝐹, 𝐺):(𝐴 ⊔ 𝐵)⟶𝑋))
30	20, 29	mpbid 147	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → case(𝐹, 𝐺):(𝐴 ⊔ 𝐵)⟶𝑋)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 104   = wceq 1372   ∪ cun 3163   ⊆ wss 3165   × cxp 4671  dom cdm 4673  ran crn 4674  Fun wfun 5262  ⟶wf 5264   ⊔ cdju 7121  casecdjucase 7167

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 615  ax-in2 616  ax-io 710  ax-5 1469  ax-7 1470  ax-gen 1471  ax-ie1 1515  ax-ie2 1516  ax-8 1526  ax-10 1527  ax-11 1528  ax-i12 1529  ax-bndl 1531  ax-4 1532  ax-17 1548  ax-i9 1552  ax-ial 1556  ax-i5r 1557  ax-13 2177  ax-14 2178  ax-ext 2186  ax-sep 4161  ax-nul 4169  ax-pow 4217  ax-pr 4252  ax-un 4478

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3an 982  df-tru 1375  df-fal 1378  df-nf 1483  df-sb 1785  df-eu 2056  df-mo 2057  df-clab 2191  df-cleq 2197  df-clel 2200  df-nfc 2336  df-ne 2376  df-ral 2488  df-rex 2489  df-v 2773  df-sbc 2998  df-dif 3167  df-un 3169  df-in 3171  df-ss 3178  df-nul 3460  df-pw 3617  df-sn 3638  df-pr 3639  df-op 3641  df-uni 3850  df-br 4044  df-opab 4105  df-mpt 4106  df-tr 4142  df-id 4338  df-iord 4411  df-on 4413  df-suc 4416  df-xp 4679  df-rel 4680  df-cnv 4681  df-co 4682  df-dm 4683  df-rn 4684  df-res 4685  df-ima 4686  df-iota 5229  df-fun 5270  df-fn 5271  df-f 5272  df-f1 5273  df-fo 5274  df-f1o 5275  df-fv 5276  df-1st 6216  df-2nd 6217  df-1o 6492  df-dju 7122  df-inl 7131  df-inr 7132  df-case 7168

This theorem is referenced by:  casef1  7174  omp1eomlem  7178  ctm  7193