P. 90 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 8901-9000   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	elixp 8901*	Membership in an infinite Cartesian product. (Contributed by NM, 28-Sep-2006.)
⊢ 𝐹 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ↔ (𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ 𝐵))
Theorem	elixpconst 8902*	Membership in an infinite Cartesian product of a constant 𝐵. (Contributed by NM, 12-Apr-2008.)
⊢ 𝐹 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ↔ 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵)
Theorem	ixpconstg 8903*	Infinite Cartesian product of a constant 𝐵. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = (𝐵 ↑m 𝐴))
Theorem	ixpconst 8904*	Infinite Cartesian product of a constant 𝐵. (Contributed by NM, 28-Sep-2006.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = (𝐵 ↑m 𝐴)
Theorem	ixpeq1 8905*	Equality theorem for infinite Cartesian product. (Contributed by NM, 29-Sep-2006.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 = X𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶)
Theorem	ixpeq1d 8906*	Equality theorem for infinite Cartesian product. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jun-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 = X𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶)
Theorem	ss2ixp 8907	Subclass theorem for infinite Cartesian product. (Contributed by NM, 29-Sep-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Aug-2016.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶 → X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ⊆ X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶)
Theorem	ixpeq2 8908	Equality theorem for infinite Cartesian product. (Contributed by NM, 29-Sep-2006.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = 𝐶 → X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶)
Theorem	ixpeq2dva 8909*	Equality theorem for infinite Cartesian product. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jun-2016.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 = 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶)
Theorem	ixpeq2dv 8910*	Equality theorem for infinite Cartesian product. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jun-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶)
Theorem	cbvixp 8911*	Change bound variable in an indexed Cartesian product. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 20-Jun-2011.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐵    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐶    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐵 = 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = X𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶
Theorem	cbvixpv 8912*	Change bound variable in an indexed Cartesian product. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐵 = 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = X𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶
Theorem	nfixpw 8913*	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for indexed Cartesian product. Version of nfixp 8914 with a disjoint variable condition, which does not require ax-13 2402. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2016.) Avoid ax-13 2402. (Revised by GG, 26-Jan-2024.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵
Theorem	nfixp 8914	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for indexed Cartesian product. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2402. Use the weaker nfixpw 8913 when possible. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2016.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵
Theorem	nfixp1 8915	The index variable in an indexed Cartesian product is not free. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 19-Jun-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2016.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵
Theorem	ixpprc 8916*	A cartesian product of proper-class many sets is empty, because any function in the cartesian product has to be a set with domain 𝐴, which is not possible for a proper class domain. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 25-Jan-2015.)
⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ V → X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = ∅)
Theorem	ixpf 8917*	A member of an infinite Cartesian product maps to the indexed union of the product argument. Remark in [Enderton] p. 54. (Contributed by NM, 28-Sep-2006.)
⊢ (𝐹 ∈ X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵)
Theorem	uniixp 8918*	The union of an infinite Cartesian product is included in a Cartesian product. (Contributed by NM, 28-Sep-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2015.)
⊢ ∪ X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ⊆ (𝐴 × ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵)
Theorem	ixpexg 8919*	The existence of an infinite Cartesian product. 𝑥 is normally a free-variable parameter in 𝐵. Remark in Enderton p. 54. (Contributed by NM, 28-Sep-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 25-Jan-2015.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ V)
Theorem	ixpin 8920*	The intersection of two infinite Cartesian products. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Feb-2015.)
⊢ X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐵 ∩ 𝐶) = (X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∩ X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶)
Theorem	ixpiin 8921*	The indexed intersection of a collection of infinite Cartesian products. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Feb-2015.)
⊢ (𝐵 ≠ ∅ → X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∩ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶 = ∩ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶)
Theorem	ixpint 8922*	The intersection of a collection of infinite Cartesian products. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Feb-2015.)
⊢ (𝐵 ≠ ∅ → X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∩ 𝐵 = ∩ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦)
Theorem	ixp0x 8923	An infinite Cartesian product with an empty index set. (Contributed by NM, 21-Sep-2007.)
⊢ X𝑥 ∈ ∅ 𝐴 = {∅}
Theorem	ixpssmap2g 8924*	An infinite Cartesian product is a subset of set exponentiation. This version of ixpssmapg 8925 avoids ax-rep 5237. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Nov-2014.)
⊢ (∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ⊆ (∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ↑m 𝐴))
Theorem	ixpssmapg 8925*	An infinite Cartesian product is a subset of set exponentiation. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 19-Jun-2011.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ⊆ (∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ↑m 𝐴))
Theorem	0elixp 8926	Membership of the empty set in an infinite Cartesian product. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 29-Sep-2006.)
⊢ ∅ ∈ X𝑥 ∈ ∅ 𝐴
Theorem	ixpn0 8927	The infinite Cartesian product of a family 𝐵(𝑥) with an empty member is empty. The converse of this theorem is equivalent to the Axiom of Choice, see ac9 10466. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Jun-2016.)
⊢ (X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ≠ ∅ → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ≠ ∅)
Theorem	ixp0 8928	The infinite Cartesian product of a family 𝐵(𝑥) with an empty member is empty. The converse of this theorem is equivalent to the Axiom of Choice, see ac9 10466. (Contributed by NM, 1-Oct-2006.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 22-Jun-2016.)
⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = ∅ → X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = ∅)
Theorem	ixpssmap 8929*	An infinite Cartesian product is a subset of set exponentiation. Remark in [Enderton] p. 54. (Contributed by NM, 28-Sep-2006.)
⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ⊆ (∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ↑m 𝐴)
Theorem	resixp 8930*	Restriction of an element of an infinite Cartesian product. (Contributed by FL, 7-Nov-2011.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 31-May-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶) → (𝐹 ↾ 𝐵) ∈ X𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶)
Theorem	undifixp 8931*	Union of two projections of a cartesian product. (Contributed by FL, 7-Nov-2011.)
⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ X𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ X𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵)𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴) → (𝐹 ∪ 𝐺) ∈ X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶)
Theorem	mptelixpg 8932*	Condition for an explicit member of an indexed product. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Jan-2015.)
⊢ (𝐼 ∈ 𝑉 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐼 ↦ 𝐽) ∈ X𝑥 ∈ 𝐼 𝐾 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐼 𝐽 ∈ 𝐾))
Theorem	resixpfo 8933*	Restriction of elements of an infinite Cartesian product creates a surjection, if the original Cartesian product is nonempty. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-Aug-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑓 ∈ X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 ↦ (𝑓 ↾ 𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 ≠ ∅) → 𝐹:X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶–onto→X𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶)
Theorem	elixpsn 8934*	Membership in a class of singleton functions. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 24-Jan-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐹 ∈ X𝑥 ∈ {𝐴}𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝐹 = {⟨𝐴, 𝑦⟩}))
Theorem	ixpsnf1o 8935*	A bijection between a class and single-point functions to it. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 24-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ ({𝐼} × {𝑥}))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐼 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→X𝑦 ∈ {𝐼}𝐴)
Theorem	mapsnf1o 8936*	A bijection between a set and single-point functions to it. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 24-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ ({𝐼} × {𝑥}))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐼 ∈ 𝑊) → 𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→(𝐴 ↑m {𝐼}))
Theorem	boxriin 8937*	A rectangular subset of a rectangular set can be recovered as the relative intersection of single-axis restrictions. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 22-Feb-2015.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐼 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → X𝑥 ∈ 𝐼 𝐴 = (X𝑥 ∈ 𝐼 𝐵 ∩ ∩ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐼 X𝑥 ∈ 𝐼 if(𝑥 = 𝑦, 𝐴, 𝐵)))
Theorem	boxcutc 8938*	The relative complement of a box set restricted on one axis. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 22-Feb-2015.)
⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐵) → (X𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∖ X𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 if(𝑘 = 𝑋, 𝐶, 𝐵)) = X𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 if(𝑘 = 𝑋, (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶), 𝐵))
2.4.29  Equinumerosity
Syntax	cen 8939	Extend class definition to include the equinumerosity relation ("approximately equals" symbol)
class ≈
Syntax	cdom 8940	Extend class definition to include the dominance relation (curly "less than or equal to")
class ≼
Syntax	csdm 8941	Extend class definition to include the strict dominance relation (curly less-than)
class ≺
Syntax	cfn 8942	Extend class definition to include the class of all finite sets.
class Fin
Definition	df-en 8943*	Define the equinumerosity relation. Definition of [Enderton] p. 129. We define ≈ to be a binary relation rather than a connective, so its arguments must be sets to be meaningful. This is acceptable because we do not consider equinumerosity for proper classes. We derive the usual definition as bren 8952. (Contributed by NM, 28-Mar-1998.)
⊢ ≈ = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑓 𝑓:𝑥–1-1-onto→𝑦}
Definition	df-dom 8944*	Define the dominance relation. For an alternate definition see dfdom2 8974. Compare Definition of [Enderton] p. 145. Typical textbook definitions are derived as brdom 8956 and domen 8957. (Contributed by NM, 28-Mar-1998.)
⊢ ≼ = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑓 𝑓:𝑥–1-1→𝑦}
Definition	df-sdom 8945	Define the strict dominance relation. Alternate possible definitions are derived as brsdom 8970 and brsdom2 9088. Definition 3 of [Suppes] p. 97. (Contributed by NM, 31-Mar-1998.)
⊢ ≺ = ( ≼ ∖ ≈ )
Definition	df-fin 8946*	Define the (proper) class of all finite sets. Similar to Definition 10.29 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 91, whose "Fin(a)" corresponds to our "𝑎 ∈ Fin". This definition is meaningful whether or not we accept the Axiom of Infinity ax-inf2 9609. If we accept Infinity, we can also express 𝐴 ∈ Fin by 𝐴 ≺ ω (Theorem isfinite 9620.) (Contributed by NM, 22-Aug-2008.)
⊢ Fin = {𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑦 ∈ ω 𝑥 ≈ 𝑦}
Theorem	relen 8947	Equinumerosity is a relation. (Contributed by NM, 28-Mar-1998.)
⊢ Rel ≈
Theorem	reldom 8948	Dominance is a relation. (Contributed by NM, 28-Mar-1998.)
⊢ Rel ≼
Theorem	relsdom 8949	Strict dominance is a relation. (Contributed by NM, 31-Mar-1998.)
⊢ Rel ≺
Theorem	encv 8950	If two classes are equinumerous, both classes are sets. (Contributed by AV, 21-Mar-2019.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V))
Theorem	breng 8951*	Equinumerosity relation. This variation of bren 8952 does not require the Axiom of Union. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-1998.) Extract from a subproof of bren 8952. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 23-Sep-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑓 𝑓:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵))
Theorem	bren 8952*	Equinumerosity relation. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-1998.) Extract breng 8951 as an intermediate result. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 23-Sep-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑓 𝑓:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵)
Theorem	brdom2g 8953*	Dominance relation. This variation of brdomg 8954 does not require the Axiom of Union. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-1998.) Extract from a subproof of brdomg 8954. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 29-Nov-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑓 𝑓:𝐴–1-1→𝐵))
Theorem	brdomg 8954*	Dominance relation. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-1998.) Extract brdom2g 8953 as an intermediate result. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 29-Nov-2024.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐶 → (𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑓 𝑓:𝐴–1-1→𝐵))
Theorem	brdomi 8955*	Dominance relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.) Avoid ax-un 7732. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 29-Nov-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 → ∃𝑓 𝑓:𝐴–1-1→𝐵)
Theorem	brdom 8956*	Dominance relation. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-1998.)
⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑓 𝑓:𝐴–1-1→𝐵)
Theorem	domen 8957*	Dominance in terms of equinumerosity. Example 1 of [Enderton] p. 146. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-1998.)
⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝐴 ≈ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵))
Theorem	domeng 8958*	Dominance in terms of equinumerosity, with the sethood requirement expressed as an antecedent. Example 1 of [Enderton] p. 146. (Contributed by NM, 24-Apr-2004.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐶 → (𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝐴 ≈ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵)))
Theorem	ctex 8959	A countable set is a set. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 29-Dec-2016.) (Proof shortened by Jim Kingdon, 13-Mar-2023.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≼ ω → 𝐴 ∈ V)
Theorem	f1oen4g 8960	The domain and range of a one-to-one, onto set function are equinumerous. This variation of f1oeng 8966 does not require the Axiom of Replacement nor the Axiom of Power Sets nor the Axiom of Union. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 7-Dec-2024.)
⊢ (((𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋) ∧ 𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵) → 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵)
Theorem	f1dom4g 8961	The domain of a one-to-one set function is dominated by its codomain when the latter is a set. This variation of f1domg 8967 does not require the Axiom of Replacement nor the Axiom of Power Sets nor the Axiom of Union. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 7-Dec-2024.)
⊢ (((𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋) ∧ 𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵) → 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵)
Theorem	f1oen3g 8962	The domain and range of a one-to-one, onto set function are equinumerous. This variation of f1oeng 8966 does not require the Axiom of Replacement nor the Axiom of Power Sets. (Contributed by NM, 13-Jan-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵) → 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵)
Theorem	f1dom3g 8963	The domain of a one-to-one set function is dominated by its codomain when the latter is a set. This variation of f1domg 8967 does not require the Axiom of Replacement nor the Axiom of Power Sets. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 9-Sep-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵) → 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵)
Theorem	f1oen2g 8964	The domain and range of a one-to-one, onto function are equinumerous. This variation of f1oeng 8966 does not require the Axiom of Replacement. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵) → 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵)
Theorem	f1dom2g 8965	The domain of a one-to-one function is dominated by its codomain. This variation of f1domg 8967 does not require the Axiom of Replacement. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2015.) (Proof shortened by BTernaryTau, 25-Sep-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵) → 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵)
Theorem	f1oeng 8966	The domain and range of a one-to-one, onto function are equinumerous. (Contributed by NM, 19-Jun-1998.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵) → 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵)
Theorem	f1domg 8967	The domain of a one-to-one function is dominated by its codomain. (Contributed by NM, 4-Sep-2004.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐶 → (𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵 → 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵))
Theorem	f1oen 8968	The domain and range of a one-to-one, onto function are equinumerous. (Contributed by NM, 19-Jun-1998.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵 → 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵)
Theorem	f1dom 8969	The domain of a one-to-one function is dominated by its codomain. (Contributed by NM, 19-Jun-1998.)
⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵 → 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵)
Theorem	brsdom 8970	Strict dominance relation, meaning "𝐵 is strictly greater in size than 𝐴". Definition of [Mendelson] p. 255. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jun-1998.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≺ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵))
Theorem	isfi 8971*	Express "𝐴 is finite". Definition 10.29 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 91 (whose "Fin " is a predicate instead of a class). (Contributed by NM, 22-Aug-2008.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Fin ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ ω 𝐴 ≈ 𝑥)
Theorem	enssdom 8972	Equinumerosity implies dominance. (Contributed by NM, 31-Mar-1998.) (Proof shortened by TM, 10-Feb-2026.)
⊢ ≈ ⊆ ≼
Theorem	enssdomOLD 8973	Obsolete version of enssdom 8972 as of 10-Feb-2026. (Contributed by NM, 31-Mar-1998.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ≈ ⊆ ≼
Theorem	dfdom2 8974	Alternate definition of dominance. (Contributed by NM, 17-Jun-1998.)
⊢ ≼ = ( ≺ ∪ ≈ )
Theorem	endom 8975	Equinumerosity implies dominance. Theorem 15 of [Suppes] p. 94. (Contributed by NM, 28-May-1998.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 → 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵)
Theorem	sdomdom 8976	Strict dominance implies dominance. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jun-1998.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≺ 𝐵 → 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵)
Theorem	sdomnen 8977	Strict dominance implies non-equinumerosity. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jun-1998.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≺ 𝐵 → ¬ 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵)
Theorem	brdom2 8978	Dominance in terms of strict dominance and equinumerosity. Theorem 22(iv) of [Suppes] p. 97. (Contributed by NM, 17-Jun-1998.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ≺ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵))
Theorem	bren2 8979	Equinumerosity expressed in terms of dominance and strict dominance. (Contributed by NM, 23-Oct-2004.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐴 ≺ 𝐵))
Theorem	enrefg 8980	Equinumerosity is reflexive. Theorem 1 of [Suppes] p. 92. (Contributed by NM, 18-Jun-1998.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐴 ≈ 𝐴)
Theorem	enref 8981	Equinumerosity is reflexive. Theorem 1 of [Suppes] p. 92. (Contributed by NM, 25-Sep-2004.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 ≈ 𝐴
Theorem	eqeng 8982	Equality implies equinumerosity. (Contributed by NM, 26-Oct-2003.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 = 𝐵 → 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵))
Theorem	domrefg 8983	Dominance is reflexive. (Contributed by NM, 18-Jun-1998.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐴 ≼ 𝐴)
Theorem	en2d 8984*	Equinumerosity inference from an implicit one-to-one onto function. (Contributed by NM, 27-Jul-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-May-2014.) (Revised by AV, 4-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑌))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐶) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐷)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵)
Theorem	en3d 8985*	Equinumerosity inference from an implicit one-to-one onto function. (Contributed by NM, 27-Jul-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-May-2014.) (Revised by AV, 4-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝐴))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑥 = 𝐷 ↔ 𝑦 = 𝐶)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵)
Theorem	en2i 8986*	Equinumerosity inference from an implicit one-to-one onto function. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jan-2004.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    &   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐶 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝐷 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐶) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐷))    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵
Theorem	en3i 8987*	Equinumerosity inference from an implicit one-to-one onto function. (Contributed by NM, 19-Jul-2004.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    &   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑥 = 𝐷 ↔ 𝑦 = 𝐶))    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵
Theorem	dom2lem 8988*	A mapping (first hypothesis) that is one-to-one (second hypothesis) implies its domain is dominated by its codomain. (Contributed by NM, 24-Jul-2004.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐶 = 𝐷 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑦)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶):𝐴–1-1→𝐵)
Theorem	dom2d 8989*	A mapping (first hypothesis) that is one-to-one (second hypothesis) implies its domain is dominated by its codomain. (Contributed by NM, 24-Jul-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 20-May-2013.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐶 = 𝐷 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑦)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 ∈ 𝑅 → 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵))
Theorem	dom3d 8990*	A mapping (first hypothesis) that is one-to-one (second hypothesis) implies its domain is dominated by its codomain. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-May-2013.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐶 = 𝐷 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑦)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵)
Theorem	dom2 8991*	A mapping (first hypothesis) that is one-to-one (second hypothesis) implies its domain is dominated by its codomain. 𝐶 and 𝐷 can be read 𝐶(𝑥) and 𝐷(𝑦), as can be inferred from their distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by NM, 26-Oct-2003.)
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐶 = 𝐷 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑦))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵)
Theorem	dom3 8992*	A mapping (first hypothesis) that is one-to-one (second hypothesis) implies its domain is dominated by its codomain. 𝐶 and 𝐷 can be read 𝐶(𝑥) and 𝐷(𝑦), as can be inferred from their distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-May-2013.)
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐶 = 𝐷 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑦))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵)
Theorem	idssen 8993	Equality implies equinumerosity. (Contributed by NM, 30-Apr-1998.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Nov-2014.)
⊢ I ⊆ ≈
Theorem	domssl 8994	If 𝐴 is a subset of 𝐵 and 𝐶 dominates 𝐵, then 𝐶 also dominates 𝐴. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 7-Dec-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≼ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ≼ 𝐶)
Theorem	domssr 8995	If 𝐶 is a superset of 𝐵 and 𝐵 dominates 𝐴, then 𝐶 also dominates 𝐴. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 7-Dec-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵) → 𝐴 ≼ 𝐶)
Theorem	ssdomg 8996	A set dominates its subsets. Theorem 16 of [Suppes] p. 94. (Contributed by NM, 19-Jun-1998.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2015.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵))
Theorem	ener 8997	Equinumerosity is an equivalence relation. (Contributed by NM, 19-Mar-1998.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Nov-2014.) (Proof shortened by AV, 1-May-2021.)
⊢ ≈ Er V
Theorem	ensymb 8998	Symmetry of equinumerosity. Theorem 2 of [Suppes] p. 92. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐵 ≈ 𝐴)
Theorem	ensym 8999	Symmetry of equinumerosity. Theorem 2 of [Suppes] p. 92. (Contributed by NM, 26-Oct-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 → 𝐵 ≈ 𝐴)
Theorem	ensymi 9000	Symmetry of equinumerosity. Theorem 2 of [Suppes] p. 92. (Contributed by NM, 25-Sep-2004.)
⊢ 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐵 ≈ 𝐴