Theorem resflem 5872

Description: A lemma to bound the range of a restriction. The conclusion would also hold with ( X i^i Y ) in place of Y (provided x does not occur in X). If that stronger result is needed, it is however simpler to use the instance of resflem 5872 where ( X i^i Y ) is substituted for Y (in both the conclusion and the third hypothesis). (Contributed by BJ, 4-Jul-2022.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
resflem.1	|- ( ph -> F : V --> X )
resflem.2	|- ( ph -> A C_ V )
resflem.3	|- ( ( ph /\ x e. A ) -> ( F ` x ) e. Y )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
resflem	|- ( ph -> ( F |` A ) : A --> Y )

Distinct variable groups:   x, A   ph, x   x, F   x, Y

Allowed substitution hints:   V( x)   X( x)

Proof of Theorem resflem

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		resflem.2	. . . . . 6 |- ( ph -> A C_ V )
2	1	sseld 3247	. . . . 5 |- ( ph -> ( x e. A -> x e. V ) )
3		resflem.1	. . . . . . 7 |- ( ph -> F : V --> X )
4		fdm 5539	. . . . . . 7 |- ( F : V --> X -> dom F = V )
5	3, 4	syl 14	. . . . . 6 |- ( ph -> dom F = V )
6	5	eleq2d 2308	. . . . 5 |- ( ph -> ( x e. dom F <-> x e. V ) )
7	2, 6	sylibrd 169	. . . 4 |- ( ph -> ( x e. A -> x e. dom F ) )
8		resflem.3	. . . . 5 |- ( ( ph /\ x e. A ) -> ( F ` x ) e. Y )
9	8	ex 115	. . . 4 |- ( ph -> ( x e. A -> ( F ` x ) e. Y ) )
10	7, 9	jcad 307	. . 3 |- ( ph -> ( x e. A -> ( x e. dom F /\ ( F ` x ) e. Y ) ) )
11	10	ralrimiv 2622	. 2 |- ( ph -> A. x e. A ( x e. dom F /\ ( F ` x ) e. Y ) )
12		ffun 5536	. . . 4 |- ( F : V --> X -> Fun F )
13	3, 12	syl 14	. . 3 |- ( ph -> Fun F )
14		ffvresb 5871	. . 3 |- ( Fun F -> ( ( F |` A ) : A --> Y <-> A. x e. A ( x e. dom F /\ ( F ` x ) e. Y ) ) )
15	13, 14	syl 14	. 2 |- ( ph -> ( ( F |` A ) : A --> Y <-> A. x e. A ( x e. dom F /\ ( F ` x ) e. Y ) ) )
16	11, 15	mpbird 167	1 |- ( ph -> ( F |` A ) : A --> Y )

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   -> wi 4   /\ wa 104   <-> wb 105   = wceq 1402   e. wcel 2209   A.wral 2528   C_ wss 3220   dom cdm 4774   |` cres 4776   Fun wfun 5371   -->wf 5373   ` cfv 5377

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 721  ax-5 1500  ax-7 1501  ax-gen 1502  ax-ie1 1546  ax-ie2 1547  ax-8 1557  ax-10 1558  ax-11 1559  ax-i12 1560  ax-bndl 1562  ax-4 1563  ax-17 1579  ax-i9 1583  ax-ial 1587  ax-i5r 1588  ax-14 2212  ax-ext 2220  ax-sep 4249  ax-pow 4311  ax-pr 4346

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3an 1011  df-tru 1405  df-nf 1514  df-sb 1816  df-eu 2089  df-mo 2090  df-clab 2225  df-cleq 2231  df-clel 2234  df-nfc 2381  df-ral 2533  df-rex 2534  df-v 2823  df-sbc 3052  df-un 3224  df-in 3226  df-ss 3233  df-pw 3690  df-sn 3715  df-pr 3716  df-op 3718  df-uni 3936  df-br 4131  df-opab 4193  df-mpt 4194  df-id 4438  df-xp 4780  df-rel 4781  df-cnv 4782  df-co 4783  df-dm 4784  df-rn 4785  df-res 4786  df-iota 5337  df-fun 5379  df-fn 5380  df-f 5381  df-fv 5385

This theorem is used by:  bj-charfun  16833