Theorem isclm 24133

Description: A subcomplex module is a left module over a subring of the field of complex numbers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Oct-2015.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
isclm.f	⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊)
isclm.k	⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝐹)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
isclm	⊢ (𝑊 ∈ ℂMod ↔ (𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝐹 = (ℂfld ↾s 𝐾) ∧ 𝐾 ∈ (SubRing‘ℂfld)))

Proof of Theorem isclm

Dummy variables 𝑓 𝑘 𝑤 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		fvexd 6771	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑊 → (Scalar‘𝑤) ∈ V)
2		fvexd 6771	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑤 = 𝑊 ∧ 𝑓 = (Scalar‘𝑤)) → (Base‘𝑓) ∈ V)
3		id 22	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑓 = (Scalar‘𝑤) → 𝑓 = (Scalar‘𝑤))
4		fveq2 6756	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑊 → (Scalar‘𝑤) = (Scalar‘𝑊))
5		isclm.f	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊)
6	4, 5	eqtr4di 2797	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑊 → (Scalar‘𝑤) = 𝐹)
7	3, 6	sylan9eqr 2801	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝑤 = 𝑊 ∧ 𝑓 = (Scalar‘𝑤)) → 𝑓 = 𝐹)
8	7	adantr 480	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (((𝑤 = 𝑊 ∧ 𝑓 = (Scalar‘𝑤)) ∧ 𝑘 = (Base‘𝑓)) → 𝑓 = 𝐹)
9		id 22	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑘 = (Base‘𝑓) → 𝑘 = (Base‘𝑓))
10	7	fveq2d 6760	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ ((𝑤 = 𝑊 ∧ 𝑓 = (Scalar‘𝑤)) → (Base‘𝑓) = (Base‘𝐹))
11		isclm.k	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝐹)
12	10, 11	eqtr4di 2797	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝑤 = 𝑊 ∧ 𝑓 = (Scalar‘𝑤)) → (Base‘𝑓) = 𝐾)
13	9, 12	sylan9eqr 2801	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (((𝑤 = 𝑊 ∧ 𝑓 = (Scalar‘𝑤)) ∧ 𝑘 = (Base‘𝑓)) → 𝑘 = 𝐾)
14	13	oveq2d 7271	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (((𝑤 = 𝑊 ∧ 𝑓 = (Scalar‘𝑤)) ∧ 𝑘 = (Base‘𝑓)) → (ℂfld ↾s 𝑘) = (ℂfld ↾s 𝐾))
15	8, 14	eqeq12d 2754	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (((𝑤 = 𝑊 ∧ 𝑓 = (Scalar‘𝑤)) ∧ 𝑘 = (Base‘𝑓)) → (𝑓 = (ℂfld ↾s 𝑘) ↔ 𝐹 = (ℂfld ↾s 𝐾)))
16	13	eleq1d 2823	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (((𝑤 = 𝑊 ∧ 𝑓 = (Scalar‘𝑤)) ∧ 𝑘 = (Base‘𝑓)) → (𝑘 ∈ (SubRing‘ℂfld) ↔ 𝐾 ∈ (SubRing‘ℂfld)))
17	15, 16	anbi12d 630	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝑤 = 𝑊 ∧ 𝑓 = (Scalar‘𝑤)) ∧ 𝑘 = (Base‘𝑓)) → ((𝑓 = (ℂfld ↾s 𝑘) ∧ 𝑘 ∈ (SubRing‘ℂfld)) ↔ (𝐹 = (ℂfld ↾s 𝐾) ∧ 𝐾 ∈ (SubRing‘ℂfld))))
18	2, 17	sbcied 3756	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑤 = 𝑊 ∧ 𝑓 = (Scalar‘𝑤)) → ([(Base‘𝑓) / 𝑘](𝑓 = (ℂfld ↾s 𝑘) ∧ 𝑘 ∈ (SubRing‘ℂfld)) ↔ (𝐹 = (ℂfld ↾s 𝐾) ∧ 𝐾 ∈ (SubRing‘ℂfld))))
19	1, 18	sbcied 3756	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑊 → ([(Scalar‘𝑤) / 𝑓][(Base‘𝑓) / 𝑘](𝑓 = (ℂfld ↾s 𝑘) ∧ 𝑘 ∈ (SubRing‘ℂfld)) ↔ (𝐹 = (ℂfld ↾s 𝐾) ∧ 𝐾 ∈ (SubRing‘ℂfld))))
20		df-clm 24132	. . 3 ⊢ ℂMod = {𝑤 ∈ LMod ∣ [(Scalar‘𝑤) / 𝑓][(Base‘𝑓) / 𝑘](𝑓 = (ℂfld ↾s 𝑘) ∧ 𝑘 ∈ (SubRing‘ℂfld))}
21	19, 20	elrab2 3620	. 2 ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ ℂMod ↔ (𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ (𝐹 = (ℂfld ↾s 𝐾) ∧ 𝐾 ∈ (SubRing‘ℂfld))))
22		3anass 1093	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝐹 = (ℂfld ↾s 𝐾) ∧ 𝐾 ∈ (SubRing‘ℂfld)) ↔ (𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ (𝐹 = (ℂfld ↾s 𝐾) ∧ 𝐾 ∈ (SubRing‘ℂfld))))
23	21, 22	bitr4i 277	1 ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ ℂMod ↔ (𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝐹 = (ℂfld ↾s 𝐾) ∧ 𝐾 ∈ (SubRing‘ℂfld)))

Syntax hints:   ↔ wb 205   ∧ wa 395   ∧ w3a 1085   = wceq 1539   ∈ wcel 2108  Vcvv 3422  [wsbc 3711  ‘cfv 6418  (class class class)co 7255  Basecbs 16840   ↾_s cress 16867  Scalarcsca 16891  SubRingcsubrg 19935  LModclmod 20038  ℂ_fldccnfld 20510  ℂModcclm 24131

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1799  ax-4 1813  ax-5 1914  ax-6 1972  ax-7 2012  ax-8 2110  ax-9 2118  ax-10 2139  ax-11 2156  ax-12 2173  ax-ext 2709  ax-nul 5225

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 396  df-or 844  df-3an 1087  df-tru 1542  df-fal 1552  df-ex 1784  df-nf 1788  df-sb 2069  df-mo 2540  df-eu 2569  df-clab 2716  df-cleq 2730  df-clel 2817  df-ral 3068  df-rex 3069  df-rab 3072  df-v 3424  df-sbc 3712  df-dif 3886  df-un 3888  df-in 3890  df-ss 3900  df-nul 4254  df-if 4457  df-sn 4559  df-pr 4561  df-op 4565  df-uni 4837  df-br 5071  df-iota 6376  df-fv 6426  df-ov 7258  df-clm 24132

This theorem is referenced by:  clmsca  24134  clmsubrg  24135  clmlmod  24136  isclmi  24146  lmhmclm  24156  isclmp  24166  cphclm  24258  phclm  24301  bj-isclm  35389