Theorem cbvmptfg 5198

Description: Rule to change the bound variable in a maps-to function, using implicit substitution. This version has bound-variable hypotheses in place of distinct variable conditions. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2402. See cbvmptf 5197 for a version with more disjoint variable conditions, but not requiring ax-13 2402. (Contributed by NM, 11-Sep-2011.) (Revised by Thierry Arnoux, 9-Mar-2017.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
cbvmptfg.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
cbvmptfg.2	⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴
cbvmptfg.3	⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐵
cbvmptfg.4	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐶
cbvmptfg.5	⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐵 = 𝐶)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
cbvmptfg	⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) = (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶)

Proof of Theorem cbvmptfg

Dummy variables 𝑧 𝑤 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		nfv 1933	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑤(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑧 = 𝐵)
2		cbvmptfg.1	. . . . . 6 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
3	2	nfcri 2915	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝑤 ∈ 𝐴
4		nfs1v 2189	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥[𝑤 / 𝑥]𝑧 = 𝐵
5	3, 4	nfan 1918	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ [𝑤 / 𝑥]𝑧 = 𝐵)
6		eleq1w 2844	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑤 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑤 ∈ 𝐴))
7		sbequ12 2285	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑤 → (𝑧 = 𝐵 ↔ [𝑤 / 𝑥]𝑧 = 𝐵))
8	6, 7	anbi12d 641	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑤 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑧 = 𝐵) ↔ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ [𝑤 / 𝑥]𝑧 = 𝐵)))
9	1, 5, 8	cbvopab1g 5172	. . 3 ⊢ {⟨𝑥, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑧 = 𝐵)} = {⟨𝑤, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ [𝑤 / 𝑥]𝑧 = 𝐵)}
10		cbvmptfg.2	. . . . . 6 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴
11	10	nfcri 2915	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦 𝑤 ∈ 𝐴
12		cbvmptfg.3	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐵
13	12	nfeq2 2940	. . . . . 6 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦 𝑧 = 𝐵
14	13	nfsb 2553	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦[𝑤 / 𝑥]𝑧 = 𝐵
15	11, 14	nfan 1918	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦(𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ [𝑤 / 𝑥]𝑧 = 𝐵)
16		nfv 1933	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑤(𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑧 = 𝐶)
17		eleq1w 2844	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑦 → (𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴))
18		sbequ 2115	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑦 → ([𝑤 / 𝑥]𝑧 = 𝐵 ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝑧 = 𝐵))
19		cbvmptfg.4	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐶
20	19	nfeq2 2940	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝑧 = 𝐶
21		cbvmptfg.5	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐵 = 𝐶)
22	21	eqeq2d 2772	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑧 = 𝐵 ↔ 𝑧 = 𝐶))
23	20, 22	sbie 2532	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝑧 = 𝐵 ↔ 𝑧 = 𝐶)
24	18, 23	bitrdi 289	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑦 → ([𝑤 / 𝑥]𝑧 = 𝐵 ↔ 𝑧 = 𝐶))
25	17, 24	anbi12d 641	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑦 → ((𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ [𝑤 / 𝑥]𝑧 = 𝐵) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑧 = 𝐶)))
26	15, 16, 25	cbvopab1g 5172	. . 3 ⊢ {⟨𝑤, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ [𝑤 / 𝑥]𝑧 = 𝐵)} = {⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑧 = 𝐶)}
27	9, 26	eqtri 2784	. 2 ⊢ {⟨𝑥, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑧 = 𝐵)} = {⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑧 = 𝐶)}
28		df-mpt 5179	. 2 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) = {⟨𝑥, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑧 = 𝐵)}
29		df-mpt 5179	. 2 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶) = {⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑧 = 𝐶)}
30	27, 28, 29	3eqtr4i 2794	1 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) = (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 399   = wceq 1559  [wsb 2089   ∈ wcel 2141  Ⅎwnfc 2908  {copab 5159   ↦ cmpt 5178

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1814  ax-4 1828  ax-5 1929  ax-6 1986  ax-7 2027  ax-8 2143  ax-9 2151  ax-10 2174  ax-11 2190  ax-12 2211  ax-13 2402  ax-ext 2733

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 400  df-or 859  df-3an 1099  df-tru 1562  df-fal 1572  df-ex 1799  df-nf 1803  df-sb 2090  df-clab 2740  df-cleq 2753  df-clel 2836  df-nfc 2910  df-rab 3414  df-v 3455  df-dif 3905  df-un 3907  df-ss 3919  df-nul 4284  df-if 4478  df-sn 4580  df-pr 4582  df-op 4586  df-opab 5160  df-mpt 5179

This theorem is referenced by:  cbvmptg  5200