Theorem toslub 32174

Description: In a toset, the lowest upper bound lub, defined for partial orders is the supremum, sup(𝐴, 𝐵, < ), defined for total orders. (these are the set.mm definitions: lowest upper bound and supremum are normally synonymous). Note that those two values are also equal if such a supremum does not exist: in that case, both are equal to the empty set. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Feb-2018.) (Revised by Thierry Arnoux, 24-Sep-2018.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
toslub.b	⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)
toslub.l	⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾)
toslub.1	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ Toset)
toslub.2	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
toslub	⊢ (𝜑 → ((lub‘𝐾)‘𝐴) = sup(𝐴, 𝐵, < ))

Proof of Theorem toslub

Dummy variables 𝑎 𝑏 𝑐 𝑑 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		toslub.b	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)
2		toslub.l	. . . 4 ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾)
3		toslub.1	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ Toset)
4		toslub.2	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵)
5		eqid 2733	. . . 4 ⊢ (le‘𝐾) = (le‘𝐾)
6	1, 2, 3, 4, 5	toslublem 32173	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑎 ∈ 𝐵) → ((∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 𝑏(le‘𝐾)𝑎 ∧ ∀𝑐 ∈ 𝐵 (∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 𝑏(le‘𝐾)𝑐 → 𝑎(le‘𝐾)𝑐)) ↔ (∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑎 < 𝑏 ∧ ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑏 < 𝑎 → ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐴 𝑏 < 𝑑))))
7	6	riotabidva 7385	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (℩𝑎 ∈ 𝐵 (∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 𝑏(le‘𝐾)𝑎 ∧ ∀𝑐 ∈ 𝐵 (∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 𝑏(le‘𝐾)𝑐 → 𝑎(le‘𝐾)𝑐))) = (℩𝑎 ∈ 𝐵 (∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑎 < 𝑏 ∧ ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑏 < 𝑎 → ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐴 𝑏 < 𝑑))))
8		eqid 2733	. . 3 ⊢ (lub‘𝐾) = (lub‘𝐾)
9		biid 261	. . 3 ⊢ ((∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 𝑏(le‘𝐾)𝑎 ∧ ∀𝑐 ∈ 𝐵 (∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 𝑏(le‘𝐾)𝑐 → 𝑎(le‘𝐾)𝑐)) ↔ (∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 𝑏(le‘𝐾)𝑎 ∧ ∀𝑐 ∈ 𝐵 (∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 𝑏(le‘𝐾)𝑐 → 𝑎(le‘𝐾)𝑐)))
10	1, 5, 8, 9, 3, 4	lubval 18309	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((lub‘𝐾)‘𝐴) = (℩𝑎 ∈ 𝐵 (∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 𝑏(le‘𝐾)𝑎 ∧ ∀𝑐 ∈ 𝐵 (∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 𝑏(le‘𝐾)𝑐 → 𝑎(le‘𝐾)𝑐))))
11	1, 5, 2	tosso 18372	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ Toset → (𝐾 ∈ Toset ↔ ( < Or 𝐵 ∧ ( I ↾ 𝐵) ⊆ (le‘𝐾))))
12	11	ibi 267	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ Toset → ( < Or 𝐵 ∧ ( I ↾ 𝐵) ⊆ (le‘𝐾)))
13	12	simpld 496	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ Toset → < Or 𝐵)
14		id 22	. . . 4 ⊢ ( < Or 𝐵 → < Or 𝐵)
15	14	supval2 9450	. . 3 ⊢ ( < Or 𝐵 → sup(𝐴, 𝐵, < ) = (℩𝑎 ∈ 𝐵 (∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑎 < 𝑏 ∧ ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑏 < 𝑎 → ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐴 𝑏 < 𝑑))))
16	3, 13, 15	3syl 18	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → sup(𝐴, 𝐵, < ) = (℩𝑎 ∈ 𝐵 (∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑎 < 𝑏 ∧ ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑏 < 𝑎 → ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐴 𝑏 < 𝑑))))
17	7, 10, 16	3eqtr4d 2783	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((lub‘𝐾)‘𝐴) = sup(𝐴, 𝐵, < ))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 397   = wceq 1542   ∈ wcel 2107  ∀wral 3062  ∃wrex 3071   ⊆ wss 3949   class class class wbr 5149   I cid 5574   Or wor 5588   ↾ cres 5679  ‘cfv 6544  ℩crio 7364  supcsup 9435  Basecbs 17144  lecple 17204  ltcplt 18261  lubclub 18262  Tosetctos 18369

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1798  ax-4 1812  ax-5 1914  ax-6 1972  ax-7 2012  ax-8 2109  ax-9 2117  ax-10 2138  ax-11 2155  ax-12 2172  ax-ext 2704  ax-rep 5286  ax-sep 5300  ax-nul 5307  ax-pow 5364  ax-pr 5428

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 398  df-or 847  df-3or 1089  df-3an 1090  df-tru 1545  df-fal 1555  df-ex 1783  df-nf 1787  df-sb 2069  df-mo 2535  df-eu 2564  df-clab 2711  df-cleq 2725  df-clel 2811  df-nfc 2886  df-ne 2942  df-ral 3063  df-rex 3072  df-rmo 3377  df-reu 3378  df-rab 3434  df-v 3477  df-sbc 3779  df-csb 3895  df-dif 3952  df-un 3954  df-in 3956  df-ss 3966  df-nul 4324  df-if 4530  df-pw 4605  df-sn 4630  df-pr 4632  df-op 4636  df-uni 4910  df-iun 5000  df-br 5150  df-opab 5212  df-mpt 5233  df-id 5575  df-po 5589  df-so 5590  df-xp 5683  df-rel 5684  df-cnv 5685  df-co 5686  df-dm 5687  df-rn 5688  df-res 5689  df-ima 5690  df-iota 6496  df-fun 6546  df-fn 6547  df-f 6548  df-f1 6549  df-fo 6550  df-f1o 6551  df-fv 6552  df-riota 7365  df-sup 9437  df-proset 18248  df-poset 18266  df-plt 18283  df-lub 18299  df-toset 18370

This theorem is referenced by:  xrsp1  32214