P. 74 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 7301-7400   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	onuninsuci 7301*	A limit ordinal is not a successor ordinal. (Contributed by NM, 18-Feb-2004.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ On    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 = ∪ 𝐴 ↔ ¬ ∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝐴 = suc 𝑥)
Theorem	onsucssi 7302	A set belongs to an ordinal number iff its successor is a subset of the ordinal number. Exercise 8 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 42 and its converse. (Contributed by NM, 16-Sep-1995.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ On    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ On    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ suc 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵)
Theorem	nlimsucg 7303	A successor is not a limit ordinal. (Contributed by NM, 25-Mar-1995.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ¬ Lim suc 𝐴)
Theorem	orduninsuc 7304*	An ordinal equal to its union is not a successor. (Contributed by NM, 18-Feb-2004.)
⊢ (Ord 𝐴 → (𝐴 = ∪ 𝐴 ↔ ¬ ∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝐴 = suc 𝑥))
Theorem	ordunisuc2 7305*	An ordinal equal to its union contains the successor of each of its members. (Contributed by NM, 1-Feb-2005.)
⊢ (Ord 𝐴 → (𝐴 = ∪ 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 suc 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴))
Theorem	ordzsl 7306*	An ordinal is zero, a successor ordinal, or a limit ordinal. (Contributed by NM, 1-Oct-2003.)
⊢ (Ord 𝐴 ↔ (𝐴 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝐴 = suc 𝑥 ∨ Lim 𝐴))
Theorem	onzsl 7307*	An ordinal number is zero, a successor ordinal, or a limit ordinal number. (Contributed by NM, 1-Oct-2003.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On ↔ (𝐴 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝐴 = suc 𝑥 ∨ (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ Lim 𝐴)))
Theorem	dflim3 7308*	An alternate definition of a limit ordinal, which is any ordinal that is neither zero nor a successor. (Contributed by NM, 1-Nov-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.)
⊢ (Lim 𝐴 ↔ (Ord 𝐴 ∧ ¬ (𝐴 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝐴 = suc 𝑥)))
Theorem	dflim4 7309*	An alternate definition of a limit ordinal. (Contributed by NM, 1-Feb-2005.)
⊢ (Lim 𝐴 ↔ (Ord 𝐴 ∧ ∅ ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 suc 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴))
Theorem	limsuc 7310	The successor of a member of a limit ordinal is also a member. (Contributed by NM, 3-Sep-2003.)
⊢ (Lim 𝐴 → (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ suc 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴))
Theorem	limsssuc 7311	A class includes a limit ordinal iff the successor of the class includes it. (Contributed by NM, 30-Oct-2003.)
⊢ (Lim 𝐴 → (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ⊆ suc 𝐵))
Theorem	nlimon 7312*	Two ways to express the class of non-limit ordinal numbers. Part of Definition 7.27 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 42, who use the symbol KI for this class. (Contributed by NM, 1-Nov-2004.)
⊢ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑦 ∈ On 𝑥 = suc 𝑦)} = {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ ¬ Lim 𝑥}
Theorem	limuni3 7313*	The union of a nonempty class of limit ordinals is a limit ordinal. (Contributed by NM, 1-Feb-2005.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 Lim 𝑥) → Lim ∪ 𝐴)
2.4.3  Transfinite induction
Theorem	tfi 7314*	The Principle of Transfinite Induction. Theorem 7.17 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 39. This principle states that if 𝐴 is a class of ordinal numbers with the property that every ordinal number included in 𝐴 also belongs to 𝐴, then every ordinal number is in 𝐴. See theorem tfindes 7323 or tfinds 7320 for the version involving basis and induction hypotheses. (Contributed by NM, 18-Feb-2004.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ On ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ On (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)) → 𝐴 = On)
Theorem	tfis 7315*	Transfinite Induction Schema. If all ordinal numbers less than a given number 𝑥 have a property (induction hypothesis), then all ordinal numbers have the property (conclusion). Exercise 25 of [Enderton] p. 200. (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-1994.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 20-Nov-2016.)
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ On → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → 𝜑))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ On → 𝜑)
Theorem	tfis2f 7316*	Transfinite Induction Schema, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-1994.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ On → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 𝜓 → 𝜑))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ On → 𝜑)
Theorem	tfis2 7317*	Transfinite Induction Schema, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-1994.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ On → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 𝜓 → 𝜑))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ On → 𝜑)
Theorem	tfis3 7318*	Transfinite Induction Schema, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 4-Nov-2003.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ On → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 𝜓 → 𝜑))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → 𝜒)
Theorem	tfisi 7319*	A transfinite induction scheme in "implicit" form where the induction is done on an object derived from the object of interest. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 24-Aug-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ On ∧ 𝑅 ⊆ 𝑇) ∧ ∀𝑦(𝑆 ∈ 𝑅 → 𝜒)) → 𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝑅 = 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝑅 = 𝑇)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜃)
Theorem	tfinds 7320*	Principle of Transfinite Induction (inference schema), using implicit substitutions. The first four hypotheses establish the substitutions we need. The last three are the basis, the induction step for successors, and the induction step for limit ordinals. Theorem Schema 4 of [Suppes] p. 197. (Contributed by NM, 16-Apr-1995.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.)
⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = suc 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜏))    &   ⊢ 𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ On → (𝜒 → 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (Lim 𝑥 → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 𝜒 → 𝜑))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → 𝜏)
Theorem	tfindsg 7321*	Transfinite Induction (inference schema), using implicit substitutions. The first four hypotheses establish the substitutions we need. The last three are the basis, the induction step for successors, and the induction step for limit ordinals. The basis of this version is an arbitrary ordinal 𝐵 instead of zero. Remark in [TakeutiZaring] p. 57. (Contributed by NM, 5-Mar-2004.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = suc 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜏))    &   ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ On → 𝜓)    &   ⊢ (((𝑦 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝑦) → (𝜒 → 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (((Lim 𝑥 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝑥) → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝐵 ⊆ 𝑦 → 𝜒) → 𝜑))    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴) → 𝜏)
Theorem	tfindsg2 7322*	Transfinite Induction (inference schema), using implicit substitutions. The first four hypotheses establish the substitutions we need. The last three are the basis, the induction step for successors, and the induction step for limit ordinals. The basis of this version is an arbitrary ordinal suc 𝐵 instead of zero. (Unnecessary distinct variable restrictions were removed by David Abernethy, 19-Jun-2012.) (Contributed by NM, 5-Jan-2005.)
⊢ (𝑥 = suc 𝐵 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = suc 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜏))    &   ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ On → 𝜓)    &   ⊢ ((𝑦 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑦) → (𝜒 → 𝜃))    &   ⊢ ((Lim 𝑥 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑥) → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝐵 ∈ 𝑦 → 𝜒) → 𝜑))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝜏)
Theorem	tfindes 7323*	Transfinite Induction with explicit substitution. The first hypothesis is the basis, the second is the induction step for successors, and the third is the induction step for limit ordinals. Theorem Schema 4 of [Suppes] p. 197. (Contributed by NM, 5-Mar-2004.)
⊢ [∅ / 𝑥]𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ On → (𝜑 → [suc 𝑥 / 𝑥]𝜑))    &   ⊢ (Lim 𝑦 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 𝜑 → [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ On → 𝜑)
Theorem	tfinds2 7324*	Transfinite Induction (inference schema), using implicit substitutions. The first three hypotheses establish the substitutions we need. The last three are the basis and the induction hypotheses (for successor and limit ordinals respectively). Theorem Schema 4 of [Suppes] p. 197. The wff 𝜏 is an auxiliary antecedent to help shorten proofs using this theorem. (Contributed by NM, 4-Sep-2004.)
⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = suc 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝜏 → 𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ On → (𝜏 → (𝜒 → 𝜃)))    &   ⊢ (Lim 𝑥 → (𝜏 → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 𝜒 → 𝜑)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ On → (𝜏 → 𝜑))
Theorem	tfinds3 7325*	Principle of Transfinite Induction (inference schema), using implicit substitutions. The first four hypotheses establish the substitutions we need. The last three are the basis, the induction step for successors, and the induction step for limit ordinals. (Contributed by NM, 6-Jan-2005.) (Revised by David Abernethy, 21-Jun-2011.)
⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = suc 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜏))    &   ⊢ (𝜂 → 𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ On → (𝜂 → (𝜒 → 𝜃)))    &   ⊢ (Lim 𝑥 → (𝜂 → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 𝜒 → 𝜑)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → (𝜂 → 𝜏))
2.4.4  The natural numbers (i.e., finite ordinals)
Syntax	com 7326	Extend class notation to include the class of natural numbers.
class ω
Definition	df-om 7327*	Define the class of natural numbers, which are all ordinal numbers that are less than every limit ordinal, i.e., all finite ordinals. Our definition is a variant of the Definition of N of [BellMachover] p. 471. See dfom2 7328 for an alternate definition. Later, when we assume the Axiom of Infinity, we show ω is a set in omex 8817, and ω can then be defined per dfom3 8821 (the smallest inductive set) and dfom4 8823. Note: the natural numbers ω are a subset of the ordinal numbers df-on 5967. They are completely different from the natural numbers ℕ (df-nn 11351) that are a subset of the complex numbers defined much later in our development, although the two sets have analogous properties and operations defined on them. (Contributed by NM, 15-May-1994.)
⊢ ω = {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ ∀𝑦(Lim 𝑦 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦)}
Theorem	dfom2 7328	An alternate definition of the set of natural numbers ω. Definition 7.28 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 42, who use the symbol KI for the inner class builder of non-limit ordinal numbers (see nlimon 7312). (Contributed by NM, 1-Nov-2004.)
⊢ ω = {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ suc 𝑥 ⊆ {𝑦 ∈ On ∣ ¬ Lim 𝑦}}
Theorem	elom 7329*	Membership in omega. The left conjunct can be eliminated if we assume the Axiom of Infinity; see elom3 8822. (Contributed by NM, 15-May-1994.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ω ↔ (𝐴 ∈ On ∧ ∀𝑥(Lim 𝑥 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑥)))
Theorem	omsson 7330	Omega is a subset of On. (Contributed by NM, 13-Jun-1994.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.)
⊢ ω ⊆ On
Theorem	limomss 7331	The class of natural numbers is a subclass of any (infinite) limit ordinal. Exercise 1 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 44. Remarkably, our proof does not require the Axiom of Infinity. (Contributed by NM, 30-Oct-2003.)
⊢ (Lim 𝐴 → ω ⊆ 𝐴)
Theorem	nnon 7332	A natural number is an ordinal number. (Contributed by NM, 27-Jun-1994.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ω → 𝐴 ∈ On)
Theorem	nnoni 7333	A natural number is an ordinal number. (Contributed by NM, 27-Jun-1994.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ω    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ On
Theorem	nnord 7334	A natural number is ordinal. (Contributed by NM, 17-Oct-1995.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ω → Ord 𝐴)
Theorem	ordom 7335	Omega is ordinal. Theorem 7.32 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 43. (Contributed by NM, 18-Oct-1995.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.)
⊢ Ord ω
Theorem	elnn 7336	A member of a natural number is a natural number. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-1998.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) → 𝐴 ∈ ω)
Theorem	omon 7337	The class of natural numbers ω is either an ordinal number (if we accept the Axiom of Infinity) or the proper class of all ordinal numbers (if we deny the Axiom of Infinity). Remark in [TakeutiZaring] p. 43. (Contributed by NM, 10-May-1998.)
⊢ (ω ∈ On ∨ ω = On)
Theorem	omelon2 7338	Omega is an ordinal number. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Jan-2013.)
⊢ (ω ∈ V → ω ∈ On)
Theorem	nnlim 7339	A natural number is not a limit ordinal. (Contributed by NM, 18-Oct-1995.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ω → ¬ Lim 𝐴)
Theorem	omssnlim 7340	The class of natural numbers is a subclass of the class of non-limit ordinal numbers. Exercise 4 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 42. (Contributed by NM, 2-Nov-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.)
⊢ ω ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ ¬ Lim 𝑥}
Theorem	limom 7341	Omega is a limit ordinal. Theorem 2.8 of [BellMachover] p. 473. Our proof, however, does not require the Axiom of Infinity. (Contributed by NM, 26-Mar-1995.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 2-Sep-2015.)
⊢ Lim ω
Theorem	peano2b 7342	A class belongs to omega iff its successor does. (Contributed by NM, 3-Dec-1995.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ω ↔ suc 𝐴 ∈ ω)
Theorem	nnsuc 7343*	A nonzero natural number is a successor. (Contributed by NM, 18-Feb-2004.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ω 𝐴 = suc 𝑥)
Theorem	ssnlim 7344*	An ordinal subclass of non-limit ordinals is a class of natural numbers. Exercise 7 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 42. (Contributed by NM, 2-Nov-2004.)
⊢ ((Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ ¬ Lim 𝑥}) → 𝐴 ⊆ ω)
Theorem	omsinds 7345*	Strong (or "total") induction principle over the finite ordinals. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 17-Jul-2015.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ω → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 𝜓 → 𝜑))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ω → 𝜒)
2.4.5  Peano's postulates
Theorem	peano1 7346	Zero is a natural number. One of Peano's five postulates for arithmetic. Proposition 7.30(1) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 42. Note: Unlike most textbooks, our proofs of peano1 7346 through peano5 7350 do not use the Axiom of Infinity. Unlike Takeuti and Zaring, they also do not use the Axiom of Regularity. (Contributed by NM, 15-May-1994.)
⊢ ∅ ∈ ω
Theorem	peano2 7347	The successor of any natural number is a natural number. One of Peano's five postulates for arithmetic. Proposition 7.30(2) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 42. (Contributed by NM, 3-Sep-2003.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ω → suc 𝐴 ∈ ω)
Theorem	peano3 7348	The successor of any natural number is not zero. One of Peano's five postulates for arithmetic. Proposition 7.30(3) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 42. (Contributed by NM, 3-Sep-2003.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ω → suc 𝐴 ≠ ∅)
Theorem	peano4 7349	Two natural numbers are equal iff their successors are equal, i.e. the successor function is one-to-one. One of Peano's five postulates for arithmetic. Proposition 7.30(4) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 43. (Contributed by NM, 3-Sep-2003.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) → (suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	peano5 7350*	The induction postulate: any class containing zero and closed under the successor operation contains all natural numbers. One of Peano's five postulates for arithmetic. Proposition 7.30(5) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 43, except our proof does not require the Axiom of Infinity. The more traditional statement of mathematical induction as a theorem schema, with a basis and an induction step, is derived from this theorem as theorem findes 7357. (Contributed by NM, 18-Feb-2004.)
⊢ ((∅ ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ω (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → suc 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)) → ω ⊆ 𝐴)
Theorem	nn0suc 7351*	A natural number is either 0 or a successor. (Contributed by NM, 27-May-1998.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ω → (𝐴 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑥 ∈ ω 𝐴 = suc 𝑥))
2.4.6  Finite induction (for finite ordinals)
Theorem	find 7352*	The Principle of Finite Induction (mathematical induction). Corollary 7.31 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 43. The simpler hypothesis shown here was suggested in an email from "Colin" on 1-Oct-2001. The hypothesis states that 𝐴 is a set of natural numbers, zero belongs to 𝐴, and given any member of 𝐴 the member's successor also belongs to 𝐴. The conclusion is that every natural number is in 𝐴. (Contributed by NM, 22-Feb-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ ω ∧ ∅ ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 suc 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 = ω
Theorem	finds 7353*	Principle of Finite Induction (inference schema), using implicit substitutions. The first four hypotheses establish the substitutions we need. The last two are the basis and the induction step. Theorem Schema 22 of [Suppes] p. 136. This is Metamath 100 proof #74. (Contributed by NM, 14-Apr-1995.)
⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = suc 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜏))    &   ⊢ 𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ ω → (𝜒 → 𝜃))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ω → 𝜏)
Theorem	findsg 7354*	Principle of Finite Induction (inference schema), using implicit substitutions. The first four hypotheses establish the substitutions we need. The last two are the basis and the induction step. The basis of this version is an arbitrary natural number 𝐵 instead of zero. (Contributed by NM, 16-Sep-1995.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = suc 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜏))    &   ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ ω → 𝜓)    &   ⊢ (((𝑦 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝑦) → (𝜒 → 𝜃))    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴) → 𝜏)
Theorem	finds2 7355*	Principle of Finite Induction (inference schema), using implicit substitutions. The first three hypotheses establish the substitutions we need. The last two are the basis and the induction step. Theorem Schema 22 of [Suppes] p. 136. (Contributed by NM, 29-Nov-2002.)
⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = suc 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝜏 → 𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ ω → (𝜏 → (𝜒 → 𝜃)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ω → (𝜏 → 𝜑))
Theorem	finds1 7356*	Principle of Finite Induction (inference schema), using implicit substitutions. The first three hypotheses establish the substitutions we need. The last two are the basis and the induction step. Theorem Schema 22 of [Suppes] p. 136. (Contributed by NM, 22-Mar-2006.)
⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = suc 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ 𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ ω → (𝜒 → 𝜃))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ω → 𝜑)
Theorem	findes 7357	Finite induction with explicit substitution. The first hypothesis is the basis and the second is the induction step. Theorem Schema 22 of [Suppes] p. 136. See tfindes 7323 for the transfinite version. This is an alternative for Metamath 100 proof #74. (Contributed by Raph Levien, 9-Jul-2003.)
⊢ [∅ / 𝑥]𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ω → (𝜑 → [suc 𝑥 / 𝑥]𝜑))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ω → 𝜑)
Theorem	dmexg 7358	The domain of a set is a set. Corollary 6.8(2) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 26. (Contributed by NM, 7-Apr-1995.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → dom 𝐴 ∈ V)
Theorem	rnexg 7359	The range of a set is a set. Corollary 6.8(3) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 26. Similar to Lemma 3D of [Enderton] p. 41. (Contributed by NM, 31-Mar-1995.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ran 𝐴 ∈ V)
Theorem	dmexd 7360	The domain of a set is a set. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 26-Jun-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → dom 𝐴 ∈ V)
Theorem	dmex 7361	The domain of a set is a set. Corollary 6.8(2) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 26. (Contributed by NM, 7-Jul-2008.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ dom 𝐴 ∈ V
Theorem	rnex 7362	The range of a set is a set. Corollary 6.8(3) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 26. Similar to Lemma 3D of [Enderton] p. 41. (Contributed by NM, 7-Jul-2008.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ran 𝐴 ∈ V
Theorem	iprc 7363	The identity function is a proper class. This means, for example, that we cannot use it as a member of the class of continuous functions unless it is restricted to a set, as in idcn 21432. (Contributed by NM, 1-Jan-2007.)
⊢ ¬ I ∈ V
Theorem	resiexg 7364	The existence of a restricted identity function, proved without using the Axiom of Replacement (unlike resfunexg 6735). (Contributed by NM, 13-Jan-2007.) (Proof shortened by Peter Mazsa, 2-Oct-2022.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ( I ↾ 𝐴) ∈ V)
Theorem	imaexg 7365	The image of a set is a set. Theorem 3.17 of [Monk1] p. 39. (Contributed by NM, 24-Jul-1995.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 “ 𝐵) ∈ V)
Theorem	imaex 7366	The image of a set is a set. Theorem 3.17 of [Monk1] p. 39. (Contributed by JJ, 24-Sep-2021.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 “ 𝐵) ∈ V
Theorem	exse2 7367	Any set relation is set-like. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Jun-2015.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝑅 Se 𝐴)
Theorem	xpexr 7368	If a Cartesian product is a set, one of its components must be a set. (Contributed by NM, 27-Aug-2006.)
⊢ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) ∈ 𝐶 → (𝐴 ∈ V ∨ 𝐵 ∈ V))
Theorem	xpexr2 7369	If a nonempty Cartesian product is a set, so are both of its components. (Contributed by NM, 27-Aug-2006.)
⊢ (((𝐴 × 𝐵) ∈ 𝐶 ∧ (𝐴 × 𝐵) ≠ ∅) → (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V))
Theorem	xpexcnv 7370	A condition where the converse of xpex 7223 holds as well. Corollary 6.9(2) in [TakeutiZaring] p. 26. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 13-Nov-2011.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ≠ ∅ ∧ (𝐴 × 𝐵) ∈ V) → 𝐴 ∈ V)
Theorem	soex 7371	If the relation in a strict order is a set, then the base field is also a set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ((𝑅 Or 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑉) → 𝐴 ∈ V)
Theorem	elxp4 7372	Membership in a Cartesian product. This version requires no quantifiers or dummy variables. See also elxp5 7373, elxp6 7462, and elxp7 7463. (Contributed by NM, 17-Feb-2004.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 × 𝐶) ↔ (𝐴 = ⟨∪ dom {𝐴}, ∪ ran {𝐴}⟩ ∧ (∪ dom {𝐴} ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ∪ ran {𝐴} ∈ 𝐶)))
Theorem	elxp5 7373	Membership in a Cartesian product requiring no quantifiers or dummy variables. Provides a slightly shorter version of elxp4 7372 when the double intersection does not create class existence problems (caused by int0 4711). (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-2004.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 × 𝐶) ↔ (𝐴 = ⟨∩ ∩ 𝐴, ∪ ran {𝐴}⟩ ∧ (∩ ∩ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ∪ ran {𝐴} ∈ 𝐶)))
Theorem	cnvexg 7374	The converse of a set is a set. Corollary 6.8(1) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 26. (Contributed by NM, 17-Mar-1998.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ◡𝐴 ∈ V)
Theorem	cnvex 7375	The converse of a set is a set. Corollary 6.8(1) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 26. (Contributed by NM, 19-Dec-2003.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ◡𝐴 ∈ V
Theorem	relcnvexb 7376	A relation is a set iff its converse is a set. (Contributed by FL, 3-Mar-2007.)
⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → (𝑅 ∈ V ↔ ◡𝑅 ∈ V))
Theorem	f1oexrnex 7377	If the range of a 1-1 onto function is a set, the function itself is a set. (Contributed by AV, 2-Jun-2019.)
⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) → 𝐹 ∈ V)
Theorem	f1oexbi 7378*	There is a one-to-one onto function from a set to a second set iff there is a one-to-one onto function from the second set to the first set. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 30-Sep-2018.)
⊢ (∃𝑓 𝑓:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑔 𝑔:𝐵–1-1-onto→𝐴)
Theorem	coexg 7379	The composition of two sets is a set. (Contributed by NM, 19-Mar-1998.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) ∈ V)
Theorem	coex 7380	The composition of two sets is a set. (Contributed by NM, 15-Dec-2003.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) ∈ V
Theorem	funcnvuni 7381*	The union of a chain (with respect to inclusion) of single-rooted sets is single-rooted. (See funcnv 6191 for "single-rooted" definition.) (Contributed by NM, 11-Aug-2004.)
⊢ (∀𝑓 ∈ 𝐴 (Fun ◡𝑓 ∧ ∀𝑔 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑓 ⊆ 𝑔 ∨ 𝑔 ⊆ 𝑓)) → Fun ◡∪ 𝐴)
Theorem	fun11uni 7382*	The union of a chain (with respect to inclusion) of one-to-one functions is a one-to-one function. (Contributed by NM, 11-Aug-2004.)
⊢ (∀𝑓 ∈ 𝐴 ((Fun 𝑓 ∧ Fun ◡𝑓) ∧ ∀𝑔 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑓 ⊆ 𝑔 ∨ 𝑔 ⊆ 𝑓)) → (Fun ∪ 𝐴 ∧ Fun ◡∪ 𝐴))
Theorem	fex2 7383	A function with bounded domain and range is a set. This version of fex 6745 is proven without the Axiom of Replacement. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → 𝐹 ∈ V)
Theorem	fabexg 7384*	Existence of a set of functions. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 25-Feb-2008.)
⊢ 𝐹 = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)}    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷) → 𝐹 ∈ V)
Theorem	fabex 7385*	Existence of a set of functions. (Contributed by NM, 3-Dec-2007.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)}    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐹 ∈ V
Theorem	dmfex 7386	If a mapping is a set, its domain is a set. (Contributed by NM, 27-Aug-2006.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 17-Sep-2011.)
⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵) → 𝐴 ∈ V)
Theorem	f1oabexg 7387*	The class of all 1-1-onto functions mapping one set to another is a set. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 25-Feb-2008.)
⊢ 𝐹 = {𝑓 ∣ (𝑓:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)}    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷) → 𝐹 ∈ V)
Theorem	fun11iun 7388*	The union of a chain (with respect to inclusion) of one-to-one functions is a one-to-one function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-May-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2015.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐵 = 𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐵:𝐷–1-1→𝑆 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶 ∨ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐵)) → ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵:∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐷–1-1→𝑆)
Theorem	ffoss 7389*	Relationship between a mapping and an onto mapping. Figure 38 of [Enderton] p. 145. (Contributed by NM, 10-May-1998.)
⊢ 𝐹 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵))
Theorem	f11o 7390*	Relationship between one-to-one and one-to-one onto function. (Contributed by NM, 4-Apr-1998.)
⊢ 𝐹 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵))
Theorem	resfunexgALT 7391	Alternate proof of resfunexg 6735, shorter but requiring ax-pow 5065 and ax-un 7209. (Contributed by NM, 7-Apr-1995.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((Fun 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶) → (𝐴 ↾ 𝐵) ∈ V)
Theorem	cofunexg 7392	Existence of a composition when the first member is a function. (Contributed by NM, 8-Oct-2007.)
⊢ ((Fun 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶) → (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) ∈ V)
Theorem	cofunex2g 7393	Existence of a composition when the second member is one-to-one. (Contributed by NM, 8-Oct-2007.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ Fun ◡𝐵) → (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) ∈ V)
Theorem	fnexALT 7394	Alternate proof of fnex 6737, derived using the Axiom of Replacement in the form of funimaexg 6208. This version uses ax-pow 5065 and ax-un 7209, whereas fnex 6737 does not. (Contributed by NM, 14-Aug-1994.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝐹 ∈ V)
Theorem	funrnex 7395	If the domain of a function exists, so does its range. Part of Theorem 4.15(v) of [Monk1] p. 46. This theorem is derived using the Axiom of Replacement in the form of funex 6738. (Contributed by NM, 11-Nov-1995.)
⊢ (dom 𝐹 ∈ 𝐵 → (Fun 𝐹 → ran 𝐹 ∈ V))
Theorem	zfrep6 7396*	A version of the Axiom of Replacement. Normally 𝜑 would have free variables 𝑥 and 𝑦. Axiom 6 of [Kunen] p. 12. The Separation Scheme ax-sep 5005 cannot be derived from this version and must be stated as a separate axiom in an axiom system (such as Kunen's) that uses this version in place of our ax-rep 4994. (Contributed by NM, 10-Oct-2003.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 ∃!𝑦𝜑 → ∃𝑤∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑤 𝜑)
Theorem	fornex 7397	If the domain of an onto function exists, so does its codomain. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jul-2004.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 → (𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵 → 𝐵 ∈ V))
Theorem	f1dmex 7398	If the codomain of a one-to-one function exists, so does its domain. This theorem is equivalent to the Axiom of Replacement ax-rep 4994. (Contributed by NM, 4-Sep-2004.)
⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ∈ V)
Theorem	f1ovv 7399	The range of a 1-1 onto function is a set iff its domain is a set. (Contributed by AV, 21-Mar-2019.)
⊢ (𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵 → (𝐴 ∈ V ↔ 𝐵 ∈ V))
Theorem	fvclex 7400*	Existence of the class of values of a set. (Contributed by NM, 9-Nov-1995.)
⊢ 𝐹 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 𝑦 = (𝐹‘𝑥)} ∈ V