Theorem bnj1534 35150

Description: First-order logic and set theory. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
bnj1534.1	⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝐹‘𝑥) ≠ (𝐻‘𝑥)}
bnj1534.2	⊢ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐹 → ∀𝑥 𝑤 ∈ 𝐹)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bnj1534	⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝐹‘𝑧) ≠ (𝐻‘𝑧)}

Distinct variable groups:   𝑤,𝐴,𝑥,𝑧   𝑤,𝐹,𝑧   𝑤,𝐻,𝑥,𝑧

Allowed substitution hints:   𝐷(𝑥,𝑧,𝑤)   𝐹(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem bnj1534

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		bnj1534.1	. 2 ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝐹‘𝑥) ≠ (𝐻‘𝑥)}
2		nfcv 2926	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
3		nfcv 2926	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧𝐴
4		nfv 1936	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧(𝐹‘𝑥) ≠ (𝐻‘𝑥)
5		bnj1534.2	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐹 → ∀𝑥 𝑤 ∈ 𝐹)
6	5	nfcii 2915	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐹
7		nfcv 2926	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝑧
8	6, 7	nffv 6879	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(𝐹‘𝑧)
9		nfcv 2926	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(𝐻‘𝑧)
10	8, 9	nfne 3060	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(𝐹‘𝑧) ≠ (𝐻‘𝑧)
11		fveq2 6869	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝐹‘𝑥) = (𝐹‘𝑧))
12		fveq2 6869	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝐻‘𝑥) = (𝐻‘𝑧))
13	11, 12	neeq12d 3020	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → ((𝐹‘𝑥) ≠ (𝐻‘𝑥) ↔ (𝐹‘𝑧) ≠ (𝐻‘𝑧)))
14	2, 3, 4, 10, 13	cbvrabw 3451	. 2 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝐹‘𝑥) ≠ (𝐻‘𝑥)} = {𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝐹‘𝑧) ≠ (𝐻‘𝑧)}
15	1, 14	eqtri 2787	1 ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝐹‘𝑧) ≠ (𝐻‘𝑧)}

Syntax hints:   → wi 4  ∀wal 1560   = wceq 1562   ∈ wcel 2144   ≠ wne 2959  {crab 3416  ‘cfv 6523

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1817  ax-4 1831  ax-5 1932  ax-6 1989  ax-7 2030  ax-8 2146  ax-9 2154  ax-10 2177  ax-11 2193  ax-12 2214  ax-ext 2736

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 400  df-or 859  df-3an 1101  df-tru 1565  df-fal 1575  df-ex 1802  df-nf 1806  df-sb 2093  df-clab 2743  df-cleq 2756  df-clel 2839  df-nfc 2913  df-ne 2960  df-ral 3079  df-rex 3089  df-rab 3417  df-v 3458  df-dif 3909  df-un 3911  df-ss 3923  df-nul 4288  df-if 4483  df-sn 4585  df-pr 4587  df-op 4591  df-uni 4868  df-br 5103  df-iota 6479  df-fv 6531

This theorem is referenced by:  bnj1523  35368