Theorem toslub 33234

Description: In a toset, the lowest upper bound lub, defined for partial orders is the supremum, sup(𝐴, 𝐵, < ), defined for total orders. (these are the set.mm definitions: lowest upper bound and supremum are normally synonymous). Note that those two values are also equal if such a supremum does not exist: in that case, both are equal to the empty set. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Feb-2018.) (Revised by Thierry Arnoux, 24-Sep-2018.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
toslub.b	⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)
toslub.l	⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾)
toslub.1	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ Toset)
toslub.2	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
toslub	⊢ (𝜑 → ((lub‘𝐾)‘𝐴) = sup(𝐴, 𝐵, < ))

Proof of Theorem toslub

Dummy variables 𝑎 𝑏 𝑐 𝑑 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		toslub.b	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)
2		toslub.l	. . . 4 ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾)
3		toslub.1	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ Toset)
4		toslub.2	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵)
5		eqid 2769	. . . 4 ⊢ (le‘𝐾) = (le‘𝐾)
6	1, 2, 3, 4, 5	toslublem 33233	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑎 ∈ 𝐵) → ((∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 𝑏(le‘𝐾)𝑎 ∧ ∀𝑐 ∈ 𝐵 (∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 𝑏(le‘𝐾)𝑐 → 𝑎(le‘𝐾)𝑐)) ↔ (∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑎 < 𝑏 ∧ ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑏 < 𝑎 → ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐴 𝑏 < 𝑑))))
7	6	riotabidva 7387	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (℩𝑎 ∈ 𝐵 (∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 𝑏(le‘𝐾)𝑎 ∧ ∀𝑐 ∈ 𝐵 (∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 𝑏(le‘𝐾)𝑐 → 𝑎(le‘𝐾)𝑐))) = (℩𝑎 ∈ 𝐵 (∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑎 < 𝑏 ∧ ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑏 < 𝑎 → ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐴 𝑏 < 𝑑))))
8		eqid 2769	. . 3 ⊢ (lub‘𝐾) = (lub‘𝐾)
9		biid 264	. . 3 ⊢ ((∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 𝑏(le‘𝐾)𝑎 ∧ ∀𝑐 ∈ 𝐵 (∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 𝑏(le‘𝐾)𝑐 → 𝑎(le‘𝐾)𝑐)) ↔ (∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 𝑏(le‘𝐾)𝑎 ∧ ∀𝑐 ∈ 𝐵 (∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 𝑏(le‘𝐾)𝑐 → 𝑎(le‘𝐾)𝑐)))
10	1, 5, 8, 9, 3, 4	lubval 18410	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((lub‘𝐾)‘𝐴) = (℩𝑎 ∈ 𝐵 (∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 𝑏(le‘𝐾)𝑎 ∧ ∀𝑐 ∈ 𝐵 (∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 𝑏(le‘𝐾)𝑐 → 𝑎(le‘𝐾)𝑐))))
11	1, 5, 2	tosso 18473	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ Toset → (𝐾 ∈ Toset ↔ ( < Or 𝐵 ∧ ( I ↾ 𝐵) ⊆ (le‘𝐾))))
12	11	ibi 270	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ Toset → ( < Or 𝐵 ∧ ( I ↾ 𝐵) ⊆ (le‘𝐾)))
13	12	simpld 499	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ Toset → < Or 𝐵)
14		id 23	. . . 4 ⊢ ( < Or 𝐵 → < Or 𝐵)
15	14	supval2 9415	. . 3 ⊢ ( < Or 𝐵 → sup(𝐴, 𝐵, < ) = (℩𝑎 ∈ 𝐵 (∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑎 < 𝑏 ∧ ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑏 < 𝑎 → ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐴 𝑏 < 𝑑))))
16	3, 13, 15	3syl 19	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → sup(𝐴, 𝐵, < ) = (℩𝑎 ∈ 𝐵 (∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑎 < 𝑏 ∧ ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑏 < 𝑎 → ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐴 𝑏 < 𝑑))))
17	7, 10, 16	3eqtr4d 2814	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((lub‘𝐾)‘𝐴) = sup(𝐴, 𝐵, < ))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 400   = wceq 1567   ∈ wcel 2149  ∀wral 3085  ∃wrex 3095   ⊆ wss 3913   class class class wbr 5113   I cid 5556   Or wor 5569   ↾ cres 5664  ‘cfv 6537  ℩crio 7367  supcsup 9400  Basecbs 17269  lecple 17317  ltcplt 18364  lubclub 18365  Tosetctos 18470

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1822  ax-4 1836  ax-5 1937  ax-6 1994  ax-7 2035  ax-8 2151  ax-9 2159  ax-10 2182  ax-11 2198  ax-12 2219  ax-ext 2741  ax-rep 5242  ax-sep 5261  ax-nul 5271  ax-pow 5337  ax-pr 5405

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-or 861  df-3or 1102  df-3an 1103  df-tru 1570  df-fal 1580  df-ex 1807  df-nf 1811  df-sb 2098  df-mo 2573  df-eu 2603  df-clab 2748  df-cleq 2761  df-clel 2844  df-nfc 2918  df-ne 2965  df-ral 3086  df-rex 3096  df-rmo 3376  df-reu 3377  df-rab 3424  df-v 3465  df-sbc 3754  df-csb 3862  df-dif 3916  df-un 3918  df-in 3920  df-ss 3930  df-nul 4295  df-if 4493  df-pw 4569  df-sn 4595  df-pr 4597  df-op 4601  df-uni 4877  df-iun 4962  df-br 5114  df-opab 5178  df-mpt 5197  df-id 5557  df-po 5570  df-so 5571  df-xp 5668  df-rel 5669  df-cnv 5670  df-co 5671  df-dm 5672  df-rn 5673  df-res 5674  df-ima 5675  df-iota 6493  df-fun 6539  df-fn 6540  df-f 6541  df-f1 6542  df-fo 6543  df-f1o 6544  df-fv 6545  df-riota 7368  df-sup 9402  df-proset 18350  df-poset 18369  df-plt 18384  df-lub 18400  df-toset 18471

This theorem is referenced by:  xrsp1  33274