![]() |
Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
|
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > riotabidva | Structured version Visualization version GIF version |
Description: Equivalent wff's yield equal restricted class abstractions (deduction form). (rabbidva 3440 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 17-Jan-2012.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
riotabidva.1 | ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
riotabidva | ⊢ (𝜑 → (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓) = (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒)) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | riotabidva.1 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) | |
2 | 1 | pm5.32da 580 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜒))) |
3 | 2 | iotabidv 6525 | . 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (℩𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)) = (℩𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜒))) |
4 | df-riota 7362 | . 2 ⊢ (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓) = (℩𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)) | |
5 | df-riota 7362 | . 2 ⊢ (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒) = (℩𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜒)) | |
6 | 3, 4, 5 | 3eqtr4g 2798 | 1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓) = (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒)) |
Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
Syntax hints: → wi 4 ↔ wb 205 ∧ wa 397 = wceq 1542 ∈ wcel 2107 ℩cio 6491 ℩crio 7361 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1798 ax-4 1812 ax-5 1914 ax-6 1972 ax-7 2012 ax-8 2109 ax-9 2117 ax-ext 2704 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 206 df-an 398 df-tru 1545 df-ex 1783 df-sb 2069 df-clab 2711 df-cleq 2725 df-clel 2811 df-v 3477 df-in 3955 df-ss 3965 df-uni 4909 df-iota 6493 df-riota 7362 |
This theorem is referenced by: riotabiia 7383 dfceil2 13801 cidpropd 17651 grpinvpropd 18895 mirval 27896 mirfv 27897 grpoidval 29754 adjval2 31132 riotaeqbidva 31724 xdivval 32073 toslub 32131 tosglb 32133 ringinvval 32373 glbconN 38236 glbconNOLD 38237 cdlemk33N 39769 cdlemk34 39770 cdlemkid4 39794 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |