Theorem zfcndinf 9775

Description: Axiom of Infinity ax-inf 8832, reproved from conditionless ZFC axioms. Since we have already reproved Extensionality, Replacement, and Power Sets above, we are justified in referencing theorem el 5081 in the proof. (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 15-Aug-2003.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
zfcndinf	⊢ ∃𝑦(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 → ∃𝑤(𝑧 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦)))

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝑦,𝑧,𝑤

Proof of Theorem zfcndinf

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		el 5081	. . 3 ⊢ ∃𝑤 𝑥 ∈ 𝑤
2		nfv 1957	. . . . . 6 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑤 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦
3		nfe1 2143	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑤∃𝑤(𝑥 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦)
4	2, 3	nfim 1943	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑤(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 → ∃𝑤(𝑥 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦))
5	4	nfal 2298	. . . . . 6 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑤∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 → ∃𝑤(𝑥 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦))
6	2, 5	nfan 1946	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑤(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 → ∃𝑤(𝑥 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦)))
7	6	nfex 2299	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑤∃𝑦(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 → ∃𝑤(𝑥 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦)))
8		axinfnd 9763	. . . . 5 ⊢ ∃𝑦(𝑥 ∈ 𝑤 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 → ∃𝑤(𝑥 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦))))
9	8	19.37iv 1991	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑤 → ∃𝑦(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 → ∃𝑤(𝑥 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦))))
10	7, 9	exlimi 2202	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑤 𝑥 ∈ 𝑤 → ∃𝑦(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 → ∃𝑤(𝑥 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦))))
11	1, 10	ax-mp 5	. 2 ⊢ ∃𝑦(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 → ∃𝑤(𝑥 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦)))
12		elequ1 2113	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑥 → (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦))
13		elequ1 2113	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑥 → (𝑧 ∈ 𝑤 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑤))
14	13	anbi1d 623	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑥 → ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦)))
15	14	exbidv 1964	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑥 → (∃𝑤(𝑧 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦) ↔ ∃𝑤(𝑥 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦)))
16	12, 15	imbi12d 336	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑥 → ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 → ∃𝑤(𝑧 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦)) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 → ∃𝑤(𝑥 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦))))
17	16	cbvalvw 2085	. . . 4 ⊢ (∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 → ∃𝑤(𝑧 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦)) ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 → ∃𝑤(𝑥 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦)))
18	17	anbi2i 616	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 → ∃𝑤(𝑧 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦))) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 → ∃𝑤(𝑥 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦))))
19	18	exbii 1892	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑦(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 → ∃𝑤(𝑧 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦))) ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 → ∃𝑤(𝑥 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦))))
20	11, 19	mpbir 223	1 ⊢ ∃𝑦(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 → ∃𝑤(𝑧 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦)))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 386  ∀wal 1599   = wceq 1601  ∃wex 1823   ∈ wcel 2106

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1839  ax-4 1853  ax-5 1953  ax-6 2021  ax-7 2054  ax-8 2108  ax-9 2115  ax-10 2134  ax-11 2149  ax-12 2162  ax-13 2333  ax-ext 2753  ax-sep 5017  ax-nul 5025  ax-pow 5077  ax-pr 5138  ax-reg 8786  ax-inf 8832

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 199  df-an 387  df-or 837  df-tru 1605  df-ex 1824  df-nf 1828  df-sb 2012  df-clab 2763  df-cleq 2769  df-clel 2773  df-nfc 2920  df-ral 3094  df-rex 3095  df-v 3399  df-dif 3794  df-un 3796  df-nul 4141  df-sn 4398  df-pr 4400

This theorem is referenced by: (None)