Theorem suctrALT 39556

Description: The successor of a transitive class is transitive. The proof of http://us.metamath.org/other/completeusersproof/suctrvd.html is a Virtual Deduction proof verified by automatically transforming it into the Metamath proof of suctrALT 39556 using completeusersproof, which is verified by the Metamath program. The proof of http://us.metamath.org/other/completeusersproof/suctrro.html is a form of the completed proof which preserves the Virtual Deduction proof's step numbers and their ordering. See suctr 6027 for the original proof. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 11-Apr-2009.) (Revised by Alan Sare, 12-Jun-2018.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
suctrALT	⊢ (Tr 𝐴 → Tr suc 𝐴)

Proof of Theorem suctrALT

Dummy variables 𝑦 𝑧 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		sssucid 6021	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ 𝐴 ⊆ suc 𝐴
2		id 22	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (Tr 𝐴 → Tr 𝐴)
3		id 22	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴) → (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴))
4	3	simpld 484	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦)
5		id 22	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)
6		trel 4960	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (Tr 𝐴 → ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴))
7	6	3impib 1137	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((Tr 𝐴 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴)
8	7	idiALT 39182	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((Tr 𝐴 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴)
9	2, 4, 5, 8	syl3an 1192	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((Tr 𝐴 ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴)
10	1, 9	sseldi 3803	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((Tr 𝐴 ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴)
11	10	3expia 1143	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((Tr 𝐴 ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴)) → (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴))
12	4	adantr 468	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴) ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦)
13		id 22	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐴 → 𝑦 = 𝐴)
14	13	adantl 469	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴) ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐴) → 𝑦 = 𝐴)
15	12, 14	eleqtrd 2894	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴) ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴)
16	1, 15	sseldi 3803	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴) ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴)
17	16	ex 399	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴) → (𝑦 = 𝐴 → 𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴))
18	17	adantl 469	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((Tr 𝐴 ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴)) → (𝑦 = 𝐴 → 𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴))
19	3	simprd 485	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴) → 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴)
20		elsuci 6010	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴 → (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑦 = 𝐴))
21	19, 20	syl 17	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴) → (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑦 = 𝐴))
22	21	adantl 469	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((Tr 𝐴 ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴)) → (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑦 = 𝐴))
23	11, 18, 22	mpjaod 878	. . . 4 ⊢ ((Tr 𝐴 ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴)) → 𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴)
24	23	ex 399	. . 3 ⊢ (Tr 𝐴 → ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴))
25	24	alrimivv 2019	. 2 ⊢ (Tr 𝐴 → ∀𝑧∀𝑦((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴))
26		dftr2 4955	. . 3 ⊢ (Tr suc 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑧∀𝑦((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴))
27	26	biimpri 219	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑧∀𝑦((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴) → Tr suc 𝐴)
28	25, 27	syl 17	1 ⊢ (Tr 𝐴 → Tr suc 𝐴)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 384   ∨ wo 865   ∧ w3a 1100  ∀wal 1635   = wceq 1637   ∈ wcel 2157  Tr wtr 4953  suc csuc 5945

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1877  ax-4 1894  ax-5 2001  ax-6 2069  ax-7 2105  ax-9 2166  ax-10 2186  ax-11 2202  ax-12 2215  ax-13 2422  ax-ext 2791

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 198  df-an 385  df-or 866  df-3an 1102  df-tru 1641  df-ex 1860  df-nf 1864  df-sb 2062  df-clab 2800  df-cleq 2806  df-clel 2809  df-nfc 2944  df-v 3400  df-un 3781  df-in 3783  df-ss 3790  df-sn 4378  df-uni 4638  df-tr 4954  df-suc 5949

This theorem is referenced by: (None)