Theorem toslub 32789

Description: In a toset, the lowest upper bound lub, defined for partial orders is the supremum, sup(𝐴, 𝐵, < ), defined for total orders. (these are the set.mm definitions: lowest upper bound and supremum are normally synonymous). Note that those two values are also equal if such a supremum does not exist: in that case, both are equal to the empty set. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Feb-2018.) (Revised by Thierry Arnoux, 24-Sep-2018.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
toslub.b	⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)
toslub.l	⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾)
toslub.1	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ Toset)
toslub.2	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
toslub	⊢ (𝜑 → ((lub‘𝐾)‘𝐴) = sup(𝐴, 𝐵, < ))

Proof of Theorem toslub

Dummy variables 𝑎 𝑏 𝑐 𝑑 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		toslub.b	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)
2		toslub.l	. . . 4 ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾)
3		toslub.1	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ Toset)
4		toslub.2	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵)
5		eqid 2725	. . . 4 ⊢ (le‘𝐾) = (le‘𝐾)
6	1, 2, 3, 4, 5	toslublem 32788	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑎 ∈ 𝐵) → ((∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 𝑏(le‘𝐾)𝑎 ∧ ∀𝑐 ∈ 𝐵 (∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 𝑏(le‘𝐾)𝑐 → 𝑎(le‘𝐾)𝑐)) ↔ (∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑎 < 𝑏 ∧ ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑏 < 𝑎 → ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐴 𝑏 < 𝑑))))
7	6	riotabidva 7395	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (℩𝑎 ∈ 𝐵 (∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 𝑏(le‘𝐾)𝑎 ∧ ∀𝑐 ∈ 𝐵 (∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 𝑏(le‘𝐾)𝑐 → 𝑎(le‘𝐾)𝑐))) = (℩𝑎 ∈ 𝐵 (∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑎 < 𝑏 ∧ ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑏 < 𝑎 → ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐴 𝑏 < 𝑑))))
8		eqid 2725	. . 3 ⊢ (lub‘𝐾) = (lub‘𝐾)
9		biid 260	. . 3 ⊢ ((∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 𝑏(le‘𝐾)𝑎 ∧ ∀𝑐 ∈ 𝐵 (∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 𝑏(le‘𝐾)𝑐 → 𝑎(le‘𝐾)𝑐)) ↔ (∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 𝑏(le‘𝐾)𝑎 ∧ ∀𝑐 ∈ 𝐵 (∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 𝑏(le‘𝐾)𝑐 → 𝑎(le‘𝐾)𝑐)))
10	1, 5, 8, 9, 3, 4	lubval 18351	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((lub‘𝐾)‘𝐴) = (℩𝑎 ∈ 𝐵 (∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 𝑏(le‘𝐾)𝑎 ∧ ∀𝑐 ∈ 𝐵 (∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 𝑏(le‘𝐾)𝑐 → 𝑎(le‘𝐾)𝑐))))
11	1, 5, 2	tosso 18414	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ Toset → (𝐾 ∈ Toset ↔ ( < Or 𝐵 ∧ ( I ↾ 𝐵) ⊆ (le‘𝐾))))
12	11	ibi 266	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ Toset → ( < Or 𝐵 ∧ ( I ↾ 𝐵) ⊆ (le‘𝐾)))
13	12	simpld 493	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ Toset → < Or 𝐵)
14		id 22	. . . 4 ⊢ ( < Or 𝐵 → < Or 𝐵)
15	14	supval2 9480	. . 3 ⊢ ( < Or 𝐵 → sup(𝐴, 𝐵, < ) = (℩𝑎 ∈ 𝐵 (∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑎 < 𝑏 ∧ ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑏 < 𝑎 → ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐴 𝑏 < 𝑑))))
16	3, 13, 15	3syl 18	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → sup(𝐴, 𝐵, < ) = (℩𝑎 ∈ 𝐵 (∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑎 < 𝑏 ∧ ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑏 < 𝑎 → ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐴 𝑏 < 𝑑))))
17	7, 10, 16	3eqtr4d 2775	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((lub‘𝐾)‘𝐴) = sup(𝐴, 𝐵, < ))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 394   = wceq 1533   ∈ wcel 2098  ∀wral 3050  ∃wrex 3059   ⊆ wss 3944   class class class wbr 5149   I cid 5575   Or wor 5589   ↾ cres 5680  ‘cfv 6549  ℩crio 7374  supcsup 9465  Basecbs 17183  lecple 17243  ltcplt 18303  lubclub 18304  Tosetctos 18411

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1789  ax-4 1803  ax-5 1905  ax-6 1963  ax-7 2003  ax-8 2100  ax-9 2108  ax-10 2129  ax-11 2146  ax-12 2166  ax-ext 2696  ax-rep 5286  ax-sep 5300  ax-nul 5307  ax-pow 5365  ax-pr 5429

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 395  df-or 846  df-3or 1085  df-3an 1086  df-tru 1536  df-fal 1546  df-ex 1774  df-nf 1778  df-sb 2060  df-mo 2528  df-eu 2557  df-clab 2703  df-cleq 2717  df-clel 2802  df-nfc 2877  df-ne 2930  df-ral 3051  df-rex 3060  df-rmo 3363  df-reu 3364  df-rab 3419  df-v 3463  df-sbc 3774  df-csb 3890  df-dif 3947  df-un 3949  df-in 3951  df-ss 3961  df-nul 4323  df-if 4531  df-pw 4606  df-sn 4631  df-pr 4633  df-op 4637  df-uni 4910  df-iun 4999  df-br 5150  df-opab 5212  df-mpt 5233  df-id 5576  df-po 5590  df-so 5591  df-xp 5684  df-rel 5685  df-cnv 5686  df-co 5687  df-dm 5688  df-rn 5689  df-res 5690  df-ima 5691  df-iota 6501  df-fun 6551  df-fn 6552  df-f 6553  df-f1 6554  df-fo 6555  df-f1o 6556  df-fv 6557  df-riota 7375  df-sup 9467  df-proset 18290  df-poset 18308  df-plt 18325  df-lub 18341  df-toset 18412

This theorem is referenced by:  xrsp1  32829