Theorem frege104 44424

Description: Proposition 104 of [Frege1879] p. 73.

Note: in the Bauer-Meenfelberg translation published in van Heijenoort's collection From Frege to Goedel, this proof has the minor clause and result swapped. (Contributed by RP, 7-Jul-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
frege103.z	⊢ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑉

Assertion

Ref	Expression
frege104	⊢ (𝑋((t+‘𝑅) ∪ I )𝑍 → (¬ 𝑋(t+‘𝑅)𝑍 → 𝑋 = 𝑍))

Proof of Theorem frege104

Dummy variable 𝑧 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		frege103.z	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑉
2	1	elexi 3455	. . 3 ⊢ 𝑍 ∈ V
3		eqeq1 2745	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑍 → (𝑧 = 𝑋 ↔ 𝑍 = 𝑋))
4		eqeq2 2753	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑍 → (𝑋 = 𝑧 ↔ 𝑋 = 𝑍))
5	3, 4	imbi12d 346	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑍 → ((𝑧 = 𝑋 → 𝑋 = 𝑧) ↔ (𝑍 = 𝑋 → 𝑋 = 𝑍)))
6		frege55c 44375	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑋 → 𝑋 = 𝑧)
7	2, 5, 6	vtocl 3504	. 2 ⊢ (𝑍 = 𝑋 → 𝑋 = 𝑍)
8	1	frege103 44423	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑍 = 𝑋 → 𝑋 = 𝑍) → (𝑋((t+‘𝑅) ∪ I )𝑍 → (¬ 𝑋(t+‘𝑅)𝑍 → 𝑋 = 𝑍)))
9	7, 8	ax-mp 5	1 ⊢ (𝑋((t+‘𝑅) ∪ I )𝑍 → (¬ 𝑋(t+‘𝑅)𝑍 → 𝑋 = 𝑍))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   = wceq 1548   ∈ wcel 2121   ∪ cun 3882   class class class wbr 5074   I cid 5514  ‘cfv 6488  t+ctcl 14942

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1803  ax-4 1817  ax-5 1918  ax-6 1975  ax-7 2016  ax-8 2123  ax-9 2131  ax-10 2154  ax-12 2191  ax-ext 2713  ax-sep 5220  ax-pr 5364  ax-frege1 44247  ax-frege2 44248  ax-frege8 44266  ax-frege52a 44314  ax-frege52c 44345

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 398  df-or 855  df-ifp 1070  df-3an 1095  df-tru 1551  df-fal 1561  df-ex 1788  df-nf 1792  df-sb 2075  df-clab 2720  df-cleq 2733  df-clel 2816  df-ral 3056  df-rex 3066  df-rab 3394  df-v 3435  df-sbc 3725  df-dif 3887  df-un 3889  df-in 3891  df-ss 3901  df-nul 4264  df-if 4457  df-sn 4558  df-pr 4560  df-op 4564  df-br 5075  df-opab 5137  df-id 5515  df-xp 5626  df-rel 5627

This theorem is referenced by:  frege114  44434