Theorem brdom2g 8997

Description: Dominance relation. This variation of brdomg 8998 does not require the Axiom of Union. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-1998.) Extract from a subproof of brdomg 8998. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 29-Nov-2024.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
brdom2g	⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑓 𝑓:𝐴–1-1→𝐵))

Distinct variable groups:   𝐴,𝑓   𝐵,𝑓

Allowed substitution hints:   𝑉(𝑓)   𝑊(𝑓)

Proof of Theorem brdom2g

Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑦 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		f1eq2 6799	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝑓:𝑥–1-1→𝑦 ↔ 𝑓:𝐴–1-1→𝑦))
2	1	exbidv 1920	. 2 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (∃𝑓 𝑓:𝑥–1-1→𝑦 ↔ ∃𝑓 𝑓:𝐴–1-1→𝑦))
3		f1eq3 6800	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (𝑓:𝐴–1-1→𝑦 ↔ 𝑓:𝐴–1-1→𝐵))
4	3	exbidv 1920	. 2 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (∃𝑓 𝑓:𝐴–1-1→𝑦 ↔ ∃𝑓 𝑓:𝐴–1-1→𝐵))
5		df-dom 8988	. 2 ⊢ ≼ = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑓 𝑓:𝑥–1-1→𝑦}
6	2, 4, 5	brabg 5543	1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑓 𝑓:𝐴–1-1→𝐵))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 206   ∧ wa 395   = wceq 1539  ∃wex 1778   ∈ wcel 2107   class class class wbr 5142  –1-1→wf1 6557   ≼ cdom 8984

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1794  ax-4 1808  ax-5 1909  ax-6 1966  ax-7 2006  ax-8 2109  ax-9 2117  ax-ext 2707  ax-sep 5295  ax-nul 5305  ax-pr 5431

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1542  df-fal 1552  df-ex 1779  df-sb 2064  df-clab 2714  df-cleq 2728  df-clel 2815  df-rab 3436  df-v 3481  df-dif 3953  df-un 3955  df-ss 3967  df-nul 4333  df-if 4525  df-sn 4626  df-pr 4628  df-op 4632  df-br 5143  df-opab 5205  df-fn 6563  df-f 6564  df-f1 6565  df-dom 8988

This theorem is referenced by:  brdomg  8998  brdomi  9000  f1dom4g  9007  0domg  9141