Theorem iotanul 5244

Description: Theorem 8.22 in [Quine] p. 57. This theorem is the result if there isn't exactly one x that satisfies ph. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
iotanul	|- ( -. E! x ph -> ( iota x ph ) = (/) )

Proof of Theorem iotanul

Dummy variable z is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-eu 2056	. . 3 |- ( E! x ph <-> E. z A. x ( ph <-> x = z ) )
2		dfiota2 5230	. . . 4 |- ( iota x ph ) = U. { z | A. x ( ph <-> x = z ) }
3		alnex 1521	. . . . . . 7 |- ( A. z -. A. x ( ph <-> x = z ) <-> -. E. z A. x ( ph <-> x = z ) )
4		ax-in2 616	. . . . . . . . . 10 |- ( -. A. x ( ph <-> x = z ) -> ( A. x ( ph <-> x = z ) -> -. z = z ) )
5	4	alimi 1477	. . . . . . . . 9 |- ( A. z -. A. x ( ph <-> x = z ) -> A. z ( A. x ( ph <-> x = z ) -> -. z = z ) )
6		ss2ab 3260	. . . . . . . . 9 |- ( { z | A. x ( ph <-> x = z ) } C_ { z | -. z = z } <-> A. z ( A. x ( ph <-> x = z ) -> -. z = z ) )
7	5, 6	sylibr 134	. . . . . . . 8 |- ( A. z -. A. x ( ph <-> x = z ) -> { z | A. x ( ph <-> x = z ) } C_ { z | -. z = z } )
8		dfnul2 3461	. . . . . . . 8 |- (/) = { z | -. z = z }
9	7, 8	sseqtrrdi 3241	. . . . . . 7 |- ( A. z -. A. x ( ph <-> x = z ) -> { z | A. x ( ph <-> x = z ) } C_ (/) )
10	3, 9	sylbir 135	. . . . . 6 |- ( -. E. z A. x ( ph <-> x = z ) -> { z | A. x ( ph <-> x = z ) } C_ (/) )
11	10	unissd 3873	. . . . 5 |- ( -. E. z A. x ( ph <-> x = z ) -> U. { z | A. x ( ph <-> x = z ) } C_ U. (/) )
12		uni0 3876	. . . . 5 |- U. (/) = (/)
13	11, 12	sseqtrdi 3240	. . . 4 |- ( -. E. z A. x ( ph <-> x = z ) -> U. { z | A. x ( ph <-> x = z ) } C_ (/) )
14	2, 13	eqsstrid 3238	. . 3 |- ( -. E. z A. x ( ph <-> x = z ) -> ( iota x ph ) C_ (/) )
15	1, 14	sylnbi 679	. 2 |- ( -. E! x ph -> ( iota x ph ) C_ (/) )
16		ss0 3500	. 2 |- ( ( iota x ph ) C_ (/) -> ( iota x ph ) = (/) )
17	15, 16	syl 14	1 |- ( -. E! x ph -> ( iota x ph ) = (/) )

Syntax hints:   -. wn 3   -> wi 4   <-> wb 105   A.wal 1370   = wceq 1372   E.wex 1514   E!weu 2053   {cab 2190   C_ wss 3165   (/)c0 3459   U.cuni 3849   iotacio 5227

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 615  ax-in2 616  ax-io 710  ax-5 1469  ax-7 1470  ax-gen 1471  ax-ie1 1515  ax-ie2 1516  ax-8 1526  ax-10 1527  ax-11 1528  ax-i12 1529  ax-bndl 1531  ax-4 1532  ax-17 1548  ax-i9 1552  ax-ial 1556  ax-i5r 1557  ax-ext 2186

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-tru 1375  df-fal 1378  df-nf 1483  df-sb 1785  df-eu 2056  df-clab 2191  df-cleq 2197  df-clel 2200  df-nfc 2336  df-ral 2488  df-rex 2489  df-v 2773  df-dif 3167  df-in 3171  df-ss 3178  df-nul 3460  df-sn 3638  df-uni 3850  df-iota 5229

This theorem is referenced by:  tz6.12-2  5561  0fv  5606  riotaund  5924  0g0  13126