Theorem ss1oel2o 17017

Description: Any subset of ordinal one being an element of ordinal two is equivalent to excluded middle. A variation of exmid01 4335 which more directly illustrates the contrast with el2oss1o 6716. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 8-Aug-2022.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ss1oel2o	⊢ (EXMID ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ⊆ 1o → 𝑥 ∈ 2o))

Proof of Theorem ss1oel2o

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		exmid01 4335	. 2 ⊢ (EXMID ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ⊆ {∅} → (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ 𝑥 = {∅})))
2		df1o2 6701	. . . . 5 ⊢ 1o = {∅}
3	2	sseq2i 3275	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 ⊆ 1o ↔ 𝑥 ⊆ {∅})
4		df2o2 6703	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 2o = {∅, {∅}}
5	4	eleq2i 2305	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 2o ↔ 𝑥 ∈ {∅, {∅}})
6		vex 2824	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝑥 ∈ V
7	6	elpr 3730	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ {∅, {∅}} ↔ (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ 𝑥 = {∅}))
8	5, 7	bitri 184	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 2o ↔ (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ 𝑥 = {∅}))
9	3, 8	imbi12i 239	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑥 ⊆ 1o → 𝑥 ∈ 2o) ↔ (𝑥 ⊆ {∅} → (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ 𝑥 = {∅})))
10	9	albii 1523	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 ⊆ 1o → 𝑥 ∈ 2o) ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ⊆ {∅} → (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ 𝑥 = {∅})))
11	1, 10	bitr4i 187	1 ⊢ (EXMID ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ⊆ 1o → 𝑥 ∈ 2o))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 105   ∨ wo 720  ∀wal 1400   = wceq 1402   ∈ wcel 2209   ⊆ wss 3220  ∅c0 3520  {csn 3709  {cpr 3710  EXMIDwem 4331  1_oc1o 6680  2_oc2o 6681

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 623  ax-in2 624  ax-io 721  ax-5 1500  ax-7 1501  ax-gen 1502  ax-ie1 1546  ax-ie2 1547  ax-8 1557  ax-10 1558  ax-11 1559  ax-i12 1560  ax-bndl 1562  ax-4 1563  ax-17 1579  ax-i9 1583  ax-ial 1587  ax-i5r 1588  ax-ext 2220  ax-nul 4259

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-dc 847  df-tru 1405  df-nf 1514  df-sb 1816  df-clab 2225  df-cleq 2231  df-clel 2234  df-nfc 2381  df-v 2823  df-dif 3222  df-un 3224  df-in 3226  df-ss 3233  df-nul 3521  df-sn 3715  df-pr 3716  df-exmid 4332  df-suc 4516  df-1o 6687  df-2o 6688

This theorem is used by: (None)