leordtvallem2 - Metamath Proof Explorer

	Metamath Proof Explorer		< Previous Next > Nearby theorems
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > leordtvallem2		Structured version Visualization version GIF version

Theorem leordtvallem2 23147

Description: Lemma for leordtval 23149. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Sep-2015.)

**Hypotheses**
Ref	Expression
leordtval.1	⊢ 𝐴 = ran (𝑥 ∈ ℝ^* ↦ (𝑥(,]+∞))
leordtval.2	⊢ 𝐵 = ran (𝑥 ∈ ℝ^* ↦ (-∞[,)𝑥))

**Assertion**
Ref	Expression
leordtvallem2	⊢ 𝐵 = ran (𝑥 ∈ ℝ^* ↦ {𝑦 ∈ ℝ^* ∣ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦})

Distinct variable group: 𝑥,𝑦 Allowed substitution hints: 𝐴(𝑥,𝑦) 𝐵(𝑥,𝑦)

**Proof of Theorem leordtvallem2**
Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		leordtval.2	. 2 ⊢ 𝐵 = ran (𝑥 ∈ ℝ^* ↦ (-∞[,)𝑥))
2		icossxr 13447	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (-∞[,)𝑥) ⊆ ℝ^*
3		sseqin2 4198	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((-∞[,)𝑥) ⊆ ℝ^* ↔ (ℝ^* ∩ (-∞[,)𝑥)) = (-∞[,)𝑥))
4	2, 3	mpbi 230	. . . . 5 ⊢ (ℝ^* ∩ (-∞[,)𝑥)) = (-∞[,)𝑥)
5		mnfxr 11290	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ -∞ ∈ ℝ^*
6		simpl 482	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ℝ^) → 𝑥 ∈ ℝ^)
7		elico1 13403	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((-∞ ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ℝ^) → (𝑦 ∈ (-∞[,)𝑥) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ ℝ^ ∧ -∞ ≤ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 < 𝑥)))
8	5, 6, 7	sylancr 587	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ℝ^) → (𝑦 ∈ (-∞[,)𝑥) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ ℝ^ ∧ -∞ ≤ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 < 𝑥)))
9		simpr 484	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ℝ^) → 𝑦 ∈ ℝ^)
10		mnfle 13149	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ ℝ^* → -∞ ≤ 𝑦)
11	9, 10	jccir 521	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ℝ^) → (𝑦 ∈ ℝ^ ∧ -∞ ≤ 𝑦))
12	11	biantrurd 532	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ℝ^) → (𝑦 < 𝑥 ↔ ((𝑦 ∈ ℝ^ ∧ -∞ ≤ 𝑦) ∧ 𝑦 < 𝑥)))
13		df-3an 1088	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝑦 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ -∞ ≤ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 < 𝑥) ↔ ((𝑦 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ -∞ ≤ 𝑦) ∧ 𝑦 < 𝑥))
14	12, 13	bitr4di 289	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ℝ^) → (𝑦 < 𝑥 ↔ (𝑦 ∈ ℝ^ ∧ -∞ ≤ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 < 𝑥)))
15		xrltnle 11300	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝑦 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ℝ^*) → (𝑦 < 𝑥 ↔ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦))
16	15	ancoms 458	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ℝ^*) → (𝑦 < 𝑥 ↔ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦))
17	8, 14, 16	3bitr2d 307	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ℝ^*) → (𝑦 ∈ (-∞[,)𝑥) ↔ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦))
18	17	rabbi2dva 4201	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ℝ^* → (ℝ^* ∩ (-∞[,)𝑥)) = {𝑦 ∈ ℝ^* ∣ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦})
19	4, 18	eqtr3id 2784	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ℝ^* → (-∞[,)𝑥) = {𝑦 ∈ ℝ^* ∣ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦})
20	19	mpteq2ia 5216	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ℝ^* ↦ (-∞[,)𝑥)) = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ^* ↦ {𝑦 ∈ ℝ^* ∣ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦})
21	20	rneqi 5917	. 2 ⊢ ran (𝑥 ∈ ℝ^* ↦ (-∞[,)𝑥)) = ran (𝑥 ∈ ℝ^* ↦ {𝑦 ∈ ℝ^* ∣ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦})
22	1, 21	eqtri 2758	1 ⊢ 𝐵 = ran (𝑥 ∈ ℝ^* ↦ {𝑦 ∈ ℝ^* ∣ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦})

Colors of variables: wff setvar class

Syntax hints: ¬ wn 3 ↔ wb 206 ∧ wa 395 ∧ w3a 1086 = wceq 1540 ∈ wcel 2108 {crab 3415 ∩ cin 3925 ⊆ wss 3926 class class class wbr 5119 ↦ cmpt 5201 ran crn 5655 (class class class)co 7403 +∞cpnf 11264 -∞cmnf 11265 ℝ^*cxr 11266 < clt 11267 ≤ cle 11268 (,]cioc 13361 [,)cico 13362

This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1795 ax-4 1809 ax-5 1910 ax-6 1967 ax-7 2007 ax-8 2110 ax-9 2118 ax-10 2141 ax-11 2157 ax-12 2177 ax-ext 2707 ax-sep 5266 ax-nul 5276 ax-pow 5335 ax-pr 5402 ax-un 7727 ax-cnex 11183 ax-resscn 11184

This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 207 df-an 396 df-or 848 df-3an 1088 df-tru 1543 df-fal 1553 df-ex 1780 df-nf 1784 df-sb 2065 df-mo 2539 df-eu 2568 df-clab 2714 df-cleq 2727 df-clel 2809 df-nfc 2885 df-ne 2933 df-nel 3037 df-ral 3052 df-rex 3061 df-rab 3416 df-v 3461 df-sbc 3766 df-csb 3875 df-dif 3929 df-un 3931 df-in 3933 df-ss 3943 df-nul 4309 df-if 4501 df-pw 4577 df-sn 4602 df-pr 4604 df-op 4608 df-uni 4884 df-iun 4969 df-br 5120 df-opab 5182 df-mpt 5202 df-id 5548 df-xp 5660 df-rel 5661 df-cnv 5662 df-co 5663 df-dm 5664 df-rn 5665 df-res 5666 df-ima 5667 df-iota 6483 df-fun 6532 df-fn 6533 df-f 6534 df-f1 6535 df-fo 6536 df-f1o 6537 df-fv 6538 df-ov 7406 df-oprab 7407 df-mpo 7408 df-1st 7986 df-2nd 7987 df-er 8717 df-en 8958 df-dom 8959 df-sdom 8960 df-pnf 11269 df-mnf 11270 df-xr 11271 df-ltxr 11272 df-le 11273 df-ico 13366

This theorem is referenced by: leordtval2 23148 leordtval 23149

W3C validator