Theorem pm5.21ndd 694

Description: Eliminate an antecedent implied by each side of a biconditional, deduction version. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Nov-2012.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Jan-2015.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
pm5.21ndd.1	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → 𝜓))
pm5.21ndd.2	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜃 → 𝜓))
pm5.21ndd.3	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
pm5.21ndd	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃))

Proof of Theorem pm5.21ndd

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		pm5.21ndd.1	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → 𝜓))
2		pm5.21ndd.3	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)))
3	1, 2	syld 45	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)))
4	3	ibd 177	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))
5		pm5.21ndd.2	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜃 → 𝜓))
6	5, 2	syld 45	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜃 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)))
7		bicom1 130	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜒 ↔ 𝜃) → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜒))
8	6, 7	syl6 33	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜃 → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜒)))
9	8	ibd 177	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜃 → 𝜒))
10	4, 9	impbid 128	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 104

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116

This theorem is referenced by:  pm5.21nd  901  sbcrext  2986  rmob  3001  epelg  4212  eqbrrdva  4709  relbrcnvg  4918  fmptco  5586  ovelrn  5919  brtpos2  6148  elpmg  6558  brdomg  6642  elfi2  6860  genpelvl  7320  genpelvu  7321  fzoval  9925  clim  11050  cnrest2  12405  cnptoprest2  12409  lmss  12415  reopnap  12707  limcdifap  12800