Theorem brdom2g 8939

Description: Dominance relation. This variation of brdomg 8940 does not require the Axiom of Union. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-1998.) Extract from a subproof of brdomg 8940. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 29-Nov-2024.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
brdom2g	⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑓 𝑓:𝐴–1-1→𝐵))

Distinct variable groups:   𝐴,𝑓   𝐵,𝑓

Allowed substitution hints:   𝑉(𝑓)   𝑊(𝑓)

Proof of Theorem brdom2g

Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑦 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		f1eq2 6757	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝑓:𝑥–1-1→𝑦 ↔ 𝑓:𝐴–1-1→𝑦))
2	1	exbidv 1942	. 2 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (∃𝑓 𝑓:𝑥–1-1→𝑦 ↔ ∃𝑓 𝑓:𝐴–1-1→𝑦))
3		f1eq3 6758	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (𝑓:𝐴–1-1→𝑦 ↔ 𝑓:𝐴–1-1→𝐵))
4	3	exbidv 1942	. 2 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (∃𝑓 𝑓:𝐴–1-1→𝑦 ↔ ∃𝑓 𝑓:𝐴–1-1→𝐵))
5		df-dom 8930	. 2 ⊢ ≼ = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑓 𝑓:𝑥–1-1→𝑦}
6	2, 4, 5	brabg 5511	1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑓 𝑓:𝐴–1-1→𝐵))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 208   ∧ wa 399   = wceq 1561  ∃wex 1800   ∈ wcel 2143   class class class wbr 5101  –1-1→wf1 6519   ≼ cdom 8926

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1816  ax-4 1830  ax-5 1931  ax-6 1988  ax-7 2029  ax-8 2145  ax-9 2153  ax-ext 2735  ax-sep 5247  ax-pr 5391

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 400  df-or 859  df-3an 1101  df-tru 1564  df-fal 1574  df-ex 1801  df-sb 2092  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2838  df-rab 3416  df-v 3457  df-dif 3908  df-un 3910  df-in 3912  df-ss 3922  df-nul 4287  df-if 4482  df-sn 4584  df-pr 4586  df-op 4590  df-br 5102  df-opab 5164  df-fn 6525  df-f 6526  df-f1 6527  df-dom 8930

This theorem is referenced by:  brdomg  8940  brdomi  8941  f1dom4g  8947  0domg  9077