Theorem isatl 39559

Description: The predicate "is an atomic lattice." Every nonzero element is less than or equal to an atom. (Contributed by NM, 18-Sep-2011.) (Revised by NM, 14-Sep-2018.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
isatlat.b	⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)
isatlat.g	⊢ 𝐺 = (glb‘𝐾)
isatlat.l	⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)
isatlat.z	⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)
isatlat.a	⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
isatl	⊢ (𝐾 ∈ AtLat ↔ (𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝐺 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 ≠ 0 → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥)))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑦,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵   𝑥,𝑦,𝐾

Allowed substitution hints:   𝐴(𝑥)   𝐵(𝑦)   𝐺(𝑥,𝑦)   ≤ (𝑥,𝑦)   0 (𝑥,𝑦)

Proof of Theorem isatl

Dummy variable 𝑘 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		fveq2 6834	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑘 = 𝐾 → (Base‘𝑘) = (Base‘𝐾))
2		isatlat.b	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)
3	1, 2	eqtr4di 2789	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑘 = 𝐾 → (Base‘𝑘) = 𝐵)
4		fveq2 6834	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑘 = 𝐾 → (glb‘𝑘) = (glb‘𝐾))
5		isatlat.g	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ 𝐺 = (glb‘𝐾)
6	4, 5	eqtr4di 2789	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑘 = 𝐾 → (glb‘𝑘) = 𝐺)
7	6	dmeqd 5854	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑘 = 𝐾 → dom (glb‘𝑘) = dom 𝐺)
8	3, 7	eleq12d 2830	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑘 = 𝐾 → ((Base‘𝑘) ∈ dom (glb‘𝑘) ↔ 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝐺))
9		fveq2 6834	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑘 = 𝐾 → (0.‘𝑘) = (0.‘𝐾))
10		isatlat.z	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)
11	9, 10	eqtr4di 2789	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑘 = 𝐾 → (0.‘𝑘) = 0 )
12	11	neeq2d 2992	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑘 = 𝐾 → (𝑥 ≠ (0.‘𝑘) ↔ 𝑥 ≠ 0 ))
13		fveq2 6834	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑘 = 𝐾 → (Atoms‘𝑘) = (Atoms‘𝐾))
14		isatlat.a	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)
15	13, 14	eqtr4di 2789	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑘 = 𝐾 → (Atoms‘𝑘) = 𝐴)
16		fveq2 6834	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑘 = 𝐾 → (le‘𝑘) = (le‘𝐾))
17		isatlat.l	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)
18	16, 17	eqtr4di 2789	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑘 = 𝐾 → (le‘𝑘) = ≤ )
19	18	breqd 5109	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑘 = 𝐾 → (𝑦(le‘𝑘)𝑥 ↔ 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥))
20	15, 19	rexeqbidv 3317	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑘 = 𝐾 → (∃𝑦 ∈ (Atoms‘𝑘)𝑦(le‘𝑘)𝑥 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥))
21	12, 20	imbi12d 344	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑘 = 𝐾 → ((𝑥 ≠ (0.‘𝑘) → ∃𝑦 ∈ (Atoms‘𝑘)𝑦(le‘𝑘)𝑥) ↔ (𝑥 ≠ 0 → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥)))
22	3, 21	raleqbidv 3316	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑘 = 𝐾 → (∀𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝑘)(𝑥 ≠ (0.‘𝑘) → ∃𝑦 ∈ (Atoms‘𝑘)𝑦(le‘𝑘)𝑥) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 ≠ 0 → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥)))
23	8, 22	anbi12d 632	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑘 = 𝐾 → (((Base‘𝑘) ∈ dom (glb‘𝑘) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝑘)(𝑥 ≠ (0.‘𝑘) → ∃𝑦 ∈ (Atoms‘𝑘)𝑦(le‘𝑘)𝑥)) ↔ (𝐵 ∈ dom 𝐺 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 ≠ 0 → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥))))
24		df-atl 39558	. . 3 ⊢ AtLat = {𝑘 ∈ Lat ∣ ((Base‘𝑘) ∈ dom (glb‘𝑘) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝑘)(𝑥 ≠ (0.‘𝑘) → ∃𝑦 ∈ (Atoms‘𝑘)𝑦(le‘𝑘)𝑥))}
25	23, 24	elrab2 3649	. 2 ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ AtLat ↔ (𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ (𝐵 ∈ dom 𝐺 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 ≠ 0 → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥))))
26		3anass 1094	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝐺 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 ≠ 0 → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥)) ↔ (𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ (𝐵 ∈ dom 𝐺 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 ≠ 0 → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥))))
27	25, 26	bitr4i 278	1 ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ AtLat ↔ (𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝐺 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 ≠ 0 → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥)))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 206   ∧ wa 395   ∧ w3a 1086   = wceq 1541   ∈ wcel 2113   ≠ wne 2932  ∀wral 3051  ∃wrex 3060   class class class wbr 5098  dom cdm 5624  ‘cfv 6492  Basecbs 17136  lecple 17184  glbcglb 18233  0.cp0 18344  Latclat 18354  Atomscatm 39523  AtLatcal 39524

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1796  ax-4 1810  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1968  ax-7 2009  ax-8 2115  ax-9 2123  ax-ext 2708

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1544  df-fal 1554  df-ex 1781  df-sb 2068  df-clab 2715  df-cleq 2728  df-clel 2811  df-ne 2933  df-ral 3052  df-rex 3061  df-rab 3400  df-v 3442  df-dif 3904  df-un 3906  df-ss 3918  df-nul 4286  df-if 4480  df-sn 4581  df-pr 4583  df-op 4587  df-uni 4864  df-br 5099  df-dm 5634  df-iota 6448  df-fv 6500  df-atl 39558

This theorem is referenced by:  atllat  39560  atl0dm  39562  atlex  39576