Theorem bj-isclm 37314

Description: The predicate "is a subcomplex module". (Contributed by BJ, 6-Jan-2024.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
bj-isclm.scal	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊))
bj-isclm.base	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 = (Base‘𝐹))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bj-isclm	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑊 ∈ ℂMod ↔ (𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝐹 = (ℂfld ↾s 𝐾) ∧ 𝐾 ∈ (SubRing‘ℂfld))))

Proof of Theorem bj-isclm

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		eqid 2736	. . 3 ⊢ (Scalar‘𝑊) = (Scalar‘𝑊)
2		eqid 2736	. . 3 ⊢ (Base‘(Scalar‘𝑊)) = (Base‘(Scalar‘𝑊))
3	1, 2	isclm 25020	. 2 ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ ℂMod ↔ (𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ (Scalar‘𝑊) = (ℂfld ↾s (Base‘(Scalar‘𝑊))) ∧ (Base‘(Scalar‘𝑊)) ∈ (SubRing‘ℂfld)))
4		bj-isclm.scal	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊))
5	4	eqcomd 2742	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (Scalar‘𝑊) = 𝐹)
6		bj-isclm.base	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 = (Base‘𝐹))
7		fveq2 6881	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊) → (Base‘𝐹) = (Base‘(Scalar‘𝑊)))
8		eqtr 2756	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝐾 = (Base‘𝐹) ∧ (Base‘𝐹) = (Base‘(Scalar‘𝑊))) → 𝐾 = (Base‘(Scalar‘𝑊)))
9	8	eqcomd 2742	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝐾 = (Base‘𝐹) ∧ (Base‘𝐹) = (Base‘(Scalar‘𝑊))) → (Base‘(Scalar‘𝑊)) = 𝐾)
10	9	ex 412	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐾 = (Base‘𝐹) → ((Base‘𝐹) = (Base‘(Scalar‘𝑊)) → (Base‘(Scalar‘𝑊)) = 𝐾))
11	6, 7, 10	syl2im 40	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊) → (Base‘(Scalar‘𝑊)) = 𝐾))
12	4, 11	mpd 15	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → (Base‘(Scalar‘𝑊)) = 𝐾)
13	12	oveq2d 7426	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (ℂfld ↾s (Base‘(Scalar‘𝑊))) = (ℂfld ↾s 𝐾))
14	5, 13	eqeq12d 2752	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((Scalar‘𝑊) = (ℂfld ↾s (Base‘(Scalar‘𝑊))) ↔ 𝐹 = (ℂfld ↾s 𝐾)))
15	12	eleq1d 2820	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((Base‘(Scalar‘𝑊)) ∈ (SubRing‘ℂfld) ↔ 𝐾 ∈ (SubRing‘ℂfld)))
16	14, 15	3anbi23d 1441	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ (Scalar‘𝑊) = (ℂfld ↾s (Base‘(Scalar‘𝑊))) ∧ (Base‘(Scalar‘𝑊)) ∈ (SubRing‘ℂfld)) ↔ (𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝐹 = (ℂfld ↾s 𝐾) ∧ 𝐾 ∈ (SubRing‘ℂfld))))
17	3, 16	bitrid 283	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑊 ∈ ℂMod ↔ (𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝐹 = (ℂfld ↾s 𝐾) ∧ 𝐾 ∈ (SubRing‘ℂfld))))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 206   ∧ wa 395   ∧ w3a 1086   = wceq 1540   ∈ wcel 2109  ‘cfv 6536  (class class class)co 7410  Basecbs 17233   ↾_s cress 17256  Scalarcsca 17279  SubRingcsubrg 20534  LModclmod 20822  ℂ_fldccnfld 21320  ℂModcclm 25018

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1910  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2008  ax-8 2111  ax-9 2119  ax-ext 2708  ax-nul 5281

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1543  df-fal 1553  df-ex 1780  df-sb 2066  df-clab 2715  df-cleq 2728  df-clel 2810  df-ne 2934  df-rab 3421  df-v 3466  df-sbc 3771  df-dif 3934  df-un 3936  df-ss 3948  df-nul 4314  df-if 4506  df-sn 4607  df-pr 4609  df-op 4613  df-uni 4889  df-br 5125  df-iota 6489  df-fv 6544  df-ov 7413  df-clm 25019

This theorem is referenced by:  bj-rveccmod  37325