Theorem brdom2g 8966

Description: Dominance relation. This variation of brdomg 8967 does not require the Axiom of Union. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-1998.) Extract from a subproof of brdomg 8967. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 29-Nov-2024.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
brdom2g	⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑓 𝑓:𝐴–1-1→𝐵))

Distinct variable groups:   𝐴,𝑓   𝐵,𝑓

Allowed substitution hints:   𝑉(𝑓)   𝑊(𝑓)

Proof of Theorem brdom2g

Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑦 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		f1eq2 6768	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝑓:𝑥–1-1→𝑦 ↔ 𝑓:𝐴–1-1→𝑦))
2	1	exbidv 1954	. 2 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (∃𝑓 𝑓:𝑥–1-1→𝑦 ↔ ∃𝑓 𝑓:𝐴–1-1→𝑦))
3		f1eq3 6769	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (𝑓:𝐴–1-1→𝑦 ↔ 𝑓:𝐴–1-1→𝐵))
4	3	exbidv 1954	. 2 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (∃𝑓 𝑓:𝐴–1-1→𝑦 ↔ ∃𝑓 𝑓:𝐴–1-1→𝐵))
5		df-dom 8957	. 2 ⊢ ≼ = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑓 𝑓:𝑥–1-1→𝑦}
6	2, 4, 5	brabg 5518	1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑓 𝑓:𝐴–1-1→𝐵))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   = wceq 1570  ∃wex 1812   ∈ wcel 2145   class class class wbr 5103  –1-1→wf1 6530   ≼ cdom 8953

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-ext 2732  ax-sep 5251  ax-pr 5398

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-sb 2100  df-clab 2739  df-cleq 2752  df-clel 2835  df-rab 3413  df-v 3452  df-dif 3902  df-un 3904  df-in 3906  df-ss 3916  df-nul 4280  df-if 4483  df-sn 4585  df-pr 4587  df-op 4591  df-br 5104  df-opab 5168  df-fn 6536  df-f 6537  df-f1 6538  df-dom 8957

This theorem is used by:  brdomg  8967  brdomi  8968  f1dom4g  8974  0domg  9105