P. 90 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 8901-9000   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	cbvixpv 8901*	Change bound variable in an indexed Cartesian product. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐵 = 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = X𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶
Theorem	nfixpw 8902*	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for indexed Cartesian product. Version of nfixp 8903 with a disjoint variable condition, which does not require ax-13 2406. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2016.) Avoid ax-13 2406. (Revised by GG, 26-Jan-2024.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵
Theorem	nfixp 8903	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for indexed Cartesian product. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2406. Use the weaker nfixpw 8902 when possible. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2016.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵
Theorem	nfixp1 8904	The index variable in an indexed Cartesian product is not free. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 19-Jun-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2016.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵
Theorem	ixpprc 8905*	A cartesian product of proper-class many sets is empty, because any function in the cartesian product has to be a set with domain 𝐴, which is not possible for a proper class domain. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 25-Jan-2015.)
⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ V → X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = ∅)
Theorem	ixpf 8906*	A member of an infinite Cartesian product maps to the indexed union of the product argument. Remark in [Enderton] p. 54. (Contributed by NM, 28-Sep-2006.)
⊢ (𝐹 ∈ X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵)
Theorem	uniixp 8907*	The union of an infinite Cartesian product is included in a Cartesian product. (Contributed by NM, 28-Sep-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2015.)
⊢ ∪ X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ⊆ (𝐴 × ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵)
Theorem	ixpexg 8908*	The existence of an infinite Cartesian product. 𝑥 is normally a free-variable parameter in 𝐵. Remark in Enderton p. 54. (Contributed by NM, 28-Sep-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 25-Jan-2015.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ V)
Theorem	ixpin 8909*	The intersection of two infinite Cartesian products. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Feb-2015.)
⊢ X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐵 ∩ 𝐶) = (X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∩ X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶)
Theorem	ixpiin 8910*	The indexed intersection of a collection of infinite Cartesian products. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Feb-2015.)
⊢ (𝐵 ≠ ∅ → X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∩ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶 = ∩ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶)
Theorem	ixpint 8911*	The intersection of a collection of infinite Cartesian products. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Feb-2015.)
⊢ (𝐵 ≠ ∅ → X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∩ 𝐵 = ∩ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦)
Theorem	ixp0x 8912	An infinite Cartesian product with an empty index set. (Contributed by NM, 21-Sep-2007.)
⊢ X𝑥 ∈ ∅ 𝐴 = {∅}
Theorem	ixpssmap2g 8913*	An infinite Cartesian product is a subset of set exponentiation. This version of ixpssmapg 8914 avoids ax-rep 5232. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Nov-2014.)
⊢ (∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ⊆ (∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ↑m 𝐴))
Theorem	ixpssmapg 8914*	An infinite Cartesian product is a subset of set exponentiation. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 19-Jun-2011.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ⊆ (∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ↑m 𝐴))
Theorem	0elixp 8915	Membership of the empty set in an infinite Cartesian product. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 29-Sep-2006.)
⊢ ∅ ∈ X𝑥 ∈ ∅ 𝐴
Theorem	ixpn0 8916	The infinite Cartesian product of a family 𝐵(𝑥) with an empty member is empty. The converse of this theorem is equivalent to the Axiom of Choice, see ac9 10455. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Jun-2016.)
⊢ (X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ≠ ∅ → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ≠ ∅)
Theorem	ixp0 8917	The infinite Cartesian product of a family 𝐵(𝑥) with an empty member is empty. The converse of this theorem is equivalent to the Axiom of Choice, see ac9 10455. (Contributed by NM, 1-Oct-2006.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 22-Jun-2016.)
⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = ∅ → X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = ∅)
Theorem	ixpssmap 8918*	An infinite Cartesian product is a subset of set exponentiation. Remark in [Enderton] p. 54. (Contributed by NM, 28-Sep-2006.)
⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ⊆ (∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ↑m 𝐴)
Theorem	resixp 8919*	Restriction of an element of an infinite Cartesian product. (Contributed by FL, 7-Nov-2011.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 31-May-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶) → (𝐹 ↾ 𝐵) ∈ X𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶)
Theorem	undifixp 8920*	Union of two projections of a cartesian product. (Contributed by FL, 7-Nov-2011.)
⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ X𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ X𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵)𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴) → (𝐹 ∪ 𝐺) ∈ X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶)
Theorem	mptelixpg 8921*	Condition for an explicit member of an indexed product. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Jan-2015.)
⊢ (𝐼 ∈ 𝑉 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐼 ↦ 𝐽) ∈ X𝑥 ∈ 𝐼 𝐾 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐼 𝐽 ∈ 𝐾))
Theorem	resixpfo 8922*	Restriction of elements of an infinite Cartesian product creates a surjection, if the original Cartesian product is nonempty. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-Aug-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑓 ∈ X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 ↦ (𝑓 ↾ 𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 ≠ ∅) → 𝐹:X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶–onto→X𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶)
Theorem	elixpsn 8923*	Membership in a class of singleton functions. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 24-Jan-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐹 ∈ X𝑥 ∈ {𝐴}𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝐹 = {⟨𝐴, 𝑦⟩}))
Theorem	ixpsnf1o 8924*	A bijection between a class and single-point functions to it. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 24-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ ({𝐼} × {𝑥}))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐼 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→X𝑦 ∈ {𝐼}𝐴)
Theorem	mapsnf1o 8925*	A bijection between a set and single-point functions to it. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 24-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ ({𝐼} × {𝑥}))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐼 ∈ 𝑊) → 𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→(𝐴 ↑m {𝐼}))
Theorem	boxriin 8926*	A rectangular subset of a rectangular set can be recovered as the relative intersection of single-axis restrictions. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 22-Feb-2015.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐼 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → X𝑥 ∈ 𝐼 𝐴 = (X𝑥 ∈ 𝐼 𝐵 ∩ ∩ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐼 X𝑥 ∈ 𝐼 if(𝑥 = 𝑦, 𝐴, 𝐵)))
Theorem	boxcutc 8927*	The relative complement of a box set restricted on one axis. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 22-Feb-2015.)
⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐵) → (X𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∖ X𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 if(𝑘 = 𝑋, 𝐶, 𝐵)) = X𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 if(𝑘 = 𝑋, (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶), 𝐵))
2.4.29  Equinumerosity
Syntax	cen 8928	Extend class definition to include the equinumerosity relation ("approximately equals" symbol)
class ≈
Syntax	cdom 8929	Extend class definition to include the dominance relation (curly "less than or equal to")
class ≼
Syntax	csdm 8930	Extend class definition to include the strict dominance relation (curly less-than)
class ≺
Syntax	cfn 8931	Extend class definition to include the class of all finite sets.
class Fin
Definition	df-en 8932*	Define the equinumerosity relation. Definition of [Enderton] p. 129. We define ≈ to be a binary relation rather than a connective, so its arguments must be sets to be meaningful. This is acceptable because we do not consider equinumerosity for proper classes. We derive the usual definition as bren 8941. (Contributed by NM, 28-Mar-1998.)
⊢ ≈ = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑓 𝑓:𝑥–1-1-onto→𝑦}
Definition	df-dom 8933*	Define the dominance relation. For an alternate definition see dfdom2 8963. Compare Definition of [Enderton] p. 145. Typical textbook definitions are derived as brdom 8945 and domen 8946. (Contributed by NM, 28-Mar-1998.)
⊢ ≼ = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑓 𝑓:𝑥–1-1→𝑦}
Definition	df-sdom 8934	Define the strict dominance relation. Alternate possible definitions are derived as brsdom 8959 and brsdom2 9077. Definition 3 of [Suppes] p. 97. (Contributed by NM, 31-Mar-1998.)
⊢ ≺ = ( ≼ ∖ ≈ )
Definition	df-fin 8935*	Define the (proper) class of all finite sets. Similar to Definition 10.29 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 91, whose "Fin(a)" corresponds to our "𝑎 ∈ Fin". This definition is meaningful whether or not we accept the Axiom of Infinity ax-inf2 9598. If we accept Infinity, we can also express 𝐴 ∈ Fin by 𝐴 ≺ ω (Theorem isfinite 9609.) (Contributed by NM, 22-Aug-2008.)
⊢ Fin = {𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑦 ∈ ω 𝑥 ≈ 𝑦}
Theorem	relen 8936	Equinumerosity is a relation. (Contributed by NM, 28-Mar-1998.)
⊢ Rel ≈
Theorem	reldom 8937	Dominance is a relation. (Contributed by NM, 28-Mar-1998.)
⊢ Rel ≼
Theorem	relsdom 8938	Strict dominance is a relation. (Contributed by NM, 31-Mar-1998.)
⊢ Rel ≺
Theorem	encv 8939	If two classes are equinumerous, both classes are sets. (Contributed by AV, 21-Mar-2019.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V))
Theorem	breng 8940*	Equinumerosity relation. This variation of bren 8941 does not require the Axiom of Union. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-1998.) Extract from a subproof of bren 8941. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 23-Sep-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑓 𝑓:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵))
Theorem	bren 8941*	Equinumerosity relation. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-1998.) Extract breng 8940 as an intermediate result. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 23-Sep-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑓 𝑓:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵)
Theorem	brdom2g 8942*	Dominance relation. This variation of brdomg 8943 does not require the Axiom of Union. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-1998.) Extract from a subproof of brdomg 8943. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 29-Nov-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑓 𝑓:𝐴–1-1→𝐵))
Theorem	brdomg 8943*	Dominance relation. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-1998.) Extract brdom2g 8942 as an intermediate result. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 29-Nov-2024.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐶 → (𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑓 𝑓:𝐴–1-1→𝐵))
Theorem	brdomi 8944*	Dominance relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.) Avoid ax-un 7722. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 29-Nov-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 → ∃𝑓 𝑓:𝐴–1-1→𝐵)
Theorem	brdom 8945*	Dominance relation. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-1998.)
⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑓 𝑓:𝐴–1-1→𝐵)
Theorem	domen 8946*	Dominance in terms of equinumerosity. Example 1 of [Enderton] p. 146. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-1998.)
⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝐴 ≈ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵))
Theorem	domeng 8947*	Dominance in terms of equinumerosity, with the sethood requirement expressed as an antecedent. Example 1 of [Enderton] p. 146. (Contributed by NM, 24-Apr-2004.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐶 → (𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝐴 ≈ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵)))
Theorem	ctex 8948	A countable set is a set. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 29-Dec-2016.) (Proof shortened by Jim Kingdon, 13-Mar-2023.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≼ ω → 𝐴 ∈ V)
Theorem	f1oen4g 8949	The domain and range of a one-to-one, onto set function are equinumerous. This variation of f1oeng 8955 does not require the Axiom of Replacement nor the Axiom of Power Sets nor the Axiom of Union. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 7-Dec-2024.)
⊢ (((𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋) ∧ 𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵) → 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵)
Theorem	f1dom4g 8950	The domain of a one-to-one set function is dominated by its codomain when the latter is a set. This variation of f1domg 8956 does not require the Axiom of Replacement nor the Axiom of Power Sets nor the Axiom of Union. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 7-Dec-2024.)
⊢ (((𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋) ∧ 𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵) → 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵)
Theorem	f1oen3g 8951	The domain and range of a one-to-one, onto set function are equinumerous. This variation of f1oeng 8955 does not require the Axiom of Replacement nor the Axiom of Power Sets. (Contributed by NM, 13-Jan-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵) → 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵)
Theorem	f1dom3g 8952	The domain of a one-to-one set function is dominated by its codomain when the latter is a set. This variation of f1domg 8956 does not require the Axiom of Replacement nor the Axiom of Power Sets. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 9-Sep-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵) → 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵)
Theorem	f1oen2g 8953	The domain and range of a one-to-one, onto function are equinumerous. This variation of f1oeng 8955 does not require the Axiom of Replacement. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵) → 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵)
Theorem	f1dom2g 8954	The domain of a one-to-one function is dominated by its codomain. This variation of f1domg 8956 does not require the Axiom of Replacement. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2015.) (Proof shortened by BTernaryTau, 25-Sep-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵) → 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵)
Theorem	f1oeng 8955	The domain and range of a one-to-one, onto function are equinumerous. (Contributed by NM, 19-Jun-1998.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵) → 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵)
Theorem	f1domg 8956	The domain of a one-to-one function is dominated by its codomain. (Contributed by NM, 4-Sep-2004.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐶 → (𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵 → 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵))
Theorem	f1oen 8957	The domain and range of a one-to-one, onto function are equinumerous. (Contributed by NM, 19-Jun-1998.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵 → 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵)
Theorem	f1dom 8958	The domain of a one-to-one function is dominated by its codomain. (Contributed by NM, 19-Jun-1998.)
⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵 → 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵)
Theorem	brsdom 8959	Strict dominance relation, meaning "𝐵 is strictly greater in size than 𝐴". Definition of [Mendelson] p. 255. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jun-1998.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≺ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵))
Theorem	isfi 8960*	Express "𝐴 is finite". Definition 10.29 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 91 (whose "Fin " is a predicate instead of a class). (Contributed by NM, 22-Aug-2008.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Fin ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ ω 𝐴 ≈ 𝑥)
Theorem	enssdom 8961	Equinumerosity implies dominance. (Contributed by NM, 31-Mar-1998.) (Proof shortened by TM, 10-Feb-2026.)
⊢ ≈ ⊆ ≼
Theorem	enssdomOLD 8962	Obsolete version of enssdom 8961 as of 10-Feb-2026. (Contributed by NM, 31-Mar-1998.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ≈ ⊆ ≼
Theorem	dfdom2 8963	Alternate definition of dominance. (Contributed by NM, 17-Jun-1998.)
⊢ ≼ = ( ≺ ∪ ≈ )
Theorem	endom 8964	Equinumerosity implies dominance. Theorem 15 of [Suppes] p. 94. (Contributed by NM, 28-May-1998.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 → 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵)
Theorem	sdomdom 8965	Strict dominance implies dominance. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jun-1998.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≺ 𝐵 → 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵)
Theorem	sdomnen 8966	Strict dominance implies non-equinumerosity. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jun-1998.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≺ 𝐵 → ¬ 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵)
Theorem	brdom2 8967	Dominance in terms of strict dominance and equinumerosity. Theorem 22(iv) of [Suppes] p. 97. (Contributed by NM, 17-Jun-1998.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ≺ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵))
Theorem	bren2 8968	Equinumerosity expressed in terms of dominance and strict dominance. (Contributed by NM, 23-Oct-2004.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐴 ≺ 𝐵))
Theorem	enrefg 8969	Equinumerosity is reflexive. Theorem 1 of [Suppes] p. 92. (Contributed by NM, 18-Jun-1998.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐴 ≈ 𝐴)
Theorem	enref 8970	Equinumerosity is reflexive. Theorem 1 of [Suppes] p. 92. (Contributed by NM, 25-Sep-2004.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 ≈ 𝐴
Theorem	eqeng 8971	Equality implies equinumerosity. (Contributed by NM, 26-Oct-2003.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 = 𝐵 → 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵))
Theorem	domrefg 8972	Dominance is reflexive. (Contributed by NM, 18-Jun-1998.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐴 ≼ 𝐴)
Theorem	en2d 8973*	Equinumerosity inference from an implicit one-to-one onto function. (Contributed by NM, 27-Jul-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-May-2014.) (Revised by AV, 4-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑌))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐶) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐷)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵)
Theorem	en3d 8974*	Equinumerosity inference from an implicit one-to-one onto function. (Contributed by NM, 27-Jul-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-May-2014.) (Revised by AV, 4-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝐴))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑥 = 𝐷 ↔ 𝑦 = 𝐶)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵)
Theorem	en2i 8975*	Equinumerosity inference from an implicit one-to-one onto function. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jan-2004.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    &   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐶 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝐷 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐶) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐷))    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵
Theorem	en3i 8976*	Equinumerosity inference from an implicit one-to-one onto function. (Contributed by NM, 19-Jul-2004.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    &   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑥 = 𝐷 ↔ 𝑦 = 𝐶))    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵
Theorem	dom2lem 8977*	A mapping (first hypothesis) that is one-to-one (second hypothesis) implies its domain is dominated by its codomain. (Contributed by NM, 24-Jul-2004.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐶 = 𝐷 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑦)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶):𝐴–1-1→𝐵)
Theorem	dom2d 8978*	A mapping (first hypothesis) that is one-to-one (second hypothesis) implies its domain is dominated by its codomain. (Contributed by NM, 24-Jul-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 20-May-2013.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐶 = 𝐷 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑦)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 ∈ 𝑅 → 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵))
Theorem	dom3d 8979*	A mapping (first hypothesis) that is one-to-one (second hypothesis) implies its domain is dominated by its codomain. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-May-2013.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐶 = 𝐷 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑦)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵)
Theorem	dom2 8980*	A mapping (first hypothesis) that is one-to-one (second hypothesis) implies its domain is dominated by its codomain. 𝐶 and 𝐷 can be read 𝐶(𝑥) and 𝐷(𝑦), as can be inferred from their distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by NM, 26-Oct-2003.)
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐶 = 𝐷 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑦))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵)
Theorem	dom3 8981*	A mapping (first hypothesis) that is one-to-one (second hypothesis) implies its domain is dominated by its codomain. 𝐶 and 𝐷 can be read 𝐶(𝑥) and 𝐷(𝑦), as can be inferred from their distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-May-2013.)
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐶 = 𝐷 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑦))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵)
Theorem	idssen 8982	Equality implies equinumerosity. (Contributed by NM, 30-Apr-1998.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Nov-2014.)
⊢ I ⊆ ≈
Theorem	domssl 8983	If 𝐴 is a subset of 𝐵 and 𝐶 dominates 𝐵, then 𝐶 also dominates 𝐴. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 7-Dec-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≼ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ≼ 𝐶)
Theorem	domssr 8984	If 𝐶 is a superset of 𝐵 and 𝐵 dominates 𝐴, then 𝐶 also dominates 𝐴. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 7-Dec-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵) → 𝐴 ≼ 𝐶)
Theorem	ssdomg 8985	A set dominates its subsets. Theorem 16 of [Suppes] p. 94. (Contributed by NM, 19-Jun-1998.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2015.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵))
Theorem	ener 8986	Equinumerosity is an equivalence relation. (Contributed by NM, 19-Mar-1998.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Nov-2014.) (Proof shortened by AV, 1-May-2021.)
⊢ ≈ Er V
Theorem	ensymb 8987	Symmetry of equinumerosity. Theorem 2 of [Suppes] p. 92. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐵 ≈ 𝐴)
Theorem	ensym 8988	Symmetry of equinumerosity. Theorem 2 of [Suppes] p. 92. (Contributed by NM, 26-Oct-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 → 𝐵 ≈ 𝐴)
Theorem	ensymi 8989	Symmetry of equinumerosity. Theorem 2 of [Suppes] p. 92. (Contributed by NM, 25-Sep-2004.)
⊢ 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐵 ≈ 𝐴
Theorem	ensymd 8990	Symmetry of equinumerosity. Deduction form of ensym 8988. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≈ 𝐴)
Theorem	entr 8991	Transitivity of equinumerosity. Theorem 3 of [Suppes] p. 92. (Contributed by NM, 9-Jun-1998.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≈ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ≈ 𝐶)
Theorem	domtr 8992	Transitivity of dominance relation. Theorem 17 of [Suppes] p. 94. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jun-1998.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Nov-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≼ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ≼ 𝐶)
Theorem	entri 8993	A chained equinumerosity inference. (Contributed by NM, 25-Sep-2004.)
⊢ 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ≈ 𝐶    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 ≈ 𝐶
Theorem	entr2i 8994	A chained equinumerosity inference. (Contributed by NM, 25-Sep-2004.)
⊢ 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ≈ 𝐶    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐶 ≈ 𝐴
Theorem	entr3i 8995	A chained equinumerosity inference. (Contributed by NM, 25-Sep-2004.)
⊢ 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵    &   ⊢ 𝐴 ≈ 𝐶    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐵 ≈ 𝐶
Theorem	entr4i 8996	A chained equinumerosity inference. (Contributed by NM, 25-Sep-2004.)
⊢ 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ≈ 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 ≈ 𝐶
Theorem	endomtr 8997	Transitivity of equinumerosity and dominance. (Contributed by NM, 7-Jun-1998.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≼ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ≼ 𝐶)
Theorem	domentr 8998	Transitivity of dominance and equinumerosity. (Contributed by NM, 7-Jun-1998.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≈ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ≼ 𝐶)
Theorem	f1imaeng 8999	If a function is one-to-one, then the image of a subset of its domain under it is equinumerous to the subset. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-May-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝐹 “ 𝐶) ≈ 𝐶)
Theorem	f1imaen2g 9000	If a function is one-to-one, then the image of a subset of its domain under it is equinumerous to the subset. (This version of f1imaeng 8999 does not need ax-rep 5232.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Nov-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 25-Jun-2015.)
⊢ (((𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐶 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉)) → (𝐹 “ 𝐶) ≈ 𝐶)