Theorem frege104 43956

Description: Proposition 104 of [Frege1879] p. 73.

Note: in the Bauer-Meenfelberg translation published in van Heijenoort's collection From Frege to Goedel, this proof has the minor clause and result swapped. (Contributed by RP, 7-Jul-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
frege103.z	⊢ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑉

Assertion

Ref	Expression
frege104	⊢ (𝑋((t+‘𝑅) ∪ I )𝑍 → (¬ 𝑋(t+‘𝑅)𝑍 → 𝑋 = 𝑍))

Proof of Theorem frege104

Dummy variable 𝑧 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		frege103.z	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑉
2	1	elexi 3470	. . 3 ⊢ 𝑍 ∈ V
3		eqeq1 2733	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑍 → (𝑧 = 𝑋 ↔ 𝑍 = 𝑋))
4		eqeq2 2741	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑍 → (𝑋 = 𝑧 ↔ 𝑋 = 𝑍))
5	3, 4	imbi12d 344	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑍 → ((𝑧 = 𝑋 → 𝑋 = 𝑧) ↔ (𝑍 = 𝑋 → 𝑋 = 𝑍)))
6		frege55c 43907	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑋 → 𝑋 = 𝑧)
7	2, 5, 6	vtocl 3524	. 2 ⊢ (𝑍 = 𝑋 → 𝑋 = 𝑍)
8	1	frege103 43955	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑍 = 𝑋 → 𝑋 = 𝑍) → (𝑋((t+‘𝑅) ∪ I )𝑍 → (¬ 𝑋(t+‘𝑅)𝑍 → 𝑋 = 𝑍)))
9	7, 8	ax-mp 5	1 ⊢ (𝑋((t+‘𝑅) ∪ I )𝑍 → (¬ 𝑋(t+‘𝑅)𝑍 → 𝑋 = 𝑍))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   = wceq 1540   ∈ wcel 2109   ∪ cun 3912   class class class wbr 5107   I cid 5532  ‘cfv 6511  t+ctcl 14951

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1910  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2008  ax-8 2111  ax-9 2119  ax-10 2142  ax-12 2178  ax-ext 2701  ax-sep 5251  ax-nul 5261  ax-pr 5387  ax-frege1 43779  ax-frege2 43780  ax-frege8 43798  ax-frege52a 43846  ax-frege52c 43877

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-ifp 1063  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1543  df-fal 1553  df-ex 1780  df-nf 1784  df-sb 2066  df-clab 2708  df-cleq 2721  df-clel 2803  df-ral 3045  df-rex 3054  df-rab 3406  df-v 3449  df-sbc 3754  df-dif 3917  df-un 3919  df-ss 3931  df-nul 4297  df-if 4489  df-sn 4590  df-pr 4592  df-op 4596  df-br 5108  df-opab 5170  df-id 5533  df-xp 5644  df-rel 5645

This theorem is referenced by:  frege114  43966