Theorem cbvmptf 5168

Description: Rule to change the bound variable in a maps-to function, using implicit substitution. This version has bound-variable hypotheses in place of distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by NM, 11-Sep-2011.) (Revised by Thierry Arnoux, 9-Mar-2017.) Add disjoint variable condition to avoid ax-13 2389. See cbvmptfg 5169 for a less restrictive version requiring more axioms. (Revised by Gino Giotto, 17-Jan-2024.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
cbvmptf.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
cbvmptf.2	⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴
cbvmptf.3	⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐵
cbvmptf.4	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐶
cbvmptf.5	⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐵 = 𝐶)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
cbvmptf	⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) = (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶)

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝐴(𝑥,𝑦)   𝐵(𝑥,𝑦)   𝐶(𝑥,𝑦)

Proof of Theorem cbvmptf

Dummy variables 𝑧 𝑤 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		nfv 1914	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑤(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑧 = 𝐵)
2		cbvmptf.1	. . . . . 6 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
3	2	nfcri 2974	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝑤 ∈ 𝐴
4		nfs1v 2159	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥[𝑤 / 𝑥]𝑧 = 𝐵
5	3, 4	nfan 1899	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ [𝑤 / 𝑥]𝑧 = 𝐵)
6		eleq1w 2898	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑤 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑤 ∈ 𝐴))
7		sbequ12 2252	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑤 → (𝑧 = 𝐵 ↔ [𝑤 / 𝑥]𝑧 = 𝐵))
8	6, 7	anbi12d 632	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑤 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑧 = 𝐵) ↔ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ [𝑤 / 𝑥]𝑧 = 𝐵)))
9	1, 5, 8	cbvopab1 5142	. . 3 ⊢ {⟨𝑥, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑧 = 𝐵)} = {⟨𝑤, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ [𝑤 / 𝑥]𝑧 = 𝐵)}
10		cbvmptf.2	. . . . . 6 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴
11	10	nfcri 2974	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦 𝑤 ∈ 𝐴
12		cbvmptf.3	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐵
13	12	nfeq2 2998	. . . . . 6 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦 𝑧 = 𝐵
14	13	nfsbv 2348	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦[𝑤 / 𝑥]𝑧 = 𝐵
15	11, 14	nfan 1899	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦(𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ [𝑤 / 𝑥]𝑧 = 𝐵)
16		nfv 1914	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑤(𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑧 = 𝐶)
17		eleq1w 2898	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑦 → (𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴))
18		sbequ 2089	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑦 → ([𝑤 / 𝑥]𝑧 = 𝐵 ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝑧 = 𝐵))
19		cbvmptf.4	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐶
20	19	nfeq2 2998	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝑧 = 𝐶
21		cbvmptf.5	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐵 = 𝐶)
22	21	eqeq2d 2835	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑧 = 𝐵 ↔ 𝑧 = 𝐶))
23	20, 22	sbiev 2329	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝑧 = 𝐵 ↔ 𝑧 = 𝐶)
24	18, 23	syl6bb 289	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑦 → ([𝑤 / 𝑥]𝑧 = 𝐵 ↔ 𝑧 = 𝐶))
25	17, 24	anbi12d 632	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑦 → ((𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ [𝑤 / 𝑥]𝑧 = 𝐵) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑧 = 𝐶)))
26	15, 16, 25	cbvopab1 5142	. . 3 ⊢ {⟨𝑤, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ [𝑤 / 𝑥]𝑧 = 𝐵)} = {⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑧 = 𝐶)}
27	9, 26	eqtri 2847	. 2 ⊢ {⟨𝑥, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑧 = 𝐵)} = {⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑧 = 𝐶)}
28		df-mpt 5150	. 2 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) = {⟨𝑥, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑧 = 𝐵)}
29		df-mpt 5150	. 2 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶) = {⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑧 = 𝐶)}
30	27, 28, 29	3eqtr4i 2857	1 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) = (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 398   = wceq 1536  [wsb 2068   ∈ wcel 2113  Ⅎwnfc 2964  {copab 5131   ↦ cmpt 5149

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1910  ax-6 1969  ax-7 2014  ax-8 2115  ax-9 2123  ax-10 2144  ax-11 2160  ax-12 2176  ax-ext 2796

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 399  df-or 844  df-3an 1085  df-tru 1539  df-ex 1780  df-nf 1784  df-sb 2069  df-clab 2803  df-cleq 2817  df-clel 2896  df-nfc 2966  df-rab 3150  df-v 3499  df-dif 3942  df-un 3944  df-in 3946  df-ss 3955  df-nul 4295  df-if 4471  df-sn 4571  df-pr 4573  df-op 4577  df-opab 5132  df-mpt 5150

This theorem is referenced by:  cbvmpt  5170  resmptf  5910  fvmpt2f  6772  offval2f  7424  suppss2f  30387  fmptdF  30404  acunirnmpt2f  30409  funcnv4mpt  30417  cbvesum  31305  esumpfinvalf  31339  binomcxplemdvbinom  40691  binomcxplemdvsum  40693  binomcxplemnotnn0  40694  supxrleubrnmptf  41733  fnlimfv  41950  fnlimfvre2  41964  fnlimf  41965  limsupequzmptf  42018  sge0iunmptlemre  42704  smflim  43060  smflim2  43087  smfsup  43095  smfinf  43099  smflimsuplem2  43102  smflimsuplem5  43105  smflimsup  43109  smfliminf  43112