Theorem mopre 38970

Description: There is at most one predecessor of 𝑁. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 12-Jan-2026.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
mopre	⊢ ∃*𝑚 suc 𝑚 = 𝑁

Distinct variable group:   𝑚,𝑁

Proof of Theorem mopre

Dummy variable 𝑙 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		eqtr3 2784	. . . 4 ⊢ ((suc 𝑚 = 𝑁 ∧ suc 𝑙 = 𝑁) → suc 𝑚 = suc 𝑙)
2		suc11reg 9574	. . . 4 ⊢ (suc 𝑚 = suc 𝑙 ↔ 𝑚 = 𝑙)
3	1, 2	sylib 220	. . 3 ⊢ ((suc 𝑚 = 𝑁 ∧ suc 𝑙 = 𝑁) → 𝑚 = 𝑙)
4	3	gen2 1816	. 2 ⊢ ∀𝑚∀𝑙((suc 𝑚 = 𝑁 ∧ suc 𝑙 = 𝑁) → 𝑚 = 𝑙)
5		suceq 6414	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑚 = 𝑙 → suc 𝑚 = suc 𝑙)
6	5	eqeq1d 2764	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑚 = 𝑙 → (suc 𝑚 = 𝑁 ↔ suc 𝑙 = 𝑁))
7	6	mo4 2593	. 2 ⊢ (∃*𝑚 suc 𝑚 = 𝑁 ↔ ∀𝑚∀𝑙((suc 𝑚 = 𝑁 ∧ suc 𝑙 = 𝑁) → 𝑚 = 𝑙))
8	4, 7	mpbir 233	1 ⊢ ∃*𝑚 suc 𝑚 = 𝑁

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 399  ∀wal 1558   = wceq 1560  ∃*wmo 2564  suc csuc 6348

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1815  ax-4 1829  ax-5 1930  ax-6 1987  ax-7 2028  ax-8 2144  ax-9 2152  ax-ext 2734  ax-sep 5246  ax-pr 5390  ax-un 7718  ax-reg 9540

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 400  df-or 859  df-3an 1100  df-tru 1563  df-fal 1573  df-ex 1800  df-sb 2091  df-mo 2566  df-clab 2741  df-cleq 2754  df-clel 2837  df-ne 2958  df-ral 3077  df-rex 3087  df-rab 3415  df-v 3456  df-dif 3907  df-un 3909  df-in 3911  df-ss 3921  df-nul 4286  df-if 4481  df-pw 4557  df-sn 4583  df-pr 4585  df-op 4589  df-uni 4866  df-br 5101  df-opab 5163  df-eprel 5547  df-fr 5600  df-suc 6352

This theorem is referenced by:  exeupre2  38971