Theorem dfcnvrefrel2 39543

Description: Alternate definition of the converse reflexive relation predicate. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 24-Jul-2019.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
dfcnvrefrel2	⊢ ( CnvRefRel 𝑅 ↔ (𝑅 ⊆ ( I ∩ (dom 𝑅 × ran 𝑅)) ∧ Rel 𝑅))

Proof of Theorem dfcnvrefrel2

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-cnvrefrel 39540	. 2 ⊢ ( CnvRefRel 𝑅 ↔ ((𝑅 ∩ (dom 𝑅 × ran 𝑅)) ⊆ ( I ∩ (dom 𝑅 × ran 𝑅)) ∧ Rel 𝑅))
2		dfrel6 39280	. . . . 5 ⊢ (Rel 𝑅 ↔ (𝑅 ∩ (dom 𝑅 × ran 𝑅)) = 𝑅)
3	2	biimpi 219	. . . 4 ⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → (𝑅 ∩ (dom 𝑅 × ran 𝑅)) = 𝑅)
4	3	sseq1d 3939	. . 3 ⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → ((𝑅 ∩ (dom 𝑅 × ran 𝑅)) ⊆ ( I ∩ (dom 𝑅 × ran 𝑅)) ↔ 𝑅 ⊆ ( I ∩ (dom 𝑅 × ran 𝑅))))
5	4	pm5.32ri 586	. 2 ⊢ (((𝑅 ∩ (dom 𝑅 × ran 𝑅)) ⊆ ( I ∩ (dom 𝑅 × ran 𝑅)) ∧ Rel 𝑅) ↔ (𝑅 ⊆ ( I ∩ (dom 𝑅 × ran 𝑅)) ∧ Rel 𝑅))
6	1, 5	bitri 278	1 ⊢ ( CnvRefRel 𝑅 ↔ (𝑅 ⊆ ( I ∩ (dom 𝑅 × ran 𝑅)) ∧ Rel 𝑅))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   = wceq 1569   ⊆ wss 3895   ∩ cin 4089   I cid 5544   × cxp 5648  dom cdm 5650  ran crn 5651  Rel wrel 5655   CnvRefRel wcnvrefrel 39125

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1827  ax-4 1841  ax-5 1942  ax-6 1999  ax-7 2040  ax-8 2146  ax-9 2154  ax-ext 2732  ax-sep 5248  ax-pr 5390

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1572  df-fal 1582  df-ex 1812  df-sb 2099  df-clab 2739  df-cleq 2752  df-clel 2835  df-ral 3077  df-rex 3087  df-rab 3413  df-v 3452  df-ss 3896  df-dif 4047  df-in 4091  df-un 4151  df-nul 4279  df-if 4482  df-sn 4584  df-pr 4586  df-op 4590  df-br 5103  df-opab 5167  df-xp 5656  df-rel 5657  df-cnv 5658  df-dm 5660  df-rn 5661  df-res 5662  df-cnvrefrel 39540

This theorem is used by:  elcnvrefrelsrel  39549  cnvrefrelcoss2  39550