P. 387 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 38601-38700   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	eqvrelref 38601	An equivalence relation is reflexive on its field. Compare Theorem 3M of [Enderton] p. 56. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-May-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Aug-2015.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 2-Jun-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → EqvRel 𝑅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝑅)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴𝑅𝐴)
Theorem	eqvrelth 38602	Basic property of equivalence relations. Theorem 73 of [Suppes] p. 82. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jul-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 6-Jul-2015.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 2-Jun-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → EqvRel 𝑅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝑅)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ↔ [𝐴]𝑅 = [𝐵]𝑅))
Theorem	eqvrelcl 38603	Elementhood in the field of an equivalence relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Aug-2015.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 2-Jun-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → EqvRel 𝑅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴𝑅𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝑅)
Theorem	eqvrelthi 38604	Basic property of equivalence relations. Part of Lemma 3N of [Enderton] p. 57. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jul-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2014.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 2-Jun-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → EqvRel 𝑅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴𝑅𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → [𝐴]𝑅 = [𝐵]𝑅)
Theorem	eqvreldisj 38605	Equivalence classes do not overlap. In other words, two equivalence classes are either equal or disjoint. Theorem 74 of [Suppes] p. 83. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2014.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 2-Jun-2019.)
⊢ ( EqvRel 𝑅 → ([𝐴]𝑅 = [𝐵]𝑅 ∨ ([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅) = ∅))
Theorem	qsdisjALTV 38606	Elements of a quotient set do not overlap. (Contributed by Rodolfo Medina, 12-Oct-2010.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jul-2014.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 3-Jun-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → EqvRel 𝑅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝐴 / 𝑅))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (𝐴 / 𝑅))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 = 𝐶 ∨ (𝐵 ∩ 𝐶) = ∅))
Theorem	eqvrelqsel 38607	If an element of a quotient set contains a given element, it is equal to the equivalence class of the element. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Aug-2015.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 28-Dec-2019.)
⊢ (( EqvRel 𝑅 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝐴 / 𝑅) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝐵 = [𝐶]𝑅)
Theorem	eqvrelcoss 38608	Two ways to express equivalent cosets. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 4-Jul-2020.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 20-Dec-2021.)
⊢ ( EqvRel ≀ 𝑅 ↔ TrRel ≀ 𝑅)
Theorem	eqvrelcoss3 38609*	Two ways to express equivalent cosets. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 28-Apr-2019.)
⊢ ( EqvRel ≀ 𝑅 ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦∀𝑧((𝑥 ≀ 𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ≀ 𝑅𝑧) → 𝑥 ≀ 𝑅𝑧))
Theorem	eqvrelcoss2 38610	Two ways to express equivalent cosets. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 3-May-2019.)
⊢ ( EqvRel ≀ 𝑅 ↔ ≀ ≀ 𝑅 ⊆ ≀ 𝑅)
Theorem	eqvrelcoss4 38611*	Two ways to express equivalent cosets. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 3-May-2019.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 30-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ( EqvRel ≀ 𝑅 ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑧(([𝑥] ≀ 𝑅 ∩ [𝑧] ≀ 𝑅) ≠ ∅ → ([𝑥]◡𝑅 ∩ [𝑧]◡𝑅) ≠ ∅))
Theorem	dfcoeleqvrels 38612	Alternate definition of the coelement equivalence relations class. Other alternate definitions should be based on eqvrelcoss2 38610, eqvrelcoss3 38609 and eqvrelcoss4 38611 when needed. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 28-Nov-2022.)
⊢ CoElEqvRels = {𝑎 ∣ ∼ 𝑎 ∈ EqvRels }
Theorem	dfcoeleqvrel 38613	Alternate definition of the coelement equivalence relation predicate: a coelement equivalence relation is an equivalence relation on coelements. Other alternate definitions should be based on eqvrelcoss2 38610, eqvrelcoss3 38609 and eqvrelcoss4 38611 when needed. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 28-Nov-2022.)
⊢ ( CoElEqvRel 𝐴 ↔ EqvRel ∼ 𝐴)
21.26.13  Redundancy
Definition	df-redunds 38614*	Define the class of all redundant sets 𝑥 with respect to 𝑦 in 𝑧. For sets, binary relation on the class of all redundant sets (brredunds 38617) is equivalent to satisfying the redundancy predicate (df-redund 38615). (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 23-Oct-2022.)
⊢ Redunds = ◡{⟨⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩, 𝑥⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦 ∧ (𝑥 ∩ 𝑧) = (𝑦 ∩ 𝑧))}
Definition	df-redund 38615	Define the redundancy predicate. Read: 𝐴 is redundant with respect to 𝐵 in 𝐶. For sets, binary relation on the class of all redundant sets (brredunds 38617) is equivalent to satisfying the redundancy predicate. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 23-Oct-2022.)
⊢ (𝐴 Redund ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩ ↔ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐶) = (𝐵 ∩ 𝐶)))
Definition	df-redundp 38616	Define the redundancy operator for propositions, cf. df-redund 38615. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 23-Oct-2022.)
⊢ ( redund (𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜒) ↔ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) ∧ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒))))
Theorem	brredunds 38617	Binary relation on the class of all redundant sets. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 25-Oct-2022.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) → (𝐴 Redunds ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩ ↔ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐶) = (𝐵 ∩ 𝐶))))
Theorem	brredundsredund 38618	For sets, binary relation on the class of all redundant sets (brredunds 38617) is equivalent to satisfying the redundancy predicate (df-redund 38615). (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 25-Oct-2022.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) → (𝐴 Redunds ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩ ↔ 𝐴 Redund ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩))
Theorem	redundss3 38619	Implication of redundancy predicate. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 26-Oct-2022.)
⊢ 𝐷 ⊆ 𝐶    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 Redund ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩ → 𝐴 Redund ⟨𝐵, 𝐷⟩)
Theorem	redundeq1 38620	Equivalence of redundancy predicates. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 26-Oct-2022.)
⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐷    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 Redund ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩ ↔ 𝐷 Redund ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩)
Theorem	redundpim3 38621	Implication of redundancy of proposition. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 26-Oct-2022.)
⊢ (𝜃 → 𝜒)    ⇒   ⊢ ( redund (𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜒) → redund (𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜃))
Theorem	redundpbi1 38622	Equivalence of redundancy of propositions. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 25-Oct-2022.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃)    ⇒   ⊢ ( redund (𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜒) ↔ redund (𝜃, 𝜓, 𝜒))
Theorem	refrelsredund4 38623	The naive version of the class of reflexive relations is redundant with respect to the class of reflexive relations (see dfrefrels2 38504) if the relations are symmetric as well. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 26-Oct-2022.)
⊢ {𝑟 ∈ Rels ∣ ( I ↾ dom 𝑟) ⊆ 𝑟} Redund ⟨ RefRels , ( RefRels ∩ SymRels )⟩
Theorem	refrelsredund2 38624	The naive version of the class of reflexive relations is redundant with respect to the class of reflexive relations (see dfrefrels2 38504) in the class of equivalence relations. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 26-Oct-2022.)
⊢ {𝑟 ∈ Rels ∣ ( I ↾ dom 𝑟) ⊆ 𝑟} Redund ⟨ RefRels , EqvRels ⟩
Theorem	refrelsredund3 38625*	The naive version of the class of reflexive relations {𝑟 ∈ Rels ∣ ∀𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑟𝑥𝑟𝑥} is redundant with respect to the class of reflexive relations (see dfrefrels3 38505) in the class of equivalence relations. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 26-Oct-2022.)
⊢ {𝑟 ∈ Rels ∣ ∀𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑟 𝑥𝑟𝑥} Redund ⟨ RefRels , EqvRels ⟩
Theorem	refrelredund4 38626	The naive version of the definition of reflexive relation is redundant with respect to reflexive relation (see dfrefrel2 38506) if the relation is symmetric as well. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 26-Oct-2022.)
⊢ redund ((( I ↾ dom 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑅 ∧ Rel 𝑅), RefRel 𝑅, ( RefRel 𝑅 ∧ SymRel 𝑅))
Theorem	refrelredund2 38627	The naive version of the definition of reflexive relation is redundant with respect to reflexive relation (see dfrefrel2 38506) in equivalence relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 25-Oct-2022.)
⊢ redund ((( I ↾ dom 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑅 ∧ Rel 𝑅), RefRel 𝑅, EqvRel 𝑅)
Theorem	refrelredund3 38628*	The naive version of the definition of reflexive relation (∀𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑅𝑥𝑅𝑥 ∧ Rel 𝑅) is redundant with respect to reflexive relation (see dfrefrel3 38507) in equivalence relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 25-Oct-2022.)
⊢ redund ((∀𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑅 𝑥𝑅𝑥 ∧ Rel 𝑅), RefRel 𝑅, EqvRel 𝑅)
21.26.14  Domain quotients
Definition	df-dmqss 38629*	Define the class of domain quotients. Domain quotients are pairs of sets, typically a relation and a set, where the quotient (see df-qs 8677) of the relation on its domain is equal to the set. See comments of df-ers 38655 for the motivation for this definition. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 16-Apr-2019.)
⊢ DomainQss = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (dom 𝑥 / 𝑥) = 𝑦}
Definition	df-dmqs 38630	Define the domain quotient predicate. (Read: the domain quotient of 𝑅 is 𝐴.) If 𝐴 and 𝑅 are sets, the domain quotient binary relation and the domain quotient predicate are the same, see brdmqssqs 38638. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 9-Aug-2021.)
⊢ (𝑅 DomainQs 𝐴 ↔ (dom 𝑅 / 𝑅) = 𝐴)
Theorem	dmqseq 38631	Equality theorem for domain quotient. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 17-Apr-2019.)
⊢ (𝑅 = 𝑆 → (dom 𝑅 / 𝑅) = (dom 𝑆 / 𝑆))
Theorem	dmqseqi 38632	Equality theorem for domain quotient, inference version. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 26-Sep-2021.)
⊢ 𝑅 = 𝑆    ⇒   ⊢ (dom 𝑅 / 𝑅) = (dom 𝑆 / 𝑆)
Theorem	dmqseqd 38633	Equality theorem for domain quotient set, deduction version. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 23-Apr-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 = 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (dom 𝑅 / 𝑅) = (dom 𝑆 / 𝑆))
Theorem	dmqseqeq1 38634	Equality theorem for domain quotient. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 17-Apr-2019.)
⊢ (𝑅 = 𝑆 → ((dom 𝑅 / 𝑅) = 𝐴 ↔ (dom 𝑆 / 𝑆) = 𝐴))
Theorem	dmqseqeq1i 38635	Equality theorem for domain quotient, inference version. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 26-Sep-2021.)
⊢ 𝑅 = 𝑆    ⇒   ⊢ ((dom 𝑅 / 𝑅) = 𝐴 ↔ (dom 𝑆 / 𝑆) = 𝐴)
Theorem	dmqseqeq1d 38636	Equality theorem for domain quotient set, deduction version. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 26-Sep-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 = 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((dom 𝑅 / 𝑅) = 𝐴 ↔ (dom 𝑆 / 𝑆) = 𝐴))
Theorem	brdmqss 38637	The domain quotient binary relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 17-Apr-2019.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑅 DomainQss 𝐴 ↔ (dom 𝑅 / 𝑅) = 𝐴))
Theorem	brdmqssqs 38638	If 𝐴 and 𝑅 are sets, the domain quotient binary relation and the domain quotient predicate are the same. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 14-Aug-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑅 DomainQss 𝐴 ↔ 𝑅 DomainQs 𝐴))
Theorem	n0eldmqs 38639	The empty set is not an element of a domain quotient. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 2-Mar-2018.)
⊢ ¬ ∅ ∈ (dom 𝑅 / 𝑅)
Theorem	qseq 38640*	The quotient set equal to a class. This theorem is used when a class 𝐴 is identified with a quotient (dom 𝑅 / 𝑅). In such a situation, every element 𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 is an 𝑅-coset [𝑣]𝑅 for some 𝑣 ∈ dom 𝑅, but there is no requirement that the "witness" 𝑣 be equal to its own block [𝑣]𝑅. 𝐴 is a set of blocks (equivalence classes), not a set of raw witnesses. In particular, when (dom 𝑅 / 𝑅) = 𝐴 is read together with a partition hypothesis 𝑅 Part 𝐴 (defined as dfpart2 38761), 𝐴 is being treated as the set of blocks [𝑣]𝑅; it does not assert any fixed-point condition 𝑣 = [𝑣]𝑅 such as would arise from the mistaken reading 𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑢 = [𝑢]𝑅. Cf. dmqsblocks 38845. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 19-Oct-2018.)
⊢ ((𝐵 / 𝑅) = 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑢(𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ ∃𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 𝑢 = [𝑣]𝑅))
Theorem	n0eldmqseq 38641	The empty set is not an element of a domain quotient. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 3-Nov-2018.)
⊢ ((dom 𝑅 / 𝑅) = 𝐴 → ¬ ∅ ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	n0elim 38642	Implication of that the empty set is not an element of a class. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 30-Dec-2024.)
⊢ (¬ ∅ ∈ 𝐴 → (dom (◡ E ↾ 𝐴) / (◡ E ↾ 𝐴)) = 𝐴)
Theorem	n0el3 38643	Two ways of expressing that the empty set is not an element of a class. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 27-May-2021.)
⊢ (¬ ∅ ∈ 𝐴 ↔ (dom (◡ E ↾ 𝐴) / (◡ E ↾ 𝐴)) = 𝐴)
Theorem	cnvepresdmqss 38644	The domain quotient binary relation of the restricted converse epsilon relation is equivalent to the negated elementhood of the empty set in the restriction. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 14-Aug-2021.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ((◡ E ↾ 𝐴) DomainQss 𝐴 ↔ ¬ ∅ ∈ 𝐴))
Theorem	cnvepresdmqs 38645	The domain quotient predicate for the restricted converse epsilon relation is equivalent to the negated elementhood of the empty set in the restriction. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 14-Aug-2021.)
⊢ ((◡ E ↾ 𝐴) DomainQs 𝐴 ↔ ¬ ∅ ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	unidmqs 38646	The range of a relation is equal to the union of the domain quotient. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 13-Oct-2018.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → (Rel 𝑅 → ∪ (dom 𝑅 / 𝑅) = ran 𝑅))
Theorem	unidmqseq 38647	The union of the domain quotient of a relation is equal to the class 𝐴 if and only if the range is equal to it as well. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 21-Apr-2019.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 28-Dec-2021.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → (Rel 𝑅 → (∪ (dom 𝑅 / 𝑅) = 𝐴 ↔ ran 𝑅 = 𝐴)))
Theorem	dmqseqim 38648	If the domain quotient of a relation is equal to the class 𝐴, then the range of the relation is the union of the class. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 29-Dec-2021.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → (Rel 𝑅 → ((dom 𝑅 / 𝑅) = 𝐴 → ran 𝑅 = ∪ 𝐴)))
Theorem	dmqseqim2 38649	Lemma for erimeq2 38670. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 29-Dec-2021.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → (Rel 𝑅 → ((dom 𝑅 / 𝑅) = 𝐴 → (𝐵 ∈ ran 𝑅 ↔ 𝐵 ∈ ∪ 𝐴))))
Theorem	releldmqs 38650*	Elementhood in the domain quotient of a relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 24-Apr-2021.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (Rel 𝑅 → (𝐴 ∈ (dom 𝑅 / 𝑅) ↔ ∃𝑢 ∈ dom 𝑅∃𝑥 ∈ [ 𝑢]𝑅𝐴 = [𝑢]𝑅)))
Theorem	eldmqs1cossres 38651*	Elementhood in the domain quotient of the class of cosets by a restriction. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 4-May-2019.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐵 ∈ (dom ≀ (𝑅 ↾ 𝐴) / ≀ (𝑅 ↾ 𝐴)) ↔ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑥 ∈ [ 𝑢]𝑅𝐵 = [𝑥] ≀ (𝑅 ↾ 𝐴)))
Theorem	releldmqscoss 38652*	Elementhood in the domain quotient of the class of cosets by a relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 23-Apr-2021.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (Rel 𝑅 → (𝐴 ∈ (dom ≀ 𝑅 / ≀ 𝑅) ↔ ∃𝑢 ∈ dom 𝑅∃𝑥 ∈ [ 𝑢]𝑅𝐴 = [𝑥] ≀ 𝑅)))
Theorem	dmqscoelseq 38653	Two ways to express the equality of the domain quotient of the coelements on the class 𝐴 with the class 𝐴. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 26-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ((dom ∼ 𝐴 / ∼ 𝐴) = 𝐴 ↔ (∪ 𝐴 / ∼ 𝐴) = 𝐴)
Theorem	dmqs1cosscnvepreseq 38654	Two ways to express the equality of the domain quotient of the coelements on the class 𝐴 with the class 𝐴. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 26-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ((dom ≀ (◡ E ↾ 𝐴) / ≀ (◡ E ↾ 𝐴)) = 𝐴 ↔ (∪ 𝐴 / ∼ 𝐴) = 𝐴)
21.26.15  Equivalence relations on domain quotients
Definition	df-ers 38655	Define the class of equivalence relations on domain quotients (or: domain quotients restricted to equivalence relations). The present definition of equivalence relation in set.mm df-er 8671 "is not standard", "somewhat cryptic", has no constant 0-ary class and does not follow the traditional transparent reflexive-symmetric-transitive relation way of definition of equivalence. Definitions df-eqvrels 38575, dfeqvrels2 38579, dfeqvrels3 38580 and df-eqvrel 38576, dfeqvrel2 38581, dfeqvrel3 38582 are fully transparent in this regard. However, they lack the domain component (dom 𝑅 = 𝐴) of the present df-er 8671. While we acknowledge the need of a domain component, the present df-er 8671 definition does not utilize the results revealed by the new theorems in the Partition-Equivalence Theorem part below (like pets 38844 and pet 38843). From those theorems follows that the natural domain of equivalence relations is not 𝑅Domain𝐴 (i.e. dom 𝑅 = 𝐴 see brdomaing 35923), but 𝑅 DomainQss 𝐴 (i.e. (dom 𝑅 / 𝑅) = 𝐴, see brdmqss 38637), see erimeq 38671 vs. prter3 38875. While I'm sure we need both equivalence relation df-eqvrels 38575 and equivalence relation on domain quotient df-ers 38655, I'm not sure whether we need a third equivalence relation concept with the present dom 𝑅 = 𝐴 component as well: this needs further investigation. As a default I suppose that these two concepts df-eqvrels 38575 and df-ers 38655 are enough and named the predicate version of the one on domain quotient as the alternate version df-erALTV 38656 of the present df-er 8671. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 26-Jun-2021.)
⊢ Ers = ( DomainQss ↾ EqvRels )
Definition	df-erALTV 38656	Equivalence relation with natural domain predicate, see also the comment of df-ers 38655. Alternate definition is dferALTV2 38660. Binary equivalence relation with natural domain and the equivalence relation with natural domain predicate are the same when 𝐴 and 𝑅 are sets, see brerser 38669. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 12-Aug-2021.)
⊢ (𝑅 ErALTV 𝐴 ↔ ( EqvRel 𝑅 ∧ 𝑅 DomainQs 𝐴))
Definition	df-comembers 38657	Define the class of comember equivalence relations on their domain quotients. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 28-Nov-2022.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 24-Jul-2023.)
⊢ CoMembErs = {𝑎 ∣ ≀ (◡ E ↾ 𝑎) Ers 𝑎}
Definition	df-comember 38658	Define the comember equivalence relation on the class 𝐴 (or, the restricted coelement equivalence relation on its domain quotient 𝐴.) Alternate definitions are dfcomember2 38665 and dfcomember3 38666. Later on, in an application of set theory I make a distinction between the default elementhood concept and a special membership concept: membership equivalence relation will be an integral part of that membership concept. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 26-Jun-2021.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 28-Nov-2022.)
⊢ ( CoMembEr 𝐴 ↔ ≀ (◡ E ↾ 𝐴) ErALTV 𝐴)
Theorem	brers 38659	Binary equivalence relation with natural domain, see the comment of df-ers 38655. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 23-Jul-2021.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝑅 Ers 𝐴 ↔ (𝑅 ∈ EqvRels ∧ 𝑅 DomainQss 𝐴)))
Theorem	dferALTV2 38660	Equivalence relation with natural domain predicate, see the comment of df-ers 38655. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 26-Jun-2021.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 30-Aug-2021.)
⊢ (𝑅 ErALTV 𝐴 ↔ ( EqvRel 𝑅 ∧ (dom 𝑅 / 𝑅) = 𝐴))
Theorem	erALTVeq1 38661	Equality theorem for equivalence relation on domain quotient. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 25-Sep-2021.)
⊢ (𝑅 = 𝑆 → (𝑅 ErALTV 𝐴 ↔ 𝑆 ErALTV 𝐴))
Theorem	erALTVeq1i 38662	Equality theorem for equivalence relation on domain quotient, inference version. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 25-Sep-2021.)
⊢ 𝑅 = 𝑆    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑅 ErALTV 𝐴 ↔ 𝑆 ErALTV 𝐴)
Theorem	erALTVeq1d 38663	Equality theorem for equivalence relation on domain quotient, deduction version. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 25-Sep-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 = 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑅 ErALTV 𝐴 ↔ 𝑆 ErALTV 𝐴))
Theorem	dfcomember 38664	Alternate definition of the comember equivalence relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 28-Nov-2022.)
⊢ ( CoMembEr 𝐴 ↔ ∼ 𝐴 ErALTV 𝐴)
Theorem	dfcomember2 38665	Alternate definition of the comember equivalence relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 25-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ( CoMembEr 𝐴 ↔ ( EqvRel ∼ 𝐴 ∧ (dom ∼ 𝐴 / ∼ 𝐴) = 𝐴))
Theorem	dfcomember3 38666	Alternate definition of the comember equivalence relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 26-Sep-2021.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 17-Jul-2023.)
⊢ ( CoMembEr 𝐴 ↔ ( CoElEqvRel 𝐴 ∧ (∪ 𝐴 / ∼ 𝐴) = 𝐴))
Theorem	eqvreldmqs 38667	Two ways to express comember equivalence relation on its domain quotient. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 26-Sep-2021.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 17-Jul-2023.)
⊢ (( EqvRel ≀ (◡ E ↾ 𝐴) ∧ (dom ≀ (◡ E ↾ 𝐴) / ≀ (◡ E ↾ 𝐴)) = 𝐴) ↔ ( CoElEqvRel 𝐴 ∧ (∪ 𝐴 / ∼ 𝐴) = 𝐴))
Theorem	eqvreldmqs2 38668	Two ways to express comember equivalence relation on its domain quotient. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 30-Dec-2024.)
⊢ (( EqvRel ≀ (◡ E ↾ 𝐴) ∧ (dom ≀ (◡ E ↾ 𝐴) / ≀ (◡ E ↾ 𝐴)) = 𝐴) ↔ ( EqvRel ∼ 𝐴 ∧ (∪ 𝐴 / ∼ 𝐴) = 𝐴))
Theorem	brerser 38669	Binary equivalence relation with natural domain and the equivalence relation with natural domain predicate are the same when 𝐴 and 𝑅 are sets. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 25-Aug-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑅 Ers 𝐴 ↔ 𝑅 ErALTV 𝐴))
Theorem	erimeq2 38670	Equivalence relation on its natural domain implies that the class of coelements on the domain is equal to the relation (this is prter3 38875 in a more convenient form , see also erimeq 38671). (Contributed by Rodolfo Medina, 19-Oct-2010.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 12-Aug-2015.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 29-Dec-2021.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → (( EqvRel 𝑅 ∧ (dom 𝑅 / 𝑅) = 𝐴) → ∼ 𝐴 = 𝑅))
Theorem	erimeq 38671	Equivalence relation on its natural domain implies that the class of coelements on the domain is equal to the relation (this is the most convenient form of prter3 38875 and erimeq2 38670). (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 7-Oct-2021.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 29-Dec-2021.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝑅 ErALTV 𝐴 → ∼ 𝐴 = 𝑅))
21.26.16  Functions
Definition	df-funss 38672	Define the class of all function sets (but not necessarily function relations, cf. df-funsALTV 38673). It is used only by df-funsALTV 38673. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 17-Jul-2021.)
⊢ Funss = {𝑥 ∣ ≀ 𝑥 ∈ CnvRefRels }
Definition	df-funsALTV 38673	Define the function relations class, i.e., the class of functions. Alternate definitions are dffunsALTV 38675, ... , dffunsALTV5 38679. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 17-Jul-2021.)
⊢ FunsALTV = ( Funss ∩ Rels )
Definition	df-funALTV 38674	Define the function relation predicate, i.e., the function predicate. This definition of the function predicate (based on a more general, converse reflexive, relation) and the original definition of function in set.mm df-fun 6513, are always the same, that is ( FunALTV 𝐹 ↔ Fun 𝐹), see funALTVfun 38690. The element of the class of functions and the function predicate are the same, that is (𝐹 ∈ FunsALTV ↔ FunALTV 𝐹) when 𝐹 is a set, see elfunsALTVfunALTV 38689. Alternate definitions are dffunALTV2 38680, ... , dffunALTV5 38683. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 17-Jul-2021.)
⊢ ( FunALTV 𝐹 ↔ ( CnvRefRel ≀ 𝐹 ∧ Rel 𝐹))
Theorem	dffunsALTV 38675	Alternate definition of the class of functions. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 18-Jul-2021.)
⊢ FunsALTV = {𝑓 ∈ Rels ∣ ≀ 𝑓 ∈ CnvRefRels }
Theorem	dffunsALTV2 38676	Alternate definition of the class of functions. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 30-Aug-2021.)
⊢ FunsALTV = {𝑓 ∈ Rels ∣ ≀ 𝑓 ⊆ I }
Theorem	dffunsALTV3 38677*	Alternate definition of the class of functions. For the 𝑋 axis and the 𝑌 axis you can convert the right side to {𝑓 ∈ Rels ∣ ∀ x1 ∀ y1 ∀ y2 (( x1 𝑓 y1 ∧ x1 𝑓 y2 ) → y1 = y2 )}. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 30-Aug-2021.)
⊢ FunsALTV = {𝑓 ∈ Rels ∣ ∀𝑢∀𝑥∀𝑦((𝑢𝑓𝑥 ∧ 𝑢𝑓𝑦) → 𝑥 = 𝑦)}
Theorem	dffunsALTV4 38678*	Alternate definition of the class of functions. For the 𝑋 axis and the 𝑌 axis you can convert the right side to {𝑓 ∈ Rels ∣ ∀𝑥1∃*𝑦1𝑥1𝑓𝑦1}. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 31-Aug-2021.)
⊢ FunsALTV = {𝑓 ∈ Rels ∣ ∀𝑢∃*𝑥 𝑢𝑓𝑥}
Theorem	dffunsALTV5 38679*	Alternate definition of the class of functions. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 31-Aug-2021.)
⊢ FunsALTV = {𝑓 ∈ Rels ∣ ∀𝑥 ∈ ran 𝑓∀𝑦 ∈ ran 𝑓(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ ([𝑥]◡𝑓 ∩ [𝑦]◡𝑓) = ∅)}
Theorem	dffunALTV2 38680	Alternate definition of the function relation predicate, cf. dfdisjALTV2 38706. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 8-Feb-2018.)
⊢ ( FunALTV 𝐹 ↔ ( ≀ 𝐹 ⊆ I ∧ Rel 𝐹))
Theorem	dffunALTV3 38681*	Alternate definition of the function relation predicate, cf. dfdisjALTV3 38707. Reproduction of dffun2 6521. For the 𝑋 axis and the 𝑌 axis you can convert the right side to (∀ x1 ∀ y1 ∀ y2 (( x1 𝑓 y1 ∧ x1 𝑓 y2 ) → y1 = y2 ) ∧ Rel 𝐹). (Contributed by NM, 29-Dec-1996.)
⊢ ( FunALTV 𝐹 ↔ (∀𝑢∀𝑥∀𝑦((𝑢𝐹𝑥 ∧ 𝑢𝐹𝑦) → 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ Rel 𝐹))
Theorem	dffunALTV4 38682*	Alternate definition of the function relation predicate, cf. dfdisjALTV4 38708. This is dffun6 6524. For the 𝑋 axis and the 𝑌 axis you can convert the right side to (∀𝑥1∃*𝑦1𝑥1𝐹𝑦1 ∧ Rel 𝐹). (Contributed by NM, 9-Mar-1995.)
⊢ ( FunALTV 𝐹 ↔ (∀𝑢∃*𝑥 𝑢𝐹𝑥 ∧ Rel 𝐹))
Theorem	dffunALTV5 38683*	Alternate definition of the function relation predicate, cf. dfdisjALTV5 38709. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 5-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ( FunALTV 𝐹 ↔ (∀𝑥 ∈ ran 𝐹∀𝑦 ∈ ran 𝐹(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ ([𝑥]◡𝐹 ∩ [𝑦]◡𝐹) = ∅) ∧ Rel 𝐹))
Theorem	elfunsALTV 38684	Elementhood in the class of functions. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 24-Jul-2021.)
⊢ (𝐹 ∈ FunsALTV ↔ ( ≀ 𝐹 ∈ CnvRefRels ∧ 𝐹 ∈ Rels ))
Theorem	elfunsALTV2 38685	Elementhood in the class of functions. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 31-Aug-2021.)
⊢ (𝐹 ∈ FunsALTV ↔ ( ≀ 𝐹 ⊆ I ∧ 𝐹 ∈ Rels ))
Theorem	elfunsALTV3 38686*	Elementhood in the class of functions. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 31-Aug-2021.)
⊢ (𝐹 ∈ FunsALTV ↔ (∀𝑢∀𝑥∀𝑦((𝑢𝐹𝑥 ∧ 𝑢𝐹𝑦) → 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ Rels ))
Theorem	elfunsALTV4 38687*	Elementhood in the class of functions. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 31-Aug-2021.)
⊢ (𝐹 ∈ FunsALTV ↔ (∀𝑢∃*𝑥 𝑢𝐹𝑥 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ Rels ))
Theorem	elfunsALTV5 38688*	Elementhood in the class of functions. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 5-Sep-2021.)
⊢ (𝐹 ∈ FunsALTV ↔ (∀𝑥 ∈ ran 𝐹∀𝑦 ∈ ran 𝐹(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ ([𝑥]◡𝐹 ∩ [𝑦]◡𝐹) = ∅) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ Rels ))
Theorem	elfunsALTVfunALTV 38689	The element of the class of functions and the function predicate are the same when 𝐹 is a set. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 26-Jul-2021.)
⊢ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐹 ∈ FunsALTV ↔ FunALTV 𝐹))
Theorem	funALTVfun 38690	Our definition of the function predicate df-funALTV 38674 (based on a more general, converse reflexive, relation) and the original definition of function in set.mm df-fun 6513, are always the same and interchangeable. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 27-Jul-2021.)
⊢ ( FunALTV 𝐹 ↔ Fun 𝐹)
Theorem	funALTVss 38691	Subclass theorem for function. (Contributed by NM, 16-Aug-1994.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2014.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 22-Sep-2021.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → ( FunALTV 𝐵 → FunALTV 𝐴))
Theorem	funALTVeq 38692	Equality theorem for function predicate. (Contributed by NM, 16-Aug-1994.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → ( FunALTV 𝐴 ↔ FunALTV 𝐵))
Theorem	funALTVeqi 38693	Equality inference for the function predicate. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.)
⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ ( FunALTV 𝐴 ↔ FunALTV 𝐵)
Theorem	funALTVeqd 38694	Equality deduction for the function predicate. (Contributed by NM, 23-Feb-2013.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ( FunALTV 𝐴 ↔ FunALTV 𝐵))
21.26.17  Disjoints vs. converse functions
Definition	df-disjss 38695	Define the class of all disjoint sets (but not necessarily disjoint relations, cf. df-disjs 38696). It is used only by df-disjs 38696. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 17-Jul-2021.)
⊢ Disjss = {𝑥 ∣ ≀ ◡𝑥 ∈ CnvRefRels }
Definition	df-disjs 38696	Define the disjoint relations class, i.e., the class of disjoints. We need Disjs for the definition of Parts and Part for the Partition-Equivalence Theorems: this need for Parts as disjoint relations on their domain quotients is the reason why we must define Disjs instead of simply using converse functions (cf. dfdisjALTV 38705). The element of the class of disjoints and the disjoint predicate are the same, that is (𝑅 ∈ Disjs ↔ Disj 𝑅) when 𝑅 is a set, see eldisjsdisj 38719. Alternate definitions are dfdisjs 38700, ... , dfdisjs5 38704. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 17-Jul-2021.)
⊢ Disjs = ( Disjss ∩ Rels )
Definition	df-disjALTV 38697	Define the disjoint relation predicate, i.e., the disjoint predicate. A disjoint relation is a converse function of the relation by dfdisjALTV 38705, see the comment of df-disjs 38696 why we need disjoint relations instead of converse functions anyway. The element of the class of disjoints and the disjoint predicate are the same, that is (𝑅 ∈ Disjs ↔ Disj 𝑅) when 𝑅 is a set, see eldisjsdisj 38719. Alternate definitions are dfdisjALTV 38705, ... , dfdisjALTV5 38709. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 17-Jul-2021.)
⊢ ( Disj 𝑅 ↔ ( CnvRefRel ≀ ◡𝑅 ∧ Rel 𝑅))
Definition	df-eldisjs 38698	Define the disjoint element relations class, i.e., the disjoint elements class. The element of the disjoint elements class and the disjoint elementhood predicate are the same, that is (𝐴 ∈ ElDisjs ↔ ElDisj 𝐴) when 𝐴 is a set, see eleldisjseldisj 38721. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 28-Nov-2022.)
⊢ ElDisjs = {𝑎 ∣ (◡ E ↾ 𝑎) ∈ Disjs }
Definition	df-eldisj 38699	Define the disjoint element relation predicate, i.e., the disjoint elementhood predicate. Read: the elements of 𝐴 are disjoint. The element of the disjoint elements class and the disjoint elementhood predicate are the same, that is (𝐴 ∈ ElDisjs ↔ ElDisj 𝐴) when 𝐴 is a set, see eleldisjseldisj 38721. As of now, disjoint elementhood is defined as "partition" in set.mm : compare df-prt 38865 with dfeldisj5 38713. See also the comments of dfmembpart2 38762 and of df-parts 38757. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 17-Jul-2021.)
⊢ ( ElDisj 𝐴 ↔ Disj (◡ E ↾ 𝐴))
Theorem	dfdisjs 38700	Alternate definition of the class of disjoints. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 18-Jul-2021.)
⊢ Disjs = {𝑟 ∈ Rels ∣ ≀ ◡𝑟 ∈ CnvRefRels }