Theorem bnj1112 35613

Description: Technical lemma for bnj69 35640. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
bnj1112.1	⊢ (𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bnj1112	⊢ (𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑗((𝑗 ∈ ω ∧ suc 𝑗 ∈ 𝑛) → (𝑓‘suc 𝑗) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑗) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))

Distinct variable groups:   𝐴,𝑖,𝑗   𝑅,𝑖,𝑗   𝑓,𝑖,𝑗,𝑦   𝑖,𝑛,𝑗

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜓(𝑦, 𝑓, 𝑖, 𝑗, 𝑛)   𝐴(𝑦, 𝑓, 𝑛)   𝑅(𝑦, 𝑓, 𝑛)

Proof of Theorem bnj1112

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		bnj1112.1	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))
2	1	bnj115 35356	. 2 ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑖((𝑖 ∈ ω ∧ suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛) → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))
3		eleq1w 2843	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑖 = 𝑗 → (𝑖 ∈ ω ↔ 𝑗 ∈ ω))
4		suceq 6431	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑖 = 𝑗 → suc 𝑖 = suc 𝑗)
5	4	eleq1d 2845	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑖 = 𝑗 → (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 ↔ suc 𝑗 ∈ 𝑛))
6	3, 5	anbi12d 644	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑖 = 𝑗 → ((𝑖 ∈ ω ∧ suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛) ↔ (𝑗 ∈ ω ∧ suc 𝑗 ∈ 𝑛)))
7	4	fveq2d 6889	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑖 = 𝑗 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = (𝑓‘suc 𝑗))
8		fveq2 6885	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑖 = 𝑗 → (𝑓‘𝑖) = (𝑓‘𝑗))
9	8	bnj1113 35416	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑖 = 𝑗 → ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑗) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅))
10	7, 9	eqeq12d 2776	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑖 = 𝑗 → ((𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅) ↔ (𝑓‘suc 𝑗) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑗) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))
11	6, 10	imbi12d 347	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑖 = 𝑗 → (((𝑖 ∈ ω ∧ suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛) → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)) ↔ ((𝑗 ∈ ω ∧ suc 𝑗 ∈ 𝑛) → (𝑓‘suc 𝑗) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑗) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅))))
12	11	cbvalvw 2068	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑖((𝑖 ∈ ω ∧ suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛) → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)) ↔ ∀𝑗((𝑗 ∈ ω ∧ suc 𝑗 ∈ 𝑛) → (𝑓‘suc 𝑗) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑗) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))
13	2, 12	bitri 278	1 ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑗((𝑗 ∈ ω ∧ suc 𝑗 ∈ 𝑛) → (𝑓‘suc 𝑗) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑗) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401  ∀wal 1567   = wceq 1569   ∈ wcel 2144  ∀wral 3076  ∪ ciun 4950  suc csuc 6364  ‘cfv 6538  ωcom 7877   predc-bnj14 35319

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1827  ax-4 1841  ax-5 1942  ax-6 1999  ax-7 2040  ax-8 2146  ax-9 2154  ax-ext 2732

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1572  df-fal 1582  df-ex 1812  df-sb 2099  df-clab 2739  df-cleq 2752  df-clel 2835  df-ral 3077  df-rex 3087  df-rab 3413  df-v 3452  df-ss 3896  df-dif 4047  df-un 4151  df-nul 4279  df-if 4482  df-sn 4584  df-pr 4586  df-op 4590  df-uni 4867  df-iun 4952  df-br 5103  df-suc 6368  df-iota 6494  df-fv 6546

This theorem is used by:  bnj1118  35614