Theorem bnj1534 32812

Description: First-order logic and set theory. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
bnj1534.1	⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝐹‘𝑥) ≠ (𝐻‘𝑥)}
bnj1534.2	⊢ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐹 → ∀𝑥 𝑤 ∈ 𝐹)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bnj1534	⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝐹‘𝑧) ≠ (𝐻‘𝑧)}

Distinct variable groups:   𝑤,𝐴,𝑥,𝑧   𝑤,𝐹,𝑧   𝑤,𝐻,𝑥,𝑧

Allowed substitution hints:   𝐷(𝑥,𝑧,𝑤)   𝐹(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem bnj1534

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		bnj1534.1	. 2 ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝐹‘𝑥) ≠ (𝐻‘𝑥)}
2		nfcv 2908	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
3		nfcv 2908	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧𝐴
4		nfv 1920	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧(𝐹‘𝑥) ≠ (𝐻‘𝑥)
5		bnj1534.2	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐹 → ∀𝑥 𝑤 ∈ 𝐹)
6	5	nfcii 2892	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐹
7		nfcv 2908	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝑧
8	6, 7	nffv 6778	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(𝐹‘𝑧)
9		nfcv 2908	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(𝐻‘𝑧)
10	8, 9	nfne 3046	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(𝐹‘𝑧) ≠ (𝐻‘𝑧)
11		fveq2 6768	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝐹‘𝑥) = (𝐹‘𝑧))
12		fveq2 6768	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝐻‘𝑥) = (𝐻‘𝑧))
13	11, 12	neeq12d 3006	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → ((𝐹‘𝑥) ≠ (𝐻‘𝑥) ↔ (𝐹‘𝑧) ≠ (𝐻‘𝑧)))
14	2, 3, 4, 10, 13	cbvrabw 3422	. 2 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝐹‘𝑥) ≠ (𝐻‘𝑥)} = {𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝐹‘𝑧) ≠ (𝐻‘𝑧)}
15	1, 14	eqtri 2767	1 ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝐹‘𝑧) ≠ (𝐻‘𝑧)}

Syntax hints:   → wi 4  ∀wal 1539   = wceq 1541   ∈ wcel 2109   ≠ wne 2944  {crab 3069  ‘cfv 6430

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1801  ax-4 1815  ax-5 1916  ax-6 1974  ax-7 2014  ax-8 2111  ax-9 2119  ax-10 2140  ax-11 2157  ax-12 2174  ax-ext 2710

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 396  df-or 844  df-3an 1087  df-tru 1544  df-fal 1554  df-ex 1786  df-nf 1790  df-sb 2071  df-clab 2717  df-cleq 2731  df-clel 2817  df-nfc 2890  df-ne 2945  df-ral 3070  df-rex 3071  df-rab 3074  df-v 3432  df-dif 3894  df-un 3896  df-in 3898  df-ss 3908  df-nul 4262  df-if 4465  df-sn 4567  df-pr 4569  df-op 4573  df-uni 4845  df-br 5079  df-iota 6388  df-fv 6438

This theorem is referenced by:  bnj1523  33030