Theorem toslub 31251

Description: In a toset, the lowest upper bound lub, defined for partial orders is the supremum, sup(𝐴, 𝐵, < ), defined for total orders. (these are the set.mm definitions: lowest upper bound and supremum are normally synonymous). Note that those two values are also equal if such a supremum does not exist: in that case, both are equal to the empty set. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Feb-2018.) (Revised by Thierry Arnoux, 24-Sep-2018.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
toslub.b	⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)
toslub.l	⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾)
toslub.1	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ Toset)
toslub.2	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
toslub	⊢ (𝜑 → ((lub‘𝐾)‘𝐴) = sup(𝐴, 𝐵, < ))

Proof of Theorem toslub

Dummy variables 𝑎 𝑏 𝑐 𝑑 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		toslub.b	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)
2		toslub.l	. . . 4 ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾)
3		toslub.1	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ Toset)
4		toslub.2	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵)
5		eqid 2738	. . . 4 ⊢ (le‘𝐾) = (le‘𝐾)
6	1, 2, 3, 4, 5	toslublem 31250	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑎 ∈ 𝐵) → ((∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 𝑏(le‘𝐾)𝑎 ∧ ∀𝑐 ∈ 𝐵 (∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 𝑏(le‘𝐾)𝑐 → 𝑎(le‘𝐾)𝑐)) ↔ (∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑎 < 𝑏 ∧ ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑏 < 𝑎 → ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐴 𝑏 < 𝑑))))
7	6	riotabidva 7252	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (℩𝑎 ∈ 𝐵 (∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 𝑏(le‘𝐾)𝑎 ∧ ∀𝑐 ∈ 𝐵 (∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 𝑏(le‘𝐾)𝑐 → 𝑎(le‘𝐾)𝑐))) = (℩𝑎 ∈ 𝐵 (∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑎 < 𝑏 ∧ ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑏 < 𝑎 → ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐴 𝑏 < 𝑑))))
8		eqid 2738	. . 3 ⊢ (lub‘𝐾) = (lub‘𝐾)
9		biid 260	. . 3 ⊢ ((∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 𝑏(le‘𝐾)𝑎 ∧ ∀𝑐 ∈ 𝐵 (∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 𝑏(le‘𝐾)𝑐 → 𝑎(le‘𝐾)𝑐)) ↔ (∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 𝑏(le‘𝐾)𝑎 ∧ ∀𝑐 ∈ 𝐵 (∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 𝑏(le‘𝐾)𝑐 → 𝑎(le‘𝐾)𝑐)))
10	1, 5, 8, 9, 3, 4	lubval 18074	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((lub‘𝐾)‘𝐴) = (℩𝑎 ∈ 𝐵 (∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 𝑏(le‘𝐾)𝑎 ∧ ∀𝑐 ∈ 𝐵 (∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 𝑏(le‘𝐾)𝑐 → 𝑎(le‘𝐾)𝑐))))
11	1, 5, 2	tosso 18137	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ Toset → (𝐾 ∈ Toset ↔ ( < Or 𝐵 ∧ ( I ↾ 𝐵) ⊆ (le‘𝐾))))
12	11	ibi 266	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ Toset → ( < Or 𝐵 ∧ ( I ↾ 𝐵) ⊆ (le‘𝐾)))
13	12	simpld 495	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ Toset → < Or 𝐵)
14		id 22	. . . 4 ⊢ ( < Or 𝐵 → < Or 𝐵)
15	14	supval2 9214	. . 3 ⊢ ( < Or 𝐵 → sup(𝐴, 𝐵, < ) = (℩𝑎 ∈ 𝐵 (∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑎 < 𝑏 ∧ ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑏 < 𝑎 → ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐴 𝑏 < 𝑑))))
16	3, 13, 15	3syl 18	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → sup(𝐴, 𝐵, < ) = (℩𝑎 ∈ 𝐵 (∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑎 < 𝑏 ∧ ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑏 < 𝑎 → ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐴 𝑏 < 𝑑))))
17	7, 10, 16	3eqtr4d 2788	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((lub‘𝐾)‘𝐴) = sup(𝐴, 𝐵, < ))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 396   = wceq 1539   ∈ wcel 2106  ∀wral 3064  ∃wrex 3065   ⊆ wss 3887   class class class wbr 5074   I cid 5488   Or wor 5502   ↾ cres 5591  ‘cfv 6433  ℩crio 7231  supcsup 9199  Basecbs 16912  lecple 16969  ltcplt 18026  lubclub 18027  Tosetctos 18134

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1798  ax-4 1812  ax-5 1913  ax-6 1971  ax-7 2011  ax-8 2108  ax-9 2116  ax-10 2137  ax-11 2154  ax-12 2171  ax-ext 2709  ax-rep 5209  ax-sep 5223  ax-nul 5230  ax-pow 5288  ax-pr 5352

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 397  df-or 845  df-3or 1087  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1542  df-fal 1552  df-ex 1783  df-nf 1787  df-sb 2068  df-mo 2540  df-eu 2569  df-clab 2716  df-cleq 2730  df-clel 2816  df-nfc 2889  df-ne 2944  df-ral 3069  df-rex 3070  df-rmo 3071  df-reu 3072  df-rab 3073  df-v 3434  df-sbc 3717  df-csb 3833  df-dif 3890  df-un 3892  df-in 3894  df-ss 3904  df-nul 4257  df-if 4460  df-pw 4535  df-sn 4562  df-pr 4564  df-op 4568  df-uni 4840  df-iun 4926  df-br 5075  df-opab 5137  df-mpt 5158  df-id 5489  df-po 5503  df-so 5504  df-xp 5595  df-rel 5596  df-cnv 5597  df-co 5598  df-dm 5599  df-rn 5600  df-res 5601  df-ima 5602  df-iota 6391  df-fun 6435  df-fn 6436  df-f 6437  df-f1 6438  df-fo 6439  df-f1o 6440  df-fv 6441  df-riota 7232  df-sup 9201  df-proset 18013  df-poset 18031  df-plt 18048  df-lub 18064  df-toset 18135

This theorem is referenced by:  xrsp1  31291