leordtvallem2 - Metamath Proof Explorer

	Metamath Proof Explorer		< Previous Next > Nearby theorems
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > leordtvallem2		Structured version Visualization version GIF version

Theorem leordtvallem2 21434

Description: Lemma for leordtval 21436. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Sep-2015.)

**Hypotheses**
Ref	Expression
leordtval.1	⊢ 𝐴 = ran (𝑥 ∈ ℝ^* ↦ (𝑥(,]+∞))
leordtval.2	⊢ 𝐵 = ran (𝑥 ∈ ℝ^* ↦ (-∞[,)𝑥))

**Assertion**
Ref	Expression
leordtvallem2	⊢ 𝐵 = ran (𝑥 ∈ ℝ^* ↦ {𝑦 ∈ ℝ^* ∣ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦})

Distinct variable group: 𝑥,𝑦 Allowed substitution hints: 𝐴(𝑥,𝑦) 𝐵(𝑥,𝑦)

**Proof of Theorem leordtvallem2**
Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		leordtval.2	. 2 ⊢ 𝐵 = ran (𝑥 ∈ ℝ^* ↦ (-∞[,)𝑥))
2		icossxr 12575	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (-∞[,)𝑥) ⊆ ℝ^*
3		sseqin2 4040	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((-∞[,)𝑥) ⊆ ℝ^* ↔ (ℝ^* ∩ (-∞[,)𝑥)) = (-∞[,)𝑥))
4	2, 3	mpbi 222	. . . . 5 ⊢ (ℝ^* ∩ (-∞[,)𝑥)) = (-∞[,)𝑥)
5		mnfxr 10436	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ -∞ ∈ ℝ^*
6		simpl 476	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ℝ^) → 𝑥 ∈ ℝ^)
7		elico1 12535	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((-∞ ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ℝ^) → (𝑦 ∈ (-∞[,)𝑥) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ ℝ^ ∧ -∞ ≤ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 < 𝑥)))
8	5, 6, 7	sylancr 581	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ℝ^) → (𝑦 ∈ (-∞[,)𝑥) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ ℝ^ ∧ -∞ ≤ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 < 𝑥)))
9		simpr 479	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ℝ^) → 𝑦 ∈ ℝ^)
10		mnfle 12284	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ ℝ^* → -∞ ≤ 𝑦)
11	9, 10	jccir 517	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ℝ^) → (𝑦 ∈ ℝ^ ∧ -∞ ≤ 𝑦))
12	11	biantrurd 528	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ℝ^) → (𝑦 < 𝑥 ↔ ((𝑦 ∈ ℝ^ ∧ -∞ ≤ 𝑦) ∧ 𝑦 < 𝑥)))
13		df-3an 1073	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝑦 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ -∞ ≤ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 < 𝑥) ↔ ((𝑦 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ -∞ ≤ 𝑦) ∧ 𝑦 < 𝑥))
14	12, 13	syl6bbr 281	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ℝ^) → (𝑦 < 𝑥 ↔ (𝑦 ∈ ℝ^ ∧ -∞ ≤ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 < 𝑥)))
15		xrltnle 10446	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝑦 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ℝ^*) → (𝑦 < 𝑥 ↔ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦))
16	15	ancoms 452	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ℝ^*) → (𝑦 < 𝑥 ↔ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦))
17	8, 14, 16	3bitr2d 299	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ℝ^*) → (𝑦 ∈ (-∞[,)𝑥) ↔ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦))
18	17	rabbi2dva 4042	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ℝ^* → (ℝ^* ∩ (-∞[,)𝑥)) = {𝑦 ∈ ℝ^* ∣ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦})
19	4, 18	syl5eqr 2828	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ℝ^* → (-∞[,)𝑥) = {𝑦 ∈ ℝ^* ∣ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦})
20	19	mpteq2ia 4977	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ℝ^* ↦ (-∞[,)𝑥)) = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ^* ↦ {𝑦 ∈ ℝ^* ∣ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦})
21	20	rneqi 5599	. 2 ⊢ ran (𝑥 ∈ ℝ^* ↦ (-∞[,)𝑥)) = ran (𝑥 ∈ ℝ^* ↦ {𝑦 ∈ ℝ^* ∣ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦})
22	1, 21	eqtri 2802	1 ⊢ 𝐵 = ran (𝑥 ∈ ℝ^* ↦ {𝑦 ∈ ℝ^* ∣ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦})

Colors of variables: wff setvar class

Syntax hints: ¬ wn 3 ↔ wb 198 ∧ wa 386 ∧ w3a 1071 = wceq 1601 ∈ wcel 2107 {crab 3094 ∩ cin 3791 ⊆ wss 3792 class class class wbr 4888 ↦ cmpt 4967 ran crn 5358 (class class class)co 6924 +∞cpnf 10410 -∞cmnf 10411 ℝ^*cxr 10412 < clt 10413 ≤ cle 10414 (,]cioc 12493 [,)cico 12494

This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1839 ax-4 1853 ax-5 1953 ax-6 2021 ax-7 2055 ax-8 2109 ax-9 2116 ax-10 2135 ax-11 2150 ax-12 2163 ax-13 2334 ax-ext 2754 ax-sep 5019 ax-nul 5027 ax-pow 5079 ax-pr 5140 ax-un 7228 ax-cnex 10330 ax-resscn 10331

This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 199 df-an 387 df-or 837 df-3an 1073 df-tru 1605 df-ex 1824 df-nf 1828 df-sb 2012 df-mo 2551 df-eu 2587 df-clab 2764 df-cleq 2770 df-clel 2774 df-nfc 2921 df-ne 2970 df-nel 3076 df-ral 3095 df-rex 3096 df-rab 3099 df-v 3400 df-sbc 3653 df-csb 3752 df-dif 3795 df-un 3797 df-in 3799 df-ss 3806 df-nul 4142 df-if 4308 df-pw 4381 df-sn 4399 df-pr 4401 df-op 4405 df-uni 4674 df-iun 4757 df-br 4889 df-opab 4951 df-mpt 4968 df-id 5263 df-xp 5363 df-rel 5364 df-cnv 5365 df-co 5366 df-dm 5367 df-rn 5368 df-res 5369 df-ima 5370 df-iota 6101 df-fun 6139 df-fn 6140 df-f 6141 df-f1 6142 df-fo 6143 df-f1o 6144 df-fv 6145 df-ov 6927 df-oprab 6928 df-mpt2 6929 df-1st 7447 df-2nd 7448 df-er 8028 df-en 8244 df-dom 8245 df-sdom 8246 df-pnf 10415 df-mnf 10416 df-xr 10417 df-ltxr 10418 df-le 10419 df-ico 12498

This theorem is referenced by: leordtval2 21435 leordtval 21436

W3C validator