| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > rabbi2dva | Structured version Visualization version GIF version | ||
| Description: Deduction from a wff to a restricted class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jan-2014.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| rabbi2dva.1 | ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ 𝜓)) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| rabbi2dva | ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓}) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | dfin5 3907 | . 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵} | |
| 2 | rabbi2dva.1 | . . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ 𝜓)) | |
| 3 | 2 | rabbidva 3419 | . 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓}) |
| 4 | 1, 3 | eqtrid 2808 | 1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓}) |
| Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
| This proof depends on syntax axioms: → wi 4 ↔ wb 209 ∧ wa 401 = wceq 1570 ∈ wcel 2145 {crab 3413 ∩ cin 3898 |
| This proof depends on axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1828 ax-4 1842 ax-5 1943 ax-6 2000 ax-7 2041 ax-9 2155 ax-ext 2733 |
| This proof depends on definitions: df-bi 210 df-an 402 df-ex 1813 df-sb 2100 df-clab 2740 df-cleq 2753 df-rab 3414 df-in 3906 |
| This theorem is used by: fndmdif 7039 bitsshft 16638 sylow3lem2 19835 leordtvallem1 23521 leordtvallem2 23522 ordtt1 23690 xkoccn 23931 txcnmpt 23936 xkopt 23967 ordthmeolem 24113 qustgphaus 24435 itg2monolem1 26064 lhop1 26327 efopn 26979 dirith 27849 pjvec 32291 pjocvec 32292 dfscott3 35731 neibastop3 37130 diarnN 42166 |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |