leordtvallem2 - Metamath Proof Explorer

	Metamath Proof Explorer		< Previous Next > Nearby theorems
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > leordtvallem2		Structured version Visualization version GIF version

Theorem leordtvallem2 23176

Description: Lemma for leordtval 23178. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Sep-2015.)

**Hypotheses**
Ref	Expression
leordtval.1	⊢ 𝐴 = ran (𝑥 ∈ ℝ^* ↦ (𝑥(,]+∞))
leordtval.2	⊢ 𝐵 = ran (𝑥 ∈ ℝ^* ↦ (-∞[,)𝑥))

**Assertion**
Ref	Expression
leordtvallem2	⊢ 𝐵 = ran (𝑥 ∈ ℝ^* ↦ {𝑦 ∈ ℝ^* ∣ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦})

Distinct variable group: 𝑥,𝑦 Allowed substitution hints: 𝐴(𝑥,𝑦) 𝐵(𝑥,𝑦)

**Proof of Theorem leordtvallem2**
Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		leordtval.2	. 2 ⊢ 𝐵 = ran (𝑥 ∈ ℝ^* ↦ (-∞[,)𝑥))
2		icossxr 13385	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (-∞[,)𝑥) ⊆ ℝ^*
3		sseqin2 4163	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((-∞[,)𝑥) ⊆ ℝ^* ↔ (ℝ^* ∩ (-∞[,)𝑥)) = (-∞[,)𝑥))
4	2, 3	mpbi 230	. . . . 5 ⊢ (ℝ^* ∩ (-∞[,)𝑥)) = (-∞[,)𝑥)
5		mnfxr 11202	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ -∞ ∈ ℝ^*
6		simpl 482	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ℝ^) → 𝑥 ∈ ℝ^)
7		elico1 13341	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((-∞ ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ℝ^) → (𝑦 ∈ (-∞[,)𝑥) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ ℝ^ ∧ -∞ ≤ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 < 𝑥)))
8	5, 6, 7	sylancr 588	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ℝ^) → (𝑦 ∈ (-∞[,)𝑥) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ ℝ^ ∧ -∞ ≤ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 < 𝑥)))
9		simpr 484	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ℝ^) → 𝑦 ∈ ℝ^)
10		mnfle 13086	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ ℝ^* → -∞ ≤ 𝑦)
11	9, 10	jccir 521	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ℝ^) → (𝑦 ∈ ℝ^ ∧ -∞ ≤ 𝑦))
12	11	biantrurd 532	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ℝ^) → (𝑦 < 𝑥 ↔ ((𝑦 ∈ ℝ^ ∧ -∞ ≤ 𝑦) ∧ 𝑦 < 𝑥)))
13		df-3an 1089	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝑦 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ -∞ ≤ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 < 𝑥) ↔ ((𝑦 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ -∞ ≤ 𝑦) ∧ 𝑦 < 𝑥))
14	12, 13	bitr4di 289	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ℝ^) → (𝑦 < 𝑥 ↔ (𝑦 ∈ ℝ^ ∧ -∞ ≤ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 < 𝑥)))
15		xrltnle 11212	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝑦 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ℝ^*) → (𝑦 < 𝑥 ↔ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦))
16	15	ancoms 458	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ℝ^*) → (𝑦 < 𝑥 ↔ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦))
17	8, 14, 16	3bitr2d 307	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ℝ^*) → (𝑦 ∈ (-∞[,)𝑥) ↔ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦))
18	17	rabbi2dva 4166	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ℝ^* → (ℝ^* ∩ (-∞[,)𝑥)) = {𝑦 ∈ ℝ^* ∣ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦})
19	4, 18	eqtr3id 2785	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ℝ^* → (-∞[,)𝑥) = {𝑦 ∈ ℝ^* ∣ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦})
20	19	mpteq2ia 5180	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ℝ^* ↦ (-∞[,)𝑥)) = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ^* ↦ {𝑦 ∈ ℝ^* ∣ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦})
21	20	rneqi 5892	. 2 ⊢ ran (𝑥 ∈ ℝ^* ↦ (-∞[,)𝑥)) = ran (𝑥 ∈ ℝ^* ↦ {𝑦 ∈ ℝ^* ∣ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦})
22	1, 21	eqtri 2759	1 ⊢ 𝐵 = ran (𝑥 ∈ ℝ^* ↦ {𝑦 ∈ ℝ^* ∣ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦})

Colors of variables: wff setvar class

Syntax hints: ¬ wn 3 ↔ wb 206 ∧ wa 395 ∧ w3a 1087 = wceq 1542 ∈ wcel 2114 {crab 3389 ∩ cin 3888 ⊆ wss 3889 class class class wbr 5085 ↦ cmpt 5166 ran crn 5632 (class class class)co 7367 +∞cpnf 11176 -∞cmnf 11177 ℝ^*cxr 11178 < clt 11179 ≤ cle 11180 (,]cioc 13299 [,)cico 13300

This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1797 ax-4 1811 ax-5 1912 ax-6 1969 ax-7 2010 ax-8 2116 ax-9 2124 ax-10 2147 ax-11 2163 ax-12 2185 ax-ext 2708 ax-sep 5231 ax-nul 5241 ax-pow 5307 ax-pr 5375 ax-un 7689 ax-cnex 11094 ax-resscn 11095

This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 207 df-an 396 df-or 849 df-3an 1089 df-tru 1545 df-fal 1555 df-ex 1782 df-nf 1786 df-sb 2069 df-mo 2539 df-eu 2569 df-clab 2715 df-cleq 2728 df-clel 2811 df-nfc 2885 df-ne 2933 df-nel 3037 df-ral 3052 df-rex 3062 df-rab 3390 df-v 3431 df-sbc 3729 df-csb 3838 df-dif 3892 df-un 3894 df-in 3896 df-ss 3906 df-nul 4274 df-if 4467 df-pw 4543 df-sn 4568 df-pr 4570 df-op 4574 df-uni 4851 df-iun 4935 df-br 5086 df-opab 5148 df-mpt 5167 df-id 5526 df-xp 5637 df-rel 5638 df-cnv 5639 df-co 5640 df-dm 5641 df-rn 5642 df-res 5643 df-ima 5644 df-iota 6454 df-fun 6500 df-fn 6501 df-f 6502 df-f1 6503 df-fo 6504 df-f1o 6505 df-fv 6506 df-ov 7370 df-oprab 7371 df-mpo 7372 df-1st 7942 df-2nd 7943 df-er 8643 df-en 8894 df-dom 8895 df-sdom 8896 df-pnf 11181 df-mnf 11182 df-xr 11183 df-ltxr 11184 df-le 11185 df-ico 13304

This theorem is referenced by: leordtval2 23177 leordtval 23178

W3C validator