Theorem zfcndinf 10034

Description: Axiom of Infinity ax-inf 9095, reproved from conditionless ZFC axioms. Since we have already reproved Extensionality, Replacement, and Power Sets above, we are justified in referencing theorem el 5262 in the proof. (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 15-Aug-2003.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
zfcndinf	⊢ ∃𝑦(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 → ∃𝑤(𝑧 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦)))

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝑦,𝑧,𝑤

Proof of Theorem zfcndinf

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		el 5262	. . 3 ⊢ ∃𝑤 𝑥 ∈ 𝑤
2		nfv 1911	. . . . . 6 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑤 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦
3		nfe1 2150	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑤∃𝑤(𝑥 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦)
4	2, 3	nfim 1893	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑤(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 → ∃𝑤(𝑥 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦))
5	4	nfal 2338	. . . . . 6 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑤∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 → ∃𝑤(𝑥 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦))
6	2, 5	nfan 1896	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑤(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 → ∃𝑤(𝑥 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦)))
7	6	nfex 2339	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑤∃𝑦(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 → ∃𝑤(𝑥 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦)))
8		axinfnd 10022	. . . . 5 ⊢ ∃𝑦(𝑥 ∈ 𝑤 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 → ∃𝑤(𝑥 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦))))
9	8	19.37iv 1945	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑤 → ∃𝑦(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 → ∃𝑤(𝑥 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦))))
10	7, 9	exlimi 2213	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑤 𝑥 ∈ 𝑤 → ∃𝑦(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 → ∃𝑤(𝑥 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦))))
11	1, 10	ax-mp 5	. 2 ⊢ ∃𝑦(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 → ∃𝑤(𝑥 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦)))
12		elequ1 2117	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑥 → (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦))
13		elequ1 2117	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑥 → (𝑧 ∈ 𝑤 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑤))
14	13	anbi1d 631	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑥 → ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦)))
15	14	exbidv 1918	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑥 → (∃𝑤(𝑧 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦) ↔ ∃𝑤(𝑥 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦)))
16	12, 15	imbi12d 347	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑥 → ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 → ∃𝑤(𝑧 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦)) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 → ∃𝑤(𝑥 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦))))
17	16	cbvalvw 2039	. . . 4 ⊢ (∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 → ∃𝑤(𝑧 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦)) ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 → ∃𝑤(𝑥 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦)))
18	17	anbi2i 624	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 → ∃𝑤(𝑧 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦))) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 → ∃𝑤(𝑥 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦))))
19	18	exbii 1844	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑦(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 → ∃𝑤(𝑧 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦))) ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 → ∃𝑤(𝑥 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦))))
20	11, 19	mpbir 233	1 ⊢ ∃𝑦(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 → ∃𝑤(𝑧 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦)))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 398  ∀wal 1531   = wceq 1533  ∃wex 1776   ∈ wcel 2110

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1792  ax-4 1806  ax-5 1907  ax-6 1966  ax-7 2011  ax-8 2112  ax-9 2120  ax-10 2141  ax-11 2157  ax-12 2173  ax-13 2386  ax-ext 2793  ax-sep 5195  ax-nul 5202  ax-pow 5258  ax-pr 5321  ax-reg 9050  ax-inf 9095

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 399  df-or 844  df-tru 1536  df-ex 1777  df-nf 1781  df-sb 2066  df-clab 2800  df-cleq 2814  df-clel 2893  df-nfc 2963  df-ral 3143  df-rex 3144  df-v 3496  df-dif 3938  df-un 3940  df-nul 4291  df-sn 4561  df-pr 4563

This theorem is referenced by: (None)