Theorem casef 7149

Description: The "case" construction of two functions is a function on the disjoint union of their domains. (Contributed by BJ, 10-Jul-2022.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
casef.f	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝑋)
casef.g	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐵⟶𝑋)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
casef	⊢ (𝜑 → case(𝐹, 𝐺):(𝐴 ⊔ 𝐵)⟶𝑋)

Proof of Theorem casef

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		casef.f	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝑋)
2		ffun 5407	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴⟶𝑋 → Fun 𝐹)
3	1, 2	syl 14	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun 𝐹)
4		casef.g	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐵⟶𝑋)
5		ffun 5407	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐺:𝐵⟶𝑋 → Fun 𝐺)
6	4, 5	syl 14	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun 𝐺)
7	3, 6	casefun 7146	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun case(𝐹, 𝐺))
8		caserel 7148	. . . 4 ⊢ case(𝐹, 𝐺) ⊆ ((dom 𝐹 ⊔ dom 𝐺) × (ran 𝐹 ∪ ran 𝐺))
9		ssid 3200	. . . . 5 ⊢ (dom 𝐹 ⊔ dom 𝐺) ⊆ (dom 𝐹 ⊔ dom 𝐺)
10		frn 5413	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴⟶𝑋 → ran 𝐹 ⊆ 𝑋)
11	1, 10	syl 14	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → ran 𝐹 ⊆ 𝑋)
12		frn 5413	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐺:𝐵⟶𝑋 → ran 𝐺 ⊆ 𝑋)
13	4, 12	syl 14	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → ran 𝐺 ⊆ 𝑋)
14	11, 13	unssd 3336	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → (ran 𝐹 ∪ ran 𝐺) ⊆ 𝑋)
15		xpss12 4767	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((dom 𝐹 ⊔ dom 𝐺) ⊆ (dom 𝐹 ⊔ dom 𝐺) ∧ (ran 𝐹 ∪ ran 𝐺) ⊆ 𝑋) → ((dom 𝐹 ⊔ dom 𝐺) × (ran 𝐹 ∪ ran 𝐺)) ⊆ ((dom 𝐹 ⊔ dom 𝐺) × 𝑋))
16	9, 14, 15	sylancr 414	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((dom 𝐹 ⊔ dom 𝐺) × (ran 𝐹 ∪ ran 𝐺)) ⊆ ((dom 𝐹 ⊔ dom 𝐺) × 𝑋))
17	8, 16	sstrid 3191	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → case(𝐹, 𝐺) ⊆ ((dom 𝐹 ⊔ dom 𝐺) × 𝑋))
18		funssxp 5424	. . . 4 ⊢ ((Fun case(𝐹, 𝐺) ∧ case(𝐹, 𝐺) ⊆ ((dom 𝐹 ⊔ dom 𝐺) × 𝑋)) ↔ (case(𝐹, 𝐺):dom case(𝐹, 𝐺)⟶𝑋 ∧ dom case(𝐹, 𝐺) ⊆ (dom 𝐹 ⊔ dom 𝐺)))
19	18	simplbi 274	. . 3 ⊢ ((Fun case(𝐹, 𝐺) ∧ case(𝐹, 𝐺) ⊆ ((dom 𝐹 ⊔ dom 𝐺) × 𝑋)) → case(𝐹, 𝐺):dom case(𝐹, 𝐺)⟶𝑋)
20	7, 17, 19	syl2anc 411	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → case(𝐹, 𝐺):dom case(𝐹, 𝐺)⟶𝑋)
21		casedm 7147	. . . 4 ⊢ dom case(𝐹, 𝐺) = (dom 𝐹 ⊔ dom 𝐺)
22		fdm 5410	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴⟶𝑋 → dom 𝐹 = 𝐴)
23	1, 22	syl 14	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → dom 𝐹 = 𝐴)
24		fdm 5410	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐺:𝐵⟶𝑋 → dom 𝐺 = 𝐵)
25	4, 24	syl 14	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → dom 𝐺 = 𝐵)
26		djueq12 7100	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((dom 𝐹 = 𝐴 ∧ dom 𝐺 = 𝐵) → (dom 𝐹 ⊔ dom 𝐺) = (𝐴 ⊔ 𝐵))
27	23, 25, 26	syl2anc 411	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (dom 𝐹 ⊔ dom 𝐺) = (𝐴 ⊔ 𝐵))
28	21, 27	eqtrid 2238	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → dom case(𝐹, 𝐺) = (𝐴 ⊔ 𝐵))
29	28	feq2d 5392	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (case(𝐹, 𝐺):dom case(𝐹, 𝐺)⟶𝑋 ↔ case(𝐹, 𝐺):(𝐴 ⊔ 𝐵)⟶𝑋))
30	20, 29	mpbid 147	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → case(𝐹, 𝐺):(𝐴 ⊔ 𝐵)⟶𝑋)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 104   = wceq 1364   ∪ cun 3152   ⊆ wss 3154   × cxp 4658  dom cdm 4660  ran crn 4661  Fun wfun 5249  ⟶wf 5251   ⊔ cdju 7098  casecdjucase 7144

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 615  ax-in2 616  ax-io 710  ax-5 1458  ax-7 1459  ax-gen 1460  ax-ie1 1504  ax-ie2 1505  ax-8 1515  ax-10 1516  ax-11 1517  ax-i12 1518  ax-bndl 1520  ax-4 1521  ax-17 1537  ax-i9 1541  ax-ial 1545  ax-i5r 1546  ax-13 2166  ax-14 2167  ax-ext 2175  ax-sep 4148  ax-nul 4156  ax-pow 4204  ax-pr 4239  ax-un 4465

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3an 982  df-tru 1367  df-fal 1370  df-nf 1472  df-sb 1774  df-eu 2045  df-mo 2046  df-clab 2180  df-cleq 2186  df-clel 2189  df-nfc 2325  df-ne 2365  df-ral 2477  df-rex 2478  df-v 2762  df-sbc 2987  df-dif 3156  df-un 3158  df-in 3160  df-ss 3167  df-nul 3448  df-pw 3604  df-sn 3625  df-pr 3626  df-op 3628  df-uni 3837  df-br 4031  df-opab 4092  df-mpt 4093  df-tr 4129  df-id 4325  df-iord 4398  df-on 4400  df-suc 4403  df-xp 4666  df-rel 4667  df-cnv 4668  df-co 4669  df-dm 4670  df-rn 4671  df-res 4672  df-ima 4673  df-iota 5216  df-fun 5257  df-fn 5258  df-f 5259  df-f1 5260  df-fo 5261  df-f1o 5262  df-fv 5263  df-1st 6195  df-2nd 6196  df-1o 6471  df-dju 7099  df-inl 7108  df-inr 7109  df-case 7145

This theorem is referenced by:  casef1  7151  omp1eomlem  7155  ctm  7170