Theorem brdom2g 9015

Description: Dominance relation. This variation of brdomg 9016 does not require the Axiom of Union. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-1998.) Extract from a subproof of brdomg 9016. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 29-Nov-2024.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
brdom2g	⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑓 𝑓:𝐴–1-1→𝐵))

Distinct variable groups:   𝐴,𝑓   𝐵,𝑓

Allowed substitution hints:   𝑉(𝑓)   𝑊(𝑓)

Proof of Theorem brdom2g

Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑦 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		f1eq2 6813	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝑓:𝑥–1-1→𝑦 ↔ 𝑓:𝐴–1-1→𝑦))
2	1	exbidv 1920	. 2 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (∃𝑓 𝑓:𝑥–1-1→𝑦 ↔ ∃𝑓 𝑓:𝐴–1-1→𝑦))
3		f1eq3 6814	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (𝑓:𝐴–1-1→𝑦 ↔ 𝑓:𝐴–1-1→𝐵))
4	3	exbidv 1920	. 2 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (∃𝑓 𝑓:𝐴–1-1→𝑦 ↔ ∃𝑓 𝑓:𝐴–1-1→𝐵))
5		df-dom 9005	. 2 ⊢ ≼ = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑓 𝑓:𝑥–1-1→𝑦}
6	2, 4, 5	brabg 5558	1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑓 𝑓:𝐴–1-1→𝐵))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 206   ∧ wa 395   = wceq 1537  ∃wex 1777   ∈ wcel 2108   class class class wbr 5166  –1-1→wf1 6570   ≼ cdom 9001

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1793  ax-4 1807  ax-5 1909  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2007  ax-8 2110  ax-9 2118  ax-ext 2711  ax-sep 5317  ax-nul 5324  ax-pr 5447

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 847  df-3an 1089  df-tru 1540  df-fal 1550  df-ex 1778  df-sb 2065  df-clab 2718  df-cleq 2732  df-clel 2819  df-rab 3444  df-v 3490  df-dif 3979  df-un 3981  df-ss 3993  df-nul 4353  df-if 4549  df-sn 4649  df-pr 4651  df-op 4655  df-br 5167  df-opab 5229  df-fn 6576  df-f 6577  df-f1 6578  df-dom 9005

This theorem is referenced by:  brdomg  9016  brdomi  9018  f1dom4g  9025  0domg  9166