ILE Home Intuitionistic Logic Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  ILE Home  >  Th. List  >  2wlklem Unicode version

Theorem 2wlklem 16600
Description: Lemma for theorems for walks of length 2. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 1-Feb-2018.)
Assertion
Ref Expression
2wlklem  |-  ( A. k  e.  { 0 ,  1 }  ( E `  ( F `  k ) )  =  { ( P `  k ) ,  ( P `  ( k  +  1 ) ) }  <->  ( ( E `
 ( F ` 
0 ) )  =  { ( P ` 
0 ) ,  ( P `  1 ) }  /\  ( E `
 ( F ` 
1 ) )  =  { ( P ` 
1 ) ,  ( P `  2 ) } ) )
Distinct variable groups:    k, E    k, F    P, k

Proof of Theorem 2wlklem
StepHypRef Expression
1 c0ex 8314 . 2  |-  0  e.  _V
2 1ex 8315 . 2  |-  1  e.  _V
3 2fveq3 5698 . . 3  |-  ( k  =  0  ->  ( E `  ( F `  k ) )  =  ( E `  ( F `  0 )
) )
4 fveq2 5693 . . . 4  |-  ( k  =  0  ->  ( P `  k )  =  ( P ` 
0 ) )
5 fv0p1e1 9402 . . . 4  |-  ( k  =  0  ->  ( P `  ( k  +  1 ) )  =  ( P ` 
1 ) )
64, 5preq12d 3795 . . 3  |-  ( k  =  0  ->  { ( P `  k ) ,  ( P `  ( k  +  1 ) ) }  =  { ( P ` 
0 ) ,  ( P `  1 ) } )
73, 6eqeq12d 2253 . 2  |-  ( k  =  0  ->  (
( E `  ( F `  k )
)  =  { ( P `  k ) ,  ( P `  ( k  +  1 ) ) }  <->  ( E `  ( F `  0
) )  =  {
( P `  0
) ,  ( P `
 1 ) } ) )
8 2fveq3 5698 . . 3  |-  ( k  =  1  ->  ( E `  ( F `  k ) )  =  ( E `  ( F `  1 )
) )
9 fveq2 5693 . . . 4  |-  ( k  =  1  ->  ( P `  k )  =  ( P ` 
1 ) )
10 oveq1 6086 . . . . . 6  |-  ( k  =  1  ->  (
k  +  1 )  =  ( 1  +  1 ) )
11 1p1e2 9404 . . . . . 6  |-  ( 1  +  1 )  =  2
1210, 11eqtrdi 2287 . . . . 5  |-  ( k  =  1  ->  (
k  +  1 )  =  2 )
1312fveq2d 5697 . . . 4  |-  ( k  =  1  ->  ( P `  ( k  +  1 ) )  =  ( P ` 
2 ) )
149, 13preq12d 3795 . . 3  |-  ( k  =  1  ->  { ( P `  k ) ,  ( P `  ( k  +  1 ) ) }  =  { ( P ` 
1 ) ,  ( P `  2 ) } )
158, 14eqeq12d 2253 . 2  |-  ( k  =  1  ->  (
( E `  ( F `  k )
)  =  { ( P `  k ) ,  ( P `  ( k  +  1 ) ) }  <->  ( E `  ( F `  1
) )  =  {
( P `  1
) ,  ( P `
 2 ) } ) )
161, 2, 7, 15ralpr 3763 1  |-  ( A. k  e.  { 0 ,  1 }  ( E `  ( F `  k ) )  =  { ( P `  k ) ,  ( P `  ( k  +  1 ) ) }  <->  ( ( E `
 ( F ` 
0 ) )  =  { ( P ` 
0 ) ,  ( P `  1 ) }  /\  ( E `
 ( F ` 
1 ) )  =  { ( P ` 
1 ) ,  ( P `  2 ) } ) )
Colors of variables: wff set class
Syntax hints:    /\ wa 104    <-> wb 105    = wceq 1402   A.wral 2528   {cpr 3709   ` cfv 5375  (class class class)co 6079   0cc0 8173   1c1 8174    + caddc 8176   2c2 9338
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 721  ax-5 1500  ax-7 1501  ax-gen 1502  ax-ie1 1546  ax-ie2 1547  ax-8 1557  ax-10 1558  ax-11 1559  ax-i12 1560  ax-bndl 1562  ax-4 1563  ax-17 1579  ax-i9 1583  ax-ial 1587  ax-i5r 1588  ax-ext 2220  ax-1cn 8266  ax-icn 8268  ax-addcl 8269  ax-mulcl 8271  ax-addcom 8273  ax-i2m1 8278  ax-0id 8281
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3an 1011  df-tru 1405  df-nf 1514  df-sb 1816  df-clab 2225  df-cleq 2231  df-clel 2234  df-nfc 2381  df-ral 2533  df-rex 2534  df-v 2823  df-sbc 3052  df-un 3224  df-sn 3714  df-pr 3715  df-op 3717  df-uni 3934  df-br 4129  df-iota 5335  df-fv 5383  df-ov 6082  df-2 9346
This theorem is referenced by:  upgr2wlkdc  16601
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator