P. 90 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 8901-9000   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	f1opwfi 8901*	A one-to-one mapping induces a one-to-one mapping on finite subsets. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 25-Jan-2015.)
⊢ (𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵 → (𝑏 ∈ (𝒫 𝐴 ∩ Fin) ↦ (𝐹 “ 𝑏)):(𝒫 𝐴 ∩ Fin)–1-1-onto→(𝒫 𝐵 ∩ Fin))
Theorem	fissuni 8902*	A finite subset of a union is covered by finitely many elements. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ∪ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ Fin) → ∃𝑐 ∈ (𝒫 𝐵 ∩ Fin)𝐴 ⊆ ∪ 𝑐)
Theorem	fipreima 8903*	Given a finite subset 𝐴 of the range of a function, there exists a finite subset of the domain whose image is 𝐴. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 22-Feb-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ ran 𝐹 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ Fin) → ∃𝑐 ∈ (𝒫 𝐵 ∩ Fin)(𝐹 “ 𝑐) = 𝐴)
Theorem	finsschain 8904*	A finite subset of the union of a superset chain is a subset of some element of the chain. A useful preliminary result for alexsub 22796 and others. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 25-Jan-2010.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 11-Feb-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 18-May-2015.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ [⊊] Or 𝐴) ∧ (𝐵 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ ∪ 𝐴)) → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ⊆ 𝑧)
Theorem	indexfi 8905*	If for every element of a finite indexing set 𝐴 there exists a corresponding element of another set 𝐵, then there exists a finite subset of 𝐵 consisting only of those elements which are indexed by 𝐴. Proven without the Axiom of Choice, unlike indexdom 35515. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 12-Sep-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑀 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑) → ∃𝑐 ∈ Fin (𝑐 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑐 𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑐 ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑))
2.4.29  Finitely supported functions
Syntax	cfsupp 8906	Extend class definition to include the predicate to be a finitely supported function.
class finSupp
Definition	df-fsupp 8907*	Define the property of a function to be finitely supported (in relation to a given zero). (Contributed by AV, 23-May-2019.)
⊢ finSupp = {⟨𝑟, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (Fun 𝑟 ∧ (𝑟 supp 𝑧) ∈ Fin)}
Theorem	relfsupp 8908	The property of a function to be finitely supported is a relation. (Contributed by AV, 7-Jun-2019.)
⊢ Rel finSupp
Theorem	relprcnfsupp 8909	A proper class is never finitely supported. (Contributed by AV, 7-Jun-2019.)
⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ V → ¬ 𝐴 finSupp 𝑍)
Theorem	isfsupp 8910	The property of a class to be a finitely supported function (in relation to a given zero). (Contributed by AV, 23-May-2019.)
⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑅 finSupp 𝑍 ↔ (Fun 𝑅 ∧ (𝑅 supp 𝑍) ∈ Fin)))
Theorem	funisfsupp 8911	The property of a function to be finitely supported (in relation to a given zero). (Contributed by AV, 23-May-2019.)
⊢ ((Fun 𝑅 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑅 finSupp 𝑍 ↔ (𝑅 supp 𝑍) ∈ Fin))
Theorem	fsuppimp 8912	Implications of a class being a finitely supported function (in relation to a given zero). (Contributed by AV, 26-May-2019.)
⊢ (𝑅 finSupp 𝑍 → (Fun 𝑅 ∧ (𝑅 supp 𝑍) ∈ Fin))
Theorem	fsuppimpd 8913	A finitely supported function is a function with a finite support. (Contributed by AV, 6-Jun-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 finSupp 𝑍)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 supp 𝑍) ∈ Fin)
Theorem	fisuppfi 8914	A function on a finite set is finitely supported. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Jun-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (◡𝐹 “ 𝐶) ∈ Fin)
Theorem	fdmfisuppfi 8915	The support of a function with a finite domain is always finite. (Contributed by AV, 27-Apr-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐷⟶𝑅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 supp 𝑍) ∈ Fin)
Theorem	fdmfifsupp 8916	A function with a finite domain is always finitely supported. (Contributed by AV, 25-May-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐷⟶𝑅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 finSupp 𝑍)
Theorem	fsuppmptdm 8917*	A mapping with a finite domain is finitely supported. (Contributed by AV, 7-Jun-2019.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝑌)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 finSupp 𝑍)
Theorem	fndmfisuppfi 8918	The support of a function with a finite domain is always finite. (Contributed by AV, 25-May-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 Fn 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 supp 𝑍) ∈ Fin)
Theorem	fndmfifsupp 8919	A function with a finite domain is always finitely supported. (Contributed by AV, 25-May-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 Fn 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 finSupp 𝑍)
Theorem	suppeqfsuppbi 8920	If two functions have the same support, one function is finitely supported iff the other one is finitely supported. (Contributed by AV, 30-Jun-2019.)
⊢ (((𝐹 ∈ 𝑈 ∧ Fun 𝐹) ∧ (𝐺 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ Fun 𝐺)) → ((𝐹 supp 𝑍) = (𝐺 supp 𝑍) → (𝐹 finSupp 𝑍 ↔ 𝐺 finSupp 𝑍)))
Theorem	suppssfifsupp 8921	If the support of a function is a subset of a finite set, the function is finitely supported. (Contributed by AV, 15-Jul-2019.)
⊢ (((𝐺 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ Fun 𝐺 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ Fin ∧ (𝐺 supp 𝑍) ⊆ 𝐹)) → 𝐺 finSupp 𝑍)
Theorem	fsuppsssupp 8922	If the support of a function is a subset of the support of a finitely supported function, the function is finitely supported. (Contributed by AV, 2-Jul-2019.) (Proof shortened by AV, 15-Jul-2019.)
⊢ (((𝐺 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ Fun 𝐺) ∧ (𝐹 finSupp 𝑍 ∧ (𝐺 supp 𝑍) ⊆ (𝐹 supp 𝑍))) → 𝐺 finSupp 𝑍)
Theorem	fsuppxpfi 8923	The cartesian product of two finitely supported functions is finite. (Contributed by AV, 17-Jul-2019.)
⊢ ((𝐹 finSupp 𝑍 ∧ 𝐺 finSupp 𝑍) → ((𝐹 supp 𝑍) × (𝐺 supp 𝑍)) ∈ Fin)
Theorem	fczfsuppd 8924	A constant function with value zero is finitely supported. (Contributed by AV, 30-Jun-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 × {𝑍}) finSupp 𝑍)
Theorem	fsuppun 8925	The union of two finitely supported functions is finitely supported (but not necessarily a function!). (Contributed by AV, 3-Jun-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 finSupp 𝑍)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 finSupp 𝑍)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐹 ∪ 𝐺) supp 𝑍) ∈ Fin)
Theorem	fsuppunfi 8926	The union of the support of two finitely supported functions is finite. (Contributed by AV, 1-Jul-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 finSupp 𝑍)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 finSupp 𝑍)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐹 supp 𝑍) ∪ (𝐺 supp 𝑍)) ∈ Fin)
Theorem	fsuppunbi 8927	If the union of two classes/functions is a function, this union is finitely supported iff the two functions are finitely supported. (Contributed by AV, 18-Jun-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → Fun (𝐹 ∪ 𝐺))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐹 ∪ 𝐺) finSupp 𝑍 ↔ (𝐹 finSupp 𝑍 ∧ 𝐺 finSupp 𝑍)))
Theorem	0fsupp 8928	The empty set is a finitely supported function. (Contributed by AV, 19-Jul-2019.)
⊢ (𝑍 ∈ 𝑉 → ∅ finSupp 𝑍)
Theorem	snopfsupp 8929	A singleton containing an ordered pair is a finitely supported function. (Contributed by AV, 19-Jul-2019.)
⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑈) → {⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩} finSupp 𝑍)
Theorem	funsnfsupp 8930	Finite support for a function extended by a singleton. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 27-Feb-2015.) (Revised by AV, 19-Jul-2019.)
⊢ (((𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑊) ∧ (Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝑋 ∉ dom 𝐹)) → ((𝐹 ∪ {⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩}) finSupp 𝑍 ↔ 𝐹 finSupp 𝑍))
Theorem	fsuppres 8931	The restriction of a finitely supported function is finitely supported. (Contributed by AV, 14-Jul-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 finSupp 𝑍)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ↾ 𝑋) finSupp 𝑍)
Theorem	ressuppfi 8932	If the support of the restriction of a function by a set which, subtracted from the domain of the function so that its difference is finite, the support of the function itself is finite. (Contributed by AV, 22-Apr-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (dom 𝐹 ∖ 𝐵) ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 = (𝐹 ↾ 𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺 supp 𝑍) ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 supp 𝑍) ∈ Fin)
Theorem	resfsupp 8933	If the restriction of a function by a set which, subtracted from the domain of the function so that its difference is finitely supported, the function itself is finitely supported. (Contributed by AV, 27-May-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (dom 𝐹 ∖ 𝐵) ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun 𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 = (𝐹 ↾ 𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 finSupp 𝑍)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 finSupp 𝑍)
Theorem	resfifsupp 8934	The restriction of a function to a finite set is finitely supported. (Contributed by AV, 12-Dec-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → Fun 𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ↾ 𝑋) finSupp 𝑍)
Theorem	frnfsuppbi 8935	Two ways of saying that a function with known codomain is finitely supported. (Contributed by AV, 8-Jul-2019.)
⊢ ((𝐼 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐹:𝐼⟶𝑆 → (𝐹 finSupp 𝑍 ↔ (◡𝐹 “ (𝑆 ∖ {𝑍})) ∈ Fin)))
Theorem	fsuppmptif 8936*	A function mapping an argument to either a value of a finitely supported function or zero is finitely supported. (Contributed by AV, 6-Jun-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 finSupp 𝑍)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ if(𝑘 ∈ 𝐷, (𝐹‘𝑘), 𝑍)) finSupp 𝑍)
Theorem	sniffsupp 8937*	A function mapping all but one arguments to zero is finitely supported. (Contributed by AV, 8-Jul-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐼 ↦ if(𝑥 = 𝑋, 𝐴, 0 ))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 finSupp 0 )
Theorem	fsuppcolem 8938	Lemma for fsuppco 8939. Formula building theorem for finite supports: rearranging the index set. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 21-Mar-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (◡𝐹 “ (V ∖ {𝑍})) ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝑋–1-1→𝑌)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (◡(𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) “ (V ∖ {𝑍})) ∈ Fin)
Theorem	fsuppco 8939	The composition of a 1-1 function with a finitely supported function is finitely supported. (Contributed by AV, 28-May-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 finSupp 𝑍)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝑋–1-1→𝑌)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) finSupp 𝑍)
Theorem	fsuppco2 8940	The composition of a function which maps the zero to zero with a finitely supported function is finitely supported. This is not only a special case of fsuppcor 8941 because it does not require that the "zero" is an element of the range of the finitely supported function. (Contributed by AV, 6-Jun-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐵⟶𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 finSupp 𝑍)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺‘𝑍) = 𝑍)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺 ∘ 𝐹) finSupp 𝑍)
Theorem	fsuppcor 8941	The composition of a function which maps the zero of the range of a finitely supported function to the zero of its range with this finitely supported function is finitely supported. (Contributed by AV, 6-Jun-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 0 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐵⟶𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 finSupp 𝑍)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺‘𝑍) = 0 )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺 ∘ 𝐹) finSupp 0 )
Theorem	mapfienlem1 8942*	Lemma 1 for mapfien 8945. (Contributed by AV, 3-Jul-2019.) (Revised by AV, 28-Jul-2024.)
⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 ↑m 𝐴) ∣ 𝑥 finSupp 𝑍}    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = {𝑥 ∈ (𝐷 ↑m 𝐶) ∣ 𝑥 finSupp 𝑊}    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (𝐺‘𝑍)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐶–1-1-onto→𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐵–1-1-onto→𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑌)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑓 ∈ 𝑆) → (𝐺 ∘ (𝑓 ∘ 𝐹)) finSupp 𝑊)
Theorem	mapfienlem2 8943*	Lemma 2 for mapfien 8945. (Contributed by AV, 3-Jul-2019.) (Revised by AV, 28-Jul-2024.)
⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 ↑m 𝐴) ∣ 𝑥 finSupp 𝑍}    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = {𝑥 ∈ (𝐷 ↑m 𝐶) ∣ 𝑥 finSupp 𝑊}    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (𝐺‘𝑍)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐶–1-1-onto→𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐵–1-1-onto→𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑌)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑔 ∈ 𝑇) → ((◡𝐺 ∘ 𝑔) ∘ ◡𝐹) finSupp 𝑍)
Theorem	mapfienlem3 8944*	Lemma 3 for mapfien 8945. (Contributed by AV, 3-Jul-2019.) (Revised by AV, 28-Jul-2024.)
⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 ↑m 𝐴) ∣ 𝑥 finSupp 𝑍}    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = {𝑥 ∈ (𝐷 ↑m 𝐶) ∣ 𝑥 finSupp 𝑊}    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (𝐺‘𝑍)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐶–1-1-onto→𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐵–1-1-onto→𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑌)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑔 ∈ 𝑇) → ((◡𝐺 ∘ 𝑔) ∘ ◡𝐹) ∈ 𝑆)
Theorem	mapfien 8945*	A bijection of the base sets induces a bijection on the set of finitely supported functions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2015.) (Revised by AV, 3-Jul-2019.) (Revised by AV, 28-Jul-2024.)
⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 ↑m 𝐴) ∣ 𝑥 finSupp 𝑍}    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = {𝑥 ∈ (𝐷 ↑m 𝐶) ∣ 𝑥 finSupp 𝑊}    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (𝐺‘𝑍)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐶–1-1-onto→𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐵–1-1-onto→𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑌)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑓 ∈ 𝑆 ↦ (𝐺 ∘ (𝑓 ∘ 𝐹))):𝑆–1-1-onto→𝑇)
Theorem	mapfien2 8946*	Equinumerousity relation for sets of finitely supported functions. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 9-Jul-2015.) (Revised by AV, 7-Jul-2019.)
⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 ↑m 𝐴) ∣ 𝑥 finSupp 0 }    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = {𝑥 ∈ (𝐷 ↑m 𝐶) ∣ 𝑥 finSupp 𝑊}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≈ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ≈ 𝑇)
2.4.30  Finite intersections
Syntax	cfi 8947	Extend class notation with the function whose value is the class of finite intersections of the elements of a given set.
class fi
Definition	df-fi 8948*	Function whose value is the class of finite intersections of the elements of the argument. Note that the empty intersection being the universal class, hence a proper class, it cannot be an element of that class. Therefore, the function value is the class of nonempty finite intersections of elements of the argument (see elfi2 8951). (Contributed by FL, 27-Apr-2008.)
⊢ fi = (𝑥 ∈ V ↦ {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑦 ∈ (𝒫 𝑥 ∩ Fin)𝑧 = ∩ 𝑦})
Theorem	fival 8949*	The set of all the finite intersections of the elements of 𝐴. (Contributed by FL, 27-Apr-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Nov-2013.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (fi‘𝐴) = {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ (𝒫 𝐴 ∩ Fin)𝑦 = ∩ 𝑥})
Theorem	elfi 8950*	Specific properties of an element of (fi‘𝐵). (Contributed by FL, 27-Apr-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Nov-2013.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴 ∈ (fi‘𝐵) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ (𝒫 𝐵 ∩ Fin)𝐴 = ∩ 𝑥))
Theorem	elfi2 8951*	The empty intersection need not be considered in the set of finite intersections. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 21-Mar-2015.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 ∈ (fi‘𝐵) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ ((𝒫 𝐵 ∩ Fin) ∖ {∅})𝐴 = ∩ 𝑥))
Theorem	elfir 8952	Sufficient condition for an element of (fi‘𝐵). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Nov-2013.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ Fin)) → ∩ 𝐴 ∈ (fi‘𝐵))
Theorem	intrnfi 8953	Sufficient condition for the intersection of the range of a function to be in the set of finite intersections. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Aug-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ (𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ Fin)) → ∩ ran 𝐹 ∈ (fi‘𝐵))
Theorem	iinfi 8954*	An indexed intersection of elements of 𝐶 is an element of the finite intersections of 𝐶. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Aug-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ Fin)) → ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ (fi‘𝐶))
Theorem	inelfi 8955	The intersection of two sets is a finite intersection. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 6-Jan-2017.)
⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋) → (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ (fi‘𝑋))
Theorem	ssfii 8956	Any element of a set 𝐴 is the intersection of a finite subset of 𝐴. (Contributed by FL, 27-Apr-2008.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 21-Mar-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐴 ⊆ (fi‘𝐴))
Theorem	fi0 8957	The set of finite intersections of the empty set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Aug-2015.)
⊢ (fi‘∅) = ∅
Theorem	fieq0 8958	A set is empty iff the class of all the finite intersections of that set is empty. (Contributed by FL, 27-Apr-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Nov-2013.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 = ∅ ↔ (fi‘𝐴) = ∅))
Theorem	fiin 8959	The elements of (fi‘𝐶) are closed under finite intersection. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Nov-2013.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (fi‘𝐶) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (fi‘𝐶)) → (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ (fi‘𝐶))
Theorem	dffi2 8960*	The set of finite intersections is the smallest set that contains 𝐴 and is closed under pairwise intersection. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Nov-2013.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (fi‘𝐴) = ∩ {𝑧 ∣ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝑧 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑧 (𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) ∈ 𝑧)})
Theorem	fiss 8961	Subset relationship for function fi. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 7-Oct-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Nov-2013.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵) → (fi‘𝐴) ⊆ (fi‘𝐵))
Theorem	inficl 8962*	A set which is closed under pairwise intersection is closed under finite intersection. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Nov-2013.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) ∈ 𝐴 ↔ (fi‘𝐴) = 𝐴))
Theorem	fipwuni 8963	The set of finite intersections of a set is contained in the powerset of the union of the elements of 𝐴. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Nov-2013.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 21-Mar-2015.)
⊢ (fi‘𝐴) ⊆ 𝒫 ∪ 𝐴
Theorem	fisn 8964	A singleton is closed under finite intersections. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Sep-2015.)
⊢ (fi‘{𝐴}) = {𝐴}
Theorem	fiuni 8965	The union of the finite intersections of a set is simply the union of the set itself. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 5-Sep-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Nov-2013.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ∪ 𝐴 = ∪ (fi‘𝐴))
Theorem	fipwss 8966	If a set is a family of subsets of some base set, then so is its finite intersection. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Aug-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝒫 𝑋 → (fi‘𝐴) ⊆ 𝒫 𝑋)
Theorem	elfiun 8967*	A finite intersection of elements taken from a union of collections. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 15-Nov-2009.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 26-Nov-2013.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐾) → (𝐴 ∈ (fi‘(𝐵 ∪ 𝐶)) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ (fi‘𝐵) ∨ 𝐴 ∈ (fi‘𝐶) ∨ ∃𝑥 ∈ (fi‘𝐵)∃𝑦 ∈ (fi‘𝐶)𝐴 = (𝑥 ∩ 𝑦))))
Theorem	dffi3 8968*	The set of finite intersections can be "constructed" inductively by iterating binary intersection ω-many times. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 21-Mar-2015.)
⊢ 𝑅 = (𝑢 ∈ V ↦ ran (𝑦 ∈ 𝑢, 𝑧 ∈ 𝑢 ↦ (𝑦 ∩ 𝑧)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (fi‘𝐴) = ∪ (rec(𝑅, 𝐴) “ ω))
Theorem	fifo 8969*	Describe a surjection from nonempty finite sets to finite intersections. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-May-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑦 ∈ ((𝒫 𝐴 ∩ Fin) ∖ {∅}) ↦ ∩ 𝑦)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐹:((𝒫 𝐴 ∩ Fin) ∖ {∅})–onto→(fi‘𝐴))
2.4.31  Hall's marriage theorem
Theorem	marypha1lem 8970*	Core induction for Philip Hall's marriage theorem. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 19-Feb-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Fin → (𝑏 ∈ Fin → ∀𝑐 ∈ 𝒫 (𝐴 × 𝑏)(∀𝑑 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴𝑑 ≼ (𝑐 “ 𝑑) → ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝒫 𝑐𝑒:𝐴–1-1→V)))
Theorem	marypha1 8971*	(Philip) Hall's marriage theorem, sufficiency: a finite relation contains an injection if there is no subset of its domain which would be forced to violate the pigeonhole principle. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 20-Feb-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ⊆ (𝐴 × 𝐵))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴) → 𝑑 ≼ (𝐶 “ 𝑑))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝒫 𝐶𝑓:𝐴–1-1→𝐵)
Theorem	marypha2lem1 8972*	Lemma for marypha2 8976. Properties of the used relation. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 20-Feb-2015.)
⊢ 𝑇 = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ({𝑥} × (𝐹‘𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ 𝑇 ⊆ (𝐴 × ∪ ran 𝐹)
Theorem	marypha2lem2 8973*	Lemma for marypha2 8976. Properties of the used relation. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 20-Feb-2015.)
⊢ 𝑇 = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ({𝑥} × (𝐹‘𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ 𝑇 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥))}
Theorem	marypha2lem3 8974*	Lemma for marypha2 8976. Properties of the used relation. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 20-Feb-2015.)
⊢ 𝑇 = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ({𝑥} × (𝐹‘𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ 𝐺 Fn 𝐴) → (𝐺 ⊆ 𝑇 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐺‘𝑥) ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥)))
Theorem	marypha2lem4 8975*	Lemma for marypha2 8976. Properties of the used relation. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 20-Feb-2015.)
⊢ 𝑇 = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ({𝑥} × (𝐹‘𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴) → (𝑇 “ 𝑋) = ∪ (𝐹 “ 𝑋))
Theorem	marypha2 8976*	Version of marypha1 8971 using a functional family of sets instead of a relation. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 20-Feb-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶Fin)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴) → 𝑑 ≼ ∪ (𝐹 “ 𝑑))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑔(𝑔:𝐴–1-1→V ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑔‘𝑥) ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥)))
2.4.32  Supremum and infimum
Syntax	csup 8977	Extend class notation to include supremum of class 𝐴. Here 𝑅 is ordinarily a relation that strictly orders class 𝐵. For example, 𝑅 could be 'less than' and 𝐵 could be the set of real numbers.
class sup(𝐴, 𝐵, 𝑅)
Syntax	cinf 8978	Extend class notation to include infimum of class 𝐴. Here 𝑅 is ordinarily a relation that strictly orders class 𝐵. For example, 𝑅 could be 'less than' and 𝐵 could be the set of real numbers.
class inf(𝐴, 𝐵, 𝑅)
Definition	df-sup 8979*	Define the supremum of class 𝐴. It is meaningful when 𝑅 is a relation that strictly orders 𝐵 and when the supremum exists. For example, 𝑅 could be 'less than', 𝐵 could be the set of real numbers, and 𝐴 could be the set of all positive reals whose square is less than 2; in this case the supremum is defined as the square root of 2 per sqrtval 14686. See dfsup2 8981 for alternate definition not requiring dummy variables. (Contributed by NM, 22-May-1999.)
⊢ sup(𝐴, 𝐵, 𝑅) = ∪ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦𝑅𝑧))}
Definition	df-inf 8980	Define the infimum of class 𝐴. It is meaningful when 𝑅 is a relation that strictly orders 𝐵 and when the infimum exists. For example, 𝑅 could be 'less than', 𝐵 could be the set of real numbers, and 𝐴 could be the set of all positive reals; in this case the infimum is 0. The infimum is defined as the supremum using the converse ordering relation. In the given example, 0 is the supremum of all reals (greatest real number) for which all positive reals are greater. (Contributed by AV, 2-Sep-2020.)
⊢ inf(𝐴, 𝐵, 𝑅) = sup(𝐴, 𝐵, ◡𝑅)
Theorem	dfsup2 8981	Quantifier-free definition of supremum. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 19-Feb-2013.)
⊢ sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅) = ∪ (𝐴 ∖ ((◡𝑅 “ 𝐵) ∪ (𝑅 “ (𝐴 ∖ (◡𝑅 “ 𝐵)))))
Theorem	supeq1 8982	Equality theorem for supremum. (Contributed by NM, 22-May-1999.)
⊢ (𝐵 = 𝐶 → sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅) = sup(𝐶, 𝐴, 𝑅))
Theorem	supeq1d 8983	Equality deduction for supremum. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 22-Jun-2011.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅) = sup(𝐶, 𝐴, 𝑅))
Theorem	supeq1i 8984	Equality inference for supremum. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 22-Jun-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = 𝐶    ⇒   ⊢ sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅) = sup(𝐶, 𝐴, 𝑅)
Theorem	supeq2 8985	Equality theorem for supremum. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.)
⊢ (𝐵 = 𝐶 → sup(𝐴, 𝐵, 𝑅) = sup(𝐴, 𝐶, 𝑅))
Theorem	supeq3 8986	Equality theorem for supremum. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 13-Jun-2018.)
⊢ (𝑅 = 𝑆 → sup(𝐴, 𝐵, 𝑅) = sup(𝐴, 𝐵, 𝑆))
Theorem	supeq123d 8987	Equality deduction for supremum. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 20-Jan-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = 𝐸)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = 𝐹)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → sup(𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶) = sup(𝐷, 𝐸, 𝐹))
Theorem	nfsup 8988	Hypothesis builder for supremum. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Mar-2014.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝑅    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥sup(𝐴, 𝐵, 𝑅)
Theorem	supmo 8989*	Any class 𝐵 has at most one supremum in 𝐴 (where 𝑅 is interpreted as 'less than'). (Contributed by NM, 5-May-1999.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Dec-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Or 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦𝑅𝑧)))
Theorem	supexd 8990	A supremum is a set. (Contributed by NM, 22-May-1999.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Dec-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Or 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∈ V)
Theorem	supeu 8991*	A supremum is unique. Similar to Theorem I.26 of [Apostol] p. 24 (but for suprema in general). (Contributed by NM, 12-Oct-2004.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Or 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦𝑅𝑧)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦𝑅𝑧)))
Theorem	supval2 8992*	Alternate expression for the supremum. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Dec-2016.) (Revised by Thierry Arnoux, 24-Sep-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Or 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅) = (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦𝑅𝑧))))
Theorem	eqsup 8993*	Sufficient condition for an element to be equal to the supremum. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 21-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Or 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝐶𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝐶 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦𝑅𝑧)) → sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅) = 𝐶))
Theorem	eqsupd 8994*	Sufficient condition for an element to be equal to the supremum. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 21-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Or 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → ¬ 𝐶𝑅𝑦)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦𝑅𝐶)) → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦𝑅𝑧)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅) = 𝐶)
Theorem	supcl 8995*	A supremum belongs to its base class (closure law). See also supub 8996 and suplub 8997. (Contributed by NM, 12-Oct-2004.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Or 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦𝑅𝑧)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	supub 8996*	A supremum is an upper bound. See also supcl 8995 and suplub 8997. This proof demonstrates how to expand an iota-based definition (df-iota 6297) using riotacl2 7144. (Contributed by NM, 12-Oct-2004.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 24-Dec-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Or 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦𝑅𝑧)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 ∈ 𝐵 → ¬ sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝑅𝐶))
Theorem	suplub 8997*	A supremum is the least upper bound. See also supcl 8995 and supub 8996. (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Dec-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Or 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦𝑅𝑧)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶𝑅sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅)) → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶𝑅𝑧))
Theorem	suplub2 8998*	Bidirectional form of suplub 8997. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Or 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦𝑅𝑧)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐶𝑅sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅) ↔ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶𝑅𝑧))
Theorem	supnub 8999*	An upper bound is not less than the supremum. (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2004.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Or 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦𝑅𝑧)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝐶𝑅𝑧) → ¬ 𝐶𝑅sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅)))
Theorem	supex 9000	A supremum is a set. (Contributed by NM, 22-May-1999.)
⊢ 𝑅 Or 𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∈ V