Theorem vopelopabsb 5399

Description: The law of concretion in terms of substitutions. Version of opelopabsb 5400 with set variables. (Contributed by NM, 30-Sep-2002.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-Jul-2011.) Remove unnecessary commutation. (Revised by SN, 1-Sep-2024.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
vopelopabsb	⊢ (⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ∈ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ↔ [𝑧 / 𝑥][𝑤 / 𝑦]𝜑)

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦,𝑧   𝑥,𝑤,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧,𝑤)

Proof of Theorem vopelopabsb

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		eqcom 2741	. . . . 5 ⊢ (⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ↔ ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ = ⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩)
2		vex 3405	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝑥 ∈ V
3		vex 3405	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝑦 ∈ V
4	2, 3	opth 5349	. . . . 5 ⊢ (⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ = ⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ↔ (𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤))
5	1, 4	bitri 278	. . . 4 ⊢ (⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ↔ (𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤))
6	5	anbi1i 627	. . 3 ⊢ ((⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ((𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤) ∧ 𝜑))
7	6	2exbii 1856	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦(⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤) ∧ 𝜑))
8		elopab 5397	. 2 ⊢ (⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ∈ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑))
9		2sb5 2276	. 2 ⊢ ([𝑧 / 𝑥][𝑤 / 𝑦]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤) ∧ 𝜑))
10	7, 8, 9	3bitr4i 306	1 ⊢ (⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ∈ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ↔ [𝑧 / 𝑥][𝑤 / 𝑦]𝜑)

Syntax hints:   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 399   = wceq 1543  ∃wex 1787  [wsb 2070   ∈ wcel 2110  ⟨cop 4537  {copab 5105

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1803  ax-4 1817  ax-5 1918  ax-6 1976  ax-7 2016  ax-8 2112  ax-9 2120  ax-10 2141  ax-12 2175  ax-ext 2706  ax-sep 5181  ax-nul 5188  ax-pr 5311

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 400  df-or 848  df-3an 1091  df-tru 1546  df-fal 1556  df-ex 1788  df-nf 1792  df-sb 2071  df-clab 2713  df-cleq 2726  df-clel 2812  df-rab 3063  df-v 3403  df-dif 3860  df-un 3862  df-nul 4228  df-if 4430  df-sn 4532  df-pr 4534  df-op 4538  df-opab 5106

This theorem is referenced by:  opelopabsb  5400  inopab  5688  cnvopab  5991  brabsb2  36570