MPE Home Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >  fndmdif Structured version   Visualization version   GIF version

Theorem fndmdif 7044
Description: Two ways to express the locus of differences between two functions. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 17-Jan-2015.)
Assertion
Ref Expression
fndmdif ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴𝐺 Fn 𝐴) → dom (𝐹𝐺) = {𝑥𝐴 ∣ (𝐹𝑥) ≠ (𝐺𝑥)})
Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐹   𝑥,𝐺   𝑥,𝐴

Proof of Theorem fndmdif
Dummy variable 𝑦 is distinct from all other variables.
StepHypRef Expression
1 difss 4093 . . . . 5 (𝐹𝐺) ⊆ 𝐹
2 dmss 5897 . . . . 5 ((𝐹𝐺) ⊆ 𝐹 → dom (𝐹𝐺) ⊆ dom 𝐹)
31, 2ax-mp 5 . . . 4 dom (𝐹𝐺) ⊆ dom 𝐹
4 fndm 6645 . . . . 5 (𝐹 Fn 𝐴 → dom 𝐹 = 𝐴)
54adantr 486 . . . 4 ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴𝐺 Fn 𝐴) → dom 𝐹 = 𝐴)
63, 5sseqtrid 3982 . . 3 ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴𝐺 Fn 𝐴) → dom (𝐹𝐺) ⊆ 𝐴)
7 sseqin2 4179 . . 3 (dom (𝐹𝐺) ⊆ 𝐴 ↔ (𝐴 ∩ dom (𝐹𝐺)) = dom (𝐹𝐺))
86, 7sylib 221 . 2 ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴𝐺 Fn 𝐴) → (𝐴 ∩ dom (𝐹𝐺)) = dom (𝐹𝐺))
9 vex 3462 . . . . 5 𝑥 ∈ V
109eldm 5895 . . . 4 (𝑥 ∈ dom (𝐹𝐺) ↔ ∃𝑦 𝑥(𝐹𝐺)𝑦)
11 eqcom 2773 . . . . . . . . 9 ((𝐹𝑥) = (𝐺𝑥) ↔ (𝐺𝑥) = (𝐹𝑥))
12 fnbrfvb 6938 . . . . . . . . 9 ((𝐺 Fn 𝐴𝑥𝐴) → ((𝐺𝑥) = (𝐹𝑥) ↔ 𝑥𝐺(𝐹𝑥)))
1311, 12bitrid 286 . . . . . . . 8 ((𝐺 Fn 𝐴𝑥𝐴) → ((𝐹𝑥) = (𝐺𝑥) ↔ 𝑥𝐺(𝐹𝑥)))
1413adantll 727 . . . . . . 7 (((𝐹 Fn 𝐴𝐺 Fn 𝐴) ∧ 𝑥𝐴) → ((𝐹𝑥) = (𝐺𝑥) ↔ 𝑥𝐺(𝐹𝑥)))
1514necon3abid 2997 . . . . . 6 (((𝐹 Fn 𝐴𝐺 Fn 𝐴) ∧ 𝑥𝐴) → ((𝐹𝑥) ≠ (𝐺𝑥) ↔ ¬ 𝑥𝐺(𝐹𝑥)))
16 fvex 6901 . . . . . . 7 (𝐹𝑥) ∈ V
17 breq2 5118 . . . . . . . 8 (𝑦 = (𝐹𝑥) → (𝑥𝐺𝑦𝑥𝐺(𝐹𝑥)))
1817notbid 321 . . . . . . 7 (𝑦 = (𝐹𝑥) → (¬ 𝑥𝐺𝑦 ↔ ¬ 𝑥𝐺(𝐹𝑥)))
1916, 18ceqsexv 3506 . . . . . 6 (∃𝑦(𝑦 = (𝐹𝑥) ∧ ¬ 𝑥𝐺𝑦) ↔ ¬ 𝑥𝐺(𝐹𝑥))
2015, 19bitr4di 292 . . . . 5 (((𝐹 Fn 𝐴𝐺 Fn 𝐴) ∧ 𝑥𝐴) → ((𝐹𝑥) ≠ (𝐺𝑥) ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑦 = (𝐹𝑥) ∧ ¬ 𝑥𝐺𝑦)))
21 eqcom 2773 . . . . . . . . . 10 (𝑦 = (𝐹𝑥) ↔ (𝐹𝑥) = 𝑦)
22 fnbrfvb 6938 . . . . . . . . . 10 ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴𝑥𝐴) → ((𝐹𝑥) = 𝑦𝑥𝐹𝑦))
2321, 22bitrid 286 . . . . . . . . 9 ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴𝑥𝐴) → (𝑦 = (𝐹𝑥) ↔ 𝑥𝐹𝑦))
2423adantlr 728 . . . . . . . 8 (((𝐹 Fn 𝐴𝐺 Fn 𝐴) ∧ 𝑥𝐴) → (𝑦 = (𝐹𝑥) ↔ 𝑥𝐹𝑦))
2524anbi1d 643 . . . . . . 7 (((𝐹 Fn 𝐴𝐺 Fn 𝐴) ∧ 𝑥𝐴) → ((𝑦 = (𝐹𝑥) ∧ ¬ 𝑥𝐺𝑦) ↔ (𝑥𝐹𝑦 ∧ ¬ 𝑥𝐺𝑦)))
26 brdif 5169 . . . . . . 7 (𝑥(𝐹𝐺)𝑦 ↔ (𝑥𝐹𝑦 ∧ ¬ 𝑥𝐺𝑦))
2725, 26bitr4di 292 . . . . . 6 (((𝐹 Fn 𝐴𝐺 Fn 𝐴) ∧ 𝑥𝐴) → ((𝑦 = (𝐹𝑥) ∧ ¬ 𝑥𝐺𝑦) ↔ 𝑥(𝐹𝐺)𝑦))
2827exbidv 1954 . . . . 5 (((𝐹 Fn 𝐴𝐺 Fn 𝐴) ∧ 𝑥𝐴) → (∃𝑦(𝑦 = (𝐹𝑥) ∧ ¬ 𝑥𝐺𝑦) ↔ ∃𝑦 𝑥(𝐹𝐺)𝑦))
2920, 28bitr2d 283 . . . 4 (((𝐹 Fn 𝐴𝐺 Fn 𝐴) ∧ 𝑥𝐴) → (∃𝑦 𝑥(𝐹𝐺)𝑦 ↔ (𝐹𝑥) ≠ (𝐺𝑥)))
3010, 29bitrid 286 . . 3 (((𝐹 Fn 𝐴𝐺 Fn 𝐴) ∧ 𝑥𝐴) → (𝑥 ∈ dom (𝐹𝐺) ↔ (𝐹𝑥) ≠ (𝐺𝑥)))
3130rabbi2dva 4181 . 2 ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴𝐺 Fn 𝐴) → (𝐴 ∩ dom (𝐹𝐺)) = {𝑥𝐴 ∣ (𝐹𝑥) ≠ (𝐺𝑥)})
328, 31eqtr3d 2803 1 ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴𝐺 Fn 𝐴) → dom (𝐹𝐺) = {𝑥𝐴 ∣ (𝐹𝑥) ≠ (𝐺𝑥)})
Colors of variables:    wff setvar class
This proof depends on syntax axioms:  ¬ wn 3  wi 4  wb 209  wa 401   = wceq 1570  wex 1812  wcel 2146  wne 2961  {crab 3419  cdif 3905  cin 3907  wss 3908   class class class wbr 5114  dom cdm 5666   Fn wfn 6538  cfv 6543
This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2148  ax-9 2156  ax-10 2179  ax-12 2216  ax-ext 2738  ax-sep 5262  ax-nul 5274  ax-pr 5409
This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-mo 2570  df-eu 2600  df-clab 2745  df-cleq 2758  df-clel 2841  df-ne 2962  df-ral 3083  df-rex 3093  df-rab 3420  df-v 3460  df-dif 3911  df-un 3913  df-in 3915  df-ss 3925  df-nul 4290  df-if 4493  df-sn 4595  df-pr 4597  df-op 4601  df-uni 4878  df-br 5115  df-opab 5179  df-id 5561  df-xp 5672  df-rel 5673  df-cnv 5674  df-co 5675  df-dm 5676  df-iota 6499  df-fun 6545  df-fn 6546  df-fv 6551
This theorem is used by:  fndmdifcom  7045  fndmdifeq0  7046  fndifnfp  7181  wemapsolem  9522  wemapso2lem  9524  dsmmbas2  21924  frlmbas  21942  ptcmplem2  24247
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator