Theorem pm5.21ndd 713

Description: Eliminate an antecedent implied by each side of a biconditional, deduction version. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Nov-2012.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Jan-2015.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
pm5.21ndd.1	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → 𝜓))
pm5.21ndd.2	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜃 → 𝜓))
pm5.21ndd.3	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
pm5.21ndd	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃))

Proof of Theorem pm5.21ndd

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		pm5.21ndd.1	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → 𝜓))
2		pm5.21ndd.3	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)))
3	1, 2	syld 45	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)))
4	3	ibd 178	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))
5		pm5.21ndd.2	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜃 → 𝜓))
6	5, 2	syld 45	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜃 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)))
7		bicom1 131	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜒 ↔ 𝜃) → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜒))
8	6, 7	syl6 33	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜃 → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜒)))
9	8	ibd 178	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜃 → 𝜒))
10	4, 9	impbid 129	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 105

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117

This theorem is referenced by:  pm5.21nd  924  sbcrext  3119  rmob  3135  epelg  4410  eqbrrdva  4924  elrelimasn  5127  relbrcnvg  5140  fmptco  5842  ovelrn  6202  suppcofn  6465  brtpos2  6481  elpmg  6897  brdomg  6984  suppeqfsuppbi  7247  elfi2  7258  genpelvl  7823  genpelvu  7824  fzoval  10478  nninfinf  10801  clim  11959  dvdsaddre2b  12520  pceu  12986  divsfval  13530  sgrppropd  13615  mndpropd  13642  issubg3  13898  resghm2b  13968  rngpropd  14088  dvdsrd  14228  opprsubrngg  14345  subrngpropd  14350  subrgpropd  14387  rhmpropd  14388  lmodprop2d  14483  cnrest2  15088  cnptoprest2  15092  lmss  15098  reopnap  15398  limcdifap  15514  iswlkg  16311  isclwwlkng  16388