Theorem eqrelrel 5785

Description: Extensionality principle for ordered triples (used by 2-place operations df-oprab 7416), analogous to eqrel 5772. Use relrelss 6276 to express the antecedent in terms of the relation predicate. (Contributed by NM, 17-Dec-2008.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
eqrelrel	⊢ ((𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ⊆ ((V × V) × V) → (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦∀𝑧(⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ 𝐴 ↔ ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ 𝐵)))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦,𝑧,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵,𝑦,𝑧

Proof of Theorem eqrelrel

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		unss 4144	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ((V × V) × V) ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ ((V × V) × V)) ↔ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ⊆ ((V × V) × V))
2		ssrelrel 5784	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ ((V × V) × V) → (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦∀𝑧(⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ 𝐴 → ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ 𝐵)))
3		ssrelrel 5784	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐵 ⊆ ((V × V) × V) → (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦∀𝑧(⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ 𝐵 → ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ 𝐴)))
4	2, 3	bi2anan9 649	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ((V × V) × V) ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ ((V × V) × V)) → ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴) ↔ (∀𝑥∀𝑦∀𝑧(⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ 𝐴 → ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ 𝐵) ∧ ∀𝑥∀𝑦∀𝑧(⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ 𝐵 → ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ 𝐴))))
5		eqss 3953	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴))
6		2albiim 1920	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∀𝑦∀𝑧(⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ 𝐴 ↔ ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ 𝐵) ↔ (∀𝑦∀𝑧(⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ 𝐴 → ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ 𝐵) ∧ ∀𝑦∀𝑧(⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ 𝐵 → ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ 𝐴)))
7	6	albii 1849	. . . 4 ⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦∀𝑧(⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ 𝐴 ↔ ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ 𝐵) ↔ ∀𝑥(∀𝑦∀𝑧(⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ 𝐴 → ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ 𝐵) ∧ ∀𝑦∀𝑧(⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ 𝐵 → ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ 𝐴)))
8		19.26 1900	. . . 4 ⊢ (∀𝑥(∀𝑦∀𝑧(⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ 𝐴 → ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ 𝐵) ∧ ∀𝑦∀𝑧(⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ 𝐵 → ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ 𝐴)) ↔ (∀𝑥∀𝑦∀𝑧(⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ 𝐴 → ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ 𝐵) ∧ ∀𝑥∀𝑦∀𝑧(⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ 𝐵 → ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ 𝐴)))
9	7, 8	bitri 278	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦∀𝑧(⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ 𝐴 ↔ ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ 𝐵) ↔ (∀𝑥∀𝑦∀𝑧(⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ 𝐴 → ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ 𝐵) ∧ ∀𝑥∀𝑦∀𝑧(⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ 𝐵 → ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ 𝐴)))
10	4, 5, 9	3bitr4g 317	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ((V × V) × V) ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ ((V × V) × V)) → (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦∀𝑧(⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ 𝐴 ↔ ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ 𝐵)))
11	1, 10	sylbir 238	1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ⊆ ((V × V) × V) → (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦∀𝑧(⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ 𝐴 ↔ ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ 𝐵)))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 400  ∀wal 1568   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2143  Vcvv 3455   ∪ cun 3904   ⊆ wss 3906  ⟨cop 4596   × cxp 5661

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1825  ax-4 1839  ax-5 1940  ax-6 1997  ax-7 2038  ax-8 2145  ax-9 2153  ax-11 2192  ax-ext 2735  ax-sep 5258  ax-pr 5406

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-or 861  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1810  df-sb 2097  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2838  df-rab 3417  df-v 3457  df-dif 3909  df-un 3911  df-in 3913  df-ss 3923  df-nul 4288  df-if 4489  df-sn 4591  df-pr 4593  df-op 4597  df-opab 5175  df-xp 5669

This theorem is referenced by: (None)