Theorem isatl 39338

Description: The predicate "is an atomic lattice." Every nonzero element is less than or equal to an atom. (Contributed by NM, 18-Sep-2011.) (Revised by NM, 14-Sep-2018.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
isatlat.b	⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)
isatlat.g	⊢ 𝐺 = (glb‘𝐾)
isatlat.l	⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)
isatlat.z	⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)
isatlat.a	⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
isatl	⊢ (𝐾 ∈ AtLat ↔ (𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝐺 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 ≠ 0 → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥)))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑦,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵   𝑥,𝑦,𝐾

Allowed substitution hints:   𝐴(𝑥)   𝐵(𝑦)   𝐺(𝑥,𝑦)   ≤ (𝑥,𝑦)   0 (𝑥,𝑦)

Proof of Theorem isatl

Dummy variable 𝑘 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		fveq2 6817	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑘 = 𝐾 → (Base‘𝑘) = (Base‘𝐾))
2		isatlat.b	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)
3	1, 2	eqtr4di 2784	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑘 = 𝐾 → (Base‘𝑘) = 𝐵)
4		fveq2 6817	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑘 = 𝐾 → (glb‘𝑘) = (glb‘𝐾))
5		isatlat.g	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ 𝐺 = (glb‘𝐾)
6	4, 5	eqtr4di 2784	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑘 = 𝐾 → (glb‘𝑘) = 𝐺)
7	6	dmeqd 5840	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑘 = 𝐾 → dom (glb‘𝑘) = dom 𝐺)
8	3, 7	eleq12d 2825	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑘 = 𝐾 → ((Base‘𝑘) ∈ dom (glb‘𝑘) ↔ 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝐺))
9		fveq2 6817	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑘 = 𝐾 → (0.‘𝑘) = (0.‘𝐾))
10		isatlat.z	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)
11	9, 10	eqtr4di 2784	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑘 = 𝐾 → (0.‘𝑘) = 0 )
12	11	neeq2d 2988	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑘 = 𝐾 → (𝑥 ≠ (0.‘𝑘) ↔ 𝑥 ≠ 0 ))
13		fveq2 6817	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑘 = 𝐾 → (Atoms‘𝑘) = (Atoms‘𝐾))
14		isatlat.a	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)
15	13, 14	eqtr4di 2784	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑘 = 𝐾 → (Atoms‘𝑘) = 𝐴)
16		fveq2 6817	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑘 = 𝐾 → (le‘𝑘) = (le‘𝐾))
17		isatlat.l	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)
18	16, 17	eqtr4di 2784	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑘 = 𝐾 → (le‘𝑘) = ≤ )
19	18	breqd 5097	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑘 = 𝐾 → (𝑦(le‘𝑘)𝑥 ↔ 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥))
20	15, 19	rexeqbidv 3313	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑘 = 𝐾 → (∃𝑦 ∈ (Atoms‘𝑘)𝑦(le‘𝑘)𝑥 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥))
21	12, 20	imbi12d 344	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑘 = 𝐾 → ((𝑥 ≠ (0.‘𝑘) → ∃𝑦 ∈ (Atoms‘𝑘)𝑦(le‘𝑘)𝑥) ↔ (𝑥 ≠ 0 → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥)))
22	3, 21	raleqbidv 3312	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑘 = 𝐾 → (∀𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝑘)(𝑥 ≠ (0.‘𝑘) → ∃𝑦 ∈ (Atoms‘𝑘)𝑦(le‘𝑘)𝑥) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 ≠ 0 → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥)))
23	8, 22	anbi12d 632	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑘 = 𝐾 → (((Base‘𝑘) ∈ dom (glb‘𝑘) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝑘)(𝑥 ≠ (0.‘𝑘) → ∃𝑦 ∈ (Atoms‘𝑘)𝑦(le‘𝑘)𝑥)) ↔ (𝐵 ∈ dom 𝐺 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 ≠ 0 → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥))))
24		df-atl 39337	. . 3 ⊢ AtLat = {𝑘 ∈ Lat ∣ ((Base‘𝑘) ∈ dom (glb‘𝑘) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝑘)(𝑥 ≠ (0.‘𝑘) → ∃𝑦 ∈ (Atoms‘𝑘)𝑦(le‘𝑘)𝑥))}
25	23, 24	elrab2 3645	. 2 ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ AtLat ↔ (𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ (𝐵 ∈ dom 𝐺 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 ≠ 0 → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥))))
26		3anass 1094	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝐺 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 ≠ 0 → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥)) ↔ (𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ (𝐵 ∈ dom 𝐺 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 ≠ 0 → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥))))
27	25, 26	bitr4i 278	1 ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ AtLat ↔ (𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝐺 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 ≠ 0 → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥)))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 206   ∧ wa 395   ∧ w3a 1086   = wceq 1541   ∈ wcel 2111   ≠ wne 2928  ∀wral 3047  ∃wrex 3056   class class class wbr 5086  dom cdm 5611  ‘cfv 6476  Basecbs 17115  lecple 17163  glbcglb 18211  0.cp0 18322  Latclat 18332  Atomscatm 39302  AtLatcal 39303

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1796  ax-4 1810  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1968  ax-7 2009  ax-8 2113  ax-9 2121  ax-ext 2703

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1544  df-fal 1554  df-ex 1781  df-sb 2068  df-clab 2710  df-cleq 2723  df-clel 2806  df-ne 2929  df-ral 3048  df-rex 3057  df-rab 3396  df-v 3438  df-dif 3900  df-un 3902  df-ss 3914  df-nul 4279  df-if 4471  df-sn 4572  df-pr 4574  df-op 4578  df-uni 4855  df-br 5087  df-dm 5621  df-iota 6432  df-fv 6484  df-atl 39337

This theorem is referenced by:  atllat  39339  atl0dm  39341  atlex  39355