Theorem frege104 44548

Description: Proposition 104 of [Frege1879] p. 73.

Note: in the Bauer-Meenfelberg translation published in van Heijenoort's collection From Frege to Goedel, this proof has the minor clause and result swapped. (Contributed by RP, 7-Jul-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
frege103.z	⊢ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑉

Assertion

Ref	Expression
frege104	⊢ (𝑋((t+‘𝑅) ∪ I )𝑍 → (¬ 𝑋(t+‘𝑅)𝑍 → 𝑋 = 𝑍))

Proof of Theorem frege104

Dummy variable 𝑧 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		frege103.z	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑉
2	1	elexi 3478	. . 3 ⊢ 𝑍 ∈ V
3		eqeq1 2768	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑍 → (𝑧 = 𝑋 ↔ 𝑍 = 𝑋))
4		eqeq2 2776	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑍 → (𝑋 = 𝑧 ↔ 𝑋 = 𝑍))
5	3, 4	imbi12d 346	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑍 → ((𝑧 = 𝑋 → 𝑋 = 𝑧) ↔ (𝑍 = 𝑋 → 𝑋 = 𝑍)))
6		frege55c 44499	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑋 → 𝑋 = 𝑧)
7	2, 5, 6	vtocl 3527	. 2 ⊢ (𝑍 = 𝑋 → 𝑋 = 𝑍)
8	1	frege103 44547	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑍 = 𝑋 → 𝑋 = 𝑍) → (𝑋((t+‘𝑅) ∪ I )𝑍 → (¬ 𝑋(t+‘𝑅)𝑍 → 𝑋 = 𝑍)))
9	7, 8	ax-mp 5	1 ⊢ (𝑋((t+‘𝑅) ∪ I )𝑍 → (¬ 𝑋(t+‘𝑅)𝑍 → 𝑋 = 𝑍))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   = wceq 1562   ∈ wcel 2144   ∪ cun 3904   class class class wbr 5102   I cid 5543  ‘cfv 6523  t+ctcl 15000

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1817  ax-4 1831  ax-5 1932  ax-6 1989  ax-7 2030  ax-8 2146  ax-9 2154  ax-10 2177  ax-12 2214  ax-ext 2736  ax-sep 5248  ax-pr 5392  ax-frege1 44371  ax-frege2 44372  ax-frege8 44390  ax-frege52a 44438  ax-frege52c 44469

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 400  df-or 859  df-ifp 1075  df-3an 1101  df-tru 1565  df-fal 1575  df-ex 1802  df-nf 1806  df-sb 2093  df-clab 2743  df-cleq 2756  df-clel 2839  df-ral 3079  df-rex 3089  df-rab 3417  df-v 3458  df-sbc 3747  df-dif 3909  df-un 3911  df-in 3913  df-ss 3923  df-nul 4288  df-if 4483  df-sn 4585  df-pr 4587  df-op 4591  df-br 5103  df-opab 5165  df-id 5544  df-xp 5655  df-rel 5656

This theorem is referenced by:  frege114  44558