Theorem fvopab3g 5781

Description: Value of a function given by ordered-pair class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 6-Mar-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 28-Apr-2015.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
fvopab3g.2	|- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )
fvopab3g.3	|- ( y = B -> ( ps <-> ch ) )
fvopab3g.4	|- ( x e. C -> E! y ph )
fvopab3g.5	|- F = { <. x , y >. | ( x e. C /\ ph ) }

Assertion

Ref	Expression
fvopab3g	|- ( ( A e. C /\ B e. D ) -> ( ( F ` A ) = B <-> ch ) )

Distinct variable groups:   x, y, A   x, B, y   x, C, y   ch, x, y

Allowed substitution hints:   ph( x, y)   ps( x, y)   D( x, y)   F( x, y)

Proof of Theorem fvopab3g

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		eleq1 2301	. . . 4 |- ( x = A -> ( x e. C <-> A e. C ) )
2		fvopab3g.2	. . . 4 |- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )
3	1, 2	anbi12d 477	. . 3 |- ( x = A -> ( ( x e. C /\ ph ) <-> ( A e. C /\ ps ) ) )
4		fvopab3g.3	. . . 4 |- ( y = B -> ( ps <-> ch ) )
5	4	anbi2d 468	. . 3 |- ( y = B -> ( ( A e. C /\ ps ) <-> ( A e. C /\ ch ) ) )
6	3, 5	opelopabg 4412	. 2 |- ( ( A e. C /\ B e. D ) -> ( <. A , B >. e. { <. x , y >. | ( x e. C /\ ph ) } <-> ( A e. C /\ ch ) ) )
7		fvopab3g.4	. . . . . 6 |- ( x e. C -> E! y ph )
8		fvopab3g.5	. . . . . 6 |- F = { <. x , y >. | ( x e. C /\ ph ) }
9	7, 8	fnopab 5511	. . . . 5 |- F Fn C
10		fnopfvb 5745	. . . . 5 |- ( ( F Fn C /\ A e. C ) -> ( ( F ` A ) = B <-> <. A , B >. e. F ) )
11	9, 10	mpan 428	. . . 4 |- ( A e. C -> ( ( F ` A ) = B <-> <. A , B >. e. F ) )
12	8	eleq2i 2305	. . . 4 |- ( <. A , B >. e. F <-> <. A , B >. e. { <. x , y >. | ( x e. C /\ ph ) } )
13	11, 12	bitrdi 196	. . 3 |- ( A e. C -> ( ( F ` A ) = B <-> <. A , B >. e. { <. x , y >. | ( x e. C /\ ph ) } ) )
14	13	adantr 276	. 2 |- ( ( A e. C /\ B e. D ) -> ( ( F ` A ) = B <-> <. A , B >. e. { <. x , y >. | ( x e. C /\ ph ) } ) )
15		ibar 301	. . 3 |- ( A e. C -> ( ch <-> ( A e. C /\ ch ) ) )
16	15	adantr 276	. 2 |- ( ( A e. C /\ B e. D ) -> ( ch <-> ( A e. C /\ ch ) ) )
17	6, 14, 16	3bitr4d 220	1 |- ( ( A e. C /\ B e. D ) -> ( ( F ` A ) = B <-> ch ) )

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   -> wi 4   /\ wa 104   <-> wb 105   = wceq 1402   E!weu 2086   e. wcel 2209   <.cop 3712   {copab 4192   Fn wfn 5375   ` cfv 5380

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 721  ax-5 1500  ax-7 1501  ax-gen 1502  ax-ie1 1546  ax-ie2 1547  ax-8 1557  ax-10 1558  ax-11 1559  ax-i12 1560  ax-bndl 1562  ax-4 1563  ax-17 1579  ax-i9 1583  ax-ial 1587  ax-i5r 1588  ax-14 2212  ax-ext 2220  ax-sep 4251  ax-pow 4313  ax-pr 4348

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3an 1011  df-tru 1405  df-nf 1514  df-sb 1816  df-eu 2089  df-mo 2090  df-clab 2225  df-cleq 2231  df-clel 2234  df-nfc 2381  df-ral 2533  df-rex 2534  df-v 2823  df-sbc 3052  df-un 3224  df-in 3226  df-ss 3233  df-pw 3690  df-sn 3715  df-pr 3716  df-op 3718  df-uni 3936  df-br 4132  df-opab 4194  df-id 4440  df-xp 4782  df-rel 4783  df-cnv 4784  df-co 4785  df-dm 4786  df-iota 5340  df-fun 5382  df-fn 5383  df-fv 5388

This theorem is used by:  recmulnqg  7764