Theorem pm5.21ndd 713

Description: Eliminate an antecedent implied by each side of a biconditional, deduction version. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Nov-2012.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Jan-2015.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
pm5.21ndd.1	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → 𝜓))
pm5.21ndd.2	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜃 → 𝜓))
pm5.21ndd.3	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
pm5.21ndd	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃))

Proof of Theorem pm5.21ndd

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		pm5.21ndd.1	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → 𝜓))
2		pm5.21ndd.3	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)))
3	1, 2	syld 45	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)))
4	3	ibd 178	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))
5		pm5.21ndd.2	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜃 → 𝜓))
6	5, 2	syld 45	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜃 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)))
7		bicom1 131	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜒 ↔ 𝜃) → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜒))
8	6, 7	syl6 33	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜃 → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜒)))
9	8	ibd 178	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜃 → 𝜒))
10	4, 9	impbid 129	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 105

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117

This theorem is referenced by:  pm5.21nd  924  sbcrext  3122  rmob  3138  epelg  4413  eqbrrdva  4927  elrelimasn  5130  relbrcnvg  5143  fmptco  5845  ovelrn  6205  suppcofn  6468  brtpos2  6484  elpmg  6900  brdomg  6987  suppeqfsuppbi  7250  elfi2  7261  genpelvl  7832  genpelvu  7833  fzoval  10489  nninfinf  10812  clim  11974  dvdsaddre2b  12535  pceu  13001  divsfval  13562  sgrppropd  13647  mndpropd  13674  issubg3  13930  resghm2b  14000  rngpropd  14120  dvdsrd  14261  opprsubrngg  14379  subrngpropd  14384  subrgpropd  14421  rhmpropd  14422  lmodprop2d  14545  cnrest2  15150  cnptoprest2  15154  lmss  15160  reopnap  15460  limcdifap  15576  iswlkg  16373  isclwwlkng  16450