Theorem dfcnvrefrel2 39462

Description: Alternate definition of the converse reflexive relation predicate. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 24-Jul-2019.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
dfcnvrefrel2	⊢ ( CnvRefRel 𝑅 ↔ (𝑅 ⊆ ( I ∩ (dom 𝑅 × ran 𝑅)) ∧ Rel 𝑅))

Proof of Theorem dfcnvrefrel2

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-cnvrefrel 39459	. 2 ⊢ ( CnvRefRel 𝑅 ↔ ((𝑅 ∩ (dom 𝑅 × ran 𝑅)) ⊆ ( I ∩ (dom 𝑅 × ran 𝑅)) ∧ Rel 𝑅))
2		dfrel6 39199	. . . . 5 ⊢ (Rel 𝑅 ↔ (𝑅 ∩ (dom 𝑅 × ran 𝑅)) = 𝑅)
3	2	biimpi 219	. . . 4 ⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → (𝑅 ∩ (dom 𝑅 × ran 𝑅)) = 𝑅)
4	3	sseq1d 3961	. . 3 ⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → ((𝑅 ∩ (dom 𝑅 × ran 𝑅)) ⊆ ( I ∩ (dom 𝑅 × ran 𝑅)) ↔ 𝑅 ⊆ ( I ∩ (dom 𝑅 × ran 𝑅))))
5	4	pm5.32ri 586	. 2 ⊢ (((𝑅 ∩ (dom 𝑅 × ran 𝑅)) ⊆ ( I ∩ (dom 𝑅 × ran 𝑅)) ∧ Rel 𝑅) ↔ (𝑅 ⊆ ( I ∩ (dom 𝑅 × ran 𝑅)) ∧ Rel 𝑅))
6	1, 5	bitri 278	1 ⊢ ( CnvRefRel 𝑅 ↔ (𝑅 ⊆ ( I ∩ (dom 𝑅 × ran 𝑅)) ∧ Rel 𝑅))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   = wceq 1570   ∩ cin 3897   ⊆ wss 3898   I cid 5541   × cxp 5645  dom cdm 5647  ran crn 5648  Rel wrel 5652   CnvRefRel wcnvrefrel 39044

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-ext 2732  ax-sep 5248  ax-pr 5390

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-sb 2100  df-clab 2739  df-cleq 2752  df-clel 2835  df-ral 3077  df-rex 3087  df-rab 3413  df-v 3452  df-dif 3901  df-un 3903  df-in 3905  df-ss 3915  df-nul 4279  df-if 4482  df-sn 4584  df-pr 4586  df-op 4590  df-br 5103  df-opab 5167  df-xp 5653  df-rel 5654  df-cnv 5655  df-dm 5657  df-rn 5658  df-res 5659  df-cnvrefrel 39459

This theorem is used by:  elcnvrefrelsrel  39468  cnvrefrelcoss2  39469