Theorem casef 7278

Description: The "case" construction of two functions is a function on the disjoint union of their domains. (Contributed by BJ, 10-Jul-2022.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
casef.f	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝑋)
casef.g	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐵⟶𝑋)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
casef	⊢ (𝜑 → case(𝐹, 𝐺):(𝐴 ⊔ 𝐵)⟶𝑋)

Proof of Theorem casef

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		casef.f	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝑋)
2		ffun 5482	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴⟶𝑋 → Fun 𝐹)
3	1, 2	syl 14	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun 𝐹)
4		casef.g	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐵⟶𝑋)
5		ffun 5482	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐺:𝐵⟶𝑋 → Fun 𝐺)
6	4, 5	syl 14	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun 𝐺)
7	3, 6	casefun 7275	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun case(𝐹, 𝐺))
8		caserel 7277	. . . 4 ⊢ case(𝐹, 𝐺) ⊆ ((dom 𝐹 ⊔ dom 𝐺) × (ran 𝐹 ∪ ran 𝐺))
9		ssid 3245	. . . . 5 ⊢ (dom 𝐹 ⊔ dom 𝐺) ⊆ (dom 𝐹 ⊔ dom 𝐺)
10		frn 5488	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴⟶𝑋 → ran 𝐹 ⊆ 𝑋)
11	1, 10	syl 14	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → ran 𝐹 ⊆ 𝑋)
12		frn 5488	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐺:𝐵⟶𝑋 → ran 𝐺 ⊆ 𝑋)
13	4, 12	syl 14	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → ran 𝐺 ⊆ 𝑋)
14	11, 13	unssd 3381	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → (ran 𝐹 ∪ ran 𝐺) ⊆ 𝑋)
15		xpss12 4831	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((dom 𝐹 ⊔ dom 𝐺) ⊆ (dom 𝐹 ⊔ dom 𝐺) ∧ (ran 𝐹 ∪ ran 𝐺) ⊆ 𝑋) → ((dom 𝐹 ⊔ dom 𝐺) × (ran 𝐹 ∪ ran 𝐺)) ⊆ ((dom 𝐹 ⊔ dom 𝐺) × 𝑋))
16	9, 14, 15	sylancr 414	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((dom 𝐹 ⊔ dom 𝐺) × (ran 𝐹 ∪ ran 𝐺)) ⊆ ((dom 𝐹 ⊔ dom 𝐺) × 𝑋))
17	8, 16	sstrid 3236	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → case(𝐹, 𝐺) ⊆ ((dom 𝐹 ⊔ dom 𝐺) × 𝑋))
18		funssxp 5501	. . . 4 ⊢ ((Fun case(𝐹, 𝐺) ∧ case(𝐹, 𝐺) ⊆ ((dom 𝐹 ⊔ dom 𝐺) × 𝑋)) ↔ (case(𝐹, 𝐺):dom case(𝐹, 𝐺)⟶𝑋 ∧ dom case(𝐹, 𝐺) ⊆ (dom 𝐹 ⊔ dom 𝐺)))
19	18	simplbi 274	. . 3 ⊢ ((Fun case(𝐹, 𝐺) ∧ case(𝐹, 𝐺) ⊆ ((dom 𝐹 ⊔ dom 𝐺) × 𝑋)) → case(𝐹, 𝐺):dom case(𝐹, 𝐺)⟶𝑋)
20	7, 17, 19	syl2anc 411	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → case(𝐹, 𝐺):dom case(𝐹, 𝐺)⟶𝑋)
21		casedm 7276	. . . 4 ⊢ dom case(𝐹, 𝐺) = (dom 𝐹 ⊔ dom 𝐺)
22		fdm 5485	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴⟶𝑋 → dom 𝐹 = 𝐴)
23	1, 22	syl 14	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → dom 𝐹 = 𝐴)
24		fdm 5485	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐺:𝐵⟶𝑋 → dom 𝐺 = 𝐵)
25	4, 24	syl 14	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → dom 𝐺 = 𝐵)
26		djueq12 7229	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((dom 𝐹 = 𝐴 ∧ dom 𝐺 = 𝐵) → (dom 𝐹 ⊔ dom 𝐺) = (𝐴 ⊔ 𝐵))
27	23, 25, 26	syl2anc 411	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (dom 𝐹 ⊔ dom 𝐺) = (𝐴 ⊔ 𝐵))
28	21, 27	eqtrid 2274	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → dom case(𝐹, 𝐺) = (𝐴 ⊔ 𝐵))
29	28	feq2d 5467	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (case(𝐹, 𝐺):dom case(𝐹, 𝐺)⟶𝑋 ↔ case(𝐹, 𝐺):(𝐴 ⊔ 𝐵)⟶𝑋))
30	20, 29	mpbid 147	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → case(𝐹, 𝐺):(𝐴 ⊔ 𝐵)⟶𝑋)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 104   = wceq 1395   ∪ cun 3196   ⊆ wss 3198   × cxp 4721  dom cdm 4723  ran crn 4724  Fun wfun 5318  ⟶wf 5320   ⊔ cdju 7227  casecdjucase 7273

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 617  ax-in2 618  ax-io 714  ax-5 1493  ax-7 1494  ax-gen 1495  ax-ie1 1539  ax-ie2 1540  ax-8 1550  ax-10 1551  ax-11 1552  ax-i12 1553  ax-bndl 1555  ax-4 1556  ax-17 1572  ax-i9 1576  ax-ial 1580  ax-i5r 1581  ax-13 2202  ax-14 2203  ax-ext 2211  ax-sep 4205  ax-nul 4213  ax-pow 4262  ax-pr 4297  ax-un 4528

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3an 1004  df-tru 1398  df-fal 1401  df-nf 1507  df-sb 1809  df-eu 2080  df-mo 2081  df-clab 2216  df-cleq 2222  df-clel 2225  df-nfc 2361  df-ne 2401  df-ral 2513  df-rex 2514  df-v 2802  df-sbc 3030  df-dif 3200  df-un 3202  df-in 3204  df-ss 3211  df-nul 3493  df-pw 3652  df-sn 3673  df-pr 3674  df-op 3676  df-uni 3892  df-br 4087  df-opab 4149  df-mpt 4150  df-tr 4186  df-id 4388  df-iord 4461  df-on 4463  df-suc 4466  df-xp 4729  df-rel 4730  df-cnv 4731  df-co 4732  df-dm 4733  df-rn 4734  df-res 4735  df-ima 4736  df-iota 5284  df-fun 5326  df-fn 5327  df-f 5328  df-f1 5329  df-fo 5330  df-f1o 5331  df-fv 5332  df-1st 6298  df-2nd 6299  df-1o 6577  df-dju 7228  df-inl 7237  df-inr 7238  df-case 7274

This theorem is referenced by:  casef1  7280  omp1eomlem  7284  ctm  7299