Theorem ss1oel2o 13873

Description: Any subset of ordinal one being an element of ordinal two is equivalent to excluded middle. A variation of exmid01 4177 which more directly illustrates the contrast with el2oss1o 6411. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 8-Aug-2022.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ss1oel2o	⊢ (EXMID ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ⊆ 1o → 𝑥 ∈ 2o))

Proof of Theorem ss1oel2o

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		exmid01 4177	. 2 ⊢ (EXMID ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ⊆ {∅} → (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ 𝑥 = {∅})))
2		df1o2 6397	. . . . 5 ⊢ 1o = {∅}
3	2	sseq2i 3169	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 ⊆ 1o ↔ 𝑥 ⊆ {∅})
4		df2o2 6399	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 2o = {∅, {∅}}
5	4	eleq2i 2233	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 2o ↔ 𝑥 ∈ {∅, {∅}})
6		vex 2729	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝑥 ∈ V
7	6	elpr 3597	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ {∅, {∅}} ↔ (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ 𝑥 = {∅}))
8	5, 7	bitri 183	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 2o ↔ (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ 𝑥 = {∅}))
9	3, 8	imbi12i 238	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑥 ⊆ 1o → 𝑥 ∈ 2o) ↔ (𝑥 ⊆ {∅} → (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ 𝑥 = {∅})))
10	9	albii 1458	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 ⊆ 1o → 𝑥 ∈ 2o) ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ⊆ {∅} → (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ 𝑥 = {∅})))
11	1, 10	bitr4i 186	1 ⊢ (EXMID ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ⊆ 1o → 𝑥 ∈ 2o))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 104   ∨ wo 698  ∀wal 1341   = wceq 1343   ∈ wcel 2136   ⊆ wss 3116  ∅c0 3409  {csn 3576  {cpr 3577  EXMIDwem 4173  1_oc1o 6377  2_oc2o 6378

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-in1 604  ax-in2 605  ax-io 699  ax-5 1435  ax-7 1436  ax-gen 1437  ax-ie1 1481  ax-ie2 1482  ax-8 1492  ax-10 1493  ax-11 1494  ax-i12 1495  ax-bndl 1497  ax-4 1498  ax-17 1514  ax-i9 1518  ax-ial 1522  ax-i5r 1523  ax-ext 2147  ax-nul 4108

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-dc 825  df-tru 1346  df-nf 1449  df-sb 1751  df-clab 2152  df-cleq 2158  df-clel 2161  df-nfc 2297  df-v 2728  df-dif 3118  df-un 3120  df-in 3122  df-ss 3129  df-nul 3410  df-sn 3582  df-pr 3583  df-exmid 4174  df-suc 4349  df-1o 6384  df-2o 6385

This theorem is referenced by: (None)