Theorem frege104 40320

Description: Proposition 104 of [Frege1879] p. 73.

Note: in the Bauer-Meenfelberg translation published in van Heijenoort's collection From Frege to Goedel, this proof has the minor clause and result swapped. (Contributed by RP, 7-Jul-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
frege103.z	⊢ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑉

Assertion

Ref	Expression
frege104	⊢ (𝑋((t+‘𝑅) ∪ I )𝑍 → (¬ 𝑋(t+‘𝑅)𝑍 → 𝑋 = 𝑍))

Proof of Theorem frege104

Dummy variable 𝑧 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		frege103.z	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑉
2	1	elexi 3515	. . 3 ⊢ 𝑍 ∈ V
3		eqeq1 2827	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑍 → (𝑧 = 𝑋 ↔ 𝑍 = 𝑋))
4		eqeq2 2835	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑍 → (𝑋 = 𝑧 ↔ 𝑋 = 𝑍))
5	3, 4	imbi12d 347	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑍 → ((𝑧 = 𝑋 → 𝑋 = 𝑧) ↔ (𝑍 = 𝑋 → 𝑋 = 𝑍)))
6		frege55c 40271	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑋 → 𝑋 = 𝑧)
7	2, 5, 6	vtocl 3561	. 2 ⊢ (𝑍 = 𝑋 → 𝑋 = 𝑍)
8	1	frege103 40319	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑍 = 𝑋 → 𝑋 = 𝑍) → (𝑋((t+‘𝑅) ∪ I )𝑍 → (¬ 𝑋(t+‘𝑅)𝑍 → 𝑋 = 𝑍)))
9	7, 8	ax-mp 5	1 ⊢ (𝑋((t+‘𝑅) ∪ I )𝑍 → (¬ 𝑋(t+‘𝑅)𝑍 → 𝑋 = 𝑍))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   = wceq 1537   ∈ wcel 2114   ∪ cun 3936   class class class wbr 5068   I cid 5461  ‘cfv 6357  t+ctcl 14347

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1796  ax-4 1810  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1970  ax-7 2015  ax-8 2116  ax-9 2124  ax-10 2145  ax-11 2161  ax-12 2177  ax-ext 2795  ax-sep 5205  ax-nul 5212  ax-pr 5332  ax-frege1 40143  ax-frege2 40144  ax-frege8 40162  ax-frege52a 40210  ax-frege52c 40241

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 399  df-or 844  df-ifp 1058  df-3an 1085  df-tru 1540  df-fal 1550  df-ex 1781  df-nf 1785  df-sb 2070  df-mo 2622  df-eu 2654  df-clab 2802  df-cleq 2816  df-clel 2895  df-nfc 2965  df-ral 3145  df-rex 3146  df-rab 3149  df-v 3498  df-sbc 3775  df-dif 3941  df-un 3943  df-in 3945  df-ss 3954  df-nul 4294  df-if 4470  df-sn 4570  df-pr 4572  df-op 4576  df-br 5069  df-opab 5131  df-id 5462  df-xp 5563  df-rel 5564

This theorem is referenced by:  frege114  40330