Theorem vopelopabsb 5499

Description: The law of concretion in terms of substitutions. Version of opelopabsb 5500 with set variables. (Contributed by NM, 30-Sep-2002.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-Jul-2011.) Remove unnecessary commutation. (Revised by SN, 1-Sep-2024.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
vopelopabsb	⊢ (⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ∈ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ↔ [𝑧 / 𝑥][𝑤 / 𝑦]𝜑)

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦,𝑧   𝑥,𝑤,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧, 𝑤)

Proof of Theorem vopelopabsb

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		eqcom 2767	. . . . 5 ⊢ (⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ↔ ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ = ⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩)
2		vex 3454	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝑥 ∈ V
3		vex 3454	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝑦 ∈ V
4	2, 3	opth 5444	. . . . 5 ⊢ (⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ = ⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ↔ (𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤))
5	1, 4	bitri 278	. . . 4 ⊢ (⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ↔ (𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤))
6	5	anbi1i 636	. . 3 ⊢ ((⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ((𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤) ∧ 𝜑))
7	6	2exbii 1882	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦(⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤) ∧ 𝜑))
8		elopab 5497	. 2 ⊢ (⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ∈ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑))
9		2sb5 2311	. 2 ⊢ ([𝑧 / 𝑥][𝑤 / 𝑦]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤) ∧ 𝜑))
10	7, 8, 9	3bitr4i 306	1 ⊢ (⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ∈ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ↔ [𝑧 / 𝑥][𝑤 / 𝑦]𝜑)

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   = wceq 1570  ∃wex 1812  [wsb 2099   ∈ wcel 2145  ⟨cop 4589  {copab 5166

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-10 2178  ax-12 2213  ax-ext 2732  ax-sep 5248  ax-pr 5390

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-clab 2739  df-cleq 2752  df-clel 2835  df-rab 3413  df-v 3452  df-dif 3901  df-un 3903  df-in 3905  df-ss 3915  df-nul 4279  df-if 4482  df-sn 4584  df-pr 4586  df-op 4590  df-opab 5167

This theorem is used by:  opelopabsb  5500  inopab  5803  difopab  5804  isarep1  6616  brabsb2  39839