Theorem opabid2 5774

Description: A relation expressed as an ordered pair abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 11-Dec-2006.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
opabid2	⊢ (Rel 𝐴 → {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝐴} = 𝐴)

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝑦,𝐴

Proof of Theorem opabid2

Dummy variables 𝑤 𝑧 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		vex 3437	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝑧 ∈ V
2		vex 3437	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝑤 ∈ V
3		opeq1 4807	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ = ⟨𝑧, 𝑦⟩)
4	3	eleq1d 2826	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝐴 ↔ ⟨𝑧, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝐴))
5		opeq2 4808	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑤 → ⟨𝑧, 𝑦⟩ = ⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩)
6	5	eleq1d 2826	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑤 → (⟨𝑧, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝐴 ↔ ⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ∈ 𝐴))
7	1, 2, 4, 6	opelopab 5487	. . 3 ⊢ (⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ∈ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝐴} ↔ ⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ∈ 𝐴)
8	7	gen2 1804	. 2 ⊢ ∀𝑧∀𝑤(⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ∈ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝐴} ↔ ⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ∈ 𝐴)
9		relopabv 5767	. . 3 ⊢ Rel {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝐴}
10		eqrel 5730	. . 3 ⊢ ((Rel {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝐴} ∧ Rel 𝐴) → ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝐴} = 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑧∀𝑤(⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ∈ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝐴} ↔ ⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ∈ 𝐴)))
11	9, 10	mpan 697	. 2 ⊢ (Rel 𝐴 → ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝐴} = 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑧∀𝑤(⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ∈ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝐴} ↔ ⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ∈ 𝐴)))
12	8, 11	mpbiri 260	1 ⊢ (Rel 𝐴 → {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝐴} = 𝐴)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 208  ∀wal 1546   = wceq 1548   ∈ wcel 2121  ⟨cop 4564  {copab 5137  Rel wrel 5626

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1803  ax-4 1817  ax-5 1918  ax-6 1975  ax-7 2016  ax-8 2123  ax-9 2131  ax-ext 2713  ax-sep 5221  ax-pr 5365

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 398  df-or 855  df-3an 1095  df-tru 1551  df-fal 1561  df-ex 1788  df-sb 2075  df-clab 2720  df-cleq 2733  df-clel 2816  df-rab 3394  df-v 3435  df-dif 3888  df-un 3890  df-in 3892  df-ss 3902  df-nul 4265  df-if 4458  df-sn 4559  df-pr 4561  df-op 4565  df-opab 5138  df-xp 5627  df-rel 5628

This theorem is referenced by:  opabbi2dv  5794  tfsconcat0i  43805