![]() |
Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
|
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > intexrab | Structured version Visualization version GIF version |
Description: The intersection of a nonempty restricted class abstraction exists. (Contributed by NM, 21-Oct-2003.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
intexrab | ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∩ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∈ V) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | intexab 5364 | . 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∩ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} ∈ V) | |
2 | df-rex 3077 | . 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) | |
3 | df-rab 3444 | . . . 4 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} | |
4 | 3 | inteqi 4974 | . . 3 ⊢ ∩ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = ∩ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} |
5 | 4 | eleq1i 2835 | . 2 ⊢ (∩ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∈ V ↔ ∩ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} ∈ V) |
6 | 1, 2, 5 | 3bitr4i 303 | 1 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∩ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∈ V) |
Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
Syntax hints: ↔ wb 206 ∧ wa 395 ∃wex 1777 ∈ wcel 2108 {cab 2717 ∃wrex 3076 {crab 3443 Vcvv 3488 ∩ cint 4970 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1793 ax-4 1807 ax-5 1909 ax-6 1967 ax-7 2007 ax-8 2110 ax-9 2118 ax-10 2141 ax-11 2158 ax-12 2178 ax-ext 2711 ax-sep 5317 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 207 df-an 396 df-or 847 df-3an 1089 df-tru 1540 df-fal 1550 df-ex 1778 df-nf 1782 df-sb 2065 df-clab 2718 df-cleq 2732 df-clel 2819 df-ne 2947 df-ral 3068 df-rex 3077 df-rab 3444 df-v 3490 df-dif 3979 df-in 3983 df-ss 3993 df-nul 4353 df-int 4971 |
This theorem is referenced by: onintrab2 7833 rankf 9863 rankvalb 9866 cardf2 10012 tskmval 10908 lspval 20996 aspval 21916 clsval 23066 spanval 31365 fldgenval 33279 rgspnval 43125 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |