Theorem mopre 38838

Description: There is at most one predecessor of 𝑁. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 12-Jan-2026.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
mopre	⊢ ∃*𝑚 suc 𝑚 = 𝑁

Distinct variable group:   𝑚,𝑁

Proof of Theorem mopre

Dummy variable 𝑙 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		eqtr3 2761	. . . 4 ⊢ ((suc 𝑚 = 𝑁 ∧ suc 𝑙 = 𝑁) → suc 𝑚 = suc 𝑙)
2		suc11reg 9531	. . . 4 ⊢ (suc 𝑚 = suc 𝑙 ↔ 𝑚 = 𝑙)
3	1, 2	sylib 219	. . 3 ⊢ ((suc 𝑚 = 𝑁 ∧ suc 𝑙 = 𝑁) → 𝑚 = 𝑙)
4	3	gen2 1803	. 2 ⊢ ∀𝑚∀𝑙((suc 𝑚 = 𝑁 ∧ suc 𝑙 = 𝑁) → 𝑚 = 𝑙)
5		suceq 6378	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑚 = 𝑙 → suc 𝑚 = suc 𝑙)
6	5	eqeq1d 2741	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑚 = 𝑙 → (suc 𝑚 = 𝑁 ↔ suc 𝑙 = 𝑁))
7	6	mo4 2570	. 2 ⊢ (∃*𝑚 suc 𝑚 = 𝑁 ↔ ∀𝑚∀𝑙((suc 𝑚 = 𝑁 ∧ suc 𝑙 = 𝑁) → 𝑚 = 𝑙))
8	4, 7	mpbir 232	1 ⊢ ∃*𝑚 suc 𝑚 = 𝑁

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 396  ∀wal 1545   = wceq 1547  ∃*wmo 2541  suc csuc 6312

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1802  ax-4 1816  ax-5 1917  ax-6 1974  ax-7 2015  ax-8 2121  ax-9 2129  ax-ext 2711  ax-sep 5218  ax-pr 5362  ax-un 7678  ax-reg 9497

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 208  df-an 397  df-or 854  df-3an 1094  df-tru 1550  df-fal 1560  df-ex 1787  df-sb 2074  df-mo 2543  df-clab 2718  df-cleq 2731  df-clel 2814  df-ne 2935  df-ral 3054  df-rex 3064  df-rab 3392  df-v 3433  df-dif 3886  df-un 3888  df-in 3890  df-ss 3900  df-nul 4262  df-if 4455  df-pw 4531  df-sn 4556  df-pr 4558  df-op 4562  df-uni 4839  df-br 5073  df-opab 5135  df-eprel 5518  df-fr 5571  df-suc 6316

This theorem is referenced by:  exeupre2  38839