Theorem sbcrext 2990

Description: Interchange class substitution and restricted existential quantifier. (Contributed by NM, 1-Mar-2008.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 13-Oct-2016.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
sbcrext	⊢ (Ⅎ𝑦𝐴 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦   𝑥,𝐵

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦)   𝐴(𝑥,𝑦)   𝐵(𝑦)

Proof of Theorem sbcrext

Dummy variable 𝑧 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		sbcex 2921	. . 3 ⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ V)
2	1	a1i 9	. 2 ⊢ (Ⅎ𝑦𝐴 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ V))
3		nfnfc1 2285	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦Ⅎ𝑦𝐴
4		id 19	. . . 4 ⊢ (Ⅎ𝑦𝐴 → Ⅎ𝑦𝐴)
5		nfcvd 2283	. . . 4 ⊢ (Ⅎ𝑦𝐴 → Ⅎ𝑦V)
6	4, 5	nfeld 2298	. . 3 ⊢ (Ⅎ𝑦𝐴 → Ⅎ𝑦 𝐴 ∈ V)
7		sbcex 2921	. . . 4 ⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ V)
8	7	2a1i 27	. . 3 ⊢ (Ⅎ𝑦𝐴 → (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ V)))
9	3, 6, 8	rexlimd2 2550	. 2 ⊢ (Ⅎ𝑦𝐴 → (∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ V))
10		sbcco 2934	. . . 4 ⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑧][𝑧 / 𝑥]∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ [𝐴 / 𝑥]∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑)
11		simpl 108	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ V ∧ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴) → 𝐴 ∈ V)
12		sbsbc 2917	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ([𝑧 / 𝑥]∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ [𝑧 / 𝑥]∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑)
13		nfcv 2282	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵
14		nfs1v 1913	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥[𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑
15	13, 14	nfrexxy 2475	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 [𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑
16		sbequ12 1745	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝜑 ↔ [𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑))
17	16	rexbidv 2439	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 [𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑))
18	15, 17	sbie 1765	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ([𝑧 / 𝑥]∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 [𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑)
19	12, 18	bitr3i 185	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ([𝑧 / 𝑥]∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 [𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑)
20		nfcvd 2283	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (Ⅎ𝑦𝐴 → Ⅎ𝑦𝑧)
21	20, 4	nfeqd 2297	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (Ⅎ𝑦𝐴 → Ⅎ𝑦 𝑧 = 𝐴)
22	3, 21	nfan1 1544	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦(Ⅎ𝑦𝐴 ∧ 𝑧 = 𝐴)
23		dfsbcq2 2916	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐴 → ([𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑))
24	23	adantl 275	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((Ⅎ𝑦𝐴 ∧ 𝑧 = 𝐴) → ([𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑))
25	22, 24	rexbid 2437	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((Ⅎ𝑦𝐴 ∧ 𝑧 = 𝐴) → (∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 [𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑))
26	25	adantll 468	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ V ∧ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴) ∧ 𝑧 = 𝐴) → (∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 [𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑))
27	19, 26	syl5bb 191	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ V ∧ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴) ∧ 𝑧 = 𝐴) → ([𝑧 / 𝑥]∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑))
28	11, 27	sbcied 2949	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ V ∧ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴) → ([𝐴 / 𝑧][𝑧 / 𝑥]∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑))
29	10, 28	bitr3id 193	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ V ∧ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴) → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑))
30	29	expcom 115	. 2 ⊢ (Ⅎ𝑦𝐴 → (𝐴 ∈ V → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑)))
31	2, 9, 30	pm5.21ndd 695	1 ⊢ (Ⅎ𝑦𝐴 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 103   ↔ wb 104   = wceq 1332   ∈ wcel 1481  [wsb 1736  Ⅎwnfc 2269  ∃wrex 2418  Vcvv 2689  [wsbc 2913

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-io 699  ax-5 1424  ax-7 1425  ax-gen 1426  ax-ie1 1470  ax-ie2 1471  ax-8 1483  ax-10 1484  ax-11 1485  ax-i12 1486  ax-bndl 1487  ax-4 1488  ax-17 1507  ax-i9 1511  ax-ial 1515  ax-i5r 1516  ax-ext 2122

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-3an 965  df-tru 1335  df-nf 1438  df-sb 1737  df-clab 2127  df-cleq 2133  df-clel 2136  df-nfc 2271  df-ral 2422  df-rex 2423  df-v 2691  df-sbc 2914

This theorem is referenced by:  sbcrex  2992