ILE Home Intuitionistic Logic Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  ILE Home  >  Th. List  >  2wlklem Unicode version

Theorem 2wlklem 16230
Description: Lemma for theorems for walks of length 2. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 1-Feb-2018.)
Assertion
Ref Expression
2wlklem  |-  ( A. k  e.  { 0 ,  1 }  ( E `  ( F `  k ) )  =  { ( P `  k ) ,  ( P `  ( k  +  1 ) ) }  <->  ( ( E `
 ( F ` 
0 ) )  =  { ( P ` 
0 ) ,  ( P `  1 ) }  /\  ( E `
 ( F ` 
1 ) )  =  { ( P ` 
1 ) ,  ( P `  2 ) } ) )
Distinct variable groups:    k, E    k, F    P, k

Proof of Theorem 2wlklem
StepHypRef Expression
1 c0ex 8173 . 2  |-  0  e.  _V
2 1ex 8174 . 2  |-  1  e.  _V
3 2fveq3 5644 . . 3  |-  ( k  =  0  ->  ( E `  ( F `  k ) )  =  ( E `  ( F `  0 )
) )
4 fveq2 5639 . . . 4  |-  ( k  =  0  ->  ( P `  k )  =  ( P ` 
0 ) )
5 fv0p1e1 9258 . . . 4  |-  ( k  =  0  ->  ( P `  ( k  +  1 ) )  =  ( P ` 
1 ) )
64, 5preq12d 3756 . . 3  |-  ( k  =  0  ->  { ( P `  k ) ,  ( P `  ( k  +  1 ) ) }  =  { ( P ` 
0 ) ,  ( P `  1 ) } )
73, 6eqeq12d 2246 . 2  |-  ( k  =  0  ->  (
( E `  ( F `  k )
)  =  { ( P `  k ) ,  ( P `  ( k  +  1 ) ) }  <->  ( E `  ( F `  0
) )  =  {
( P `  0
) ,  ( P `
 1 ) } ) )
8 2fveq3 5644 . . 3  |-  ( k  =  1  ->  ( E `  ( F `  k ) )  =  ( E `  ( F `  1 )
) )
9 fveq2 5639 . . . 4  |-  ( k  =  1  ->  ( P `  k )  =  ( P ` 
1 ) )
10 oveq1 6025 . . . . . 6  |-  ( k  =  1  ->  (
k  +  1 )  =  ( 1  +  1 ) )
11 1p1e2 9260 . . . . . 6  |-  ( 1  +  1 )  =  2
1210, 11eqtrdi 2280 . . . . 5  |-  ( k  =  1  ->  (
k  +  1 )  =  2 )
1312fveq2d 5643 . . . 4  |-  ( k  =  1  ->  ( P `  ( k  +  1 ) )  =  ( P ` 
2 ) )
149, 13preq12d 3756 . . 3  |-  ( k  =  1  ->  { ( P `  k ) ,  ( P `  ( k  +  1 ) ) }  =  { ( P ` 
1 ) ,  ( P `  2 ) } )
158, 14eqeq12d 2246 . 2  |-  ( k  =  1  ->  (
( E `  ( F `  k )
)  =  { ( P `  k ) ,  ( P `  ( k  +  1 ) ) }  <->  ( E `  ( F `  1
) )  =  {
( P `  1
) ,  ( P `
 2 ) } ) )
161, 2, 7, 15ralpr 3724 1  |-  ( A. k  e.  { 0 ,  1 }  ( E `  ( F `  k ) )  =  { ( P `  k ) ,  ( P `  ( k  +  1 ) ) }  <->  ( ( E `
 ( F ` 
0 ) )  =  { ( P ` 
0 ) ,  ( P `  1 ) }  /\  ( E `
 ( F ` 
1 ) )  =  { ( P ` 
1 ) ,  ( P `  2 ) } ) )
Colors of variables: wff set class
Syntax hints:    /\ wa 104    <-> wb 105    = wceq 1397   A.wral 2510   {cpr 3670   ` cfv 5326  (class class class)co 6018   0cc0 8032   1c1 8033    + caddc 8035   2c2 9194
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 716  ax-5 1495  ax-7 1496  ax-gen 1497  ax-ie1 1541  ax-ie2 1542  ax-8 1552  ax-10 1553  ax-11 1554  ax-i12 1555  ax-bndl 1557  ax-4 1558  ax-17 1574  ax-i9 1578  ax-ial 1582  ax-i5r 1583  ax-ext 2213  ax-1cn 8125  ax-icn 8127  ax-addcl 8128  ax-mulcl 8130  ax-addcom 8132  ax-i2m1 8137  ax-0id 8140
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3an 1006  df-tru 1400  df-nf 1509  df-sb 1811  df-clab 2218  df-cleq 2224  df-clel 2227  df-nfc 2363  df-ral 2515  df-rex 2516  df-v 2804  df-sbc 3032  df-un 3204  df-sn 3675  df-pr 3676  df-op 3678  df-uni 3894  df-br 4089  df-iota 5286  df-fv 5334  df-ov 6021  df-2 9202
This theorem is referenced by:  upgr2wlkdc  16231
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator