Theorem sbcfg 5266

Description: Distribute proper substitution through the function predicate with domain and codomain. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 15-Jul-2018.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
sbcfg	|- ( X e. V -> ( [. X / x ]. F : A --> B <-> [_ X / x ]_ F : [_ X / x ]_ A --> [_ X / x ]_ B ) )

Distinct variable groups:   x, V   x, X

Allowed substitution hints:   A( x)   B( x)   F( x)

Proof of Theorem sbcfg

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-f 5122	. . . 4 |- ( F : A --> B <-> ( F Fn A /\ ran F C_ B ) )
2	1	a1i 9	. . 3 |- ( X e. V -> ( F : A --> B <-> ( F Fn A /\ ran F C_ B ) ) )
3	2	sbcbidv 2962	. 2 |- ( X e. V -> ( [. X / x ]. F : A --> B <-> [. X / x ]. ( F Fn A /\ ran F C_ B ) ) )
4		sbcfng 5265	. . . 4 |- ( X e. V -> ( [. X / x ]. F Fn A <-> [_ X / x ]_ F Fn [_ X / x ]_ A ) )
5		sbcssg 3467	. . . . 5 |- ( X e. V -> ( [. X / x ]. ran F C_ B <-> [_ X / x ]_ ran F C_ [_ X / x ]_ B ) )
6		csbrng 4995	. . . . . 6 |- ( X e. V -> [_ X / x ]_ ran F = ran [_ X / x ]_ F )
7	6	sseq1d 3121	. . . . 5 |- ( X e. V -> ( [_ X / x ]_ ran F C_ [_ X / x ]_ B <-> ran [_ X / x ]_ F C_ [_ X / x ]_ B ) )
8	5, 7	bitrd 187	. . . 4 |- ( X e. V -> ( [. X / x ]. ran F C_ B <-> ran [_ X / x ]_ F C_ [_ X / x ]_ B ) )
9	4, 8	anbi12d 464	. . 3 |- ( X e. V -> ( ( [. X / x ]. F Fn A /\ [. X / x ]. ran F C_ B ) <-> ( [_ X / x ]_ F Fn [_ X / x ]_ A /\ ran [_ X / x ]_ F C_ [_ X / x ]_ B ) ) )
10		sbcan 2946	. . 3 |- ( [. X / x ]. ( F Fn A /\ ran F C_ B ) <-> ( [. X / x ]. F Fn A /\ [. X / x ]. ran F C_ B ) )
11		df-f 5122	. . 3 |- ( [_ X / x ]_ F : [_ X / x ]_ A --> [_ X / x ]_ B <-> ( [_ X / x ]_ F Fn [_ X / x ]_ A /\ ran [_ X / x ]_ F C_ [_ X / x ]_ B ) )
12	9, 10, 11	3bitr4g 222	. 2 |- ( X e. V -> ( [. X / x ]. ( F Fn A /\ ran F C_ B ) <-> [_ X / x ]_ F : [_ X / x ]_ A --> [_ X / x ]_ B ) )
13	3, 12	bitrd 187	1 |- ( X e. V -> ( [. X / x ]. F : A --> B <-> [_ X / x ]_ F : [_ X / x ]_ A --> [_ X / x ]_ B ) )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   /\ wa 103   <-> wb 104   e. wcel 1480   [.wsbc 2904   [_csb 2998   C_ wss 3066   ran crn 4535   Fn wfn 5113   -->wf 5114

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-io 698  ax-5 1423  ax-7 1424  ax-gen 1425  ax-ie1 1469  ax-ie2 1470  ax-8 1482  ax-10 1483  ax-11 1484  ax-i12 1485  ax-bndl 1486  ax-4 1487  ax-14 1492  ax-17 1506  ax-i9 1510  ax-ial 1514  ax-i5r 1515  ax-ext 2119  ax-sep 4041  ax-pow 4093  ax-pr 4126

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-3an 964  df-tru 1334  df-nf 1437  df-sb 1736  df-eu 2000  df-mo 2001  df-clab 2124  df-cleq 2130  df-clel 2133  df-nfc 2268  df-ral 2419  df-v 2683  df-sbc 2905  df-csb 2999  df-un 3070  df-in 3072  df-ss 3079  df-pw 3507  df-sn 3528  df-pr 3529  df-op 3531  df-br 3925  df-opab 3985  df-id 4210  df-rel 4541  df-cnv 4542  df-co 4543  df-dm 4544  df-rn 4545  df-fun 5120  df-fn 5121  df-f 5122

This theorem is referenced by:  ctiunctlemf  11940