Theorem pm5.21ndd 695

Description: Eliminate an antecedent implied by each side of a biconditional, deduction version. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Nov-2012.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Jan-2015.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
pm5.21ndd.1	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → 𝜓))
pm5.21ndd.2	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜃 → 𝜓))
pm5.21ndd.3	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
pm5.21ndd	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃))

Proof of Theorem pm5.21ndd

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		pm5.21ndd.1	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → 𝜓))
2		pm5.21ndd.3	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)))
3	1, 2	syld 45	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)))
4	3	ibd 177	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))
5		pm5.21ndd.2	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜃 → 𝜓))
6	5, 2	syld 45	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜃 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)))
7		bicom1 130	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜒 ↔ 𝜃) → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜒))
8	6, 7	syl6 33	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜃 → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜒)))
9	8	ibd 177	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜃 → 𝜒))
10	4, 9	impbid 128	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 104

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116

This theorem is referenced by:  pm5.21nd  902  sbcrext  3014  rmob  3029  epelg  4249  eqbrrdva  4753  relbrcnvg  4962  fmptco  5630  ovelrn  5963  brtpos2  6192  elpmg  6602  brdomg  6686  elfi2  6909  genpelvl  7415  genpelvu  7416  fzoval  10029  clim  11160  cnrest2  12596  cnptoprest2  12600  lmss  12606  reopnap  12898  limcdifap  12991