Theorem cbvopab1g 5180

Description: Change first bound variable in an ordered-pair class abstraction, using explicit substitution. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2401. See cbvopab1 5179 for a version with more disjoint variable conditions, but not requiring ax-13 2401. (Contributed by NM, 6-Oct-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 14-Oct-2016.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
cbvopab1g.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑧𝜑
cbvopab1g.2	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓
cbvopab1g.3	⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
cbvopab1g	⊢ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {⟨𝑧, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓}

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦   𝑦,𝑧

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧)   𝜓(𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧)

Proof of Theorem cbvopab1g

Dummy variables 𝑤 𝑣 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		nfv 1947	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑣∃𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑)
2		nfv 1947	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝑤 = ⟨𝑣, 𝑦⟩
3		nfs1v 2193	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥[𝑣 / 𝑥]𝜑
4	2, 3	nfan 1932	. . . . . 6 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(𝑤 = ⟨𝑣, 𝑦⟩ ∧ [𝑣 / 𝑥]𝜑)
5	4	nfex 2354	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥∃𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑣, 𝑦⟩ ∧ [𝑣 / 𝑥]𝜑)
6		opeq1 4833	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑣 → ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ = ⟨𝑣, 𝑦⟩)
7	6	eqeq2d 2771	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑣 → (𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ↔ 𝑤 = ⟨𝑣, 𝑦⟩))
8		sbequ12 2286	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑣 → (𝜑 ↔ [𝑣 / 𝑥]𝜑))
9	7, 8	anbi12d 644	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑣 → ((𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝑤 = ⟨𝑣, 𝑦⟩ ∧ [𝑣 / 𝑥]𝜑)))
10	9	exbidv 1954	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑣 → (∃𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑣, 𝑦⟩ ∧ [𝑣 / 𝑥]𝜑)))
11	1, 5, 10	cbvexv1 2371	. . . 4 ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑣∃𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑣, 𝑦⟩ ∧ [𝑣 / 𝑥]𝜑))
12		nfv 1947	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧 𝑤 = ⟨𝑣, 𝑦⟩
13		cbvopab1g.1	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧𝜑
14	13	nfsb 2552	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧[𝑣 / 𝑥]𝜑
15	12, 14	nfan 1932	. . . . . 6 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨𝑣, 𝑦⟩ ∧ [𝑣 / 𝑥]𝜑)
16	15	nfex 2354	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧∃𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑣, 𝑦⟩ ∧ [𝑣 / 𝑥]𝜑)
17		nfv 1947	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑣∃𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑧, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜓)
18		opeq1 4833	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑣 = 𝑧 → ⟨𝑣, 𝑦⟩ = ⟨𝑧, 𝑦⟩)
19	18	eqeq2d 2771	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑣 = 𝑧 → (𝑤 = ⟨𝑣, 𝑦⟩ ↔ 𝑤 = ⟨𝑧, 𝑦⟩))
20		sbequ 2120	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑣 = 𝑧 → ([𝑣 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ [𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑))
21		cbvopab1g.2	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓
22		cbvopab1g.3	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
23	21, 22	sbie 2531	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ([𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)
24	20, 23	bitrdi 290	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑣 = 𝑧 → ([𝑣 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
25	19, 24	anbi12d 644	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑣 = 𝑧 → ((𝑤 = ⟨𝑣, 𝑦⟩ ∧ [𝑣 / 𝑥]𝜑) ↔ (𝑤 = ⟨𝑧, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜓)))
26	25	exbidv 1954	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑣 = 𝑧 → (∃𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑣, 𝑦⟩ ∧ [𝑣 / 𝑥]𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑧, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜓)))
27	16, 17, 26	cbvexv1 2371	. . . 4 ⊢ (∃𝑣∃𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑣, 𝑦⟩ ∧ [𝑣 / 𝑥]𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑧∃𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑧, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜓))
28	11, 27	bitri 278	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑧∃𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑧, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜓))
29	28	abbii 2827	. 2 ⊢ {𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑)} = {𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑧∃𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑧, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜓)}
30		df-opab 5168	. 2 ⊢ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑)}
31		df-opab 5168	. 2 ⊢ {⟨𝑧, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓} = {𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑧∃𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑧, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜓)}
32	29, 30, 31	3eqtr4i 2793	1 ⊢ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {⟨𝑧, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓}

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   = wceq 1570  ∃wex 1812  Ⅎwnf 1816  [wsb 2099  {cab 2738  ⟨cop 4590  {copab 5167

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-10 2178  ax-11 2194  ax-12 2213  ax-13 2401  ax-ext 2732

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-clab 2739  df-cleq 2752  df-clel 2835  df-rab 3413  df-v 3452  df-dif 3902  df-un 3904  df-ss 3916  df-nul 4280  df-if 4483  df-sn 4585  df-pr 4587  df-op 4591  df-opab 5168

This theorem is used by:  cbvmptfg  5206