Theorem relbrcnvg 5107

Description: When 𝑅 is a relation, the sethood assumptions on brcnv 4905 can be omitted. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Apr-2015.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
relbrcnvg	⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → (𝐴◡𝑅𝐵 ↔ 𝐵𝑅𝐴))

Proof of Theorem relbrcnvg

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		relcnv 5106	. . . 4 ⊢ Rel ◡𝑅
2		brrelex12 4757	. . . 4 ⊢ ((Rel ◡𝑅 ∧ 𝐴◡𝑅𝐵) → (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V))
3	1, 2	mpan 424	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴◡𝑅𝐵 → (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V))
4	3	a1i 9	. 2 ⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → (𝐴◡𝑅𝐵 → (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V)))
5		brrelex12 4757	. . . 4 ⊢ ((Rel 𝑅 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝐴) → (𝐵 ∈ V ∧ 𝐴 ∈ V))
6	5	ancomd 267	. . 3 ⊢ ((Rel 𝑅 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝐴) → (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V))
7	6	ex 115	. 2 ⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → (𝐵𝑅𝐴 → (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V)))
8		brcnvg 4903	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) → (𝐴◡𝑅𝐵 ↔ 𝐵𝑅𝐴))
9	8	a1i 9	. 2 ⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → ((𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) → (𝐴◡𝑅𝐵 ↔ 𝐵𝑅𝐴)))
10	4, 7, 9	pm5.21ndd 710	1 ⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → (𝐴◡𝑅𝐵 ↔ 𝐵𝑅𝐴))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 104   ↔ wb 105   ∈ wcel 2200  Vcvv 2799   class class class wbr 4083  ^◡ccnv 4718  Rel wrel 4724

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 714  ax-5 1493  ax-7 1494  ax-gen 1495  ax-ie1 1539  ax-ie2 1540  ax-8 1550  ax-10 1551  ax-11 1552  ax-i12 1553  ax-bndl 1555  ax-4 1556  ax-17 1572  ax-i9 1576  ax-ial 1580  ax-i5r 1581  ax-14 2203  ax-ext 2211  ax-sep 4202  ax-pow 4258  ax-pr 4293

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3an 1004  df-tru 1398  df-nf 1507  df-sb 1809  df-eu 2080  df-mo 2081  df-clab 2216  df-cleq 2222  df-clel 2225  df-nfc 2361  df-ral 2513  df-rex 2514  df-v 2801  df-un 3201  df-in 3203  df-ss 3210  df-pw 3651  df-sn 3672  df-pr 3673  df-op 3675  df-br 4084  df-opab 4146  df-xp 4725  df-rel 4726  df-cnv 4727

This theorem is referenced by:  eliniseg2  5108  relbrcnv  5109