![]() |
Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
|
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > intexrab | Structured version Visualization version GIF version |
Description: The intersection of a nonempty restricted class abstraction exists. (Contributed by NM, 21-Oct-2003.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
intexrab | ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∩ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∈ V) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | intexab 5206 | . 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∩ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} ∈ V) | |
2 | df-rex 3112 | . 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) | |
3 | df-rab 3115 | . . . 4 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} | |
4 | 3 | inteqi 4842 | . . 3 ⊢ ∩ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = ∩ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} |
5 | 4 | eleq1i 2880 | . 2 ⊢ (∩ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∈ V ↔ ∩ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} ∈ V) |
6 | 1, 2, 5 | 3bitr4i 306 | 1 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∩ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∈ V) |
Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
Syntax hints: ↔ wb 209 ∧ wa 399 ∃wex 1781 ∈ wcel 2111 {cab 2776 ∃wrex 3107 {crab 3110 Vcvv 3441 ∩ cint 4838 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1797 ax-4 1811 ax-5 1911 ax-6 1970 ax-7 2015 ax-8 2113 ax-9 2121 ax-10 2142 ax-11 2158 ax-12 2175 ax-ext 2770 ax-sep 5167 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 210 df-an 400 df-or 845 df-tru 1541 df-ex 1782 df-nf 1786 df-sb 2070 df-clab 2777 df-cleq 2791 df-clel 2870 df-nfc 2938 df-ne 2988 df-ral 3111 df-rex 3112 df-rab 3115 df-v 3443 df-dif 3884 df-in 3888 df-ss 3898 df-nul 4244 df-int 4839 |
This theorem is referenced by: onintrab2 7497 rankf 9207 rankvalb 9210 cardf2 9356 tskmval 10250 lspval 19740 aspval 20559 clsval 21642 spanval 29116 rgspnval 40112 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |