leordtvallem2 - Metamath Proof Explorer

	Metamath Proof Explorer		< Previous Next > Nearby theorems
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > leordtvallem2		Structured version Visualization version GIF version

Theorem leordtvallem2 23098

Description: Lemma for leordtval 23100. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Sep-2015.)

**Hypotheses**
Ref	Expression
leordtval.1	⊢ 𝐴 = ran (𝑥 ∈ ℝ^* ↦ (𝑥(,]+∞))
leordtval.2	⊢ 𝐵 = ran (𝑥 ∈ ℝ^* ↦ (-∞[,)𝑥))

**Assertion**
Ref	Expression
leordtvallem2	⊢ 𝐵 = ran (𝑥 ∈ ℝ^* ↦ {𝑦 ∈ ℝ^* ∣ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦})

Distinct variable group: 𝑥,𝑦 Allowed substitution hints: 𝐴(𝑥,𝑦) 𝐵(𝑥,𝑦)

**Proof of Theorem leordtvallem2**
Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		leordtval.2	. 2 ⊢ 𝐵 = ran (𝑥 ∈ ℝ^* ↦ (-∞[,)𝑥))
2		icossxr 13393	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (-∞[,)𝑥) ⊆ ℝ^*
3		sseqin2 4186	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((-∞[,)𝑥) ⊆ ℝ^* ↔ (ℝ^* ∩ (-∞[,)𝑥)) = (-∞[,)𝑥))
4	2, 3	mpbi 230	. . . . 5 ⊢ (ℝ^* ∩ (-∞[,)𝑥)) = (-∞[,)𝑥)
5		mnfxr 11231	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ -∞ ∈ ℝ^*
6		simpl 482	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ℝ^) → 𝑥 ∈ ℝ^)
7		elico1 13349	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((-∞ ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ℝ^) → (𝑦 ∈ (-∞[,)𝑥) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ ℝ^ ∧ -∞ ≤ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 < 𝑥)))
8	5, 6, 7	sylancr 587	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ℝ^) → (𝑦 ∈ (-∞[,)𝑥) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ ℝ^ ∧ -∞ ≤ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 < 𝑥)))
9		simpr 484	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ℝ^) → 𝑦 ∈ ℝ^)
10		mnfle 13095	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ ℝ^* → -∞ ≤ 𝑦)
11	9, 10	jccir 521	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ℝ^) → (𝑦 ∈ ℝ^ ∧ -∞ ≤ 𝑦))
12	11	biantrurd 532	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ℝ^) → (𝑦 < 𝑥 ↔ ((𝑦 ∈ ℝ^ ∧ -∞ ≤ 𝑦) ∧ 𝑦 < 𝑥)))
13		df-3an 1088	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝑦 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ -∞ ≤ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 < 𝑥) ↔ ((𝑦 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ -∞ ≤ 𝑦) ∧ 𝑦 < 𝑥))
14	12, 13	bitr4di 289	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ℝ^) → (𝑦 < 𝑥 ↔ (𝑦 ∈ ℝ^ ∧ -∞ ≤ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 < 𝑥)))
15		xrltnle 11241	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝑦 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ℝ^*) → (𝑦 < 𝑥 ↔ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦))
16	15	ancoms 458	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ℝ^*) → (𝑦 < 𝑥 ↔ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦))
17	8, 14, 16	3bitr2d 307	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ℝ^*) → (𝑦 ∈ (-∞[,)𝑥) ↔ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦))
18	17	rabbi2dva 4189	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ℝ^* → (ℝ^* ∩ (-∞[,)𝑥)) = {𝑦 ∈ ℝ^* ∣ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦})
19	4, 18	eqtr3id 2778	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ℝ^* → (-∞[,)𝑥) = {𝑦 ∈ ℝ^* ∣ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦})
20	19	mpteq2ia 5202	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ℝ^* ↦ (-∞[,)𝑥)) = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ^* ↦ {𝑦 ∈ ℝ^* ∣ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦})
21	20	rneqi 5901	. 2 ⊢ ran (𝑥 ∈ ℝ^* ↦ (-∞[,)𝑥)) = ran (𝑥 ∈ ℝ^* ↦ {𝑦 ∈ ℝ^* ∣ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦})
22	1, 21	eqtri 2752	1 ⊢ 𝐵 = ran (𝑥 ∈ ℝ^* ↦ {𝑦 ∈ ℝ^* ∣ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦})

Colors of variables: wff setvar class

Syntax hints: ¬ wn 3 ↔ wb 206 ∧ wa 395 ∧ w3a 1086 = wceq 1540 ∈ wcel 2109 {crab 3405 ∩ cin 3913 ⊆ wss 3914 class class class wbr 5107 ↦ cmpt 5188 ran crn 5639 (class class class)co 7387 +∞cpnf 11205 -∞cmnf 11206 ℝ^*cxr 11207 < clt 11208 ≤ cle 11209 (,]cioc 13307 [,)cico 13308

This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1795 ax-4 1809 ax-5 1910 ax-6 1967 ax-7 2008 ax-8 2111 ax-9 2119 ax-10 2142 ax-11 2158 ax-12 2178 ax-ext 2701 ax-sep 5251 ax-nul 5261 ax-pow 5320 ax-pr 5387 ax-un 7711 ax-cnex 11124 ax-resscn 11125

This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 207 df-an 396 df-or 848 df-3an 1088 df-tru 1543 df-fal 1553 df-ex 1780 df-nf 1784 df-sb 2066 df-mo 2533 df-eu 2562 df-clab 2708 df-cleq 2721 df-clel 2803 df-nfc 2878 df-ne 2926 df-nel 3030 df-ral 3045 df-rex 3054 df-rab 3406 df-v 3449 df-sbc 3754 df-csb 3863 df-dif 3917 df-un 3919 df-in 3921 df-ss 3931 df-nul 4297 df-if 4489 df-pw 4565 df-sn 4590 df-pr 4592 df-op 4596 df-uni 4872 df-iun 4957 df-br 5108 df-opab 5170 df-mpt 5189 df-id 5533 df-xp 5644 df-rel 5645 df-cnv 5646 df-co 5647 df-dm 5648 df-rn 5649 df-res 5650 df-ima 5651 df-iota 6464 df-fun 6513 df-fn 6514 df-f 6515 df-f1 6516 df-fo 6517 df-f1o 6518 df-fv 6519 df-ov 7390 df-oprab 7391 df-mpo 7392 df-1st 7968 df-2nd 7969 df-er 8671 df-en 8919 df-dom 8920 df-sdom 8921 df-pnf 11210 df-mnf 11211 df-xr 11212 df-ltxr 11213 df-le 11214 df-ico 13312

This theorem is referenced by: leordtval2 23099 leordtval 23100

W3C validator