Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > intexrab | Structured version Visualization version GIF version |
Description: The intersection of a nonempty restricted class abstraction exists. (Contributed by NM, 21-Oct-2003.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
intexrab | ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∩ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∈ V) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | intexab 5272 | . 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∩ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} ∈ V) | |
2 | df-rex 3072 | . 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) | |
3 | df-rab 3306 | . . . 4 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} | |
4 | 3 | inteqi 4890 | . . 3 ⊢ ∩ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = ∩ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} |
5 | 4 | eleq1i 2827 | . 2 ⊢ (∩ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∈ V ↔ ∩ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} ∈ V) |
6 | 1, 2, 5 | 3bitr4i 303 | 1 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∩ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∈ V) |
Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
Syntax hints: ↔ wb 205 ∧ wa 397 ∃wex 1779 ∈ wcel 2104 {cab 2713 ∃wrex 3071 {crab 3303 Vcvv 3437 ∩ cint 4886 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1795 ax-4 1809 ax-5 1911 ax-6 1969 ax-7 2009 ax-8 2106 ax-9 2114 ax-10 2135 ax-11 2152 ax-12 2169 ax-ext 2707 ax-sep 5232 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 206 df-an 398 df-or 846 df-tru 1542 df-fal 1552 df-ex 1780 df-nf 1784 df-sb 2066 df-clab 2714 df-cleq 2728 df-clel 2814 df-ne 2942 df-ral 3063 df-rex 3072 df-rab 3306 df-v 3439 df-dif 3895 df-in 3899 df-ss 3909 df-nul 4263 df-int 4887 |
This theorem is referenced by: onintrab2 7679 rankf 9600 rankvalb 9603 cardf2 9749 tskmval 10645 lspval 20286 aspval 21126 clsval 22237 spanval 29744 rgspnval 41189 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |