Theorem suctrALT 42446

Description: The successor of a transitive class is transitive. The proof of https://us.metamath.org/other/completeusersproof/suctrvd.html is a Virtual Deduction proof verified by automatically transforming it into the Metamath proof of suctrALT 42446 using completeusersproof, which is verified by the Metamath program. The proof of https://us.metamath.org/other/completeusersproof/suctrro.html 42446 is a form of the completed proof which preserves the Virtual Deduction proof's step numbers and their ordering. See suctr 6349 for the original proof. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 11-Apr-2009.) (Revised by Alan Sare, 12-Jun-2018.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
suctrALT	⊢ (Tr 𝐴 → Tr suc 𝐴)

Proof of Theorem suctrALT

Dummy variables 𝑦 𝑧 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		sssucid 6343	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ 𝐴 ⊆ suc 𝐴
2		id 22	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (Tr 𝐴 → Tr 𝐴)
3		id 22	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴) → (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴))
4	3	simpld 495	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦)
5		id 22	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)
6		trel 5198	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (Tr 𝐴 → ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴))
7	6	3impib 1115	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((Tr 𝐴 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴)
8	7	idiALT 42097	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((Tr 𝐴 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴)
9	2, 4, 5, 8	syl3an 1159	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((Tr 𝐴 ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴)
10	1, 9	sselid 3919	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((Tr 𝐴 ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴)
11	10	3expia 1120	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((Tr 𝐴 ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴)) → (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴))
12	4	adantr 481	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴) ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦)
13		id 22	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐴 → 𝑦 = 𝐴)
14	13	adantl 482	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴) ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐴) → 𝑦 = 𝐴)
15	12, 14	eleqtrd 2841	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴) ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴)
16	1, 15	sselid 3919	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴) ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴)
17	16	ex 413	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴) → (𝑦 = 𝐴 → 𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴))
18	17	adantl 482	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((Tr 𝐴 ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴)) → (𝑦 = 𝐴 → 𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴))
19	3	simprd 496	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴) → 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴)
20		elsuci 6332	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴 → (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑦 = 𝐴))
21	19, 20	syl 17	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴) → (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑦 = 𝐴))
22	21	adantl 482	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((Tr 𝐴 ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴)) → (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑦 = 𝐴))
23	11, 18, 22	mpjaod 857	. . . 4 ⊢ ((Tr 𝐴 ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴)) → 𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴)
24	23	ex 413	. . 3 ⊢ (Tr 𝐴 → ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴))
25	24	alrimivv 1931	. 2 ⊢ (Tr 𝐴 → ∀𝑧∀𝑦((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴))
26		dftr2 5193	. . 3 ⊢ (Tr suc 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑧∀𝑦((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴))
27	26	biimpri 227	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑧∀𝑦((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴) → Tr suc 𝐴)
28	25, 27	syl 17	1 ⊢ (Tr 𝐴 → Tr suc 𝐴)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 396   ∨ wo 844   ∧ w3a 1086  ∀wal 1537   = wceq 1539   ∈ wcel 2106  Tr wtr 5191  suc csuc 6268

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1798  ax-4 1812  ax-5 1913  ax-6 1971  ax-7 2011  ax-8 2108  ax-9 2116  ax-ext 2709

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 397  df-or 845  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1542  df-ex 1783  df-sb 2068  df-clab 2716  df-cleq 2730  df-clel 2816  df-v 3434  df-un 3892  df-in 3894  df-ss 3904  df-sn 4562  df-uni 4840  df-tr 5192  df-suc 6272

This theorem is referenced by: (None)