Theorem zfcndinf 10029

Description: Axiom of Infinity ax-inf 9085, reproved from conditionless ZFC axioms. Since we have already reproved Extensionality, Replacement, and Power Sets above, we are justified in referencing theorem el 5235 in the proof. (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 15-Aug-2003.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
zfcndinf	⊢ ∃𝑦(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 → ∃𝑤(𝑧 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦)))

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝑦,𝑧,𝑤

Proof of Theorem zfcndinf

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		el 5235	. . 3 ⊢ ∃𝑤 𝑥 ∈ 𝑤
2		nfv 1915	. . . . . 6 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑤 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦
3		nfe1 2151	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑤∃𝑤(𝑥 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦)
4	2, 3	nfim 1897	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑤(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 → ∃𝑤(𝑥 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦))
5	4	nfal 2331	. . . . . 6 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑤∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 → ∃𝑤(𝑥 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦))
6	2, 5	nfan 1900	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑤(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 → ∃𝑤(𝑥 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦)))
7	6	nfex 2332	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑤∃𝑦(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 → ∃𝑤(𝑥 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦)))
8		axinfnd 10017	. . . . 5 ⊢ ∃𝑦(𝑥 ∈ 𝑤 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 → ∃𝑤(𝑥 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦))))
9	8	19.37iv 1949	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑤 → ∃𝑦(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 → ∃𝑤(𝑥 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦))))
10	7, 9	exlimi 2215	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑤 𝑥 ∈ 𝑤 → ∃𝑦(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 → ∃𝑤(𝑥 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦))))
11	1, 10	ax-mp 5	. 2 ⊢ ∃𝑦(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 → ∃𝑤(𝑥 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦)))
12		elequ1 2118	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑥 → (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦))
13		elequ1 2118	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑥 → (𝑧 ∈ 𝑤 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑤))
14	13	anbi1d 632	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑥 → ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦)))
15	14	exbidv 1922	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑥 → (∃𝑤(𝑧 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦) ↔ ∃𝑤(𝑥 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦)))
16	12, 15	imbi12d 348	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑥 → ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 → ∃𝑤(𝑧 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦)) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 → ∃𝑤(𝑥 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦))))
17	16	cbvalvw 2043	. . . 4 ⊢ (∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 → ∃𝑤(𝑧 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦)) ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 → ∃𝑤(𝑥 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦)))
18	17	anbi2i 625	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 → ∃𝑤(𝑧 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦))) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 → ∃𝑤(𝑥 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦))))
19	18	exbii 1849	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑦(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 → ∃𝑤(𝑧 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦))) ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 → ∃𝑤(𝑥 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦))))
20	11, 19	mpbir 234	1 ⊢ ∃𝑦(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 → ∃𝑤(𝑧 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦)))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 399  ∀wal 1536   = wceq 1538  ∃wex 1781   ∈ wcel 2111

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1797  ax-4 1811  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1970  ax-7 2015  ax-8 2113  ax-9 2121  ax-10 2142  ax-11 2158  ax-12 2175  ax-13 2379  ax-ext 2770  ax-sep 5167  ax-nul 5174  ax-pow 5231  ax-pr 5295  ax-reg 9040  ax-inf 9085

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 400  df-or 845  df-tru 1541  df-ex 1782  df-nf 1786  df-sb 2070  df-clab 2777  df-cleq 2791  df-clel 2870  df-nfc 2938  df-ral 3111  df-rex 3112  df-v 3443  df-dif 3884  df-un 3886  df-nul 4244  df-sn 4526  df-pr 4528

This theorem is referenced by: (None)