Theorem isatl 39292

Description: The predicate "is an atomic lattice." Every nonzero element is less than or equal to an atom. (Contributed by NM, 18-Sep-2011.) (Revised by NM, 14-Sep-2018.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
isatlat.b	⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)
isatlat.g	⊢ 𝐺 = (glb‘𝐾)
isatlat.l	⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)
isatlat.z	⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)
isatlat.a	⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
isatl	⊢ (𝐾 ∈ AtLat ↔ (𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝐺 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 ≠ 0 → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥)))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑦,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵   𝑥,𝑦,𝐾

Allowed substitution hints:   𝐴(𝑥)   𝐵(𝑦)   𝐺(𝑥,𝑦)   ≤ (𝑥,𝑦)   0 (𝑥,𝑦)

Proof of Theorem isatl

Dummy variable 𝑘 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		fveq2 6858	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑘 = 𝐾 → (Base‘𝑘) = (Base‘𝐾))
2		isatlat.b	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)
3	1, 2	eqtr4di 2782	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑘 = 𝐾 → (Base‘𝑘) = 𝐵)
4		fveq2 6858	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑘 = 𝐾 → (glb‘𝑘) = (glb‘𝐾))
5		isatlat.g	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ 𝐺 = (glb‘𝐾)
6	4, 5	eqtr4di 2782	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑘 = 𝐾 → (glb‘𝑘) = 𝐺)
7	6	dmeqd 5869	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑘 = 𝐾 → dom (glb‘𝑘) = dom 𝐺)
8	3, 7	eleq12d 2822	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑘 = 𝐾 → ((Base‘𝑘) ∈ dom (glb‘𝑘) ↔ 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝐺))
9		fveq2 6858	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑘 = 𝐾 → (0.‘𝑘) = (0.‘𝐾))
10		isatlat.z	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)
11	9, 10	eqtr4di 2782	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑘 = 𝐾 → (0.‘𝑘) = 0 )
12	11	neeq2d 2985	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑘 = 𝐾 → (𝑥 ≠ (0.‘𝑘) ↔ 𝑥 ≠ 0 ))
13		fveq2 6858	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑘 = 𝐾 → (Atoms‘𝑘) = (Atoms‘𝐾))
14		isatlat.a	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)
15	13, 14	eqtr4di 2782	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑘 = 𝐾 → (Atoms‘𝑘) = 𝐴)
16		fveq2 6858	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑘 = 𝐾 → (le‘𝑘) = (le‘𝐾))
17		isatlat.l	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)
18	16, 17	eqtr4di 2782	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑘 = 𝐾 → (le‘𝑘) = ≤ )
19	18	breqd 5118	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑘 = 𝐾 → (𝑦(le‘𝑘)𝑥 ↔ 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥))
20	15, 19	rexeqbidv 3320	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑘 = 𝐾 → (∃𝑦 ∈ (Atoms‘𝑘)𝑦(le‘𝑘)𝑥 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥))
21	12, 20	imbi12d 344	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑘 = 𝐾 → ((𝑥 ≠ (0.‘𝑘) → ∃𝑦 ∈ (Atoms‘𝑘)𝑦(le‘𝑘)𝑥) ↔ (𝑥 ≠ 0 → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥)))
22	3, 21	raleqbidv 3319	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑘 = 𝐾 → (∀𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝑘)(𝑥 ≠ (0.‘𝑘) → ∃𝑦 ∈ (Atoms‘𝑘)𝑦(le‘𝑘)𝑥) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 ≠ 0 → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥)))
23	8, 22	anbi12d 632	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑘 = 𝐾 → (((Base‘𝑘) ∈ dom (glb‘𝑘) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝑘)(𝑥 ≠ (0.‘𝑘) → ∃𝑦 ∈ (Atoms‘𝑘)𝑦(le‘𝑘)𝑥)) ↔ (𝐵 ∈ dom 𝐺 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 ≠ 0 → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥))))
24		df-atl 39291	. . 3 ⊢ AtLat = {𝑘 ∈ Lat ∣ ((Base‘𝑘) ∈ dom (glb‘𝑘) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝑘)(𝑥 ≠ (0.‘𝑘) → ∃𝑦 ∈ (Atoms‘𝑘)𝑦(le‘𝑘)𝑥))}
25	23, 24	elrab2 3662	. 2 ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ AtLat ↔ (𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ (𝐵 ∈ dom 𝐺 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 ≠ 0 → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥))))
26		3anass 1094	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝐺 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 ≠ 0 → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥)) ↔ (𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ (𝐵 ∈ dom 𝐺 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 ≠ 0 → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥))))
27	25, 26	bitr4i 278	1 ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ AtLat ↔ (𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝐺 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 ≠ 0 → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥)))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 206   ∧ wa 395   ∧ w3a 1086   = wceq 1540   ∈ wcel 2109   ≠ wne 2925  ∀wral 3044  ∃wrex 3053   class class class wbr 5107  dom cdm 5638  ‘cfv 6511  Basecbs 17179  lecple 17227  glbcglb 18271  0.cp0 18382  Latclat 18390  Atomscatm 39256  AtLatcal 39257

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1910  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2008  ax-8 2111  ax-9 2119  ax-ext 2701

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1543  df-fal 1553  df-ex 1780  df-sb 2066  df-clab 2708  df-cleq 2721  df-clel 2803  df-ne 2926  df-ral 3045  df-rex 3054  df-rab 3406  df-v 3449  df-dif 3917  df-un 3919  df-ss 3931  df-nul 4297  df-if 4489  df-sn 4590  df-pr 4592  df-op 4596  df-uni 4872  df-br 5108  df-dm 5648  df-iota 6464  df-fv 6519  df-atl 39291

This theorem is referenced by:  atllat  39293  atl0dm  39295  atlex  39309