Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > riotabidva | Structured version Visualization version GIF version |
Description: Equivalent wff's yield equal restricted class abstractions (deduction form). (rabbidva 3480 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 17-Jan-2012.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
riotabidva.1 | ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
riotabidva | ⊢ (𝜑 → (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓) = (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒)) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | riotabidva.1 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) | |
2 | 1 | pm5.32da 581 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜒))) |
3 | 2 | iotabidv 6341 | . 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (℩𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)) = (℩𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜒))) |
4 | df-riota 7116 | . 2 ⊢ (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓) = (℩𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)) | |
5 | df-riota 7116 | . 2 ⊢ (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒) = (℩𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜒)) | |
6 | 3, 4, 5 | 3eqtr4g 2883 | 1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓) = (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒)) |
Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
Syntax hints: → wi 4 ↔ wb 208 ∧ wa 398 = wceq 1537 ∈ wcel 2114 ℩cio 6314 ℩crio 7115 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1796 ax-4 1810 ax-5 1911 ax-6 1970 ax-7 2015 ax-8 2116 ax-9 2124 ax-10 2145 ax-11 2161 ax-12 2177 ax-ext 2795 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 209 df-an 399 df-or 844 df-tru 1540 df-ex 1781 df-nf 1785 df-sb 2070 df-clab 2802 df-cleq 2816 df-clel 2895 df-nfc 2965 df-v 3498 df-in 3945 df-ss 3954 df-uni 4841 df-iota 6316 df-riota 7116 |
This theorem is referenced by: riotabiia 7136 dfceil2 13212 cidpropd 16982 grpinvpropd 18176 mirval 26443 mirfv 26444 grpoidval 28292 adjval2 29670 xdivval 30597 toslub 30657 tosglb 30659 ringinvval 30865 glbconN 36515 cdlemk33N 38047 cdlemk34 38048 cdlemkid4 38072 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |